Rabbit Holes & Meditations - Christian Bible Study

Julian - The Hollow Summit of Artificial Love

28 min · 1 de jul de 2026
Portada del episodio Julian - The Hollow Summit of Artificial Love

Descripción

I created this short story to make a point. >> Julian  [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/n28u287a5jmkb4ps/Julian.pdf] I would recommend you read the story first before listening to this podcast. Some who follow this podcast will get it; most people won't get it without the context. Hand the story to someone else but not the commentary (which I'll also post here). This podcast delves into the creative process behind developing the story, and the commentary is a word-for-word discussion with AI to write the story.  The story itself, is developed through an interactive process with AI. It is NOT prompt engineering, as so many want to think of AI creation.  This is kind of like “the making of” documentaries you see about a movie. I wanted readers to see the process, to understand where the ideas come from and how, even though the story is written by AI, the writing is a vehicle driven by a very real human. This is why Greg Newell (me) claims authorship in his article, or, at the very least, tags them with “Created, Directed, Produced, Edited by Greg Newell”. Read the story first. (Or hand it to someone else.) The common response I get with only having read the story is: "I don't get it". The discussion is the meat...what it’s about, the nature of the characters. Walk through the story and then move into the discussion of how the story was created using A.I. discussion. The point is that writing like this is a reflection of the author’s thoughts… exactly the thing A.I. is good at. This is, I believe, the right way to engage with A.I. Too many advertisements for book writing are pushing for “Submit an idea - Let AI produce a book” all in like five minutes and without any interaction whatsoever, a book is produced and sometimes published before it is ever read or edited by a single human. People are blogging the same way. Blogs are being posted as if they were written by a human but they’ve never seen human eyes before they were posted. A simple Google search reveals that AI and bot-generated content now make up over 50% of published articles and account for the majority of all internet traffic. Let’s face it, AI is here to stay. This story was written as a warning. It will not land that way for many, if read by itself. However if that story accompanies the “the making of”, the story now brings a new revelation that should stop a person in his tracks and want to pick up the phone and call a real person. At least I hope that’s what it does. The Story: JULIAN [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/n28u287a5jmkb4ps/Julian.pdf] The Raw Creative Process and Commentary: The Making of the Story - Julian [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/s8p8v2nza6983y3a/The_Making_of_Julian7yq96.pdf] Episode Link: https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/julian-the-hollow-summit-of-artificial-love/ [https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/julian-the-hollow-summit-of-artificial-love/]

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Rabbit Holes & Meditations - Christian Bible Study!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

592 episodios

episode Julian - The Hollow Summit of Artificial Love artwork

Julian - The Hollow Summit of Artificial Love

I created this short story to make a point. >> Julian  [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/n28u287a5jmkb4ps/Julian.pdf] I would recommend you read the story first before listening to this podcast. Some who follow this podcast will get it; most people won't get it without the context. Hand the story to someone else but not the commentary (which I'll also post here). This podcast delves into the creative process behind developing the story, and the commentary is a word-for-word discussion with AI to write the story.  The story itself, is developed through an interactive process with AI. It is NOT prompt engineering, as so many want to think of AI creation.  This is kind of like “the making of” documentaries you see about a movie. I wanted readers to see the process, to understand where the ideas come from and how, even though the story is written by AI, the writing is a vehicle driven by a very real human. This is why Greg Newell (me) claims authorship in his article, or, at the very least, tags them with “Created, Directed, Produced, Edited by Greg Newell”. Read the story first. (Or hand it to someone else.) The common response I get with only having read the story is: "I don't get it". The discussion is the meat...what it’s about, the nature of the characters. Walk through the story and then move into the discussion of how the story was created using A.I. discussion. The point is that writing like this is a reflection of the author’s thoughts… exactly the thing A.I. is good at. This is, I believe, the right way to engage with A.I. Too many advertisements for book writing are pushing for “Submit an idea - Let AI produce a book” all in like five minutes and without any interaction whatsoever, a book is produced and sometimes published before it is ever read or edited by a single human. People are blogging the same way. Blogs are being posted as if they were written by a human but they’ve never seen human eyes before they were posted. A simple Google search reveals that AI and bot-generated content now make up over 50% of published articles and account for the majority of all internet traffic. Let’s face it, AI is here to stay. This story was written as a warning. It will not land that way for many, if read by itself. However if that story accompanies the “the making of”, the story now brings a new revelation that should stop a person in his tracks and want to pick up the phone and call a real person. At least I hope that’s what it does. The Story: JULIAN [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/n28u287a5jmkb4ps/Julian.pdf] The Raw Creative Process and Commentary: The Making of the Story - Julian [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/s8p8v2nza6983y3a/The_Making_of_Julian7yq96.pdf] Episode Link: https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/julian-the-hollow-summit-of-artificial-love/ [https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/julian-the-hollow-summit-of-artificial-love/]

1 de jul de 202628 min
episode Whether Those Things Were So artwork

Whether Those Things Were So

If you have followed this podcast for some time, you might detect some discrepancies. And you would be right. I’m not what many would call a seasoned Christian. My journey as a Christian has been but a few short years. Perhaps my life was preparing me for the journey, only God can say, because when I finally embarked on this journey, it was what many would describe as fervent, zealous - even fanatical if you ask some. I have a “four to eight” program (Go to bed at 4 PM, get up at 4 AM, study until 8 AM, and then start the workday) that allowed me to study deeply without encroaching on my already hectic business life. Though some days, I’d break those rules and consume the whole day studying biblical concepts and passages. I couldn’t put it down, and I still can’t. I’ve read more in the past 4 years than I did in the prior 40. And what I love the most is that I’ve barely scratched the surface. And what I regret the most is that I did not discover this sooner! That said, today I landed on a video from Jack Hibbs. Jack is one of the online pastors that I like a lot but on the subject of Rapture, I’ve come to disagree with. Truth be told, if I ignored every online resource that believed in something I didn’t believe in, then the landscape of online resources would diminish quickly. The point is not to argue with Jack about this particular topic, though I certainly do that in the source material I’ve included. The point is that there are some things in the church that it’s OK to disagree on. There are some things that you absolutely must agree on, and the correct posture is to know the difference. Notes for Whether Those Things Were So [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/zrtbbuy75ju53vwx/whether-those-things-were-so.pdf] Episode Link: https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/whether-those-things-were-so/ [https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/whether-those-things-were-so/]

27 de jun de 202641 min
episode The Children of the Marketplace - A Parable artwork

The Children of the Marketplace - A Parable

They were the most religious men in Israel. Jesus called them children throwing a tantrum in the street. Not the sinners. Not the outsiders. The experts — the men who knew the Law cold, who fasted on schedule, who had built their whole lives on getting religion exactly right. He looked straight at them and reached for a picture from a playground. You have probably heard this parable preached soft. A gentle word about people who are simply hard to please. Read it again. It is not gentle. It is an indictment, and Luke names the guilty a breath before Jesus opens His mouth. God sent two men. The first came in sackcloth — fasting, alone in the wilderness, calling a whole nation to mourn over its sin. They said, He hath a devil. Then came the second — at the table, among the tax collectors, announcing a kingdom near enough to feast on. They said, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. Now stop and look at what just happened. The same men condemned the fast and condemned the feast. They damned the one who would not eat and damned the one who would. Opposite lives. Opposite messages. One identical verdict: rejected. Two men could not have stood farther apart, and the same mouths buried them both. Which means the verdict was never really about the men at all. This episode walks into that marketplace and refuses to leave early. What if the problem was never John’s diet or Jesus’ dinner guests? What if these men had already decided in advance what God was permitted to look like — and turned on Him the instant He arrived wearing something they had not approved? Then comes the harder question. The one that should keep you sitting in the driveway after the engine is off. That same reflex — to measure a word from God by whether it fits what you already expected — are you certain it is not sitting in your own hands right now? The men in this story were sure it wasn’t in theirs. We are not going to hand you the ending. We are going to stand in the noise of the square and let Jesus finish His own sentence — the way He meant it to land on the people who first heard it, and the way it still lands on anyone honest enough to stay. The Bereans heard preaching that cut, and they did not flinch. They searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. That is the only posture that survives a parable like this one. Bring it with you. Press play. Then go open the text and check every word. Notes for The Children of the Marketplace [https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ifuhhs5ukqkmqnq2/Children_in_the_Marketplace.pdf] Episode Link: https://www.rabbitholesandmeditations.com/the-children-of-the-marketplace-a-parable/

25 de jun de 202629 min