You Are Not Crazy (Patreon Exclusive Podcast)

[PREVIEW] Pattern Recognition vs. The Blame Game

2 min · 27 de mar de 2026
Portada del episodio [PREVIEW] Pattern Recognition vs. The Blame Game

Descripción

There's a difference between someone naming a pattern to seek resolution and someone digging up the past to dodge accountability. If you've ever tried to address what's not working in your relationship and ended up defending yourself instead, this episode is for you. We talk about what healthy accountability actually looks like — and how to recognize when someone is rewriting history to keep you stuck.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de You Are Not Crazy (Patreon Exclusive Podcast)!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

10 episodios

episode [PREVIEW] Q&A: Trauma Bonds, Leaving, and Rebuilding Self-Esteem artwork

[PREVIEW] Q&A: Trauma Bonds, Leaving, and Rebuilding Self-Esteem

This month's Q&A episode covers three listener questions that get to the heart of what recovery actually requires. First, I explore whether trauma bonds in adult relationships are rooted in our earliest relational wounds with parents. The connection is real, but it is not the whole story, and understanding what your nervous system learned to call love can be enormously clarifying. Second, I answer one of the most common questions I receive: how do I leave? I walk through what to prepare quietly, what to say, what to avoid, and why one more honest conversation will never produce the outcome you are hoping for. Finally, I talk about rebuilding self-esteem after years of being diminished. You are not starting from zero. You are starting from a deficit that was manufactured, and that distinction changes how the work of restoration unfolds. Please ask questions for the next episode here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeMInxIFVH04aCaxJiNsA58os45FHcxWtBBa-SFYlwaHBq4Yg/viewform?usp=header [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeMInxIFVH04aCaxJiNsA58os45FHcxWtBBa-SFYlwaHBq4Yg/viewform?usp=header]

9 de jun de 20263 min
episode [PREVIEW] When Love Feels Like a Hostage Situation: BPD in Romantic Relationships artwork

[PREVIEW] When Love Feels Like a Hostage Situation: BPD in Romantic Relationships

This episode is dropping here first before it goes out to the general feed. If you have been around for a while, you may remember the original BPD episode — it is one of the most listened-to things I have ever put out, and I have wanted to come back to it for a long time. Two more years of client work, my own processing, and graduate coursework later, I felt like the conversation deserved more depth and more honesty than I gave it the first time around. I go into the idealization cycle, splitting, emotional dysregulation, what leaving actually looks like, and a piece that I do not hear talked about directly enough — what to do when someone threatens self-harm to keep you from going. I also share some of my own experience more openly than I have before.

9 de jun de 20265 min
episode [PREVIEW] What the DSM Gets Wrong About Survivors artwork

[PREVIEW] What the DSM Gets Wrong About Survivors

You’ve probably heard of the DSM—the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It’s often treated like the authority on what’s “wrong” with people. It’s where diagnoses like anxiety, depression, PTSD, ADHD, and personality disorders are defined and categorized. In this episode, I’m breaking down what the DSM actually is—and what it isn’t. These diagnoses are not based on clear biological evidence. There are no blood tests, no brain scans, no definitive markers. They are based on patterns, observations and agreements among clinicians. With the development of the next version (DSM-6), there’s a push to move even further toward a biological model of mental health—despite the fact that those biological markers still don’t exist. That matters for survivors. If you’ve ever been in a therapist’s office and felt like your reactions to abuse were being labeled as symptoms instead of understood as survival… this conversation is for you. We talk about: * Why trauma responses are often pathologized * How diagnoses like BPD are disproportionately applied to survivors * The risk of shifting away from context and toward unproven biology * The history of psychiatric models getting it wrong (like the chemical imbalance theory) * And why your pain makes sense in the context of what you’ve been through

17 de abr de 20262 min
episode [PREVIEW] When It Feels Real But Isn’t Safe: Understanding Pathological Love, Cluster B Traits, and Repeated Harm artwork

[PREVIEW] When It Feels Real But Isn’t Safe: Understanding Pathological Love, Cluster B Traits, and Repeated Harm

In this episode, I break down one of the most confusing realities survivors face: something can feel deeply real and still be unsafe. We explore the difference between emotional intensity and emotional depth, and why relationships involving coercive control, gaslighting, and intermittent reinforcement create powerful bonds that are not built on secure attachment. I answer listener questions, including: * Was any of it real, or was I being used? * Are these borderline traits, narcissism, or something more calculated? * Why did they get worse when I got stronger? * When does mental illness stop being an explanation and start being an excuse? We also talk about Cluster B personality traits, the patterns that define pathological abuse, and why the cycle—not the label—is what matters most. If you’ve ever felt like you were constantly resetting the relationship, questioning your reality, or trying to understand what you were actually in, this episode will help you name it clearly.

27 de mar de 20265 min