Theology Matters
Lesson 22: Questions 44, 45, and 46 In Lesson 21, we considered what happens to the wicked at death and at the day of judgment. We saw that the souls of the wicked are cast into the torments of hell at death, while their bodies lie in their graves until the resurrection and judgment of the great day (Q42). We also saw that, at the day of judgment, the wicked will be raised, sentenced body and soul, and punished forever with the devil and his angels (Q43). Those are heavy truths. Question 44 is an inflection point in the catechism. Question 6: What is the Bible about? 17. What things are chiefly contained in the holy scriptures? 1. The holy scriptures chiefly contain what man ought to believe concerning God, and what duty God requireth of man. Questions 7 through 43 have fleshed out “what man ought to believe concerning God”. Now, with Question 44, we begin the second part of that answer: “what duty God requireth of man.” Before we begin, I want to say something frankly. Faithful Christians have disagreed about aspects of the Law of God, especially how the moral law relates to the Christian life under the New Covenant. I want to give grace to brothers and sisters who disagree with me, and I am willing to discuss and even debate those questions outside of class. But in class, we do not have time to chase every side trail. Clarifying questions are welcome, especially if you are trying to understand what is being taught. But I do need time to teach the material without turning the class into an extended debate. Question 44: How then shall we live? 17. What is the duty which God requireth of man? 1. The duty which God requireth of man is, obedience to his revealed will. This is a simple answer, but it is not shallow. After teaching us about salvation, death, resurrection, judgment, and eternal destiny, the catechism now asks: what does God require of man? The answer is “obedience to His revealed will.” That word duty is important. The catechism does not ask what man finds inspiring, what man prefers, what man feels is meaningful, or what man considers spiritually useful. It asks what duty God requires. Man is a creature. God is the Creator. Man is not autonomous. He is not self-defining. He does not get to invent his own moral universe. God made man, and therefore God has the right to command man. This is already offensive to the modern mind. We live in a time when many people treat obedience as a threat to authenticity. They assume freedom means self-rule. But Scripture teaches the opposite. True freedom is not freedom from God’s will. True freedom is life ordered under God’s will. When a fish is “free” from water, it is not flourishing. When man is “free” from God, he is not liberated. He is dying. “With what shall I come before the Lord, and bow myself before God on high? Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves a year old? Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams, with ten thousands of rivers of oil? Shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?” He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? (Micah 6:6-8, ESV) Notice that this passage does not treat obedience as mysterious. God has told man what is good. He has revealed what He requires. Man’s duty is not to speculate upward into the clouds, trying to discover a hidden moral standard. God has spoken. He requires justice, mercy, and humility. That phrase “to walk humbly with your God” is essential. Biblical obedience is not mere external conformity, though external conformity matters. It is not simply keeping up appearances, though appearances matter. It is the life of a creature before the face of God. Humility is built into obedience because obedience begins with the confession that God is God and I am not. And Samuel said, “Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected you from being king.” (1 Samuel 15:22-23, ESV) This comes after Saul had disobeyed the command of the Lord while trying to preserve a religious-looking excuse. He claimed the spared animals were for sacrifice (i.e., worship). Samuel’s response is devastating. God does not desire religious performance as a substitute for obedience. “To obey is better than sacrifice.” That matters because sinners are very skilled at religious substitution. We would rather do something impressive than submit to something plain. We would rather offer a grand gesture than obey a clear command. We may prefer dramatic sacrifice, public intensity, emotional display, or theological talk over simple obedience. But God is not fooled. The duty God requires is obedience to His revealed will. This also helps us understand the role of doctrine. True doctrine never exists to make us clever rebels. Sound theology should make us obedient worshipers. If our doctrine increases our confidence while leaving us careless about obedience, something has gone wrong. Knowledge and obedience are not enemies. The Bible presents true knowledge of God as the root of faithful obedience. Now we must be careful. When the catechism says God requires obedience, it is not saying fallen man can render that obedience in his own strength. It is not saying obedience is the ground of our justification. We have already learned that justification is God’s gracious act of pardoning all our sins and accepting us as righteous in His sight only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us and received by faith alone. We do not obey in order to become justified. We obey because we are justified. But that does not mean obedience becomes optional. Grace does not cancel duty. Grace restores us to God so that we may begin, however imperfectly, to walk in His ways. Christ did not redeem a people so they might remain lawless. He saves rebels and makes them sons, servants, and worshipers. So Question 44 teaches us a foundational principle: God requires obedience to His revealed will. Not obedience to human tradition. Not obedience to personal preference. Not obedience to cultural fashion. Not obedience to private impressions that contradict Scripture. Obedience to His revealed will. And that means the Christian life must be governed by the Word of God. Question 45: What rule do we obey? 17. What did God at first reveal to man for the rule of his obedience? 1. The rule which God at first revealed to man for his obedience, was the moral law. Question 45 takes the general principle of Question 44 and applies it more specifically. Since God requires obedience to His revealed will, what did He first reveal to man as the rule of that obedience? The catechism answers: “the moral law.” This is where controversy often increases. Many Christians hear “law” and immediately think “legalism”. Others hear “moral law” and assume we are retreating from the gospel, weakening grace, or putting Christians back under Moses in a way that undermines the New Covenant. We need to slow down. Legalism is a real danger. We should reject it. Legalism treats obedience as the ground of acceptance with God, adds human traditions as though they were divine commands, or uses law without Christ and without grace. But the moral law itself is not legalism. God’s commands are not the enemy. Sin is the enemy. Self-righteousness is the enemy. Misusing the law is dangerous; the law itself is holy. For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus. (Romans 2:12-16, ESV) Paul teaches that even Gentiles, who did not receive the law in the same covenantal form as Israel, still show “the work of the law” written on their hearts. Their consciences accuse or excuse them. This does not mean fallen man has saving righteousness by nature. He does not. It does mean man remains a moral creature living before God’s moral order. This is why all human beings have some sense of right and wrong, even when that sense is corrupted, suppressed, inconsistent, or misdirected. Men may deny God, but they cannot escape moral reality. They still accuse. They still defend. They still appeal to justice. They still condemn betrayal, cruelty, theft, and dishonesty when those sins are committed against them. Their conscience bears witness that they live under moral obligation. That matters because the moral law is not an arbitrary list God invented at Sinai. The moral law reflects God’s own righteous character and the moral order He built into creation. Man is not a blank canvas morally. God made man in His image, obligated to love, worship, trust, and obey Him. For Moses writes about the righteousness that is based on the law, that the person who does the commandments shall live by them. (Romans 10:5, ESV) Paul is contrasting righteousness based on the law with righteousness based on faith. The one who would be justified by law must do the law. That is a crushing word to sinners. The law does not grade on a curve. It does not say, “Try your best and perhaps God will accept you.” If you seek life by law-keeping, the demand is obedience. Perfect, unerring, perpetual obedience. This is why the law exposes our need for Christ. The moral law tells us what righteousness requires, and then our sin shows us that we have not met that requirement. The law is good; we are not. The problem is not that God’s standard is defective. The problem is that man is guilty and corrupt. So we must hold two truths together: * FIRST, the moral law remains a true rule of obedience. * SECOND, the moral law cannot justify sinners. If we confuse those two truths, we will fall into error. * If we deny the law as a rule of obedience, we drift toward antinomianism. * If we use the law as the ground of justification, we drift toward legalism. The Reformed path is neither lawlessness nor self-righteousness. It is gospel obedience: justified by Christ alone, and then taught by grace to walk in God’s ways. This is why the sequence of the catechism matters. It does not begin with the law (what we do). It begins with God, Scripture, creation, providence, sin, Christ, redemption, effectual calling, justification, adoption, sanctification, perseverance, death, resurrection, and judgment (what we believe). Only then does it unfold the moral law in detail. That order is pastoral and theological. The law is not being introduced as a ladder into God’s favor. It is being introduced as the revealed rule of obedience for creatures before God, and for redeemed people who now belong to Christ. It is not optional for any human, but true obedience is only possible for redeemed believers. So Question 45 teaches us that God first revealed the moral law as the rule of man’s obedience. That law condemns us when we seek righteousness by it, but it also teaches us what obedience looks like. For the unbeliever, it exposes guilt. For the believer, it remains a duty, lived through Christ, by the Spirit, in gratitude, faith, and love. Question 46: Where is the moral law summarized? 17. Where is the moral law summarily comprehended? 1. The moral law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments. Question 46 now tells us where the moral law is summarized. The catechism says it is “summarily comprehended in the ten commandments.” That phrase means the Ten Commandments summarize the moral law. They do not exhaust every possible application, but they give the central summary. “At that time the Lord said to me, ‘Cut for yourself two tablets of stone like the first, and come up to me on the mountain and make an ark of wood. And I will write on the tablets the words that were on the first tablets that you broke, and you shall put them in the ark.’ So I made an ark of acacia wood, and cut two tablets of stone like the first, and went up the mountain with the two tablets in my hand. And he wrote on the tablets, in the same writing as before, the Ten Commandments that the Lord had spoken to you on the mountain out of the midst of the fire on the day of the assembly. And the Lord gave them to me. Then I turned and came down from the mountain and put the tablets in the ark that I had made. And there they are, as the Lord commanded me.” (Deuteronomy 10:1-5, ESV) The Ten Commandments were written by the very finger of God on tablets of stone. That alone should make us slow to treat them lightly. They are not merely Israelite cultural artifacts. They are not moral suggestions. They are not an embarrassing older stage of religion that Christians must outgrow. They are the summary of God’s moral law. Now, we need to say this carefully. The Ten Commandments were given at Sinai within the Mosaic covenant. That historical setting matters. We must not flatten all biblical covenants as though nothing changes from Moses to Christ. The New Covenant is not simply the Mosaic covenant reprinted. Christ has fulfilled the law. The ceremonial and civil aspects of Israel’s covenant life are not binding on the church in the same way they were binding on national Israel. The catechism is not saying the Mosaic Law remains over the Christian as a covenant. I do not believe the Mosaic Law remains over the Christian as a covenant. It is saying the moral law is summarized in the Ten Commandments. That is an important distinction. The moral law did not begin at Sinai. Sinai gave a covenantal publication of the moral law, written by the finger of God, summarized in ten words. But the moral law itself is rooted in God’s character and creation order. And behold, a man came up to him, saying, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” He said to him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” The young man said to him, “All these I have kept. What do I still lack?” Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.” When the young man heard this he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions. (Matthew 19:16-22, ESV) Jesus points the rich young man to commandments from the Decalogue: murder, adultery, theft, false witness, honoring father and mother, and loving neighbor. Jesus does not treat the commandments as morally irrelevant. He uses them to expose the man’s understanding of goodness, obedience, and his own heart. In context, the man was claiming perfect righteousness for the second table of the Law, those commandments that govern relationships between man and man. He was wrong about this, so Jesus then goes back to the first table and exposes how this man’s wealth is a god competing with God, violating the First Commandment. This is one use of the law: it exposes sin. The rich young man thought he had kept these commands. But when Christ pressed him, his idolatry was revealed. He loved his possessions. The law did not save him. It exposed him. That should teach us how to study the Ten Commandments. We must not study them superficially. “You shall not murder” does not merely forbid the physical act of murder while permitting hatred. “You shall not commit adultery” does not merely forbid the outward act while permitting lust. “You shall not steal” does not merely forbid robbery while permitting greed and exploitation. The commandments reach the heart. Jesus shows this in Matthew 5. (We’ll unpack these later.) At the same time, we should not study the commandments only as instruments of condemnation. For the believer, the law also teaches the shape of love. Jesus says the whole law hangs on love for God and love for neighbor. That does not make the commandments disappear. It shows their inner logic. The first table teaches love for God. The second table teaches love for neighbor. This is why we should not pit love against law. Biblical love is not lawless sentiment. If I say I love God while worshiping idols, taking His Name in vain, and refusing His appointed worship, I am lying. If I say I love my neighbor while dishonoring authority, hating, lusting, stealing, lying, and coveting, I am lying. Love fulfills the law because love gladly seeks the good that God commands. Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. (1 John 3:4, ESV; emphasis added) Here, John makes the explicit point that “sin is lawlessness.” Do you wish to avoid sin? The Law, even the Mosaic Law, especially the Ten Commandments, shows us the pattern for lawful obedience. So as we begin this section, we need the right posture. We do not come to the Ten Commandments trying to earn justification. Christ is our righteousness. We do not come as autonomous critics sitting over God’s law. God is our Lord. We do not come as legalists looking for ways to feel superior. We are sinners saved by grace. We do not come as antinomians looking for loopholes. We are children learning our Father’s will. Conclusion Questions 44, 45, and 46 bring us into a new major section of the catechism. We have considered salvation in Christ, the benefits believers receive, the destiny of believers, and the destiny of the wicked. Now we begin to consider the duty God requires of man. FIRST, we should believe differently. We should stop thinking of obedience as a threat to grace. Biblical obedience is not the enemy of the gospel. Self-righteousness is the enemy. Legalism is the enemy. Lawlessness is the enemy. Obedience to God’s revealed will is our duty and the grateful calling of every redeemed child. SECOND, we should understand the law rightly. The moral law reveals God’s righteous standard. It exposes our sin. It shows our need for Christ. For the believer, it serves as a rule of grateful obedience. We are not justified by law-keeping. We are justified by Christ alone. But the Christ Who justifies us also teaches us to walk in His ways. THIRD, we should come to the Ten Commandments humbly. We should not come eager to argue, looking for loopholes, or trying to soften God’s commands. We should come ready to listen. We should come as people who: * know our weakness * trust Christ’s righteousness * depend on the Spirit’s help * desire to please our Father So as we enter this section on the moral law, let us remember the catechism’s order. Grace has come first. Christ has come first. Justification, adoption, sanctification, perseverance, and resurrection hope have come first. Now, standing in that grace, we ask: “Lord, what do You require of us?” And the answer begins here: * obedience to His revealed will * according to the moral law * summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments
73 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Theology Matters!