The Possession of Hannah Grace

The Offering (2023)

On this episode of Film Jury, we're diving into the 2023 supernatural horror film The Offering. Set within an Orthodox Jewish community, the film blends demonic folklore, family trauma, and possession horror into a chilling story centered around an ancient evil unleashed during funeral preparations. The verdicts are split on this one. Kat and Kristina both deliver Guilty verdicts, finding the film weighed down by familiar horror tropes, predictable scares, and missed opportunities despite its unique cultural backdrop. James lands on a light Not Guilty, appreciating the film's atmosphere, creature design, and willingness to explore lesser-seen religious traditions within the horror genre, even if the execution doesn't fully live up to its potential. Does The Offering bring something fresh to possession horror, or is it another case of style over substance? Join the jury as we debate the scares, symbolism, performances, and whether this supernatural thriller deserves a place on your watchlist.

The Possession of Hannah Grace

In this episode of Film Jury, the jury heads into the underground halls of The Possession of Hannah Grace (2018), a horror film that somehow feels like CSI, a CW supernatural pilot, and Cabin in the Woods all stitched together under flickering fluorescent lights. James Patrick, Kat Stratford, and Kristina Patrick break down the film's rushed editing, bizarre worldbuilding, over-the-top exorcism sequences, and an underground morgue that looks suspiciously like a secret Vatican demon lab. Along the way, the panel debates whether the movie had genuine potential buried beneath the surface, or if it was doomed by production chaos from the start. From upside-down crucifix lighting and "Vecna" telekinesis to motion-sensor jump scares and one very confused EMT named Randy, nothing escapes the scrutiny of the Film Jury. Court is now in session.

The Mortuary Assistant

On this episode of Film Jury, we dive into the upcoming adaptation of and why Kat, James, and Kristina absolutely loathed it. From the baffling creative decisions to the wasted potential of adapting one of the most genuinely unsettling indie horror games in recent years, the jury tears into what went wrong and why this adaptation completely missed the psychological dread that made the original game so effective. Was it bad casting? Weak writing? A total misunderstanding of the source material? Or did Hollywood once again prove that adapting horror games is far harder than studios think? Nothing is spared in this brutally honest breakdown as the Film Jury delivers its verdict.

The Autopsy of Jane Doe

In this episode of Film Jury, we put The Autopsy of Jane Doe on trial. What starts as a routine examination of an unidentified body quickly becomes something far more disturbing as layers of mystery, science, and the unexplained begin to collide inside the morgue. But the real question isn't just what happened to Jane Doe… it's whether the film itself holds up under scrutiny. We break down the storytelling, tension, pacing, and horror mechanics that drive the film, and challenge whether its reputation matches its execution. Is it truly a standout modern horror entry, or does it lean too heavily on atmosphere over substance? After deliberation, the jury returns with a unanimous decision: 3 Not Guilty verdicts. But not for the reasons you might expect.

The Grudge (2004)

We close out our month-long theme of movies we hated so much we had to dedicate an entire series to them… with a surprising twist. This week on Film Jury, new juror Shannon Scott steps in and selects The Grudge (2004), a film infamous for its eerie atmosphere, fragmented storytelling, and that unforgettable croaking curse. But what was meant to be another unanimous takedown didn't quite go as planned. While Shannon holds firm with a guilty verdict, both Kat and James break ranks and deliver a shocking not guilty, defending the film's mood, structure, and lasting impact on early 2000s horror. Is The Grudge a confusing mess or an underrated horror experiment that still gets under your skin? Tune in as we debate: * Whether the nonlinear narrative works or falls apart * The effectiveness of its atmosphere versus its storytelling * If this remake holds up or belongs in the "so bad it's bad" category Three jurors. One divisive horror film. A split verdict you won't see coming.