The Brightmine Podcast (US)

FFCRA's December 31 Expiration Date Looms Large for HR

15 min · 2 de dic de 2020
Portada del episodio FFCRA's December 31 Expiration Date Looms Large for HR

Descripción

On this podcast, Littler employment attorney Natasha DeCourcy [https://www.littler.com/people/natasha-l-decourcy] joins XpertHR Legal Editor David Weisenfeld to discuss what happens if the Families First Coronavirus Response Act and its federal paid leave provision is allowed to expire on December 31. DeCourcy takes employers through all the potential contingencies, including whether an expiration also means the end of an employer's ability to continue claiming tax credits. She also advises that employers should not mention the FFCRA, or anything related to COVID, at all in their employee handbooks because of the fleeting nature of these requirements.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de The Brightmine Podcast (US)!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

60 episodios

episode What the Supreme Court's Vaccine Mandate Rulings Mean for Employers artwork

What the Supreme Court's Vaccine Mandate Rulings Mean for Employers

With the Supreme Court blocking the Biden administration's vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers from taking effect, what happens next? And, does the ruling leave companies on their own when it comes to vaccine-related safety measures? XpertHR Legal Editor David Weisenfeld [https://www.xperthr.com/authors/xperthr-editorial-team/33553/#david-b-weisenfeld-jd-legal-editor] breaks down this monumental ruling striking down the COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) that would have affected an estimated 84-million employees, and a separate opinion upholding a vaccine requirement for health care workers. Meanwhile, XpertHR Legal Editor Melissa Boyce [https://www.xperthr.com/authors/xperthr-editorial-team/33553/], who leads our vaccination resource coverage, discusses how employers can proceed now that the Supreme Court has spoken.

21 de ene de 202219 min
episode Handling Employee Social Media Use Amid the 2020 Election artwork

Handling Employee Social Media Use Amid the 2020 Election

Long-time employment attorneys Jonathan Hyman [https://meyersroman.com/attorneys/jonathan-t-hyman/] and Robin Shea [https://www.constangy.com/people-Robin-Shea], both accomplished bloggers on workplace issues, join XpertHR Legal Editor David Weisenfeld for a wide-ranging discussion about employee social media use. Generally speaking, employers can hold an employee responsible for posts on their personal social media accounts. But there are lots of exceptions to the rule. "Employers can't get too draconian or employees will perceive them as Big Brother," said Hyman. "The message shouldn't be 'don't post political stuff.' It should be 'let's be respectful.'" Shea asserted that employers must avoid content-based judgments. "You can't allow pro-Biden posts and not pro-Trump posts." Both agree there may be situations where employers may need to hold employees accountable for what they post on their personal social channels (e.g. harassment or calls for violence).

1 de oct de 202026 min