Dr. Niklas: Venture Grade

DN #21: Recruiter as a Service & Why Juniors Belong in an Office (w/ Adomas Pranevicius)

39 min Ā· Gestern
Episode DN #21: Recruiter as a Service & Why Juniors Belong in an Office (w/ Adomas Pranevicius) Cover

Beschreibung

"If you're a junior, you should go work in an office." I talk to Adomas, founder of Remotely Talents, about why remote teams are going senior-only in the AI era, and what that does to everyone trying to get their first job. Adomas spent 10 years running a beverage company in Lithuania, sold it, ran e-commerce supplement brands, then built a remote recruitment agency on a "recruiter as a service" model that drops the 20-35% placement fees. We get into where US companies are actually hiring now, why dev roles collapsed as a share of his placements, and the four-year SEO grind behind most of his leads. In this episode: - Recruiter as a Service: Why he ditched 20-35% placement fees for a flat monthly model that stops when the role is filled. - The LatAm Shift: Why 65-70% of US remote roles now go to Latin America, and why the Philippines wave faded. - Senior-Only Remote: Why he refuses to place juniors in remote roles, and what that means for how people get experience. - The Dev Hiring Collapse: Why tech roles fell from 80% of his placements to under 10%, while marketing took over. - Google Is a Backlinks Network: The four-year organic SEO grind behind most of his leads, and why GPT traffic is following. - Where Paid Ads Break: $7k burned on Google search, bot-filled X ads, and the channels he'd actually bet on. - Remote Onboarding: Why remote hires churn when companies skip the work of making them feel part of the team. - The AI Squeeze: Smaller senior teams, AI-augmented hires, and the coaching academy he just launched for displaced juniors. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Should juniors really start in an office, or is remote-first still possible for entry level? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #RemoteWork #Hiring #Recruitment #RemotelyTalents #Adomas #LatAm #SEO #AIandJobs #Startups Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:22 What Remotely Talents does: recruiter as a service 1:34 How traditional placement fees work, and why he rejects them 3:05 Is remote hiring actually slowing down? 6:19 What companies get wrong about return-to-office 7:32 The biggest remote onboarding mistakes 11:02 From a beverage company to remote recruitment 14:36 Building the brand on organic traffic over four years 15:16 "Google is a backlinks network": the SEO playbook 18:01 Paid ads: Google search, X, and what actually works 21:20 How AI is reshaping the hiring landscape 24:37 Building funnels solo with AI, and the junior problem 28:55 Which regions are most in demand now 31:04 Why dev roles fell from 80% to under 10% 34:49 The remote hiring process, step by step

Kommentare

0

Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert

Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der Dr. Niklas: Venture Grade-Community!

Loslegen

2 Monate für 1 €

Dann 4,99 € / Monat Ā· Jederzeit kündbar.

  • Podcasts nur bei Podimo
  • 20 Stunden Hƶrbücher / Monat
  • Alle kostenlosen Podcasts

Alle Folgen

21 Folgen

Episode DN #21: Recruiter as a Service & Why Juniors Belong in an Office (w/ Adomas Pranevicius) Cover

DN #21: Recruiter as a Service & Why Juniors Belong in an Office (w/ Adomas Pranevicius)

"If you're a junior, you should go work in an office." I talk to Adomas, founder of Remotely Talents, about why remote teams are going senior-only in the AI era, and what that does to everyone trying to get their first job. Adomas spent 10 years running a beverage company in Lithuania, sold it, ran e-commerce supplement brands, then built a remote recruitment agency on a "recruiter as a service" model that drops the 20-35% placement fees. We get into where US companies are actually hiring now, why dev roles collapsed as a share of his placements, and the four-year SEO grind behind most of his leads. In this episode: - Recruiter as a Service: Why he ditched 20-35% placement fees for a flat monthly model that stops when the role is filled. - The LatAm Shift: Why 65-70% of US remote roles now go to Latin America, and why the Philippines wave faded. - Senior-Only Remote: Why he refuses to place juniors in remote roles, and what that means for how people get experience. - The Dev Hiring Collapse: Why tech roles fell from 80% of his placements to under 10%, while marketing took over. - Google Is a Backlinks Network: The four-year organic SEO grind behind most of his leads, and why GPT traffic is following. - Where Paid Ads Break: $7k burned on Google search, bot-filled X ads, and the channels he'd actually bet on. - Remote Onboarding: Why remote hires churn when companies skip the work of making them feel part of the team. - The AI Squeeze: Smaller senior teams, AI-augmented hires, and the coaching academy he just launched for displaced juniors. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Should juniors really start in an office, or is remote-first still possible for entry level? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #RemoteWork #Hiring #Recruitment #RemotelyTalents #Adomas #LatAm #SEO #AIandJobs #Startups Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:22 What Remotely Talents does: recruiter as a service 1:34 How traditional placement fees work, and why he rejects them 3:05 Is remote hiring actually slowing down? 6:19 What companies get wrong about return-to-office 7:32 The biggest remote onboarding mistakes 11:02 From a beverage company to remote recruitment 14:36 Building the brand on organic traffic over four years 15:16 "Google is a backlinks network": the SEO playbook 18:01 Paid ads: Google search, X, and what actually works 21:20 How AI is reshaping the hiring landscape 24:37 Building funnels solo with AI, and the junior problem 28:55 Which regions are most in demand now 31:04 Why dev roles fell from 80% to under 10% 34:49 The remote hiring process, step by step

Gestern39 min
Episode DN #20: The Distribution Wedge, Vibe Coding Traps & Pot Odds in Pre-Seed (w/ Martin Tobias) Cover

DN #20: The Distribution Wedge, Vibe Coding Traps & Pot Odds in Pre-Seed (w/ Martin Tobias)

"Don't show me a TAM slide. Show me 200 customer discovery calls and 20 people on a waitlist." I talk to Martin Tobias, founder and managing partner of Incisive Ventures, about why distribution is the only real moat left now that anyone can build software. Martin went from Accenture and Microsoft to founding three companies (taking one public as the last IPO of the dot-com boom) and 250+ angel investments before launching his pre-seed fund. Martin walks through how he reads a founder in five minutes after 20,000 CEO meetings, why he spends three weeks on a PRD before letting Claude or Replit touch the code, and why the application layer will end up three to five times bigger than AI infrastructure. In this episode: - The Distribution Wedge: Why getting your product in front of customers is the only moat left when anyone can build the product. - Don't Believe Your Own Hype: The $2B market cap on $10M of revenue, and the lesson he took from the dot-com peak. - The 5-Minute Read: Why 20,000 CEO meetings let him pattern-match a top-10% founder almost instantly. - Vibe Coding's Data Model Trap: Why he now front-loads a PRD and data model before vibe coding anything past a dashboard. - The Death of the Junior Dev: Why a portfolio company fired three juniors to hire one senior, and the "how does anyone become senior?" problem. - SaaS vs Labor: Why a $300B software market is really chasing a $4.5T labor expense. - The First Five Hires: Why he avoids solo founders and never hires straight from big tech. - Pot Odds in Pre-Seed: The poker math behind making bets you lose 90% of the time. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Is distribution really the only moat left, or does product still win? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #PreSeed #VentureCapital #MartinTobias #IncisiveVentures #VibeCoding #B2BSaaS #AngelInvesting #Startups #AI Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:24 From Accenture and Microsoft to founder to VC 4:13 "Don't believe your own hype": $2B cap on $10M revenue 5:20 Backing Google as an LP, DocuSign, and finding his B2B lane 7:36 The biggest mistakes first-time angels make 9:37 Reading a founder in five minutes after 20,000 CEOs 11:55 Why distribution is the only moat now software is cheap 13:36 The deal flow matching problem & InvestorMatch.Pro [http://InvestorMatch.Pro] 15:19 Replit vs Claude Code: 450k lines for $10k 18:21 Why you need a PRD before vibe coding 21:00 The death of the junior developer 24:32 SaaS is $300B, labor is $4.5T 32:18 The first five hires & why he avoids solo founders 38:50 Application layer vs infrastructure layer 45:00 Poker, pot odds & the asymmetry of venture

9. Juni 202648 min
Episode DN #19: Vibe Coding Slop, Full-Stack Designers & Distribution as Product (w/ Jacob Counsell) Cover

DN #19: Vibe Coding Slop, Full-Stack Designers & Distribution as Product (w/ Jacob Counsell)

"Distribution is a nightmare for everybody. But secretly, it's a product problem." I talk to Jacob Counsell, product designer of 15 years in Silicon Valley tech and founder of LaunchChair.io [http://LaunchChair.io], about why most vibe-coded apps feel broken after four months, why designers will touch code again after a decade of being told not to, and why founders complaining about distribution usually have a product problem they're afraid to admit. Jacob breaks down the wedge LaunchChair plays in the vibe-coding space, the spec-aware prompt engine behind it, and why he thinks a team of three with agents now ships what fifty people shipped three years ago. In this episode: - Vibe Coding Slop: Why most Lovable and Bolt apps feel broken after four months of building. - Distribution as Product: Why founders blaming distribution usually have a product problem they're afraid to name. - The Full-Stack Designer Returns: Why designers will touch a lot more code in the AI era. - The HCI Overcorrection: How we stopped hiring weirdos from art school and the internet got boring. - The 5-Person Team Thesis: How a team of three with agents now ships what fifty people shipped three years ago. - LaunchChair's Wedge: A spec-aware prompt engine that forces functioning features instead of broken Lovable mockups. - The Silofication Problem: Why big tech ships bugs that sit unfixed for two-plus years. - Baseline + A/B Testing: Why endless user research before launch is a trap, and what to do instead. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Should designers touch code in the AI era? Where do you land? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #VibeCoding #ProductDesign #JacobCounsell #LaunchChair #Founders #AI #StartupBuilding #Distribution #Designers Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:29 Why Jacob built LaunchChair: a wedge into the vibe-coding slop problem 2:08 Being technical + design: the full-stack designer advantage 3:30 How AI tools changed product design in the last year 4:30 The HCI overcorrection: why we stopped hiring weirdos from art school 6:38 Distribution is a nightmare — but secretly, it's a product problem 9:00 Agent orchestration for LinkedIn (without becoming a Claude Slop Cannon) 11:55 The full-stack designer is back: designers will touch a lot more code 15:23 Smaller teams, fewer silos: why a team of 3 ships what 50 used to 18:35 When a fast-and-loose team works (and when it doesn't) 22:58 Baseline + A/B testing beats endless user research 24:09 LaunchChair's wedge: spec-aware prompts that build functioning features 28:59 BuildHop and PromptJoy: two side products dogfooded with LaunchChair 33:50 Why most vibe-coded apps look broken (the load-more example) 35:30 Acceptance criteria + remediation prompts: how LaunchChair fixes hallucinations 35:57 The future of design: designers shipping production-ready features

2. Juni 202639 min
Episode DN #18: Dirty Jobs, AI Robotics & Why Humanoids Are a Pipe Dream (w/ Jay Kapoor) Cover

DN #18: Dirty Jobs, AI Robotics & Why Humanoids Are a Pipe Dream (w/ Jay Kapoor)

"Why would you give a robot human weaknesses?" I talk to Jay Kapoor, co-founder and general partner of VSC Ventures, about the "dirty, dusty, and dangerous" industries that VCs keep skipping over and why he thinks humanoid robots are the wrong bet. Jay started his career at the NFL and Madison Square Garden before spending 11 years investing in seed-stage companies, and now backs founders building AI and robotics for the deskless workers powering $80T of global GDP. Jay walks through why 90% of US factories still don't have a single robot in 2026, why the death of systems integrators is opening a massive deployment gap, and why the next great founders no longer need a decade in their industry to build in it. In this episode: - The DDD Thesis: Why dirty, dusty, and dangerous industries are the most underpriced sector in venture today. - The 90% Factory Gap: Why 9 out of 10 US factories still don't have a single robot in 2026. - The Death of Systems Integrators: Who's responsible for actually deploying robots when the consultants disappear. - Why Humanoids Are a Pipe Dream: The case for purpose-built robotics over Optimus and Figure. - The 500% Turnover Job: Recycling sorters quit before they find their parking spot, and why automation is the only fix. - The 4-to-1 Electrician Shortage: Why Jensen Huang says plumbers and electricians are the bottleneck on AI compute. - Founder-Led Storytelling in VC: Why VSC Ventures runs a 30-person PR agency for portfolio companies. - Founder-Market Fit Is Dead: Why a decade in an industry is no longer required to build in it. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Humanoid robots: pipe dream or future of labor? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #Robotics #AI #VC #VSCVentures #DataCenters #Manufacturing #Tradespeople #Startups #Founders Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:35 The DDD thesis: dirty, dusty, dangerous industries explained 4:04 Why labor shortages + generational ownership shifts + AI converge into the opportunity 4:58 From the NFL to backing robots: Jay's path through media into venture 6:52 Building VSC Ventures around founder-led storytelling 9:35 Why founder-CEOs becoming industry champions is the new playbook 12:35 Why most VCs miss DDD opportunities (and how that creates pricing alpha) 16:13 Why fundraises are now won by speed of execution mid-process 19:28 Where capital is still underfunded: implementation, not robots 21:30 The 90% gap: why most US factories still have zero robots 23:39 The data center bottleneck and SoftBank's $40B automation bet 24:22 Why Jay is skeptical about data centers in space 32:42 Humanoid robots: pipe dream or the future of labor? 35:45 Purpose-built vs general-purpose robots in industrial settings 38:45 Where the worst labor shortages will hit next: electricians and plumbers 41:49 Where to find Jay: Twitter, LinkedIn, and the Climb show

26. Mai 202642 min
Episode DN #17: AI Sentence DNA, Voice as the Last Moat & Audience-First Building (w/ Sadok Hasan) Cover

DN #17: AI Sentence DNA, Voice as the Last Moat & Audience-First Building (w/ Sadok Hasan)

"Voice is the last moat." I talk to Sadok, growth and AI operator and founder of Bloomberry, about why the next defensible thing for solo founders isn't a feature but their authentic voice. Sadok spent the last decade running paid growth at Air Wallex, Pure Storage, Procore and Google before bootstrapping Bloomberry, an end-to-end content distribution system that learns your voice over time and writes in it. Bloomberry's research has identified 7,000+ cadences, structures, and phrases that AI consistently uses, and Saduk thinks killing those patterns is the difference between content that converts and content that gets scrolled past. In this episode: - AI Sentence DNA: The 7,000+ cadences and phrases that flag AI-generated content (and how to strip them out). - Voice as the Last Moat: Why authentic founder voice is the one thing AI cannot replicate at scale. - The 1-Comment First Customer: How Sadok's first ever LinkedIn comment, on day 2 of launch, converted into a paying user. - Bootstrap vs Venture: Why he is deliberately avoiding VC for now, and what burnt-out venture-backed founders are signaling. - Audience Before Product: Why content distribution should start before the product exists, not after. - Founder-Led Marketing: Why podcast appearances and personal posting beat scaled outreach for early-stage founders. - Protect the Mid-Funnel Leak: The unglamorous fix most founders skip while chasing top-of-funnel. - When to Raise: The $2K to $5K MRR threshold below which VCs will not take a meeting. šŸŽ§ Full episode on all podcast platforms šŸ’¬ Bootstrap or raise: where do you land for an early-stage SaaS in 2026? Let us know in the comments! šŸ”” Please like and subscribe! Every subscriber helps our channel grow. #DN #Bloomberry #AISlop #VoiceMoat #Bootstrapping #FounderLedMarketing #ContentMarketing #PerformanceMarketing #SaaS #Startups Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:18 Killing AI slop: the thesis behind Bloomberry 1:21 What Bloomberry actually does and why ChatGPT can't replace it 4:30 AI Sentence DNA: 7,000+ cadences and phrases that flag AI writing 6:17 Why he's bootstrapping instead of raising VC 7:52 The 1-comment first customer story 9:47 From Fry's Electronics retail floor to growth operator 13:30 When to start with paid ads (Google and Bing, not Facebook) 17:45 What "what sticks" actually means in early iteration 24:13 Why FinTech is the wrong industry for solo founders 27:41 The $2K-$5K MRR threshold for raising venture 31:56 Why B2B beats B2C for monetization 37:19 Building an audience in an AI-saturated world 39:05 Audience first, product second 41:24 Where to find Bloomberry

19. Mai 202643 min