Intellectual Property | SnIPpets | Fieldfisher

Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

4 min · 3. mai 2023
episode Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch cover

Beskrivelse

Fieldfisher IP expert and director, Sheena Sheikh Brown [https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/people/sheena-sheikh-brown], summarises the weighty decision of Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/2695.html] [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch) in this 5 minute SnIPpets podcast.   In brief, in 2022, the UK High Court dismissed a detailed copyright claim brought by the great-niece of Boris Pasternak (author of Doctor Zhivago), that a substantial part of the "selection, structure and arrangement of facts and incidents" in her biographical work about Boris's muse were copied by the author of a work of historical fiction. The Court did however find infringement of an extract from a translation of another work.

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til å kommentere

Registrer deg nå og bli medlem av Intellectual Property | SnIPpets | Fieldfisher sitt community!

Prøv gratis

Prøv gratis i 14 dager

99 kr / Måned etter prøveperioden. · Avslutt når som helst.

  • Eksklusive podkaster
  • 20 timer lydbøker i måneden
  • Gratis podkaster

Alle episoder

6 Episoder

episode Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch cover

Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

Fieldfisher IP expert and director, Sheena Sheikh Brown [https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/people/sheena-sheikh-brown], summarises the weighty decision of Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/2695.html] [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch) in this 5 minute SnIPpets podcast.   In brief, in 2022, the UK High Court dismissed a detailed copyright claim brought by the great-niece of Boris Pasternak (author of Doctor Zhivago), that a substantial part of the "selection, structure and arrangement of facts and incidents" in her biographical work about Boris's muse were copied by the author of a work of historical fiction. The Court did however find infringement of an extract from a translation of another work.

3. mai 20234 min