Winners' Circle
Katy Irving and Rory Mitchell are helping HRW, Healthcare Research Worldwide, explore a new way to understand one of the most important moments in healthcare: the doctor patient consultation. HRW recently won an AI Excellence Award for its work using interactive AI avatars to simulate consultation conversations in pharmaceutical market research. In this episode, Russ, Katy, and Rory explore why real doctor patient conversations are so difficult to study. Katy explains how those moments inside the consultation room are often the “holy grail” for pharma and medtech companies because they reveal how doctors ask questions, how patients describe symptoms, and how treatment decisions begin to take shape. They dive into HRW’s AI avatar project, which uses an avatar to play one side of the consultation while a real doctor or patient interacts with it. The goal is not to replace clinicians, but to create a more realistic research simulation that can uncover the actual language, questions, concerns, and behaviors that emerge in healthcare conversations. The conversation also covers the technical and ethical challenges of building avatars that behave like doctors or patients. Rory shares how the team had to carefully limit the doctor avatar to avoid medical advice, while also giving patient avatars enough personality, emotion, and realism to feel believable without becoming unpredictable. Along the way, Katy and Rory discuss avatar bugs, emotional realism, patient trust, the uncanny valley, self-funded innovation, conference reactions, cross-functional teamwork, training applications, and how AI avatars could help researchers, clients, and healthcare teams better understand the conversations that shape patient care. Topics Covered: [00:01] Welcome and intro, Katy Irving, Rory Mitchell, HRW, and the AI Excellence Award win [00:43] What Healthcare Research Worldwide does in pharma and medtech research [01:00] Why doctor patient consultations are so valuable to understand [01:30] Why real consultations are difficult to simulate in research [02:00] Using interactive AI avatars to play one side of a consultation [02:39] Why old research workarounds often fell short [03:06] Compliance, ethics, and brand-specific consultation simulations [04:22] Building doctor and patient avatars with different guardrails [04:46] Why the doctor avatar had to avoid medical recommendations [05:30] Creating patient avatars with personality, history, and emotion [06:30] Testing, refining, and “parenting” the avatars into better behavior [08:45] Why consultation insights matter for pharma strategy [10:03] What HRW underestimated when building the avatar experience [10:27] Platform bugs, delayed answers, and strange conversation paths [13:23] How HRW defined success in a self-funded proof of concept [14:30] The first successful doctor and avatar interaction [15:32] How patients reacted to avatar doctors [16:00] Testing different tones, including neutral, empathetic, and friend-like avatars [17:07] Why HRW shared failures and funny moments with the industry [19:25] The line between realistic enough and misleadingly real [20:33] Why HRW is not trying to replace doctors or nurses with avatars [21:55] How the cross-functional team shaped the project [23:36] Combining technology, behavioral science, and patient research perspectives [24:33] Future uses for AI avatars beyond consultation simulation [24:44] Using avatars as interactive research deliverables for clients [25:30] Training applications for medical and professional conversations [26:26] Using doctor avatars to understand product language and peer conversations [26:57] Final thoughts on AI avatars and the hidden world of healthcare research
80 Episoder
Kommentarer
0Vær den første til å kommentere
Registrer deg nå og bli medlem av Winners' Circle sitt community!