The BMK Vision Podcast

#106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?" | BMK Vision Roundtable

26 min · 6. juli 2026
episode #106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?" | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

Beskrivelse

"I've been giving onboarding away for years and I close a lot of deals. My competitors who charge for it lose deals. So why would I fix something that doesn't seem broken? What am I actually missing?" That's the listener question. In this Roundtable episode of The BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson and Gary Boyle answer it directly — and the answer is not what the asker wants to hear. Giving away onboarding feels like a sales strategy. It is actually a positioning decision. Gary's first move is to stop the framing: how do you know that was why you won? How do you know the competitors who charge are actually losing those deals? The asker has built a sales story on data he does not have. And underneath the sales story is a structural problem he has not named — when an owner gives onboarding away, the operating reality is almost always that there is no real onboarding to give. The free price tag is the financial signature of the work that never got built. The episode walks through the new-MSP client who could not sell until he had a real offer to put in front of prospects, the doctor-patient frame for what buyers are actually paying for, why one month of recurring revenue is a number not attached to reality, and the close that names the whole frame: the thing that works in the short term is not the thing that works in the long term. 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - Sales strategy or positioning decision — which choice are you actually making? - "How do you know that's why you won?" — the question the asker has not answered - Free onboarding usually means there is no onboarding - The new-MSP client who could not sell until he had a real offer - Assessment, onboarding, support — one system, not three - Scoping onboarding like a project, not pricing it like a discount - The doctor-patient frame for what the buyer is actually paying for - The trap — if you give it away, you better actually do the work - Selling the assessment first, not the MSP proposal - Why the thing that works in the short term is not the thing that works in the long term ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP onboarding, MSP free onboarding, MSP onboarding fee, MSP assessment, MSP discovery, MSP sales process, MSP positioning, MSP pricing strategy, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?"

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til å kommentere

Registrer deg nå og bli medlem av The BMK Vision Podcast sitt community!

Prøv gratis

Prøv gratis i 14 dager

99 kr / Måned etter prøveperioden. · Avslutt når som helst.

  • Eksklusive podkaster
  • 20 timer lydbøker i måneden
  • Gratis podkaster

Alle episoder

98 Episoder

episode #106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?" | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

#106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?" | BMK Vision Roundtable

"I've been giving onboarding away for years and I close a lot of deals. My competitors who charge for it lose deals. So why would I fix something that doesn't seem broken? What am I actually missing?" That's the listener question. In this Roundtable episode of The BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson and Gary Boyle answer it directly — and the answer is not what the asker wants to hear. Giving away onboarding feels like a sales strategy. It is actually a positioning decision. Gary's first move is to stop the framing: how do you know that was why you won? How do you know the competitors who charge are actually losing those deals? The asker has built a sales story on data he does not have. And underneath the sales story is a structural problem he has not named — when an owner gives onboarding away, the operating reality is almost always that there is no real onboarding to give. The free price tag is the financial signature of the work that never got built. The episode walks through the new-MSP client who could not sell until he had a real offer to put in front of prospects, the doctor-patient frame for what buyers are actually paying for, why one month of recurring revenue is a number not attached to reality, and the close that names the whole frame: the thing that works in the short term is not the thing that works in the long term. 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - Sales strategy or positioning decision — which choice are you actually making? - "How do you know that's why you won?" — the question the asker has not answered - Free onboarding usually means there is no onboarding - The new-MSP client who could not sell until he had a real offer - Assessment, onboarding, support — one system, not three - Scoping onboarding like a project, not pricing it like a discount - The doctor-patient frame for what the buyer is actually paying for - The trap — if you give it away, you better actually do the work - Selling the assessment first, not the MSP proposal - Why the thing that works in the short term is not the thing that works in the long term ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP onboarding, MSP free onboarding, MSP onboarding fee, MSP assessment, MSP discovery, MSP sales process, MSP positioning, MSP pricing strategy, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #106 - "Why Would I Fix Something That Isn't Broken?"

6. juli 202626 min
episode #105 - "I've Tried Twice. Both Times Something Blew Up." | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

#105 - "I've Tried Twice. Both Times Something Blew Up." | BMK Vision Roundtable

"Do either of you actually believe an owner can fully get out of the day-to-day of an MSP and not have it fall apart? I've tried twice. Both times something blew up and I had to come back in." That's the question a listener sent. In this Roundtable episode of The BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson and Gary Boyle answer it directly — yes, it's possible — and then walk through why the asker's two attempts didn't hold. Getting out of the day-to-day isn't a decision. It's a construction. The owner who never asked "how do I get big enough that I don't have to do everything," and instead just asked "I want to get big, full stop" — that owner gets there. The owner who treats stepping back as a single decision typically watches the structure underneath them collapse at the first stress test. Gary's line lands the whole question: yeah, your business is doing fine. Let me know what happens after your first hire. The first hire is when the game changes — and the structure most owners need to build before that hire never gets built. They train the task without transferring the accountability for the outcome. Six months later something blows up, the owner re-engages, the cycle repeats. 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - The listener question — two failed attempts, and whether it's even possible - Why getting out of the day-to-day is a construction, not a decision - "Let me know what happens after your first hire" — the line that changes the game - Why most owners arrive at this through pain, not planning - The peer-group catalyst — EO, BMK Community, exposure to what's possible - The gestalt method — experience share over prescriptive advice - The phone-off-for-four-hours diagnostic - Training the task vs. transferring the outcome - Loom-recorded SOPs and the addictive feeling of giving work away - Builders vs. billers — making every seat's role legible - Close — it feels less like stepping back, more like building something strong enough to hold ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP owner out of day to day, MSP owner step back, MSP first hire, MSP SOP, MSP delegation, MSP strategic plan, MSP peer group, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #105 - "I've Tried Twice. Both Times Something Blew Up."

29. juni 202622 min
episode #104 - "I Didn't Get Into This Company to Pay Myself Less." | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

#104 - "I Didn't Get Into This Company to Pay Myself Less." | BMK Vision Roundtable

"I didn't get into this company to pay myself less." That was the disdainful read from one partner in a three-person MSP partnership when the advice came up to cut owner W-2 and tie additional comp to profit. In this Roundtable episode of The BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson and Gary Boyle take the position apart and walk through why the cut is not punitive — it's diagnostic. The W-2 floor that covers the owner's household nut is the same floor that mutes every signal the P&L is sending. Year after year of substandard profit becomes background noise because the W-2 number keeps moving. At some point the owner forgets how the business actually makes money. The cut is the only thing that makes the next unbilled hour, the next un-captured product cost, the next half-point of service salary feel real again. Gary's reframe lands harder underneath the math: are we actually owners — or employees who happen to own the company? 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - Why owner-comp conversations always get uncomfortable — and what the discomfort is actually about - The W-2 floor that covers the nut and mutes the P&L - Josh's BMK confession — "you've forgotten how your business makes money" - The write-off mindset and the 35% reality most owners get wrong - The 33% service-salaries lever — bombastic for years, ignored because of the $12K paycheck - "I could go make 300K" — the math owners assert but never run - The recapture-the-signal exercise — the cut paycheck as diagnostic - Are we actually owners — or employees who happen to own the company? - The sub-$3M owner-as-billable-resource trap - "You didn't build this company to pay yourself — you built it to actually build something" ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP owner compensation, MSP owner pay, MSP W-2 vs distribution, MSP partnership comp, MSP P&L discipline, MSP under 3 million, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #104 - "I Didn't Get Into This Company to Pay Myself Less."

22. juni 202628 min
episode #103 - "I Fired a $15K Client and I'm Pissed I Did It." | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

#103 - "I Fired a $15K Client and I'm Pissed I Did It." | BMK Vision Roundtable

"I fired a client doing 15 grand a month. I've replaced maybe half of it so far, and I'm kind of pissed about it." That question came out of a peer-group room, and it is the most common form of buyer's remorse in MSP ownership. In this Roundtable episode of The BMK Vision Podcast, Josh and Gary walk through why the regret is almost always a measurement problem, not a decision problem. The short answer: you were not supposed to replace the revenue. You were supposed to replace the gross profit. At BMK's 65 percent AGP target, a fired $15K client running at 35 percent AGP becomes two $4K clients — same gross profit, less servicing load, less capacity drag. Underneath the math, the deeper truths land: top-line revenue lies, net profit lies, AGP per account is the tell. And the toxic client tax — the cultural drag on the team — almost never shows up in the financial review that justified the fire in the first place. 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - Why the regret is a math problem, not a decision problem - Replace the gross profit, not the revenue - The BMK 65 percent AGP target — and what it means for replacement math - The two-lever rule — bad client and bad profit both have to be true - The $5M ego anchor — and why owners protect the round number - Gary's $17M client and the "would you start this business today?" reframe - The "fire some technicians" gift — the recalibration owners usually avoid - Everyone gets paid except the owner — the quietly damaging norm - The toxic client tax — culture drag never shows up on the P&L - Hard call vs bad call — the two feel identical for the first six months ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP fire bad client, MSP gross profit, AGP, MSP owner pay, MSP P&L review, MSP toxic client, MSP under 5 million, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #103 - "I Fired a $15K Client and I'm Pissed I Did It."

15. juni 202628 min
episode #102 - "Why Would I Hire Someone Who Doesn't Know What They're Doing?" | BMK Vision Roundtable cover

#102 - "Why Would I Hire Someone Who Doesn't Know What They're Doing?" | BMK Vision Roundtable

"Hire green and train them up is a cop out." A frenemy of the show sent that line in an email, and Josh and Gary spend this Roundtable episode taking the position apart. The senior MSP sales hire most owners are chasing is a unicorn — and even if one exists, the affordability math rarely supports it. In this conversation, Josh and Gary walk through the harder truth underneath the senior-hire fantasy: below five million in revenue, you don't know what good looks like, and you will be tricked. Salary surfers, the pedestal-prevents-accountability dynamic, and the ninety-thousand-dollar mistake that drags on for six months — all of it is real, all of it is common, and all of it points toward the same answer. 🎙 What We Cover in This Episode - Why the senior MSP sales unicorn is mostly fantasy - The affordability matrix — percent of revenue, not revenue they generate - You don't know what good looks like — and how that trips every interview - Salary surfers and the pedestal-prevents-accountability dynamic - Why the owner is the de facto closer and what to actually delegate - Opener vs closer — the role split that fits a 1–5 person sales team - Where to find green talent — military, athletes, waiters, daily life - Always be interviewing — the fortitude move that keeps you out of hostage situations ⸻ 👤 Host Links Josh Peterson: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshdpeterson/ Gary Boyle: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garyboyle/ ⸻ 🚀 Subscribe & Follow BMK Vision YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@beringmckinleyvision?sub_confirmation=1 Vision Platform: https://beringmckinley.com/vision Apply to Be a Guest: https://beringmckinley.com/blog#speaker-form ⸻ 🔎 SEO Keywords MSP sales hire, MSP appointment setter, hire green sales, owner-led sales, MSP sales process, opener vs closer, MSP under 5 million, MSP roundtable, BMK Vision Podcast, Bering McKinley 📝 Credits Host: Josh Peterson Co-Host: Gary Boyle Producer: Bering McKinley Episode: #102 - "Why Would I Hire Someone Who Doesn't Know What They're Doing?"

8. juni 202631 min