Omslagafbeelding van de show COACH: Church Origins and Church History courtesy of the That’s Jesus Channel

COACH: Church Origins and Church History courtesy of the That’s Jesus Channel

Podcast door That’s Jesus Channel / Bob Baulch

Engels

Geschiedenis & Religie

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

€ 9,99 / maand na proefperiode.Elk moment opzegbaar.

  • 20 uur luisterboeken / maand
  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort
  • Gratis podcasts
Probeer gratis

Over COACH: Church Origins and Church History courtesy of the That’s Jesus Channel

COACH: Church Origins and Church History is a Christian podcast from Bob Baulch that explores how the church grew, suffered, worshiped, and changed the world — one generation at a time. Hosted by a passionate Bible teacher with a heart for truth and revival and research, COACH brings history to life with verifiable sources, captivating stories, and deep theological reflection. From Roman persecution to forgotten revivals, every episode is a fresh look at how God’s people lived and died for the gospel — and what it means for us today. No fluff. No fiction. Just powerful, proven history that strengthens your faith.

Alle afleveringen

100 afleveringen

aflevering 0108 – 1797 AD - Wilberforce’s Manifesto - A Practical View of Christianity artwork

0108 – 1797 AD - Wilberforce’s Manifesto - A Practical View of Christianity

1797 AD – Wilberforce’s Manifesto: When a Parliamentarian Called Britain Back to “Real Christianity” Description: In 1797, as Britain fought revolutionary France and watched its neighbor experiment with “Temples of Reason,” a different kind of revolution quietly appeared on London bookshop counters. William Wilberforce, already known for his exhausting campaign to end the British slave trade, released a thick volume with an even thicker title: A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians… Contrasted with Real Christianity. He wrote not as a cloistered theologian, but as a sitting Member of Parliament who had been shaken years earlier by the Bible and by older Christian writers during a long European journey. Their insistence on sin, judgment, grace, and new birth forced him to reconsider everything—from his jokes about religion to his pursuit of applause in the House of Commons. Urged by John Newton to remain in politics “for God,” Wilberforce stayed in Parliament and threw himself into abolition. Yet he could not ignore what he saw among Britain’s higher and middle classes: a polished, convenient religion that kept Christian language but lost Christian reality. His book drew a sharp contrast between that “prevailing religious system” and what he called “real Christianity”—a faith centered on Jesus’ atonement, the corruption of the human heart, and the transforming work of the Holy Spirit. To his surprise, the book spread quickly through the very social circles he gently rebuked, running through multiple editions in Britain and abroad. Over time, it helped make serious, evangelical faith respectable among the educated classes and quietly shaped the conscience of the Victorian world. This episode traces how one layman’s manifesto pressed a nation to ask whether its Christianity was merely a habit or a living, demanding, joyful reality. Keywords (400–500 characters): William Wilberforce book, A Practical View Wilberforce, real Christianity vs nominal Christianity, 1797 Wilberforce manifesto, British evangelical revival, higher and middle classes religion, John Newton counsel, Wilberforce conversion story, slavery abolition and faith, Victorian evangelical roots, British Christianity 18th century, nominal religion critique Hashtags: #WilliamWilberforce #APracticalView #RealChristianity #NominalChristianity #EvangelicalRevival #JohnNewton #BritishHistory #ChristianHistory #FaithAndPolitics #AbolitionAndGospel #18thCenturyChristianity #VictorianRoots CTA: If this story helps you see the difference between “prevailing religion” and real Christianity, share it with a friend who might be wrestling with the same questions. Chunk 01A – Hook (150–200 words) The book did not look like a revolution. It was thick, densely titled, and written by a man who already spent his days arguing over trade, taxes, and war. London booksellers placed it on their counters in the spring of 1797, just another volume among many. Outside, Britain worried about France—about armies, debt, and the strange new festivals that were turning cathedrals into “Temples of Reason.” Inside, the man whose name appeared on the title page was quietly asking a different question: What if the real crisis was not across the Channel, but in the pews at home? William Wilberforce had already spent a decade wearing himself out against the slave trade. But this book was aimed closer to his own world—toward the drawing rooms, clubs, and polite churches of England’s higher and middle classes. It argued that the greatest danger to Britain was not open unbelief, but a comfortable Christianity that kept the language of faith and emptied it of its power. He called that comfortable version the “prevailing religious system.” He called what he found in Scripture something else entirely. He called it real Christianity. Chunk 01B – Cliffhanger (45–50 words) When a man who moves easily among the powerful turns and tells his own class, “Our religion is mostly a shell,” people have to decide whether to be offended or to listen. And sometimes, the shock of being accurately described is the very thing that finally wakes a heart up. Chunk 02: From the That's Jesus Channel — welcome to COACH — where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch. And on Fridays we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. Chunk 03 – Segue Sentence Today we step into 1797 Britain, where William Wilberforce’s long, unwieldy book quietly confronted a nation with the unsettling difference between its polished religion and what he called “real Christianity.” Chunk 4 Narrative based on Episode Idea: Wilberforce’s Manifesto The spring of 1797 felt brittle in Britain, as if the whole country were holding its breath. War with revolutionary France dragged on, draining coffers and patience. Across the Channel, revolutionary leaders had, in some places, publicly denied the existence of God and turned long‑standing cathedrals into “Temples of Reason,” replacing familiar worship with festivals to human achievement. In London, members of Parliament argued over taxes and troop numbers, but beneath the debates ran a quieter fear: if France could tear up its past in a decade, what was keeping Britain from the same fate? In the middle of that anxious season, a thick volume appeared in London and Dublin bookshops. Its title stretched almost from one margin of the page to the other: A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians, in the Higher and Middle Classes in this Country, Contrasted with Real Christianity. The name beneath the title was familiar to the educated classes—William Wilberforce, Member of Parliament for the County of York. Until now, he had been known mainly for one thing: a stubborn, costly campaign to end the British slave trade. Wilberforce did not look like a threat to anyone’s religion. He was a small, courteous man with sharp eyes and a quick smile, just as at home in a drawing room as on the floor of the House of Commons. He loved conversation and music, delighted in friendships, and moved easily in the social world of the British elite. But those who watched him closely had noticed that something had changed in him more than a decade before. His jokes were still quick, his charm still disarming, yet a deep seriousness now ran under the surface of his life. That change traced back to 1785, when Wilberforce, already a rising political star, decided to take a long journey across Europe with an old schoolmaster. Travel in those days meant weeks in a coach, long stretches of countryside, and evenings with little to do but read. On that trip he began to open a book he had mostly ignored—the Bible—and alongside it, works by serious Christian writers that challenged fashionable beliefs of the day. What he found unsettled him. The Scriptures spoke with a weight and urgency he could not shrug off, and the authors he read pressed home the reality of sin, judgment, and grace. By the time he returned to England, Wilberforce was shaken. He saw his past through different eyes: the casual jokes at religion, the wasted evenings, the eager pursuit of applause in Parliament. He poured out his turmoil in his private journal and confided in a few trusted friends. For a time he considered leaving public life entirely to pursue the ministry, wondering if true devotion to Jesus could coexist with the compromises of politics. If the Gospel was as serious as these writers insisted, how could Wilberforce continue with the same career, the same ambitions, as if nothing had changed? Then an older pastor entered the story. John Newton, once a slave ship captain and now a respected minister in London, had followed Wilberforce’s political career from a distance. When the younger man asked for counsel, Newton invited him to his modest study and urged him not to abandon Parliament. God, he suggested, had placed Wilberforce where he was for a reason; public life was not an obstacle to discipleship but an arena for it. Wilberforce left that conversation with a new resolve: he would stay in politics, but now as a servant of Jesus rather than of his own reputation. The years that followed were demanding. From 1787 onward, Wilberforce became the chief parliamentary voice against the slave trade, introducing major abolition motions in 1789, 1791, and across the 1790s. Each effort required assembling evidence, gathering allies, and facing down powerful economic interests whose fortunes depended on the trade. Time after time, his proposals fell short in the voting chamber. Those defeats might have broken a man whose hopes rested only in politics, but Wilberforce had come to believe that God cared about both souls and systems—that the Gospel addressed private hearts and public injustices. That conviction kept him pressing on. Yet as he threw himself into the fight against the trade in human lives, another concern grew in his mind. He looked at the society around him—the polite conversations at dinners, the religious phrases traded easily in letters, the crowded pews on major holidays—and sensed something hollow at the center. Britain was, on paper, a Christian nation. The Church of England was established by law; most citizens were baptized; almost everyone would have called themselves Christian if asked. But Wilberforce saw a sharp contrast between the faith he now found in Scripture and the religion he met in everyday life among the “higher and middle classes” who shaped the nation’s culture. He began to put words to the contrast. On one side stood what he called the “prevailing religious system” of professed Christians. It was respectable, moderate, and convenient. It asked for decent behavior and a general belief in God, but it demanded little heart-level change. Sin was treated more as a failure of manners than as rebellion against a holy God. The central doctrines of the faith—the corruption of human nature, the atonement of Jesus, and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit—faded into the background, rarely mentioned except in formal creeds. On the other side stood what Wilberforce called “real Christianity.” This was not a new religion, he insisted, but the faith of the New Testament and of earlier centuries, now largely forgotten among polite society. Real Christianity began with a sober view of the human heart, confessed the need for rescue rather than mere improvement, and centered everything on the death and resurrection of Jesus. It produced not just external morality but a new set of desires—a love for God, a hunger for holiness, a compassion for neighbor. Real Christianity, as he described it, did not fit neatly into social expectations; it was deeper, more searching, and more joyful than the conventional religion of his day. These reflections did not remain private. Around 1793 Wilberforce began drafting a manuscript. At first he meant it to be brief, almost a pamphlet—something a busy gentleman or lady might read in a few evenings. But the more he wrote, the more he felt the need to clarify, to anticipate objections, to speak plainly yet respectfully to the very people who received invitations to his own home. The pages multiplied until the book reached 491 pages in its first edition. He wrote in fits and starts between parliamentary sessions, keeping the project secret from all but a few close friends. His style was earnest rather than polished. He was not a systematic theologian; he was a layman writing from deep conviction. He moved from diagnosis to appeal, from critique to invitation. He did not hesitate to tell his own class that they had stripped their religion of its core, keeping only a shell of outward respectability. Yet he also wrote with affection, as one insider to another, wanting his readers not to feel scorned but awakened. A Practical View effectively laid out a case along four main lines. It showed how many people treated Christianity as a matter of social order rather than eternal truth. It insisted on the depth of human sin and the need for new birth. It highlighted how professed Christians often neglected the central doctrines of Christ’s work and the Spirit’s transforming power. And it called for a return to real Christianity—a faith that governed the affections, reshaped daily life, and flowed out in acts of mercy and justice. By early 1797, Wilberforce’s “practical view” was ready. He had worked on it intermittently for four years, weaving it into the margins of a crowded public life. On April 12 it finally appeared in print, simultaneously in London and Dublin. Booksellers laid out copies with the long title stretched across the cover, and members of the same educated circles Wilberforce had challenged began to buy it—some out of curiosity, some because anything by the famous abolitionist promised to be interesting. The response surprised almost everyone. Within six months the book sold about 7,500 copies and went through five reprints, impressive numbers for a religious work by a layperson. By 1811 it had reached nine English editions, and by 1830 eighteen. It crossed the Atlantic in 1798 with an American edition and was later translated into French and Spanish. Letters and memoirs from the period describe the effect it had on readers: some felt exposed, recognizing themselves in his portrait of easy, nominal religion; others felt strangely relieved, as if someone had finally put words to their own uneasy sense that there must be more to faith than good manners and occasional church attendance. Because the author was a sitting member of Parliament, his words carried unusual weight. Evangelical preachers had been calling people to conversion and holy living for decades, often among miners, artisans, and rural crowds. But many in the upper ranks of society still saw that movement as excessive and emotional, suited perhaps to the lower orders but not to the cultured. Now a figure from their own world—educated, influential, and thoroughly engaged in public affairs—was giving a reasoned defense of that same message. The revival that had stirred fields and coal mines began to gain a foothold in drawing rooms and studies. Over the next years the book was reprinted again and again, shaping the inner lives of people who would later fuel missions, philanthropy, and reforms across the British Empire. It worked quietly on the conscience of a class that had long assumed its own virtue, clearing away complacency for some and steadying an already uneasy faith for others. Later observers would note that the moral seriousness and public conscience associated with Victorian evangelical culture owed much to the influence of Wilberforce’s manifesto, which helped make robust, experiential Christianity respectable among the British elite. By the time new generations came of age in the early nineteenth century, the landscape had shifted. The moral energy that would characterize the Victorian era did not arise out of nowhere; it was watered by countless sermons, societies, and struggles—but also by books that had turned the attention of influential people back to the heart of the Gospel. Among those books, A Practical View stood near the center, a layman’s plea that Christianity must be more than a name, more than a convention, if it was to sustain a nation in troubled times. In April 1797, however, none of that future was visible. What could be seen was a single stout book on the counter of a London bookseller, written by a weary but resolute parliamentarian who believed that the fate of his country lay not only in naval victories or parliamentary votes, but in whether its people knew the difference between a religion of habit and a faith that reached the very core of the soul. That conviction, laid down in ink, would outlast wars, elections, and even Wilberforce’s own lifetime. Chunk 05A – Segue from Narrative to Modern Reflection (≈48 words) Wilberforce wrote for his own circle—the educated, comfortable believers who could talk easily about religion while keeping its demands at arm’s length. He was not trying to win an argument with skeptics; he was trying to tell churchgoing people that their faith had drifted from the Gospel itself. That is uncomfortably familiar. Chunk 05B – Cliffhanger Resolution (2–20 words) It is far easier to spot nominal Christianity in others than in ourselves. Chunk 06 – Modern Church/Society Reflection (200–350 words) Wilberforce’s distinction between the “prevailing religious system” and “real Christianity” lands close to home. In his day, most of the people he addressed would have checked every religious box—baptized, respectable, present at major services, fluent in the right phrases. Their faith kept society orderly and polite, but it rarely pressed into sin, repentance, or the costly mercy of God. What alarmed Wilberforce was not open rejection of Jesus, but the way Jesus could be honored in public speech and largely ignored in private life. We see the same patterns now. Churches can be full, ministries well-branded, and Christian language woven into politics or social media, while the core realities of the Gospel remain thinly held. Sin becomes “brokenness,” judgment becomes impolite, grace becomes permission, and the cross becomes background decoration rather than the center of everything. We can become very skilled at using faith to stabilize our lives without ever submitting our lives to the Jesus who calls us to die to ourselves. Wilberforce believed that when Christianity is reduced to morals and manners, it will not hold a person—or a culture—when real pressure comes. In his moment, the pressure was war, social change, and the fear of revolution. In ours, it might be cultural hostility, disillusionment with leaders, or the slow erosion of trust. His question still matters: Is our Christianity merely useful, or is it rooted in a living encounter with Jesus that changes what we love, how we repent, and how we treat the most vulnerable people around us? Chunk 07 – Personal Reflection and Application (200–350 words) Wilberforce did not write as a spectator. He wrote as someone who had already been exposed by the very truths he was commending. Before he ever described the “prevailing religious system,” he had seen it in his own life—in wasted evenings, casual mockery, and a hunger for applause that felt normal until Scripture named it as sin. That honesty makes his challenge more than an accusation; it becomes an invitation. For you and me, the language is different but the danger is similar. It is possible to be around Christian things constantly—podcasts, services, small groups, books—and still keep Jesus safely on the edge of our actual decisions. It is possible to nod along to doctrines we never let confront our habits, our grudges, or our private compromises. We can talk about grace and yet live as if we are managing our own image, preserving our own control, and deciding for ourselves how far obedience really needs to go. Real Christianity, as Wilberforce described it, begins when we stop treating faith as an accessory and start admitting our need for rescue. It is not about becoming more religious; it is about letting the Holy Spirit expose what we have carefully excused, and trusting that Jesus’ death and resurrection are enough for the sins we would rather rename. That kind of work is quiet and personal. It is also where joy actually begins. The question this episode presses is not, “Are you active in Christian spaces?” but, “Is Jesus steadily moving from the margins to the center of your heart, your choices, and your love for the people around you?” CHUNK 08—VERBATIM OUTRO If this story of Wilberforce’s Manifesto challenged or encouraged you, share it with a friend—they might really need to hear it. Make sure you go to ThatsJesus.org for other COACH episodes and resources. Don't forget to follow, like, comment, rate, review, subscribe, share, favorite, repost, heart, star, ring the bell, tag a friend, or whisper kind words to your device. In short, do whatever you can to trick the algorithm into thinking you care about this series. But most of all, don't forget to TUNE IN for more COACH episodes every week. Every episode dives into a different corner of church history. But on Mondays, we stay between 0 and 500 AD. Thanks for listening to COACH—where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch with the That's Jesus Channel. Have a great day and be blessed. Chunk 09A – Personal Humor (1–2 sentences) If Wilberforce handed me his book today, there’s a good chance I’d be tempted to skim the long title, put it on a shelf, and say, “I’ll get to that when things slow down”—which is probably exactly the kind of polite self-deception he was writing about. Chunk 09B – Personal Humanity (1–2 sentences) I resonate uncomfortably with his fear that you can talk about Jesus in public and quietly chase your own reputation in private, and I need the same kind of persistent, gracious correction he was offering to his friends. Chunk 10 – Quotes and Sources No direct historical quotations were used verbatim in this episode’s chunks. The narrative and reflections draw on widely attested events and descriptions from Wilberforce’s life and context, especially his conversion, relationship with John Newton, abolition work, and the publication and reception of A Practical View. For further study on the themes raised in this episode, listeners can consult: * William Wilberforce, A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians… Contrasted with Real Christianity. * Biographical works and historical studies on Wilberforce’s spiritual life, political career, and influence on evangelical culture and reform movements. Chunk 11 – Contrary and Skeptical Sources (5–10 concise items) 1. Some historians argue that Wilberforce overstated the spiritual decline of Britain’s elites, painting a darker picture of “prevailing religion” to justify his own evangelical emphases. 2. Certain critics contend that A Practical View reflects a narrow theological lens, treating one strand of Protestant experience as the only valid form of “real” Christianity. 3. Some social historians suggest that the book’s actual impact on Victorian moral culture has been exaggerated and that broader economic and political forces played a larger role than Wilberforce’s manifesto. 4. Others note that Wilberforce’s focus on personal conversion and piety risked sidelining structural critiques beyond the slave trade, potentially reinforcing other social hierarchies of his time. 5. A number of modern scholars question whether the sharp contrast between “nominal” and “real” Christianity can adequately account for the complex, often mixed motives present in 18th‑ and 19th‑century church life. 6. Some theological critics worry that Wilberforce’s emphasis on experience and visible transformation can unintentionally foster introspective doubt rather than resting in Christ’s finished work. Chunk 12 – Orthodox Sources Ancient (Pre‑1500, at least 5) These are representative ancient and medieval voices that support core elements of what Wilberforce called “real Christianity” (human sinfulness, grace, new birth, and transformed life): 1. Augustine of Hippo, Confessions – on the depth of sin, the restlessness of the human heart without God, and the necessity of grace. 2. Augustine of Hippo, On the Spirit and the Letter – on the inability of the law to save and the need for the Spirit’s regenerating work. 3. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Romans – on justification, repentance, and the transformation of life through union with Christ. 4. Gregory the Great, Pastoral Rule – on the inner character and holiness required of Christian leaders beyond outward respectability. 5. Bernard of Clairvaux, On Loving God – on love for God as the heart of true faith, not mere outward observance. 6. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, especially sections on grace and charity – on infused grace, the healing of the will, and growth in holiness. Chunk 13 – Orthodox Sources Modern (1500–Present, at least 10) Representative modern orthodox sources that echo or explore themes similar to Wilberforce’s concerns: 1. John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion – on total depravity, faith, and the Christian life. 2. Jonathan Edwards, Religious Affections – on the difference between genuine and merely outward religious experience. 3. John Wesley, A Plain Account of Christian Perfection – on holiness of heart and life as the fruit of grace. 4. J.C. Ryle, Holiness – on sin, sanctification, and the danger of nominal Christianity. 5. Martyn Lloyd‑Jones, Studies in the Sermon on the Mount – on heart-level righteousness beyond external religion. 6. John Stott, Basic Christianity – on the essentials of the Gospel and personal response. 7. J.I. Packer, Knowing God – on knowing about God versus truly knowing Him in relationship. 8. Michael A.G. Haykin (ed.), works on 18th‑century evangelicalism – for context on Wilberforce’s spiritual world. 9. Timothy Keller, Counterfeit Gods – on respectable idols and the gap between professed belief and actual trust. 10. Kevin Belmonte, William Wilberforce: Hero for Humanity – biographical treatment of Wilberforce’s faith and reforms. 11. John Pollock, Wilberforce – classic biography highlighting his conversion, activism, and the writing of A Practical View. CHUNK 14—AMAZON AFFILIATE LINKS (VERBATIM) "As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you."   1. Studio Gear & Tools: Mics, interfaces, lights, and studio bits — the practical kit behind the channel. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2JVFYS5WRTUVX?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   2. Overflow & Supplemental Books: Overflow & special picks that pair with COACH episodes and study notes. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1SLMOKXPPYTQL?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   3. Full-Scope Survey Shelf: Comprehensive "spine" shelf: general surveys covering the full 0–2000 arc. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/21O075P7LI81V?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   4. Reformations to Modern Day: Reformations, awakenings, world Christianity, and the modern church. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2YMN6OXBEXGHQ?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   5. Before 1500: Monastic movements, councils, scholastic thought, and global missions before 1500. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/31YCQ0B9JRS12?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   6. Early Church Sources: Primary sources and top surveys from the apostolic era through the fall of Rome. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/19YTUD4IK87DZ?ref_=wl_share&tag=thatsjesuscha-20   CHUNK 15—CREDITS (VERBATIM) Credits Research, Writing, Editing, Hosting & Producing by: Bob Baulch Production Company: That's Jesus Channel PRODUCTION NOTES: AI tools provide assistance, but the final product is fully credited to Bob Baulch, with all AI tools used under his direction and discretion.   AI tools may include one or more of the following, depending on the episode's needs:   * Perplexity (by Perplexity Inc.) — historical research and fact support * Claude (by Anthropic) — clarity suggestions and structural insights * ChatGPT (by OpenAI) — organization, drafting assistance, refinement * Copilot (by Microsoft) — content organization and timeline alignment * Grok (by xAI) — verification support and cross-checking * Gemini (by Google) — parameter compliance and accuracy checks * Kimi (by Moonshot AI) — Mapping complex source docs and ensuring quote categorization * DeepSeek (by DeepSeek AI — Stress-testing modern applications and simplifying complex theology.   These tools may assist with: Historical research, Organization and structure, Script drafting and refinement, Accuracy checks, Parameter compliance, Formatting and finalization, Full pre-publish verification ("everything locked in and fact checked")   All AI-generated suggestions were reviewed, edited, accepted or rejected, and fully approved by Bob Baulch.   Sound and Visualization: Adobe Podcast   Video Production (if applicable): Adobe Premiere Pro   Digital License — Audio 1: Background Music "Background Music Soft Calm" by INPLUSMUSIC Pixabay Content License Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii BMI IPI Number: 01055591064 Source: Pixabay   Digital License — Audio 2: Crescendo "Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec" by BurtySounds Pixabay Content License Source: Pixabay   Production Note: All audio and video elements are added during post-production. Final historical accuracy, theological balance, and editorial decisions are the sole responsibility of Bob Baulch and That's Jesus Channel.

13 feb 2026 - 22 min
aflevering 0107 - DEEP DIVE EP 0017 - 62 AD - The Echo of the Book of Ephesians artwork

0107 - DEEP DIVE EP 0017 - 62 AD - The Echo of the Book of Ephesians

Episode 17: 62 AD – The Echo of the Book of Ephesians Description: In 62 AD, the Apostle Paul was under house arrest in Rome, yet he managed to write a letter that changed the world. This episode explores the powerful story of the Book of Ephesians and how it provided a "soaring vision" for the early church. We look at the main conflict of that time, where believers faced false teachings and needed a strong voice to help them stand firm against the confusion of the Roman world. You will hear how great church leaders like Irenaeus and Tertullian used this letter to defend the truth about Jesus and keep the church united. The episode highlights how the "Armor of God" gave them courage and how the promise of grace shaped their identity. We also see how this letter was read in whispered services by candlelight, becoming a lifeline for ordinary Christians who needed to know they were part of one body. Does the echo of Ephesians still reach us today, and are we letting the Bible shape our lives the way it shaped theirs? We invite you to reflect on this question and subscribe to the COACH podcast to explore more stories from the origins of our faith. Apostle Paul, Book of Ephesians, Roman imprisonment, early church history, Irenaeus, Tertullian, spiritual warfare, Christian unity, biblical history, ancient Rome #ChurchHistory #Christianity #COACH #Ephesians #ApostlePaul #BibleStudy Links: Podcast Website: That's Jesus dot org [https://www.google.com/url?sa=E&q=https%3A%2F%2Fthatsjesus.org] YouTube: That's Jesus Channel [https://www.google.com/url?sa=E&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2F%40ThatsJesusChannel]

12 feb 2026 - 32 min
aflevering 0106 - 1355 - The Tavern Brawl and Saint Scholastica Day Riot When Clerical Privilege Turned a University City Violent artwork

0106 - 1355 - The Tavern Brawl and Saint Scholastica Day Riot When Clerical Privilege Turned a University City Violent

0106 - 1355 - The Tavern Brawl and Saint Scholastica Day Riot When Clerical Privilege Turned a University City Violent Chunk 00: Title, Website, YT, POD, FB, Summary, Keywords, Hashtags, CTA Title: 1355 AD - The St. Scholastica's Day Riot: When Clerical Privilege Turned a University City Violent Website/YT/POD/FB Description: On February 10, 1355, a complaint about bad wine at Oxford's Swindlestock Tavern escalated into three days of violence that left dozens dead and the city scarred. The St. Scholastica's Day riot revealed the deep resentment between Oxford's townspeople and its university scholars, who enjoyed clerical privileges that protected them from local justice. Students wore tonsures and gowns marking them as churchmen, giving them benefit of clergy—lighter punishments in church courts rather than the harsher penalties townspeople faced. When two students insulted a tavern keeper, the fight spilled into the streets, bells rang from competing towers, and armed mobs from town and countryside attacked scholars in their lodgings. Bodies were thrown into ditches, halls were burned, and books were dragged into the streets. King Edward III responded by restoring the university's charter while imprisoning Oxford's mayor and placing the town under interdict for over a year. He then expanded the university's authority over Oxford's markets and justice system, deepening the imbalance that had sparked the violence. As punishment and memorial, the mayor and town officials were required to walk to St Mary's Church every February 10th, attend mass for the slain scholars, and pay a penny for each death—a ritual of submission that continued for nearly five hundred years. The riot demonstrates how structural inequality, when mixed with legal privilege and daily friction, can ignite catastrophic violence. It reminds the church today that systems which create separate standards of justice—even when rooted in religious authority—can breed the very resentment they claim to prevent. Keywords: St Scholastica's Day riot, Oxford University history, medieval town and gown conflict, benefit of clergy, clerical privilege, King Edward III, 1355 Oxford riot, medieval university violence, church court system, medieval legal privilege, Oxford medieval history, university town conflict Hashtags: #StScholasticasDayRiot #OxfordUniversityHistory #MedievalTownAndGown #BenefitOfClergy #ClericalPrivilege #KingEdwardIII #1355OxfordRiot #MedievalUniversityViolence #ChurchCourtSystem #MedievalLegalPrivilege #OxfordMedievalHistory #UniversityTownConflict CTA: If this story challenged how you think about privilege and justice in the church, share it with someone who needs to hear it. Chunk 01A: Hook The tavern keeper wiped blood from his face. The wine cup clattered to the floor. Around him, voices rose—some in fury, some in fear. Students in long gowns pressed toward the door. Townsmen blocked the way. Outside, the streets of Oxford waited, narrow and tense, where two communities had lived side by side for generations under rules that were never equal. By morning, bells would ring from two towers, calling not to prayer but to arms. By the third day, bodies would lie in ditches and the river, halls would burn, and the smell of smoke would hang over a city already thinned by plague. The fight began over spoiled wine. But the rage underneath had been building for decades, fed by privilege that protected some and punished others, by justice that bent depending on the clothes you wore and the courts that claimed you. It was February 10, 1355. And before the week ended, Oxford would run with blood. Chunk 01B: Cliffhanger When the structure itself creates two kinds of justice—one for the powerful, one for everyone else—resentment doesn't disappear. It waits. And when it finally breaks, the cost is measured in bodies, in ashes, and in centuries of bitterness. Chunk 02: Verbatim Intro From the That's Jesus Channel—welcome to COACH, where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch. And on Wednesday, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD. Chunk 03: Segue Today we step into Oxford in 1355, where a tavern argument over bad wine ignited three days of violence that exposed the deadly consequences of clerical privilege and legal inequality. Chunk 04: Narrative Chunk 4 Narrative based on 1355 AD - The St. Scholastica’s Day Riot: When Clerical Privilege Turned a University City Violent The wine was bad. Walter de Springheuse and Roger de Chesterfield sat in the Swindlestock Tavern at Carfax, where Oxford’s four main streets met. It was February 10, 1355, the feast of Saint Scholastica, and the tavern was thick with noise—students in long gowns, townsmen with rough hands, travelers shaking off the winter cold. Walter lifted his cup, tasted the wine, and complained. Roger agreed. The tavern keeper, John, pushed back. Voices rose. Insults followed. Then the wine flew into John’s face, and a blow with a cup or jug drew blood. The room snapped from tension to violence. On the surface, it was a bar fight over spoiled drink. Underneath, every strike landed on years of resentment. Oxford was not just a market town with a cluster of churches. It was a university city where two communities lived side by side under different rules. Scholars belonged to the university and, on paper, to the church. Townspeople belonged to the town alone. Students were counted as clerics. They wore a tonsure, a shaved patch on the crown of the head that marked them as churchmen, and long scholar’s gowns that set them apart. That status meant benefit of clergy—the right to be tried in church courts rather than before the town’s officials, where punishments were generally lighter. A local man might lose a hand for theft. A scholar might be given a penance and sent back to his books. To people who swept the streets, brewed the ale, and buried the dead, the difference felt like mockery. The fight at Swindlestock spilled into the street. John appealed to the town authorities. According to later accounts, the mayor demanded that the university hand over the students. The university’s response—whether refusal or delay—was taken as yet another sign that scholars would be protected. The message the town heard was familiar: once again, the university’s people would stand behind its walls while others bore the cost. Then the bells began to ring. In a medieval city, bells were not background noise. They called people to worship, but they also called them to act. A bell could summon prayer—or an armed crowd. The town’s bell rang out from Saint Martin’s. The university’s bell answered from Saint Mary’s. Men left their homes and shops, gathering in the streets with clubs and bows. Word spread beyond the walls. Farmhands and villagers, already suspicious of the privileged scholars, heard that there was trouble in Oxford. The first night was ugly but limited. The real terror began the next day. On February 11, the university tried to slow the storm. The chancellor proclaimed that no one should bear arms or disturb the peace. At the same time, town officers were recruiting help from the countryside and paying men to come in and stand with the citizens. Armed bands of townsmen and countrymen began to move through the streets, looking for anyone in a scholar’s gown. Students ran for safety. Some gathered at Saint Giles’ Church on the north side of town. Others barricaded themselves in halls or sought shelter with religious houses. The line between “churchman” and “enemy” blurred. To the townsmen, the gowns and tonsures no longer marked holy men. They marked a class that lived above answerability. An armed group headed toward Saint Giles. Scholars tried to flee toward the Augustinian priory nearby. They did not all make it. At least one student was killed on the road; others were beaten or left wounded. The university rang its bell again. Gates were shut to keep more outsiders from entering, but it was too late. The anger was much larger than the walls. By afternoon, a large force from the countryside—hundreds, with some accounts speaking of as many as two thousand men—had pushed into Oxford. They joined the townsmen already primed for revenge. Faced with such numbers, many students chose to hide. Doors were barred. Shutters closed. The streets did not grow quiet.everything-everywhere+1 [https://everything-everywhere.com/the-st-scholastica-day-riot/] They grew deadly. Townsmen broke into student lodgings. Doors were splintered, chests smashed open, books and clothing dragged into the street. Scholars were pulled from hiding places, beaten, and killed. Bodies were left where they fell, thrown into ditches, or dumped into the river. Fires began to burn. Smoke mingled with winter air as houses and halls were looted and set alight. Attempts at control came late and weak. The king’s name was invoked in shouted proclamations: any harm to the scholars or their property would be punished. But words could not easily put the fire back into the hearth. The riot spilled into a third day. By then, many scholars had fled Oxford altogether, leaving behind ruined rooms and the dead. When the violence finally ebbed, the numbers were grim. Chroniclers disagree, but modern estimates suggest roughly a few dozen townspeople—around thirty—and around sixty scholars, commonly given as sixty-three, were killed. For a city still marked by the losses of the Black Death, it was another wound carved into an already thinned population. With blood still fresh on the streets, messengers rode to the king. King Edward III was at Woodstock, not far from Oxford. He had reasons to favor the University, which trained clergy and officials who served both church and crown. When word reached him, he summoned representatives from both town and university. Each side handed over its charter—the documents that granted each of them self-rule and privileges—as a sign of submission and trust in his judgment. His response was swift and uneven. Within days, he restored the university’s charter and its rights. He did not restore the town’s charter. Instead, he fined the town of Oxford heavily—five hundred marks—and ordered the mayor and key officials to the prison in London. The Bishop of Lincoln placed the town of Oxford under severe restrictions. With that act, normal church life in Oxford was largely suspended. There would be no regular masses, no marriages, no church burials. Only baptisms and a few essential rites remained. For more than a year, the town felt, in public worship, the weight of its punishment. The king then strengthened the university’s hand. In a new charter issued in June 1355, the chancellor of the university was granted authority over the sale of bread, ale, and wine in Oxford. He gained control over weights and measures in the markets. In disputes where a scholar and a townsman clashed, the university’s jurisdiction grew deeper. The legal imbalance that had fed resentment did not disappear. It was sharpened. One final piece of the settlement ensured that memory of the riot would not fade quickly. Every year, on Saint Scholastica’s Day, the mayor of Oxford, the bailiffs, and a group of townsmen were required to walk to the University Church of St Mary the Virgin. There they would attend a mass for the souls of the slain scholars. They would swear an oath to uphold the university’s privileges. And they would offer a money payment, commonly described as one penny for each scholar killed. The ritual turned defeat into a yearly act of submission, carried out in the sight of the very institution that had emerged stronger from the chaos. The ceremony continued for centuries. Attempts to end it met resistance. Some town leaders complained that it had become a public humiliation, sharpened by scholars who treated it as a moment for mockery. Yet the pattern held into the early nineteenth century, with 1825 often noted as the year when a mayor finally refused to perform it and the university chose not to insist. The St. Scholastica’s Day riot left Oxford scarred. Streets had run with blood. Halls had been burned or abandoned. Some scholars never returned. Town families grieved husbands, sons, and brothers. The physical damage could be repaired over time. The lingering suspicion between “town” and “gown” was slower to heal. Decades earlier, violence in Oxford had helped send scholars to Cambridge; now, once again, the city’s identity as a place of learning was entangled with stories of fire and fear. Yet the university endured, its privileges reinforced by royal decision and woven into law and ritual. The town, carrying both punishment and memory, continued to live beside it. Each Saint Scholastica’s Day, the echo of a riot long past was carried forward in a quiet walk to church, in coins laid down on an altar, in an oath repeated by leaders who had inherited a story they did not choose. Chunk 05A: Segue from Narrative to Modern Reflection The riot at Oxford ended with royal judgment, expanded university power, and a yearly ritual of submission that lasted nearly five hundred years. But the wound beneath the violence—the structure that created separate justice for separate people—was never truly healed. It was institutionalized. Today, we face our own version of that question: What happens when the church operates under different standards than the people around it? Chunk 05B: Cliffhanger Resolution We create the very resentment we're called to overcome. Chunk 06: Modern Church/Society Reflection The St. Scholastica's Day riot wasn't just about wine or tempers. It was about a system where students accused of theft might receive a penance while townspeople lost their hands. It was about watching privileged men hide behind church authority while bearing none of the consequences their neighbors faced daily. That structural inequality—legal, visible, and defended by both crown and church—turned ordinary frustration into lethal rage. The modern church doesn't claim benefit of clergy anymore. But we still create systems where leaders, institutions, or movements operate under different accountability structures than everyone else. We build organizations where misconduct by pastors is handled internally while staff are fired publicly. We establish giving structures that lack transparency, trusting that spiritual authority somehow replaces financial oversight. We ask for grace and patience from our communities while holding others to standards we don't apply to ourselves. When privilege becomes a shield rather than a responsibility, resentment doesn't stay theoretical. It becomes real—and it breaks trust in ways that take generations to rebuild. The question Oxford faced in 1355 hasn't disappeared. It's relocated. And the church must ask: Are we willing to live under the same standards of justice, accountability, and consequence that we ask of others? Chunk 07: Personal Reflection and Application This story pushes past organizational structures and asks something more personal: Where do you expect grace for yourself that you're not willing to extend to others? Where do you claim understanding for your failures while holding others to stricter judgment? The clerical privilege that fueled Oxford's violence wasn't just legal—it was relational. It was the daily assumption that "my status makes my mistakes different than yours." You and I live in that tension constantly. We ask our spouse to overlook our sharp tone while cataloging their irritability. We expect our boss to understand our lateness while resenting a coworker's. We want the church to be patient with our doubts while judging others for theirs. We build invisible systems of privilege in our homes, workplaces, and friendships—and then wonder why resentment grows. Walking with Jesus means laying down the assumption that we deserve different treatment. It means living under the same grace we preach, the same accountability we demand, the same honesty we ask others to show. It means refusing to let position, history, or spiritual language become a shield against the consequences of our choices. The riot at Oxford started with bad wine. But it exploded because years of separate standards had convinced one group they were above the rules. That pattern doesn't just destroy cities. It destroys marriages, friendships, and churches. And it starts with you and me, in the small daily choice to live like grace is for everyone—or just for us. Chunk 08: Verbatim Outro If this story of privilege and violence in medieval Oxford challenged or encouraged you, would you share it with someone who needs to hear it? And if COACH is helping you walk with Jesus, would you consider subscribing, leaving a review, or supporting this ministry? You can find book recommendations, episode transcripts, and ways to connect at ThatsJesus.org. I'm Bob Baulch. Thanks for listening. And on Wednesday, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD. Chunk 09A: Personal Humor I've never had wine bad enough to start a riot, but I have sent back coffee that made me seriously reconsider my tip—so I guess I understand the impulse, even if my follow-through is significantly less medieval. Chunk 09B: Personal Humanity I've spent too much of my life assuming that my mistakes deserved more patience than other people's, and watching that play out in my own relationships has been humbling in ways I didn't expect. Chunk 10: Quotes and Sources No direct quotes were used in Chunks 01A-08. The narrative is based on historical descriptions of documented events. All content reflects historically attested actions, contexts, and outcomes from the St. Scholastica's Day riot of 1355. Primary Historical Sources Consulted: * Medieval chronicles and university records documenting the riot and its aftermath * Royal charters and legal documents from Edward III's reign * Episcopal records regarding the interdict placed on Oxford Chunk 11: Contrary and Skeptical Sources 1. Revisionist historians argue that the riot's severity has been exaggerated by university chroniclers to justify expanded privileges and that town grievances were legitimate responses to genuine exploitation. (Academic historical revisionism regarding medieval university-town relations) 2. Some scholars suggest that the benefit of clergy system was necessary for maintaining educated clergy and that modern critiques impose anachronistic standards of justice on medieval social structures. (Medieval institutional apologetics) 3. Certain historians contend that the death toll was significantly lower than commonly reported and that the violence was comparable to other medieval urban conflicts rather than uniquely egregious. (Minimization of riot severity in comparative urban history) 4. Legal historians have argued that clerical privilege served important functions in preserving church autonomy from secular interference and shouldn't be judged solely by its social consequences. (Canon law apologetics) 5. Some accounts downplay the role of structural inequality, attributing the riot primarily to mob psychology and opportunistic violence rather than systemic grievances. (Psychological rather than structural interpretations) Chunk 12: Orthodox Sources Ancient (Pre-1500 AD) 1. Bede. Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Penguin Classics. (Historical context for clerical structures in England) 2. Gratian. Decretum Gratiani (Concordance of Discordant Canons). (Foundation of medieval canon law regarding clerical privilege) 3. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica. (Medieval theological framework for justice and authority) 4. Augustine of Hippo. City of God. Penguin Classics. ISBN: 978-0142437551. (Theological foundation for relationship between church and civil authority) 5. John of Salisbury. Policraticus. Cambridge University Press. (Medieval political philosophy and critique of clerical abuse) Chunk 13: Orthodox Sources Modern (1500 AD-Present) 1. Cobban, Alan B. The Medieval English Universities: Oxford and Cambridge to c. 1500. University of California Press, 1988. ISBN: 978-0520063518. 2. Rait, Robert S. Life in the Medieval University. Cambridge University Press, 1912. 3. Kerr, Ian, ed. A Companion to the Medieval English University. Brill, 2020. ISBN: 978-9004436244. 4. Rashdall, Hastings. The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. Oxford University Press, 1936. 5. Swanson, R.N. Church and Society in Late Medieval England. Blackwell, 1993. ISBN: 978-0631142867. 6. Southern, R.W. The Making of the Middle Ages. Yale University Press, 1953. ISBN: 978-0300002300. 7. Logan, F. Donald. A History of the Church in the Middle Ages. Routledge, 2002. ISBN: 978-0415132893. 8. Oakley, Francis. The Medieval Experience: Foundations of Western Cultural Singularity. University of Toronto Press, 1988. ISBN: 978-0802066992. 9. Catto, J.I., ed. The History of the University of Oxford, Vol. 1: The Early Oxford Schools. Oxford University Press, 1984. ISBN: 978-0198229698. 10. Kaye, Joel. A History of Balance, 1250-1375. Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN: 978-1107619524. (Medieval concepts of justice and equity) 11. Orme, Nicholas. Medieval Schools: From Roman Britain to Renaissance England. Yale University Press, 2006. ISBN: 978-0300111989. I CHUNK 14 – AMAZON AFFILIATE LINKS – VERBATIM As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. Studio Gear & Tools: Mics, interfaces, lights, and studio bits the practical kit behind the channel. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2JVFYS5WRTUVX?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2JVFYS5WRTUVX?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] Overflow & Supplemental Books: Overflow & special picks that pair with COACH episodes and study notes. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1SLMOKXPPYTQL?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1SLMOKXPPYTQL?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] Full-Scope Survey Shelf: Comprehensive spine shelf: general surveys covering the full 02000 arc. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/21O075P7LI81V?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/21O075P7LI81V?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] Reformations to Modern Day: Reformations, awakenings, world Christianity, and the modern church. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2YMN6OXBEXGHQ?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2YMN6OXBEXGHQ?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] Before 1500: Monastic movements, councils, scholastic thought, and global missions before 1500. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/31YCQ0B9JRS12?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/31YCQ0B9JRS12?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] Early Church Sources: Primary sources and top surveys from the apostolic era through the fall of Rome. https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/19YTUD4IK87DZ?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20 [https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/19YTUD4IK87DZ?ref=wlshare&tag=thatsjesuscha-20] CHUNK 15 – CREDITS – VERBATIM Credits Research, Writing, Editing, Hosting & Producing by: Bob Baulch Production Company: Thats Jesus Channel PRODUCTION NOTES: AI tools provide assistance, but the final product is fully credited to Bob Baulch, with all AI tools used under his direction and discretion. AI tools may include one or more of the following, depending on the episodes needs: ChatGPT (by OpenAI) Claude (by Anthropic) Copilot (by Microsoft) Gemini (by Google) Grok (by xAI) Perplexity (by Perplexity Inc.) These tools may assist with: Historical research, Organization and structure, Script drafting and refinement, Accuracy checks, Parameter compliance, Formatting and finalization, Full pre-publish verification All AI-generated suggestions were reviewed, edited, accepted or rejected, and fully approved by Bob Baulch. Sound and Visualization: Adobe Podcast Video Production (if applicable): Adobe Premiere Pro Digital License Audio 1: Background Music Background Music Soft Calm by INPLUSMUSIC Pixabay Content License Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii BMI IPI Number: 01055591064 Source: Pixabay Digital License Audio 2: Crescendo Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec by BurtySounds Pixabay Content License Source: Pixabay Production Note: All audio and video elements are added during post-production. Final historical accuracy, theological balance, and editorial decisions are the sole responsibility of Bob Baulch and Thats Jesus Channel.

12 feb 2026 - 17 min
aflevering FASTING DAY 25 BONUS - Modern Fasting - Recovery or Distortion artwork

FASTING DAY 25 BONUS - Modern Fasting - Recovery or Distortion

BONUS DAY 25: Modern Fasting – Recovery or Distortion? Description: Is the modern church recovering biblical fasting, or are we just baptizing diet culture? In this final bonus episode, Bob Baulch tackles the biggest controversies surrounding the modern fasting movement. We ask the hard questions: Is "Intermittent Fasting" (16:8) a spiritual discipline or just a weight-loss trend? Is a "Technology Fast" actually fasting, or just a digital break? We explore why giving up food must always be paired with prayer to be spiritual, otherwise, it is simply dieting [Source 8: 544-545]. We also confront the commercialization of the "Daniel Fast," exposing how companies exploit the desire to be faithful by selling expensive meal kits for a fast that is supposed to be about simplicity and self-denial [Source 8: 554]. Furthermore, we address a critical safety issue: the danger of religious fasting masking eating disorders within the church. We discuss how spiritual language can sometimes be used to justify destructive behavior and why God wants your heart, not your harm [Source 8: 556]. This finale challenges us to navigate these modern trends with discernment. We conclude with a final charge to make fasting a regular, secret, and humble part of your walk with God—ensuring that the fast remains the tool, and God remains the treasure [Source 8: 561-562]. Keywords: Modern fasting controversies, Christian intermittent fasting, social media fast, juice fast biblical, Daniel Fast commercialization, fasting and eating disorders, spiritual vs diet, 16:8 fasting Christian, technology detox.

11 feb 2026 - 25 min
aflevering 0105 - DEEP DIVE of Episode 16 - 410 AD - Augustine and the Sack of Rome artwork

0105 - DEEP DIVE of Episode 16 - 410 AD - Augustine and the Sack of Rome

Title: Deep Dive: 410 AD – Augustine and the Sack of Rome (Revisiting Ep 16) Description: In 410 AD, the invincible city of Rome was sacked by the Visigoths, shocking the ancient world and causing a massive crisis of faith. This episode explores how Augustine of Hippo responded to the panic when pagan leaders began blaming Christians for the disaster. We discuss the terror of the invasion after 800 years of safety and the pagan accusation that the old gods were angry. The story highlights Augustine’s masterpiece, The City of God, and his famous teaching on the "Two Cities"—the City of Man and the City of God. We also look at why he urged believers to live as pilgrims who anchor their hope in heaven rather than in earthly empires. If you feel anxious about the chaos in the world today, this episode offers a timeless reminder of where true security is found. We invite you to subscribe to COACH for more weekly stories from early church history. Augustine of Hippo, Sack of Rome, Alaric, Visigoths, City of God, fall of Rome, Christian history, early church, Bob Baulch, two cities theology #ChurchHistory #Christianity #COACH #DeepDive #Augustine #CityOfGod #Rome #Faith https://www.thatsjesus.org

11 feb 2026 - 32 min
Super app. Onthoud waar je bent gebleven en wat je interesses zijn. Heel veel keuze!
Super app. Onthoud waar je bent gebleven en wat je interesses zijn. Heel veel keuze!
Makkelijk in gebruik!
App ziet er mooi uit, navigatie is even wennen maar overzichtelijk.

Kies je abonnement

Meest populair

Premium

20 uur aan luisterboeken

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort

  • Geen advertenties in Podimo shows

  • Elk moment opzegbaar

Probeer 14 dagen gratis
Daarna € 9,99 / maand

Probeer gratis

Premium Plus

100 uur aan luisterboeken

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort

  • Geen advertenties in Podimo shows

  • Elk moment opzegbaar

Probeer 30 dagen gratis
Daarna € 13,99 / maand

Probeer gratis

Alleen bij Podimo

Populaire luisterboeken

Veelgestelde vragen

Meer vragen & antwoorden
Probeer gratis

Probeer 14 dagen gratis. € 9,99 / maand na proefperiode. Elk moment opzegbaar.