Lawyering Under 20th Century Authoritarianism

Lawyering Under 20th Century Authoritarianism

We often imagine authoritarianism as the abandonment of law, a moment of rupture when constitutions are torn up and courts are shut down. But some of history’s most effective assaults on democracy have worked through law rather than against it. In this episode, host Madhav Khosla is joined by David Dyzenhaus, professor of law and philosophy at the University of Toronto, and Jan-Werner Müller, professor of politics at Princeton University, to examine how repressive regimes from Nazi Germany to apartheid South Africa governed through lawyers, courts, and legal theory, and how those 20th-century cases illuminate the present. Drawing on the dilemmas faced by human rights lawyers under unjust regimes, they discuss the role of the legal profession, why aspiring autocrats attack lawyers and other professions, what it means when professional identity collapses into political loyalty, and whether lawyers who stay inside a compromised system are preserving the rule of law or merely lending it legitimacy. "Lawyering Without Law" is brought to you by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Please subscribe and leave a review. We’d love to know what you think. To learn more about the Knight Institute, visit our website, knightcolumbia.org [http://knightcolumbia.org/], and follow us on social media.

From Torture to Trump: How the Expansion of Executive Power after 9/11 Eroded Accountability and the Rule of Law

The Bush administration’s use of torture after 9/11 was aided by government lawyers who provided contorted legal justifications for its use against detainees. In this episode, Alberto Mora, who served as General Counsel of the Navy during the George W. Bush administration, joins hosts Katy Glenn Bass and Madhav Khosla to recount how he discovered that interrogators at Guantánamo Bay detention facility had been authorized to use techniques that he believed qualified as torture. He explains how his initial assumption that this was due to misguided advice by other lawyers that could be corrected gave way to the realization that the abuse was deliberate and sanctioned at the highest levels of the United States government. Mora reflects on the moral and strategic costs of torture, the failure to hold high-level government officials accountable for authorizing it, and how that absence of accountability has helped pave the way for the broader erosion of legal norms we see today.  "Lawyering Without Law" is brought to you by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Please subscribe and leave a review. We’d love to know what you think. To learn more about the Knight Institute, visit our website, knightcolumbia.org [http://knightcolumbia.org/], and follow us on social media.

When Lawyers Stop Following the Rules: How Politics Became Law

What happens when lawyers stop believing that law and politics are different things? Constitutional law scholar Deborah Pearlstein joins host Katy Glenn Bass to discuss legal ethics, the rule of law, and how decades of erosion of norms within the legal profession have fueled the democratic backsliding we’re witnessing in America today. Pearlstein’s scholarship and her forthcoming book, Losing the Law, map the forces that have weakened the ethical foundations of American law—from the Reagan-era DOJ and the rise of the conservative legal movement, to the diminishing options for holding lawyers accountable for actions that undermine democracy.  Her diagnosis is sobering. But Pearlstein also offers a surprising and ambitious proposal for how the legal profession and American democracy might find their way back. "Lawyering Without Law" is brought to you by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Please subscribe and leave a review. We’d love to know what you think. To learn more about the Knight Institute, visit our website, knightcolumbia.org [http://knightcolumbia.org/], and follow us on social media.

Principle vs. Profit: How Institutions Lose Their Way

Bribery is the corruption we prosecute. But according to Lawrence Lessig, it's institutional corruption that poses the most danger to American democracy. Hosts Katy Glenn Bass and Madhav Khosla speak with the Harvard Law professor who makes a pointed distinction: the corruption hollowing out American institutions isn’t about bribes, it’s structural—the capture of courts, law firms, corporations, and Congress by economic dependencies pull each away from its founding purpose and leave them vulnerable to political pressure. Yet Lessig finds hope in the lawyers who have refused to bend, in universities that eventually drew a line, and in preparing law students to make professional decisions that align with their values. "Lawyering Without Law" is brought to you by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Please subscribe and leave a review. We’d love to know what you think. To learn more about the Knight Institute, visit our website, knightcolumbia.org [http://knightcolumbia.org/], and follow us on social media.

What Does Legal Authoritarianism Look Like?

What does authoritarianism look like when it operates through law? In the first episode of “Lawyer Without Law,” hosts Katy Glenn Bass and Madhav Khosla speak with Princeton University Professor Kim Lane Scheppele. They explore historic examples of the legal profession’s role in democratic backsliding around the world and in the United States. They examine how authoritarian leaders have exploited legal systems to consolidate power, what that means for legal institutions as democratic norms come under strain, and how lawyers have too often been complicit in this dynamic.  "Lawyering Without Law" is brought to you by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Please subscribe and leave a review. We’d love to know what you think. To learn more about the Knight Institute, visit our website, knightcolumbia.org [http://knightcolumbia.org/], and follow us on social media.