Raquel Aldana on Credibility, Trauma Science, and What the Law Really Needs From Mental Health Professionals
Your role is to educate adjudicators about trauma science, not to advocate. And when done well, forensic mental health reports can increase approval rates from 42% to 82%.
In this episode, I sit down with Professor Raquel Aldana, the Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis and a scholar who has spent years examining the intersection of immigration law, trauma science, and credibility adjudication. She recently published groundbreaking research in the American Journal of Law and Medicine on the role of mental health forensic assessments in credibility determinations.
Professor Aldana explains the fundamental gap between what the law expects from someone telling their story and what science actually tells us about how trauma affects memory and narration.
You'll learn:
✅ Why post-9/11 credibility standards (consistency, demeanor, plausibility) don't align with trauma science
✅ What attorneys are really looking for when they refer clients for evaluations
✅ How to negotiate expectations with attorneys before you even meet the client
✅ Why trauma survivors often present inconsistencies the legal system misinterprets as dishonesty
✅ How to write reports that educate rather than advocate
✅ Why clinicians should never do this work alone
If you've ever wondered how a judge reads your report, whether you're writing in ways that actually serve your clients legally, or what the law really needs from you that you may not be delivering, this conversation will give you a sharper sense of how your work lands on the legal side of the table.
Skwara A, Howard S, Velazquez C, Aldana R. Adjudicating Credibility: Documenting the Role of Mental Health Immigration Forensic Assessments [https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/551BE9C5D4D67FAC031F43B815FF9D30/S009885882510066Xa.pdf/adjudicating_credibility_documenting_the_role_of_mental_health_immigration_forensic_assessments.pdf]. American Journal of Law & Medicine. 2025;51(2):217-251. doi:10.1017/amj.2025.10066
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?
Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you.
👉 Get the free guide [https://www.psychevalcoach.com/free-guide]
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need.
👉 Learn More Here [https://www.psychevalcoach.com/certificate-program]
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise
🔹 Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/psychevalcoach/]
🔹 Facebook
[https://www.facebook.com/psychevalcoach]🔹 LinkedIn [https://www.linkedin.com/company/psychevalcoach]
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
[https://www.facebook.com/groups/immigrationevaluationsconsultation/]
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group [https://www.psychevalcoach.com/consultation-group] for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory. [https://immigrationpsychevaldirectory.com/]