The Steel CodCast
This is probably the most emotionally charged debate in the appliance industry. More emotional than gas vs. induction. More emotional than front load vs. top load. And in 2026, it's still very much alive. Deep fill vs. load sensing — and what it actually tells us about how human beings process trust, visual evidence, and decades of marketing conditioning. Jon Beresford breaks down where the belief that "more water equals better cleaning" actually comes from, why the appliance industry created it, and why they never bothered to update the story as the engineering evolved. He explains what load sensing is actually doing — not minimizing water, but calibrating it to the specific load — and why that distinction matters more than most people realize. He walks through the detergent concentration argument, the optimal threshold problem, and why the existence of a deep fill button doesn't prove load sensing has failed (hint: no one adds a special button for the objectively best option in every situation). Speed Queen comes up — because of course it does. Jon addresses it directly: the brand earns every bit of its reputation, but he asks the harder question of how much of what customers love is actually attributable to the water, versus everything else Speed Queen builds into the machine. The final take: deep fill solves a human problem. Load sensing solves an engineering problem. They're not competing. The debate has survived this long because everyone's been using the wrong scoreboard. 🎙️ Hosted by Shannon O'Hara and Jon Beresford | The Steel Codcast 🔔 New episode every day of the week. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.
100 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der The Steel CodCast-Community!