Omslagafbeelding van de show Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Podcast door Christopher Appiah-Thompson

Engels

Nieuws & Politiek

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

€ 9,99 / maand na proefperiode.Elk moment opzegbaar.

  • 20 uur luisterboeken / maand
  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort
  • Gratis podcasts
Probeer gratis

Over Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Dr. Christopher Appiah-Thompson’s emphasis on political culture and traditional leadership offers a powerful lens for rethinking constitutional reform, peacebuilding, and electoral design in African countries. He argues that elections without legitimacy or fairness can entrench authoritarianism or spark violence. Cultural norms must underpin democratic practiceWhy Appiah-Thompson’s Framework Works• It moves beyond Western institutionalism, showing how democracy in Africa is shaped by culture, history, and informal authority.• It offers a more accurate lens for policy and peacebuilding, especially in regions where the state is weak or contested.• It encourages rethinking democratic legitimacy, not just as legal compliance but as cultural resonance.Appiah-Thompson’s emphasis on political culture and traditional leadership applies powerfully to Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa, where informal institutions continue to shape democratic outcomes, mediate conflict, and legitimize governance.

Alle afleveringen

10 afleveringen

aflevering When Courts Dare to Dissent: Judicial Independence and the Power to Strike Down Laws artwork

When Courts Dare to Dissent: Judicial Independence and the Power to Strike Down Laws

Welcome back to the show. Today’s episode dives into a puzzle at the heart of constitutional democracy: why do some courts boldly strike down controversial laws, while others, facing similar laws, hold back. Scholars usually answer with one phrase—judicial independence—the idea that judges need protection from political pressure in order to make tough decisions against the government of the day. Across the next ten minutes, this episode has three goals. First, to unpack what judicial independence really means in practice, and how it differs from judicial review itself. Second, to explain the article’s core claim that independence should be treated as a conditional factor that moderates the relationship between ideology and decisions, rather than just another additive variable in our models. Third, to explore what this conditional view tells us about famous US Supreme Court cases on important federal statutes, and what it implies for anyone who wants courts to both protect rights and remain accountable

10 jan 2026 - 5 min
Super app. Onthoud waar je bent gebleven en wat je interesses zijn. Heel veel keuze!
Super app. Onthoud waar je bent gebleven en wat je interesses zijn. Heel veel keuze!
Makkelijk in gebruik!
App ziet er mooi uit, navigatie is even wennen maar overzichtelijk.

Kies je abonnement

Meest populair

Premium

20 uur aan luisterboeken

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort

  • Geen advertenties in Podimo shows

  • Elk moment opzegbaar

Probeer 14 dagen gratis
Daarna € 9,99 / maand

Probeer gratis

Premium Plus

Onbeperkt luisterboeken

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort

  • Geen advertenties in Podimo shows

  • Elk moment opzegbaar

Probeer 14 dagen gratis
Daarna € 13,99 / maand

Probeer gratis

Alleen bij Podimo

Populaire luisterboeken

Veelgestelde vragen

Meer vragen & antwoorden
Probeer gratis

Probeer 14 dagen gratis. € 9,99 / maand na proefperiode. Elk moment opzegbaar.