The Learning Curve presented by the Academic Commons

Alternative Grading with Dr. Julian Harris

31 min · 29 de may de 2026
Portada del episodio Alternative Grading with Dr. Julian Harris

Descripción

In this episode, Julian Harris, PhD, shares how alternative grading practices better reflect student learning, foster a growth mindset, and allow for meaningful feedback loops. He offers practical insights into his experiences with alternative grading, the challenges encountered along the way, and the benefits of transitioning to a different assessment model. This conversation provides valuable insights and key strategies for implementing alternative grading in your classroom. Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast! Guest: Julian Harris, PhD  * Role: Assistant Professor of Biochemistry   * Expertise: biochemistry, alternative grading systems, growth mindset   Quote from the Episode:  * “They [students] feel seen by the grading system. That it helps them think about learning and growth mindset from the more sort of malleable perspective, where they really do view the mistakes as opportunities to get better.” - Julian Harris, PhD    Getting Started:  * Start small with assessment changes, such as allowing for exam corrections, or offering a retake of a single exam.   * Approach alternative grading practices with a growth mindset: reflect on what works and what doesn’t, and adjust without expecting perfection the first time.   * Create intentional changes for students to revisit material, learn from feedback, and show improvement.   * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/schedule-consultation.cfm] to talk about incorporating alternative grading practices in your classroom.     Terms to Know:  The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear.  * Standards Based Grading: A grading system in which an instructor creates a list of clear standards that describe specific things students will learn to do. Each assignment is aligned with one or more of the created standards; each standard is assessed multiple times to meet the standard without penalty.   * Specifications Grading: A grading system in which an instructor creates a list of specifications that describe the qualities and characteristics of a successful submission for an assignment. Student work is graded holistically, earning a single mark: “Satisfactory” or “Not Yet”.   * Growth Mindset: The belief that intelligence and abilities can be developed through effort and dedication rather than being fixed, innate traits. A growth mindset also views perceived failures as opportunities to learn and grow.    Selected Resources:    The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations.    1. Clark D. Grading for Growth : A Guide to Alternative Grading Practices That Promote Authentic Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education. First edition. (Talbert R, ed.). Routledge; 2023. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991001235919603866]    2. Yik BJ, Machost H, Streifer AC, Palmer MS, Morkowchuk L, Stains M. Students’ Perceptions of Specifications Grading: Development and Evaluation of the Perceptions of Grading Schemes (PGS) Instrument. Journal of chemical education. 2024;101(9):3723-3738. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069 [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/149onue/cdi_crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acs_jchemed_4c00698]8    3. Nilson LB. Specifications Grading : Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. First edition. Stylus; 2016. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991000880550103866]    4. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de The Learning Curve presented by the Academic Commons!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

15 episodios

episode Alternative Grading with Dr. Julian Harris artwork

Alternative Grading with Dr. Julian Harris

In this episode, Julian Harris, PhD, shares how alternative grading practices better reflect student learning, foster a growth mindset, and allow for meaningful feedback loops. He offers practical insights into his experiences with alternative grading, the challenges encountered along the way, and the benefits of transitioning to a different assessment model. This conversation provides valuable insights and key strategies for implementing alternative grading in your classroom. Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast! Guest: Julian Harris, PhD  * Role: Assistant Professor of Biochemistry   * Expertise: biochemistry, alternative grading systems, growth mindset   Quote from the Episode:  * “They [students] feel seen by the grading system. That it helps them think about learning and growth mindset from the more sort of malleable perspective, where they really do view the mistakes as opportunities to get better.” - Julian Harris, PhD    Getting Started:  * Start small with assessment changes, such as allowing for exam corrections, or offering a retake of a single exam.   * Approach alternative grading practices with a growth mindset: reflect on what works and what doesn’t, and adjust without expecting perfection the first time.   * Create intentional changes for students to revisit material, learn from feedback, and show improvement.   * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/schedule-consultation.cfm] to talk about incorporating alternative grading practices in your classroom.     Terms to Know:  The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear.  * Standards Based Grading: A grading system in which an instructor creates a list of clear standards that describe specific things students will learn to do. Each assignment is aligned with one or more of the created standards; each standard is assessed multiple times to meet the standard without penalty.   * Specifications Grading: A grading system in which an instructor creates a list of specifications that describe the qualities and characteristics of a successful submission for an assignment. Student work is graded holistically, earning a single mark: “Satisfactory” or “Not Yet”.   * Growth Mindset: The belief that intelligence and abilities can be developed through effort and dedication rather than being fixed, innate traits. A growth mindset also views perceived failures as opportunities to learn and grow.    Selected Resources:    The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations.    1. Clark D. Grading for Growth : A Guide to Alternative Grading Practices That Promote Authentic Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education. First edition. (Talbert R, ed.). Routledge; 2023. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991001235919603866]    2. Yik BJ, Machost H, Streifer AC, Palmer MS, Morkowchuk L, Stains M. Students’ Perceptions of Specifications Grading: Development and Evaluation of the Perceptions of Grading Schemes (PGS) Instrument. Journal of chemical education. 2024;101(9):3723-3738. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069 [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/149onue/cdi_crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acs_jchemed_4c00698]8    3. Nilson LB. Specifications Grading : Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. First edition. Stylus; 2016. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991000880550103866]    4. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]

29 de may de 202631 min
episode Power Skills with Dr. Thomas Schrand artwork

Power Skills with Dr. Thomas Schrand

In this episode, Thomas Schrand, PhD, shares how the Hallmarks Core and its Power Skills cultivate adaptable, intellectually curious graduates prepared for an evolving, AI-influenced world. He offers practical insights into learner-centered teaching, critical thinking, and reflective practice that help students build durable, human-centered competencies. Educators will gain strategies for strengthening meaningful learning across disciplines.   Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast!   Guest: Thomas Schrand, PhD * Role: Associate Dean for General Education & Professor of History * Expertise: Curriculum development, pedagogy, general education, and active learning. Quote from the Episode: “At the end of four years of this experience… you end up as someone who can think on their feet, someone who has confidence in what they're saying and their ability to grapple with challenging and nuanced questions.” - Thomas Schrand, PhD   Getting Started: * Ask students to apply course concepts to real‑world or professional scenarios, reinforcing both disciplinary relevance and transferable competencies. * Start each class with a device‑free expectation to promote presence, note‑taking by hand, and deeper engagement with peers and content. * Build in reflective moments—such as end‑of‑week or end‑of‑unit prompts asking students to identify key takeaways or what learning mattered most to them. * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/schedule-consultation.cfm]to talk about learning design and incorporating these skills into your classroom. Terms to Know: The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear. * Learner Centered Teaching: An approach that focuses on how students learn—emphasizing engagement, active participation, and cognitive processes rather than instructor-led delivery. * Active Learning: Any instructional method that requires students to be metacognitive and engage in meaningful activities (e.g., discussion, problem solving) rather than passively listening to lectures. * Cognitive Psychology: A branch of psychology which explores the mental process related to perceiving, attending, thinking, language, learning, and memory. Selected Resources: The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations. 1. The Science of Learning – Academic Commons Self-Paced Program [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/resources/Science%20of%20Learning/] 2. Designing Learning that Endures: The Science of Learning in Practice: Academic Commons Self-Paced Program [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/resources/designing-learning-that-endures-the-science-of-learning-in-practice/] 3. The Hallmarks Core Program – Thomas Jefferson University Page [https://www.jefferson.edu/academics/hallmarks.html] 4. Major, C. H., Harris, M. S., & Zakrajsek, T. (2021). Teaching for learning : 101 intentionally designed educational activities to put students on the path to success. (Second edition.). ROUTLEDGE. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/vpou2e/alma991001147059203866] 5. Zakrajsek, T., & Nilson, L. B. (2023). Teaching at its best: a research-based resource for college instructors (Fifth edition.). Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Brand. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/vpou2e/alma991001127959003866] 6. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]

6 de may de 202624 min
episode Intentional Feedback with Dr. Chris Pastore artwork

Intentional Feedback with Dr. Chris Pastore

This episode features Chris Pastore, PhD, and an in‑depth conversation on intentional feedback as a cornerstone of effective teaching and learning. Drawing from decades of experience in engineering education, faculty development, and transdisciplinary practice, Dr. Pastore discusses how feedback can evolve from a simple correction to a powerful tool for learner growth and metacognition. This episode offers educators concrete techniques for balancing critique with encouragement, modeling vulnerability, and creating spaces where students feel safe to grow.   Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast!   Guest: Chris Pastore, PhD * Role: Professor of Transdisciplinary Studies and Engineering; Assistant Provost, Faculty Development: Nexus Learning and Classroom Pedagogy Center for Faculty Development & Nexus Learning * Expertise: Pedagogy, sustainability, composites, & textiles   Quote from the Episode: "[...] what is the purpose of your feedback? Is it to correct the student, or is it to guide the student? It's easier to correct a student, but it's probably not as useful to the class experience." - Chris Pastore Getting Started: * Approach feedback as a tool to guide students' learning rather than simply identifying mistakes. * Use short video/audio feedback in Canvas for a faster and more personalized feedback process. * Ask students to reflect on resubmissions, identifying what they did to improve their work. * Develop a feedback turnaround plan that you can maintain throughout the semester. * Encourage a growth mindset in class and normalize that learning new material takes time and mistakes will be made. * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/schedule-consultation.cfm]to talk about providing effective feedback to students.   Terms to Know: The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear. Authentic Assessment: An assessment that requires a student to apply their learning to new situations, which requires them to determine what information or skills they have learned in the class most relevant to solving the problem. These assessments focus on complex real-world scenarios and the constraints they entail. Feedback: A response provided by faculty or mentor to students to guide their learning. It can take several forms, from written, to verbal, non-verbal, or digital. Learning Styles Myth: The idea that there are stable, consistent methods by which individuals take in, organize, process, and remember information (e.g. Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic), and by teaching those methods, students learn better. There is no empirical support for this claim. Metacognition: AKA “thinking about your thinking”. It refers to the knowledge a student has of themselves and how they learn to direct their learning. This process allows students to identify knowledge gaps, recognize when they are having difficulty learning new information, and incorporate new knowledge. Muddiest Point: A formative assessment technique that involves students pointing out what they were most confused about and explaining what was “muddy” in the lesson.   Selected Resources: The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations. 1. The Power of Rubrics: Helping Learners & Instructors – Academic Commons [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/resources/Power-of-Rubrics/] 2. Angelo, T. A. & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. Jossey Bass: San Francisco, CA 3. Major, C. H., Harris, M. S., & Zakrajsek, T. (2021). Teaching for learning : 101 intentionally designed educational activities to put students on the path to success. (Second edition.). ROUTLEDGE. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991001147059203866] 4. Canvas LMS – How to leave feedback comments [https://community.instructure.com/en/kb/articles/664292-how-do-i-leave-feedback-comments-for-student-submissions-in-speedgrader-with-performance-and-usability-upgrades] 5. Darby, F., & Lang, J. M. (2019). Small teaching online : applying learning science in online classes. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Brand. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/15ef00r/alma991000925489603866] 6. Office of Curriculum, Assessment and Teaching Transformation - University at Buffalo. (2026). Feedback. University of Buffalo. https://www.buffalo.edu/catt/teach/develop/teach/feedback.html [https://www.buffalo.edu/catt/teach/develop/teach/feedback.html] 7. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]

1 de abr de 202624 min
episode Advancing Academic Writing with Pam Walter artwork

Advancing Academic Writing with Pam Walter

This episode features Pamela Walter, MFA, the Director of the Office for Professional Writing, Publishing, and Communication (OPWPC). Pam shares how the OPWPC supports researchers in writing, publishing, presenting, and navigating the complexities of scholarly communication. This episode also highlights common writing challenges, the importance of narrative flow in scientific communication, team-based approaches to increasing publication output, and the influence of generative AI in academic writing.   Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast!    Guest: Pamela Walter, MFA * Role: Medical Editor/Writer and Director of the Office for Professional Writing, Publishing, and Communication * Expertise: Professional writing skills, publishing practices, and presentation skills.   Quote from the Episode: * "If you can speak, you can write, and there are plenty of resources available to turn that unpolished writing into polished writing." Pam Walter, MFA   Getting Started: * Participate in writing retreats for focused, uninterrupted writing time, and use short writing sprints to overcome writer's block and make consistent progress. * Take advantage of in-house services like manuscript reviews, presentation feedback, and workshops to enhance the quality and impact of your research communication. * Use connective words and a logical flow to make your research writing more engaging and easier to follow, even for technical audiences. * Utilize tools like BioRender [https://library.jefferson.edu/tech/software/index.cfm?keywords=BioRender] to create graphical abstracts and visually summarize your research. * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/writing.cfm] to improve your academic writing. Terms to Know: The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear. * Connective Words: A word or phrase whose function is to link linguistic units together. * Narrative Writing: In essence, story writing; it can be fiction or nonfiction. If it has a narrative structure and tells a story, it is narrative writing. * Generative AI: An AI system capable of generating text, images, or other media in response to prompts. Selected Resources: The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations. 1. Professional Writing & Communication (OPWPC) [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/writing.cfm] 2. Jefferson Libraries Homepage [https://library.jefferson.edu/] 3. AI for Educators: From Basics to Best Practices [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/resources/ai_educators/#/] 4. Research Administration Center of Excellence (RACE) [https://research.jefferson.edu/resources/sponsored-research/race.html] 5. Hillier, A., Kelly, R. P., & Klinger, T. (2016). Narrative Style Influences Citation Frequency in Climate Change Science. PloS One, 11(12), e0167983. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/gbh139/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859471264] 6. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]

4 de mar de 202629 min
episode Designing Learning Objectives with Dr. Nanette Tomicek artwork

Designing Learning Objectives with Dr. Nanette Tomicek

This episode features Nanette Tomicek, PhD, and a discussion on designing effective and inclusive learning objectives. Emphasizing the importance of planning, multiple pedagogical frameworks, and inclusive language in curriculum design. This episode highlights practical strategies for educators to develop well-crafted, measurable objectives.   Guest: Nanette Tomicek, PhD * Role: Course Director for Anatomy & Physiology, East Falls Campus, Associate Professor * Expertise: Pedagogy, active learning, laboratory, and excellence in anatomy and physiology education.   Quote from the Episode: "The learning outcome has to be measurable. That's very important. [...] you need to be thinking about what do you want your students to be able to do, at the end of the course.” - Nanette Tomicek, PhD Getting Started: * Collaborate with colleagues to help plan development of learning objectives and gain diverse perspectives. * Clearly define what you want students to get out of the course. * Stick to one verb per learning objective that leads to observable and measurable student actions. * Contact us [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/schedule-consultation.cfm]to talk about designing effective learning objectives.   Terms to Know: The terms below are mentioned in the episode, and for context and clarity, we've provided brief definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms you may hear. * Learning Objective: A statement describing what a learner should be able to know or do by the end of an instruction period, using measurable and observable actions. * Bloom’s Taxonomy: A framework which classifies different levels of human thinking and learning – i.e., thinking, learning, and understanding. Selected Resources: The Learning Curve team curated this list based on university resources or guest recommendations. 1. Learning Design – Academic Commons Page [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/learning-design.cfm] 2. Zakrajsek, T., & Nilson, L. B. (2023). Teaching at its best: a research-based resource for college instructors (Fifth edition.). Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Brand. [https://jefferson.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TJU_INST/vpou2e/alma991001127959003866] 3. Bloom’s Taxonomy - Center for Teaching Excellence - The University of Utah. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2025, from https://cte.utah.edu/instructor-education/Blooms-Taxonomy.php [https://cte.utah.edu/instructor-education/Blooms-Taxonomy.php] 4. Writing Measurable Course Objectives - The Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2025, from https://teaching.charlotte.edu//teaching-guides/course-design/writing-measurable-course-objectives [https://teaching.charlotte.edu/teaching-guides/course-design/writing-measurable-course-objectives] 5. Academic Commons Upcoming Workshops and Events [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/upcoming-workshops.cfm]   Follow and subscribe to be notified about new episodes! Episodes premiere monthly, every first Wednesday at 10:30AM. Head over to our webpage [https://academiccommons.jefferson.edu/thelearningcurve/] to check out more episodes and learn more about the podcast!

4 de feb de 202624 min