The Science of Leading
Claire Monroe and Edwin Carrington unpack why experience, pedigree, and instinct often predict performance far less than managers assume, and how newer research has refined—but not overturned—the case for structured, job-relevant hiring methods. They also explain why work samples, structured interviews, and observable skills produce stronger, fairer decisions than unstructured conversations or résumé polish.
96 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der The Science of Leading-Community!