Asian Education Podcast
Quantitative ethnography and educational research In this episode, concluding our mini-series introducing special issues of the Journal of International Cooperation in Education, Edward Vickers talks to Belle Dang, Andy Nguyen and Eric Hamilton about their work on quantitative ethnography. They begin by explaining what quantitative ethnography (QE) is, and why they see it as especially useful for educational researchers working in low- and middle-income countries. QE refers to methods of quantifying data from what is typically viewed as the inherently qualitative field of ethnography. It enables researchers to visually map or tabulate this data in ways that may be both illuminating for scholars, and readily understandable or persuasive to non-academic audiences such as policymakers, administrators or educational practitioners. The discussion then turns to the article by Belle, Andy and their co-authors on the ‘digital transformation’ of Vietnamese higher education. As Andy and Belle explain, this research was prompted by their experience of the Covid-19 pandemic and the strains this placed upon higher education in Vietnam. As elsewhere, in Vietnam policymakers and educators responded to these strains in part by accelerating the adoption of digital technology for instructional use. In this study, the authors compare the approaches to digital technology in the higher education sector during and after the pandemic, using ‘epistemic network analysis’ to quantify and visually map the patterns and connections between ideas in relevant documents. In their research on the take-up of digital technology in Vietnamese higher education, Belle, Andy and their team found that the focus shifted from primarily technical considerations during the pandemic to more searching reflection on the purpose and appropriate uses of the technology during the post-pandemic period. Faced with the immediate crisis of Covid-19, the sector rushed to expand digital infrastructure and put in place the necessary administrative framework, perhaps without a very sophisticated or secure understanding of the technology’s potential and limitations. However, once the emergency was over, more attention was directed towards elaborating a ‘vision’ for the collaborative use of digital technology in higher education. Nevertheless, the overall impression that emerges from the study of Vietnam is of general enthusiasm there for digital technology - at least among policymakers and university administrators. This episode concludes with some discussion of whether Andy, Belle or their colleagues encountered any scepticism concerning the merits of this rush to digitalise, or any wider public debate over the potential disadvantages of an excessive reliance on digital technology in higher education, or more generally. Related Readings: Hamilton E, Espino DP, Lee S, Lux K (2025), "Editorial: Quantitative ethnography in education research and evaluation in low- and middle-income nations". Journal of International Cooperation in Education, Vol. 27 No. 2 pp. 81–85, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICE-08-2025-064 [https://doi.org/10.1108/JICE-08-2025-064] Nguyen, HL; Dang, B; Hong, Y; Nguyen, A (2025), "Digital transformation in Vietnamese higher education: an epistemic network analysis of policy documents". Journal of International Cooperation in Education, Vol. 27 No. 2 pp. 138–156, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICE-03-2024-0010 [https://doi.org/10.1108/JICE-03-2024-0010]
53 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der Asian Education Podcast-Community!