Answering Common Pentecostal Objections

When Truth Gets Personal: Why I Couldn't Publish the Episode I Recorded

I had a completely different episode planned, but when I sat down to publish it, I couldn’t. In this honest episode of Grace Over Grind, I share why I felt like a fraud teaching something I haven’t fully walked through yet, how the Holy Spirit has been convicting my heart, and why sometimes God asks us to slow down before we speak.

Answering Common Pentecostal Objections

In this episode, we take an honest and careful look at some of the most common objections raised in Pentecostal salvation discussions. What about speaking in tongues as evidence? What about “repent and be baptized” language? What about verses that seem to connect salvation to specific outward acts? Instead of reacting emotionally, we slow down and walk through Scripture in context. We examine the passages that are often used to support a formula-based view of salvation and compare them with the consistent teaching of the Epistles. When the whole counsel of God is considered, a clear pattern emerges: salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, and obedience flows from that faith, it does not create it.

Why The Epistles Clarify Salvation

In this episode, we take a deeper look at why the Epistles, not the book of Acts, are where salvation doctrine is clearly defined and explained. Acts shows us the historical unfolding of the early church, but the letters written to believers are where the apostles slow down and teach, clarify, and establish what salvation truly means. When we confuse descriptive moments in Acts with prescriptive doctrine, it can create uncertainty and a works-based mindset. But when we read Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and the other New Testament letters, we see a consistent message: salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, and everything else flows from that finished work. This episode explains the difference between narrative and doctrine, why transitional moments in Acts must be interpreted carefully, and how the Epistles bring clarity that produces confidence rather than confusion. If you have ever wrestled with assurance or wondered whether you did enough to be saved, this conversation will help you see how Scripture interprets Scripture and why resting in Christ’s completed work changes everything.

Why Acts Has Transitional Moments (And Why Doctrine Is Not Built on Them)

In this episode, we take a closer look at the book of Acts and why it must be read in its proper biblical context. Acts records a unique, transitional period in redemptive history, when God was moving His people from the Old Covenant into the New. We’ll talk about why descriptive moments in Acts (like tongues, signs, and specific experiences) are not automatically prescriptive for salvation doctrine, and why building doctrine from transitional narratives leads to confusion, fear, and inconsistency. This episode isn’t about dismissing Acts; it’s about honoring what God was doing in that moment while letting the rest of Scripture interpret it correctly. When we understand Acts as transitional, grace becomes clearer, assurance becomes stronger, and salvation stops feeling like a formula.

Acts 2:38 in Context: Why Belief Saves and Everything Else Follows

This episode is not an attack on Pentecostals. This is simply where I come from and where many of my friends and family still are. In this episode, we walk through Acts 2:38 in its full biblical context to answer one question: Does salvation come through a formula, or through faith in Jesus Christ? We talk about how belief saves, and how repentance, baptism, and obedience naturally follow genuine faith, without turning grace into a checklist. Truth, by its nature, is divisive. You’re either for truth or against it, but this conversation is rooted in Scripture, love, and a desire for clarity, not division.