What is the Role of Field Testing in Direct Instruction? with Owen Engelmann
Welcome back to The Direct Instruction Podcast — I’m your host, Dr. Zach Groshell. If you’re new here, this show is about Big DI — Direct Instruction as a science of teaching. We look at real implementation, talk with people building and refining DI programs, and get practical about what it takes to engineer instruction that reliably works for students. If this is your first time tuning in, take a look through the back catalogue — there’s a growing library of conversations with researchers, trainers, curriculum developers, and practitioners from across the DI world.
Today I’m joined by Owen Engelmann of Engelmann-Becker Corporation, the curriculum development organization founded by Siegfried Engelmann and Wesley Becker that has spent decades designing and field testing Direct Instruction programs. Owen has worked extensively in the development and revision of DI materials, carrying forward the engineering tradition behind some of the most thoroughly tested instructional programs ever created. Direct Instruction itself emerged from the work of Siegfried Engelmann and Wesley Becker in the 1960s and became known for its highly systematic approach [https://www.nifdi.org/what-is-di/basic-philosophy.html] to curriculum design and field testing.
This episode is an inside look at field testing — the process at the heart of how DI programs are actually built. Owen walks us through how an initial field-test version is created, why programs are only written a few weeks ahead of the field, and what happens when real students encounter a script for the very first time. We get concrete about the revision cycles that shape programs lesson by lesson: who’s in the room, what gets recorded, how student errors are interpreted, and how a single moment of confusion can trigger a rewrite of an example, an exercise, or even an entire sequence.
We also explore the deeper diagnostic challenges behind the process. How do developers distinguish between a flaw in the script and a flaw in delivery? What kinds of student errors signal a local issue versus a deeper structural problem in the program design? And what standards of evidence are strong enough to justify a revision? Along the way, Owen shares stories from the field — moments where a child’s unexpected response exposed a hidden ambiguity or rewrote an instructional sequence entirely. This conversation offers a rare look at the extraordinary amount of iteration, observation, and engineering discipline required to make Direct Instruction programs appear seamless in the classroom.
----------------------------------------
I’m also looking forward to attending this year’s National Direct Instruction Conference and Institutes in Eugene, Oregon [https://www.nifdi.org/training-events/national-di-conference-eugene.html] — packed sessions, amazing block parties, and the kind of hallway conversations that stay with you. At last year’s event, I filmed a few mini YouTube reflections and quick interviews, and those links are in the show notes.
If you’re implementing DI or thinking about getting started, I strongly recommend reaching out to NIFDI — the National Institute for Direct Instruction — at www.nifdi.org [https://www.nifdi.org/]. They are the gold standard for DI coaching, training, and ongoing implementation support.
CAN’T GET ENOUGH CONTENT?
Over on his Substack [https://douglascarnine.substack.com/p/history-teach-it-and-learn-from-it], Doug Carnine has been writing about one of education’s biggest recurring problems: the field’s inability to preserve and build on what it already knows. In “History: Teach It and Learn from It,” Carnine revisits a 30-year-old research program on teaching U.S. history and argues that today’s debates about knowledge, primary sources, memorization, and inquiry are often rediscoveries of ideas that were already studied decades ago. It’s a fascinating companion piece to this episode’s conversation about field testing, instructional design, and the importance of cumulative professional knowledge.
https://douglascarnine.substack.com/p/history-teach-it-and-learn-from-it [https://douglascarnine.substack.com/p/history-teach-it-and-learn-from-it]
You may also want to check out the recent NIFDI webinar Science of Reading: Explicit Fundamental Language Instruction to Improve Reading Comprehension, presented by Kurt Engelmann and the NIFDI team, along with my follow-up blog post unpacking the instructional design principles behind the lessons. These focus on the engineering moves that make DI’s approach to language comprehension so distinctive — cumulative review, mediated scaffolding, concept sequencing, and teaching reasoning directly through carefully controlled examples.
https://educationrickshaw.com/2026/04/15/the-instructional-design-behind-dis-approach-to-language-comprehension/ [https://educationrickshaw.com/2026/04/15/the-instructional-design-behind-dis-approach-to-language-comprehension/]
CONTACT ZACH GROSHELL FOR SPEAKING AND CONSULTING HERE [https://educationrickshaw.com/contact/]
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der The Direct Instruction Podcast-Community!