UNSOLVED: The Susan Powell Story

NonSequitur & Mr. Atheist Take Your Calls

TasteCraft: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYDHHsUVy2Fv48fLPOxi8rw?disable_polymer=true

UNSOLVED: The Susan Powell Story

Susan Cox Powell (October 16, 1981 – c. December 6, 2009) is an American missing person from West Valley City, Utah. Susan's disappearance and presumed murder, as well as the subsequent investigation and events, garnered significant media attention. Her husband, Joshua "Josh" Powell, was named a person of interest in the investigation into her disappearance. However, Joshua was never charged; on February 5, 2012, he killed himself and the couple's two young sons, Charles Joshua Powell (b. January 19, 2005) and Braden Timothy Powell (b. January 2, 2007) in a murder–suicide after custody of the boys had been awarded to Susan's parents, Charles and Judy Cox. An investigation also discovered that her father-in-law Stephen Powell had recorded numerous videos professing his love for her and had been recording her without her knowledge.

Original Sin

[http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nonseqshow/~4/oHNEZSoeyQE]

The Genesis Correction: Eden’s Orchard of Life | Godless Engineer & Stephanie Lawrence Debate

Are fundamentalist Christians missing the forest for the tree? Stephanie Lawrence thinks so. They claim that there wasn’t just ONE tree of life, but an entire orchard of them. The following text is an brief explanation put forth by Lawrence: Kinds is a concept that goes in with an orchard of life as opposed to a single phylogenic tree of life. I attached a picture of it. Q: where does one draw the line for what a kind is? A: it is unknown (nobody was here), but can be as broad as: |bacteria|fungus|animal|plant| Or as specific as a species itself (keeping in mind speciation happens and renaming of the same organism, but usually the colloquial name doesn't change, i.e. Mosquito. Or A random combination of specific and broad. It is unknowable to know if for example if all felines are related or not, or what is related to what all together. It is really not a matter of what's related to what, even the original kinds may have not been related. Kinds is not a classification system and isn't meant to replace taxonomy. It's a concept, it goes with multiple phylogenic trees as shown in the picture. It's reasoning is by eliminating the single tree for reasons listed here. There are problems with a single tree: 1) it assumes abiogenesis, an unfalsifiable claim, as opposed to nature's kinds. 2) it can't explain in detail how the butterfly or mushroom evolved from microorganisms 3) it assumes only naturalistic origins of life. 4) it can't explain in detail how bacteria became eukaryotes with all the implications with it. 5) it assumes change in allele frequency is a driving force for the microbe-to-man evolution, while changes in allele frequency can exist, it may be that i isn't a power that can evolve a sea sponge into a human over time and environmental pressures. 6) it can't account for the evolution of consciousness, there is no reason life can't exist on earth AS IS without consciousness. Kinds with the orchard of life require a non naturalistic worldview and more of a mystical worldview, likely a consciousness based one Kinds are non biblical.

Let’s Set the Record Straight

[http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nonseqshow/~4/Ni61QEaTvU8]