The Reminger Report: Emerging Technologies

AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law

11 min · 8. Apr. 2026
Episode AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law Cover

Beschreibung

In this episode of the Reminger Report Podcast on Emerging Technologies, Zachary Pyers and Kyle Wallace discuss the growing legal challenges posed by lawyers’ and judges’ reliance on artificial intelligence—particularly the issue of AI‑generated “hallucinated” case citations. The conversation traces the evolution of these problems from early cases like Mata v. Avianca to the more recent Shahid v. Esaam, where an appellate court discovered that a trial court had unknowingly incorporated faulty, AI‑generated citations into its decision. Kyle and Zach explore the ethical obligations of attorneys under rules like Rule 11, the judiciary’s response to AI‑related errors, and why the continued rise of AI calls for vigilance, verification, and responsible use rather than abandonment.

Kommentare

0

Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert

Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der The Reminger Report: Emerging Technologies-Community!

Loslegen

2 Monate für 1 €

Dann 4,99 € / Monat · Jederzeit kündbar.

  • Podcasts nur bei Podimo
  • 20 Stunden Hörbücher / Monat
  • Alle kostenlosen Podcasts

Alle Folgen

74 Folgen

Episode AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law Cover

AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law

In this episode of the Reminger Report Podcast on Emerging Technologies, Zachary Pyers and Kyle Wallace discuss the growing legal challenges posed by lawyers’ and judges’ reliance on artificial intelligence—particularly the issue of AI‑generated “hallucinated” case citations. The conversation traces the evolution of these problems from early cases like Mata v. Avianca to the more recent Shahid v. Esaam, where an appellate court discovered that a trial court had unknowingly incorporated faulty, AI‑generated citations into its decision. Kyle and Zach explore the ethical obligations of attorneys under rules like Rule 11, the judiciary’s response to AI‑related errors, and why the continued rise of AI calls for vigilance, verification, and responsible use rather than abandonment.

8. Apr. 202611 min