Constitutional Chisme Obergefell v. Hodges

Constitutional Chisme Obergefell v. Hodges

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, in honor of the 11th anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, we are revisiting the landmark Supreme Court decision that recognized same-sex marriage as a fundamental right. Under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, all states must license a marriage between two people of the same sex and recognize such a marriage if it was lawfully licensed and performed in another state. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Constitutional Chisme: Garratt v. Dailey

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, we are covering Garratt v. Dailey. The case raised important questions about intent in battery and whether a person can be liable for battery if they did not specifically intend to harm someone but knew with substantial certainty that harmful contact would occur. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Constitutional Chisme: Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. Thompson

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, we are covering Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. Thompson. The case raised important questions about federal-question jurisdiction and whether a state-law claim that references a federal statute can be heard in federal court.  Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Selita: From the Workforce to a Full-Ride Law School Scholarship

In this episode, Selita shares her nontraditional journey to becoming an attorney and the lessons she learned along the way. Before attending college, Selita spent 7–8 years in the workforce, proving that there is no single timeline for pursuing your dreams. From earning her bachelor's degree in Communications from the University of Missouri–St. Louis to receiving a full-ride scholarship to Michigan State University College of Law, Selita opens up about the importance of perseverance, community, and finding lifelong friendships throughout law school. We also discuss representation in the legal profession and on social media. As a proud Tongan woman from the South Pacific Islands, Selita began creating TikTok content because she rarely saw people who looked like her sharing their experiences online. Through her content, she has become the representation she wished she had growing up. Whether you're a law student, bar exam taker, first-generation professional, or someone pursuing a dream on your own timeline, Selita's story is a powerful reminder that resilience, representation, and determination can take you further than you ever imagined. Follow us on social media, support the show, and never miss an episode: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli] Subscribe, leave a review, and share the podcast with a future attorney who needs to hear this story. Kaplan Bar Prep Discount: Use code PASSWITHPONZ to save an additional $100 off Kaplan Bar Prep, and it stacks with current promotions and sales!

Constitutional Chisme: Crawford v. Ally

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, we are covering Crawford v. Ally. The case raised important questions about when courts can restrict an individual's liberty without a hearing and ultimately highlighted the constitutional requirement of notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before certain protective orders can remain in effect. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]  Need Support? If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-SAFE (7233), text START to 88788, or visit The Hotline for free, confidential support available 24/7.