The Viral Elon Musk Lawsuit Everyone Is Getting Wrong

The Viral Elon Musk Lawsuit Everyone Is Getting Wrong

Everyone got this viral lawsuit totally wrong. FOR AD-FREE EPISODES, BUY A PAID SUBSCRIPTION TO MY PATREON OR SUBSTACK!! SUPPORT MY WORK:  Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co [https://www.usermag.co]        Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz [http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz]        This week, a viral story claimed Elon Musk's xAI is suing Minnesota so that he can create AI-generated CS*M. That false claim exploded across social media, but it leaves out the most important part.      In this episode of Free Speech Friday, I sit down with First Amendment scholar Jeff Kosseff to break down Minnesota's new AI law, why xAI is challenging it, why major civil liberties orgs like the ACLU are also against the law, and why free speech advocates across the country say the law raises serious concerns. This convo is NOT defending Elon Musk. It is about understanding how AI regulation can produce unintended consequences and why even laws that claim to do good can do immense harm to us all.    We discuss: * The $500,000-per-image penalties facing AI companies * How the law could affect image generators, creative software, and indie developers * Why First Amendment scholars are sounding the alarm * The risks of strict liability for AI platforms * The chilling effect on online speech and creative expression * Whether AI-generated content deserves First Amendment protection * How this compares to Section 230, FOSTA-SESTA, and the Take It Down Act * Why regulating platforms instead of bad actors may have unintended consequences

AI Is Destroying Millions of Books (But Not For The Reason You Think)

Is AI destroying human literature?  SUPPORT MY WORK:  Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co [https://www.usermag.co]       Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz [http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz]          You might have seen the viral videos of a "book guillotine" slicing the spines off thousands of books in a massive warehouse. Last week, the internet exploded after videos surfaced showing Anthropic cutting the spines off thousands of books to train AI models. Social media quickly filled with claims that AI companies were destroying rare books, erasing human knowledge, and building a future where artificial intelligence replaces libraries.  But is that actually what happened? In this episode of Power User, I sit down with tech policy expert Derek Slater, who worked on the original Google Books project, to explain why Anthropic is actually scanning books and destroying physical copies afterward, how decades of copyright law (not just AI) created this bizarre situation, and how we can actually save the books!!   We discuss: * Why Anthropic buys books by the pallet * Whether rare books are actually being destroyed * How Google Books handled digitization * Why copyright law incentivizes destroying books * The Internet Archive lawsuits * Fair use and AI training * The future of libraries in the AI era * Why the viral outrage missed the bigger story

Inside The Nantucket Influencer War

Nantucket's "No Influencers" Sign Started a Gender and Class War, Here's What It's Really About SUPPORT MY WORK:  Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co [https://www.usermag.co]      Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz [http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz]  Last week, the internet exploded after a small Nantucket shop posted a simple sign reading "No Influencers." What started as a local controversy quickly became a national debate about influencer culture, old money, quiet luxury, class, authenticity, and the future of social media. In this bonus episode of Power User, I'm joined by freelance reporter Andrea Domanick, co-host of The Culture Journalist podcast and newsletter, to unpack the most cursed discourse of the summer. We get into why this fight is not actually about one sign or one influencer, and who gets to define status, taste, and authenticity in America's most exclusive spaces.  We explore: * The Four Winds Craft Guild controversy * Paige Lorenz and Dairy Boy * Quiet luxury and the old money aesthetic * The rise of influencer culture * Why "influencer" has become a loaded word * The history of influencer bans * Social media, class, and cultural capital * Why privacy has become the ultimate luxury

Trump's Plan to Destroy 'Woke AI'

If AI becomes the foundation of search, education, government, and everyday life, the fight over who controls AI outputs could shape the future of the internet.  SUPPORT MY WORK:  Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co [https://www.usermag.co]     Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz [http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz]        The Trump administration is making a major push to reshape AI in a way that could affect ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and every AI company building the future by trying to ban "woke" AI.    In this episode of Free Speech Friday, TechDirt's Mike Masnick joins me to break down the FTC's proposed AI policy, what it actually says, and how it will pressure AI companies to change their answers, withhold information, give misleading information, and what this battle means for free speech, censorship, AI regulation, and open-weight models. We discuss: • Trump's AI Executive Orders • The FTC's new anti-woke AI policy proposal • ChatGPT and AI censorship • Free speech and the First Amendment • OpenAI vs Grok • Open-weight AI models • Government regulation of artificial intelligence • The future of AI in America

The AI War Just Went Nuclear: Everyone Hates Anthropic Now (Even Denny's Diner)

The biggest fight in AI isn't about chatbots anymore, it's about who gets to control the future of artificial intelligence.  SUPPORT MY WORK:  Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co [https://www.usermag.co]     Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz [http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz]          Is Anthropic trying to lock down AI before their IPO, or are open-weight models genuinely a threat to global safety? In this episode of Power User, Matthew Berman, co-founder of the tech media outlet Forward Future, breaks down the explosive debate rocking Silicon Valley and Washington DC.   After the release of China's powerful Kimi K3 open-weight model, OpenAI's autonomous hacking benchmark, and a growing push from Anthropic to restrict open AI models, Silicon Valley has erupted into one of the biggest technology battles in years.     Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Microsoft, Meta, Google, IBM, Hugging Face, Mozilla, Palantir, Dell and dozens of other massive technology companies have all come together to publicly back open weight AI models, while Anthropic argues against them.  Whoever wins will control the future of the tech landscape for decades to come.  I break down:  What open weight AI actually is How Kimi K3 changed the AI race The OpenAI benchmark that escaped containment The Hugging Face security incident Anthropic's campaign against open models Why Jensen Huang and all of Silicon Valley is pushing back The growing debate inside Washington over regulating AI Why this fight could determine who controls AI for decades