What I Find Interesting Podcast

Your Life Story Isn't Written in Stone

20 min · 13. Feb. 2025
Episode Your Life Story Isn't Written in Stone Cover

Beschreibung

---------------------------------------- Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy [https://acast.com/privacy] for more information.

Kommentare

0

Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert

Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der What I Find Interesting Podcast-Community!

Loslegen

2 Monate für 1 €

Dann 4,99 € / Monat · Jederzeit kündbar.

  • Podcasts nur bei Podimo
  • 20 Stunden Hörbücher / Monat
  • Alle kostenlosen Podcasts

Alle Folgen

4 Folgen

Episode Why We Trust AI (And Why We Shouldn't) Cover

Why We Trust AI (And Why We Shouldn't)

Have you ever passed along something you heard from a friend without verifying its truth? Or used an answer from ChatGPT without fact-checking it first? In this episode, I delve into our instinctive trust in AI and how it mirrors our historical tendency to believe authoritative-sounding voices. From politicians and influencers to conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience, humans often prioritize compelling narratives over verified truths. AI is just the latest extension of this age-old habit. So, why do we do this? And what does it say about us? Sources & Further Reading: * The Spread of True and False News Online * Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). * This study analyzes the differential diffusion of true and false news stories on Twitter, revealing that false news spreads more rapidly and broadly than true news. * Link to study [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap9559] * The Psychology of Fake News * Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). * This research explores the cognitive mechanisms behind susceptibility to fake news, suggesting that a lack of analytical thinking contributes to the acceptance of misinformation. * Link to study [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350161464_The_Psychology_of_Fake_News] * Reliance on Emotion Promotes Belief in Fake News * Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). * This study provides evidence that individuals who rely on emotional reasoning are more likely to believe and share fake news. * Link to study [https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3] * Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning * Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). * This paper argues that susceptibility to fake news is more closely related to cognitive laziness than to partisan bias. * Link to study [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29935897/] * Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking * Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). * This research identifies factors that contribute to belief in fake news, including a general tendency to accept weak claims and a lack of analytical thinking. * Link to study [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30929263/] Listen now on Acast, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts! ---------------------------------------- Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy [https://acast.com/privacy] for more information.

6. Feb. 202512 min