Seen and Solved by Hubbard-Hall
When parts aren’t coming out clean, the first instinct is to change the chemistry. In many cases, that’s not where the problem starts. In this episode of Seen & Solved, Tim Pennington talks with Mike Valenti about what actually drives cleaning performance in a metal finishing operation. It’s a practical look at a common issue across shops – trying to solve systemic problems with chemistry, when the limitation is really equipment, capacity, or how the process is being run. Mike walks through why most cleaning challenges trace back to equipment, not the cleaner itself, and how factors like throughput, part geometry, and soil loading determine whether a system will hold or break down. From immersion and spray systems to ultrasonics, the conversation covers where each approach works and where it doesn’t. They also get into what you can see on the floor when things aren’t right: rinse stages that can’t keep up, oil carrying through the line, tanks being changed too frequently, or systems that were sized for a different level of production. As more operations move from solvent to aqueous cleaning, those gaps become harder to ignore, especially with complex parts and tighter performance requirements. The takeaway is straightforward. Cleaning isn’t a single variable, it’s a system. Spray pressure, coverage, time, temperature, rinsing, and oil removal all have to work together. If the equipment isn’t set up or maintained to support that, no chemistry change will stabilize the process.
91 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der Seen and Solved by Hubbard-Hall-Community!