Billede af showet Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters

Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters

Podcast af Steph Curnow for BABCP

engelsk

Videnskab & teknologi

Begrænset tilbud

2 måneder kun 19 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / månedOpsig når som helst.

  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • Gratis podcasts
Kom i gang

Læs mere Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters

The podcast that brings you all the latest CBT research published in the BABCP Journals

Alle episoder

12 episoder

episode Using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking with Francesca Brady and Rachel Witkin cover

Using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking with Francesca Brady and Rachel Witkin

In this episode, Steph Curnow speaks with Fran Brady and Rachel Witkin about their paper, A phased approach for using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking, published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. The discussion explores why the paper was developed, highlighting the significant gaps in access to mental health care for survivors of human trafficking and the risks when trafficking experiences go unrecognised in clinical settings. Fran and Rachel emphasise that trafficking is often hidden in plain sight and more common than many realise, with survivors frequently remaining vulnerable to further exploitation. The authors outline a three-phase model of care, focusing on establishing safety, remembrance and supporting reconnection and recovery. They also stress the importance of building trust through approaches such as bridging referrals, and reflect on the emotional impact of this work, highlighting the need for strong support systems for clinicians. Resources: Read the full paper here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/phased-approach-for-using-cbt-with-adult-survivors-of-human-trafficking/C9701086F9429323A91EF058E640B40B [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/phased-approach-for-using-cbt-with-adult-survivors-of-human-trafficking/C9701086F9429323A91EF058E640B40B] Brady, F., Gratton, J., Witkin, R., & Walsh, E. (2025). A phased approach for using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e57. doi:10.1017/S1754470X25100329 Witkin, R., & Robjant, K. (2022). The Trauma-Informed Code of Conduct for All Professionals Working with Survivors of Trafficking and Slavery. [https://www.helenbamber.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/HBF%20Trauma%20Informed%20Code%20of%20Conduct%202nd%20Edition.pdf] Fran's co-authored paper on experience of trust in trafficking can be found here [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20008066.2026.2615608] Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/special-issues/being-an-anti-racist-cbt-therapist] Stay Connected: Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here [https://babcp.com/Podcasts]: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com [podcasts@babcp.com] Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

2. apr. 2026 - 40 min
episode Common misconceptions about CBT-E for eating disorders with Dr Rebecca Murphy cover

Common misconceptions about CBT-E for eating disorders with Dr Rebecca Murphy

In this episode of Research Matters, Steph talks with Dr Rebecca Murphy about her forthcoming paper, Evolving perspectives on CBT-E for eating disorders: clarifying ten key points – misconceptions and communication gaps explored, published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Rebecca is a clinical psychologist and Research Director at the Centre for Research on Eating Disorders at Oxford, where she specialises in developing and disseminating evidence-based treatments for eating disorders, particularly CBT-E. Rebecca discusses why she and her colleagues wrote the paper and identifies that there are not just misconceptions around CBT-E but areas where more clarification could be helpful for clinicians. Steph and Rebecca explore three of the most common misunderstandings, including concerns about rigidity, questions about the applicability of CBT-E in real clinical settings and therapist worries about treating people with co-occurring conditions. Rebecca explains how flexibility within fidelity supports truly individualised care, why outcomes in routine settings can match research trials, and how clinicians can deliver CBT-E effectively even when presentations feel complex. Links and resources The paper discussed is: Murphy, R., Bailey-Straebler, S., Dalle Grave, R., Calugi, S., Osborne, E. L., & Cooper, Z. (2025). Evolving perspectives on CBT-E for eating disorders: clarifying ten key points – misconceptions and communication gaps explored. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e50. doi:10.1017/S1754470X25100299 The full version of the article can be found freely available here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/evolving-perspectives-on-cbte-for-eating-disorders-clarifying-ten-key-points-misconceptions-and-communication-gaps-explored/47CC468578C77CD65064DAFFE151A0B9 [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/evolving-perspectives-on-cbte-for-eating-disorders-clarifying-ten-key-points-misconceptions-and-communication-gaps-explored/47CC468578C77CD65064DAFFE151A0B9] CBT E training and resources: https://www.cbte.co [https://www.cbte.co] If you enjoy the episode, please rate, review and subscribe. You can contact the podcast at podcasts@babcp.com or follow @babcppodcasts on Instagram and Bluesky. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

12. dec. 2025 - 33 min
episode Ten misconceptions about CBT for psychosis with Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor cover

Ten misconceptions about CBT for psychosis with Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor

In this episode, Steph talks with clinical psychologist and CBT therapist Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor about her paper "Ten Misconceptions About CBT for Psychosis", recently published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Katherine shares insights into how CBT for psychosis has evolved from its early days, when psychological approaches were thought to have little place in treating psychosis, to its current role as a recommended, evidence-based therapy. They discuss some of the most common misunderstandings that still persist today including: · The myth that CBTp is about "thinking positively" or correcting thoughts · Misconceptions around the role of the therapeutic relationship in CBTp · The belief that some people are "too complex" for CBTp Katherine discusses why these misconceptions matter, how they can lead to people missing out on effective therapy, and what clinicians can do to challenge them. She also reflects on the importance of delivering high-quality, full-dose, evidence-based CBT for people with psychosis, ensuring that all clients receive the same standard of care we'd wish for our own loved ones. Read the paper: 10 Misconceptions About CBT for Psychosis [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/ten-misconceptions-about-cbt-for-psychosis/7194931256512159530FB32F588B1A5C] in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X25100275 [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X25100275] Feedback or questions: podcasts@babcp.com Follow us: @babcppodcasts on Instagram and Bluesky Don't forget to subscribe, rate and review the show. And check out our sister podcasts — Let's Talk About CBT and Practice Matters — for more conversations on CBT in practice and research. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

12. nov. 2025 - 34 min
episode Integrating religious beliefs and practices in CT-PTSD with Katherine Wakelin cover

Integrating religious beliefs and practices in CT-PTSD with Katherine Wakelin

In this episode of Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, Steph speaks with clinical psychologist Katherine Wakelin about her recently published clinical guidance paper, Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices, in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Together, they explore how therapists can compassionately and effectively incorporate clients' religious beliefs into cognitive therapy when working with moral injury. Katherine shares the motivation behind writing this paper, guidance on involving spiritual leaders in treatment, and practical tips for therapists who may feel apprehensive about discussing religion in therapy. Read the full paper here [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/cognitive-therapy-for-moral-injury-in-posttraumatic-stress-disorder-integrating-religious-beliefs-and-practices/412C2F692DAF3EAEABD52B8D4A347832] Wakelin, K. E., & El-Leithy, S. (2025). Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e2. doi:10.1017/S1754470X24000436 Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/special-issues/being-an-anti-racist-cbt-therapist] Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here [https://babcp.com/Podcasts]: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com [podcasts@babcp.com] Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. In this episode, I am joined by Katherine Wakelin. Katherine is lead author of the paper Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices which was published in the cognitive behaviour therapist Hi, Katherine Welcome to the podcast. Katherine: Hello. Thank you for having me Steph. Steph: Thank you for coming. So just before we start, would you please tell the listeners a little bit about yourself and the areas that you work? Katherine: Sure. My is Katherine, Katherine Wakelin, I'm a clinical psychologist. I did my training at the University of Surrey and since then have always part of training and after training worked in a range of different specialist trauma services, so I guess certainly work in PTSD has been a specialist interest of mine for quite a few years now. I currently work in a community mental health team in Hampshire, and I guess my role within the team is in a specialist trauma place there as well. And by the time this airs I'll also be working at the University of Southampton as part of their doctorate programme as well. So that's a bit of my background and yeah what I'm currently doing. Steph: Great. And congratulations on your new role then. That's exciting. So I probably collared you about this paper this time last year, maybe we were at the conference, because it was in progress. And I really wanted to chat to you about it, because I thought it was a really interesting paper. And I was like, if it gets published, do you want to come on the pod? You very, very kindly agreed. So often on the podcast, we often talk to people about research papers, what they did, why they did it. This is slightly different because this is a clinical guidance paper where you're giving actually practical guidance for CBT therapists on how to work with this client group. So was there any particular motivation behind writing this paper, how did this come about? Katherine: Definitely. Well, I guess it probably brewed over a few years. I think the first case I worked with, which was a PTSD case using cognitive therapy for PTSD, where moral injury was a big component in it, was when I was working at the Traumatic Stress Service in South West London with my colleague Sharif, who co-authored the paper with me. And I guess that certainly was a really exciting piece of clinical work where I drew, with lot of Sharif's encouragement and support, but drew on the client's religious beliefs that were largely underpinning and driving the moral injury that initially we'd overlooked that aspect. And then I guess as time has gone on, worked with similar cases across different religions and different religious backgrounds, but really clearly seeing this theme, particularly when working with moral injury, actually the real value if religion is a key part of somebody's identity, then the real relevance to their PTSD and their distress and that ongoing maintenance, unless that's considered. So that's something that over time kept coming up and with Sharif's encouragement, he'd been saying all along, we should publish a paper on this. And I was like, yeah, yeah, sure. But then I guess when, over time when that kept coming up, we thought, okay, this is an idea actually that I think is a key part of the missing puzzle that perhaps didn't seem to be written about or widely talked about within the PTSD world or CBT world either. Steph: So I'm sure that many people will be familiar with the term moral injury, but just in case for anyone who isn't, would you mind just saying a little bit about what we mean by moral injury and how this might present when working with clients with PTSD? Katherine: Definitely. So I guess the paper or the definition our paper drew on throughout was Litz's definition of moral injury, which is sort of the leading in the field generally and how it's defined is the profound psychological distress that arises from very extreme events which violate somebody's very deeply held morals. This could involve somebody maybe perpetrating acts or failing to prevent acts or even bearing witness to acts that really violate their own moral code. So that could be for example somebody, it's really common in the veterans I've worked with, perhaps who've been part of events whether it be civilians are injured or killed or unintended consequences of actions, accidental car crashes or accidents where others are hurt or harmed or even where you've been a bystander of events and you've been unable to intervene and you've watched something very horrific play out. Or I guess even being subjugated to other people maybe betraying you or treating you in ways that severely violate your own moral code. So I guess that's the definition that's talked about in the paper, consistently refers to you throughout. But certainly Hannah Murray, has written a very fantastic paper on moral injury in cognitive therapy PTSD so I would certainly read that and our paper definitely leans on that a lot as a foundation and introduction to work in moral injury which was I think Hannah's paper was one of the first I think really clearly and explicitly laid out conditions of how you might be able to routinely be working with this for PTSD and then I guess mine and Sharif's paper expand on that and think particularly in the realm of working with clients with religious beliefs and that's a part of the identity. And actually the paper highlights the intro but Litz's actually original definition of moral injury, I guess defines it as profound as a whole list but profound psychological, biological but also like spiritual distress is named in that which I think the clues in the name, isn't it? If we're not considering someone's spiritual religious beliefs as part of working with this deeply, deeply held distress that is very relevant to somebody's moral code, then we're missing an obvious piece of the puzzle. Steph: So in the paper, you offer several practical ways of incorporating religious beliefs into therapy in the context of moral injury. Would you be able to just talk through a few of those? Katherine: Yeah, definitely. I guess the paper tries to of walk readers through how they might consider religion at various different aspects of somebody's treatment. In the beginning, certainly holding that in mind when you're formulating distress with clients. And I guess the formulation is always a work in progress. So certainly I've been, I've certainly missed that to start off with somebody in our initial formulation. And as our work's progressed actually we've come back to formulation, added that in actually that perhaps maybe a fear of a higher order judgment or condemnation based on acts they've perpetrated perhaps is actually really fuelling that current threat in their PTSD that might have been missing initially. And I guess it's been really I guess some of the guidance by Griffiths talks about listening out for the sacred but I guess the idea of clinicians more routinely listening out for sort of language that might imply religion or spiritual beliefs, people talking about maybe being deserving or mentioning prayer or religious communities at all. I guess really listening out for that in your sessions as natural points to then pick up on and just explore I guess, if religion is part of their identity. So listening out for religion, I think it's really important. But then certainly when you're getting into the work and when moral injury is a big theme of that, because that's not always necessarily obvious when you first begin. And I guess these are things that people may never have ever admitted or talked about before because the traumas and the shame and the guilt could be so profound. It might not be obvious you're going to be working with moral injury until you get into the work. I guess as you get into that that often feels an actual place also to just gently prompt and open up conversations around religion. I guess you can give really good psycho education around moral injury and Hannah certainly lays that out in her paper really nicely. But then sort of opening up and sort of thinking, I guess, very understandably when these types of events happen, people can be informed by their morals or things that govern their behaviours and actions and can hold a lot of shame. I guess I'm curious for you, whether or not religious or any beliefs around spirituality can impact on moral code. Is that relevant for you? Opening questions early on or when moral injury comes into light is helpful. So we can hold that in mind on our formulation. But I guess the big part of the paper then moves into thinking about how we can actually practically use religious beliefs and teachings or spiritual beliefs and teachings within the updating work of cognitive therapy for PTSD. So I guess a big part of it is I think often having these conversations with clients. I know I've certainly worked with clients where it's really obvious on the surface that they may be feel very responsible for maybe some horrific events that happened. But actually when you can't I guess keep downward arrowing perhaps beneath that, fears of what that means about themselves or being condemned, being maybe judged as evil, being punished by a higher order God. And I guess that then really driving the distress. So I think when you reach that bit and you're able to acknowledge those appraisals, I think a key part of then starting those updating conversations often is- certainly I name that I'm not a religious expert or not trying to be a religious expert. And I know that they'll know a lot more about their religion than I do. So I guess I'll often start quite general questions of asking, I wonder, is there any religious teachings or scriptures that they're aware of that could be quite important to us when we're kind of trying to update some of these appraisals? And clients can really surprise you sometimes and draw on things that you certainly would never have thought of. And then I guess when clients get stuck, that's a really natural point in which the paper then guides you through of how you might set up inviting a religious leader or surveying religious experts to bring in their perspective. If that's going to be, if these are really key cognitions that we're needing to think about, but in terms of the updating work. And then as we always do, then linking those updates really nicely back into the membrane. Steph: Yeah. And one thing that I really liked about this paper as well is that you had some really illustrative case examples of that as well, didn't you, and how incorporating those techniques, I guess, into the work has really helped them move forward. Katherine: Definitely. And yeah, so try to really bring it to life in the paper. We had Zara and Ali were some of the case examples we discussed throughout. And I tried to put within the paper real life quotes and answers that we gathered from imams and like religious Christian chaplains and ministers that we surveyed as well included as well so that's hopefully can be quite a useful resource for other therapists when they're working with similar clients or similar beliefs to get ideas from and have some confidence I guess to sort of implement similar ideas within their CBT work. Steph: So I guess the process of seeking advice from other religious experts for me was quite new, but obviously something really innovative that you've done in your therapy. Is there anything that people should be mindful of or consider if they're going to incorporate that into the work that they're doing? Katherine: Yeah, definitely. And I get these questions quite a bit because I think it does feel daunting, doesn't it? Inviting a religious leader into a therapy session, perhaps. But I guess I'll just reflect back. I think every time we do behavioural experiments, every time we take clients outside of the therapy room, every time we interview someone or survey someone, we're taking a relational risk, aren't we? We don't quite know what's going to happen. We can't predict the whole thing. So I guess there is an element of I guess being able to know that we won't know exactly what's going to happen but I guess what we can really do is really think about it carefully beforehand and put in as much support and preparation to try and make this as a most helpful experience as possible for the client and make it as therapeutic as possible. So I lay it out on the paper how I guess my experience of doing this, which so far has had a great success rate but obviously you can't sort of foresee everything. I guess the big things being starting this conversation collaborative with a client and really thinking through together. If you get into this point of actually acknowledging that you as a therapist aren't an expert in this particular religious area, certainly, but you can see how important it to the client and really validating that, how essential it obviously is to their belief system and their identity and actually the real, I guess, significance of that and importance of us weighing that into therapy. I guess usually I've had expensive clients being like, yes, yes, of course, and buying into that. I guess thinking, okay, if you don't know these answers to these big questions, because often clients in my experience have been grappling with questions around, could they be forgiven? Perhaps if they've maybe unintentionally or accidentally maybe ended somebody's life or resulted in very serious accident and thinking about who could we ask? And I guess how I usually set it up is sort of saying that, you know, in CBT, when we get to really important issues, there may well be things where we want to survey or ask xperts in the area so that we, both me and you can learn. And I think it's a really nice modelling as well of lowering the power dynamics as well, because you're really naming that you're the therapist, don't hold the answers, and you're going to be really guided by the client. So really making those conversations as collaborative as possible. And generally I've found clients to be really over actually that a sort of seemingly secular NHS clinician would be entrusted in their faith in this way. So then I guess lead you on to if they've brought into this, if you know if they're really nervous, I guess it's thinking about ways we can do it and to reduce maybe some of the some of the fears they may have and thinking what that pretensions may be. So for some people I've certainly found it to be helpful often, giving them a choice, but generally clients I've experienced prefer maybe for me to source a religious leader as opposed to themselves. So, it's someone who's not known, they're not in their community. I guess these communities often are quite small and quite tight knit and I guess fears around confidentiality can be quite real for our service users or whether it's a survey rather than actually face to face interview, again, that can reduce obviously, anonymity of the client even more so. I mean personally my preference is generally to try and interview somebody with the client there as well if possible because I think it really could bring it to life for the client. It can really I guess allow them to have natural follow-up discussions and questions you didn't even know that they had and arise from it and I guess if you get a really compassionate I'm thinking about some of the leaders I work with, like a really compassionate minister or imam who's able to kind their tone of voice and the way they speak can really, it's not just the words on the paper that they're saying, but also the way they're saying it and teaching the client can have a really emotional felt sense to those words as well that a survey might not. But you know, you'd be led by what the client is wanting. And then I guess in terms of then actually setting it up, I'd usually always give a session to really think through what questions we'd want to ask, linking them really to some of the key appraisals that we're wanting to update, all the key things that they're really stuck on. And I give examples of the types of questions some of my clients have asked in the paper. So whether it's around certain scenarios, whether it's feasible for God to forgive them or what they can do in terms of moving forward or making an amends can be really, I guess, key things to ask or particularly asking about what teachings we can draw on. And then I guess what I've also found is a big emphasis on once you've agreed some difficult questions, I guess the importance is you get in their consent, but I guess how much they'll be willing for you to share with a spiritual leader in advance. So, you know, normally you don't need to share their full name or anything like that, but maybe a bit of background about the sort of thing you're looking for help for. So maybe it might be saying that, you know, I'm in NHS therapist, I'm working with somebody, maybe who was a veteran holds a lot of shame and guilt around some of the lives that have been lost in combat and whether or not we're looking for a religious leader who might be able to help answer some of our questions about God's forgiveness and our war or injust actions. That sort of level of detail would be initial things I'd be thinking about. And I usually would always try and if you find somebody suitable, NHS Chaplaincy is a really good place to start if you're an NHS therapist. But as well, or if they don't have somebody who's suitable, whether they can recommend you somebody. I've used networks, I guess, within my workplace or colleagues who I know are particularly aligned with a certain religious. If they can recommend me a leader, I guess that's going to be particularly compassionate and understanding to mental health. I'm really sounding that out. I think then largely set up really nicely. I usually would meet with the religious leader with the clients agreement in advance of the session actually just to have a brief chat with them really check out that they do feel comfortable asking these types of questions or show them the questions. And I guess if I had any concerns at that point that would give me a chance as a therapist to step back or reconsider if we need to, if there's maybe someone who'd be more suitable. Steph: Yeah, that did answer one of my questions, which was like, I wonder if this has ever gone wrong. When you've been like, actually, maybe this person isn't suitable for this after all. Katherine: And I mean, yeah, exactly. So I think that's the real importance of trying, if possible, to have a conversation with them in advance. It gives you a bit of a as well as a therapist to give them, the religious leaders, bit of psycho-ed around a bit about what PTSD is, if they don't know already, which can be really helpful. But generally, I've found religious leaders to be so respectful and so compassionate, and I guess often a big part of their role within their communities is also a very pastoral role often and they've brought a whole level of , I guess, spiritual knowledge, but also a real warmth and like a real compassion that's hard to convey, I think. Yeah. Steph: Yeah, because it just took quite a special type of person to be a religious leader, doesn't it? So you would imagine that they would be bringing that really, compassion and that empathy with them to the work as well. Katherine: And you know, I think therapists often have lot of apprehensions about that, but I think just do your homework and do your thinking carefully beforehand. And certainly, I think if you're having a recommendation, so if it's through the NHS Chaplaincy Service, they'll have been screened, they'll have been vetted, they'll be trained to work within health settings. If not, if it's maybe a colleague or a friend of yours who has an understanding of mental health who's able to recommend somebody who knows somebody and going through that way I found I guess to be a really effective and helpful way. And I guess also I guess also needing to think in ahead in advance of like who I guess a client would deem an expert as well so I guess there's lots of different sects or denomination between various religions or I guess what if any qualifications a client would require to feel that they would have the knowledge I guess to be able to answer some of these questions are obviously helpful things to think through with a client in advance of then going on your search for somebody but yeah. Steph: Yeah, and I think your paper talks about that a bit doesn't about how you work really collaboratively with the client on that and asking them who they would feel would be most appropriate and how, how then you could find that person. Katherine: I guess I've certainly been quite surprised because I'd say almost most people I've worked with have often been a lot less picky or specific than I thought they would be. Maybe if they've particularly aligned within a specific denomination and I've thought, do we need to really match this? And then they've actually been a lot more open than I thought. So sometimes clients can surprise you. And I guess it's really understanding who and what they would deem as knowledgeable on this. Steph: And you say in the paper as well that CBT therapists often report some discomfort maybe in bringing religion into the therapeutic work. Is there anything that you'd like therapists to know or any practical tips about how they can manage this if they are feeling apprehensive? Katherine: Yeah, I think that's such a big question. I my big take home would be, be curious and actually, because we're curious about so many things, why are we often just not curious about religion? Actually, there's no difference there. I think, you know, your therapeutic training of empathy, validation, open questions, your Socratic questioning, being, listening. All of that are going to be your key soft skills that you're going to be needing here. And it's not about you as a clinician holding religious answers or expertise on spiritual guidance topics. Often when clients have sort of said, I guess maybe being a bit surprised that I've been interested or even being like, I guess, maybe are you religious too? But I guess how I always frame it is if it's important to you then it's important to me and in our work and when you're getting to this point in cognitive therapy PTSD and think moral injury is so explicitly tied to somebody's moral beliefs and if they're religious then religion is going to be a good part of that. It's quite a natural seamless flow I've found and so actually just being curious, holding those open questions and I guess naming that you don't, you may get it wrong as well. So, think that's a really nice way of balancing the power dynamics. You know, I'm really mindful. You know a lot more about Hinduism than I do. There may be things that I say, I get it wrong. You do call me out on that and name that because I certainly am willing to like learn alongside you and I can hear how important this is to you. So I guess I'm wondering how we can integrate into this work more. And I guess those kinds of conversations have really reducing the power dynamic. I think therapeutically that is also really valuable as well. And clients can teach you things. So I've learned so much through this work, things I never would have known, amazing updates that I never would have, we never would have generated ourselves or I never would have generated with my standard CT PTSD textbook in mind. And that's been so, I've seen such a quick and rapid clinical shift for clients because we got to something that I guess is so culturally meaningful and so in line with their religion and their identity. Steph: Yeah, well, that's amazing. And it sounds like that's just been such a helpful thing to give your clients as well. Like you say, just really meeting them where they're at in this process and asking them, working really collaboratively with them. Katherine: I think sometimes there can be like, maybe it's not a nervousness but I guess maybe a general sort of ambivalence perhaps around, I guess if a therapist sees themselves maybe thinks sort of, I'm not religious or I'm in a secular service so religion's not really, it's not relevant I guess to CBT, it's sometimes an attitude I've come across. I guess what I've really found is religion, particularly working in moral injury, can be your sort of supercharge, I think, and can actually be your sort of superpower in terms of updating and working with some really challenging and really complex and very tightly held morally injurious beliefs. And actually, I think being open to considering how you might be able to draw on it is only going to be in your advantage because there's so much in the religious literature that I think around moving forwards, making amends, forgiveness around building new life, how we keep moving forwards after these events that's going to be really helpful for clients when they're grappling with this. Steph: . So I guess we might have covered this a little bit already just with what we've been talking about. But what impact do you hope that this paper will have on the world of CBT then? Katherine: Well, I'm hoping it will be widely read. It's been in the top 10 actually downloaded, which has been excited recently. So we're hoping that means people are reading it. I guess for it to become more routine, for it not to have to be seen as a specialist or unusual adaptation. I think what I guess the angle of the paper was that there is lots of trials which have specifically adapted CBT for religious interventions and followed specific like protocols I guess for spiritually adapted CBT for behavioural activation for people who are Muslim or something like that like very specific and I guess as part of that you need specialist training, you need to access the specialist protocols and the average routine clinician couldn't deliver that intervention and I guess what the angle of this paper was that was meant because the hope was empowering any and all CBT therapists to read that and think, you know what, I could do that. But actually I don't need to have done a specialist course. I don't need to have to have a specialist protocol for doing this. Actually this involves like a good dose of curiosity, openness, a willingness to not have the answers and then be able to draw on the experts when needed is the I guess, real hope of the paper. So that hopefully it can become more of a routinely thought of idea. Steph: And have you had any feedback from the clients that you've worked with when you've incorporated this or any of the clinicians when you've been using this approach? Katherine: Yeah, definitely. Definitely been really, really striking, qualitatively and quantitatively from the feedback from clients where we've incorporated religion, certainly have found often to be cases that maybe have felt quite stuck. Maybe they've worked on these traumas before in previous therapy and it's never quite hit the nail on the head. And I guess it's that idea that we maybe hit the surface level initially of maybe it feeling around their fault or something and the whole sort of next layer of the onion around maybe feeling judgment had been missed. And I guess what I found clients fed back, I guess clients have often been quite overwhelmed or even quite emotional actually towards the end of therapy, feeling back that I never thought a white British therapist would be interested in this part of my identity. I guess feeding back often that maybe their friends or their families had been quite suspicious or maybe quite negative of them receiving secular help for their mental health. And they sort of ran out of options. So I ended up going to the NHS. But actually, then their friends and family turning around and being like, why are you going to the mosque now? What have you been doing with that therapist now? How is that NHS therapist now, I guess, seeing you, I guess, re-engaging with their community and their spiritual life again. So guess often that has been reported back and one client I guess put it really well I guess they sort of gave feedback at the end of their words were basically that I couldn't argue with you that you were using or we were using the whole logic and the whole framework that I've built my whole life around aka her religion and actually when we were bringing in passages from the scriptures that I guess her whole religious identity believed in, actually she'd already bought into it so actually it was quite easy win in terms of updating because these are things that already they've built their life around. I guess feedback I've often had for people is I maybe knew that God or Allah was forgiving, but I never knew if he'd forgive something as serious as this, perhaps maybe when someone's died as a result of their actions and never obviously felt brave enough or able to ask that question to their community or to religious leaders. So I sort of held this for many, many years and just the relief that they've felt like, yeah, like a boulder being lifted off the chest was one analogy of describing it was just phenomenal. Steph: Yeah, sounds like it just really set them free, just being able to do this work and like you say, having not having a boulder on your chest anymore, that must feel such a relief. Katherine: Definitely, one imam that I worked with, with one client, their language round, I guess it was around whether or Allah could forgive the unintended consequences of the events that have unfolded. And I guess the imam kept referring to Allah giving you a blank page. And that then came sort of a bit of the catchphrase in therapy of this time, now having a blank page and what they were going to do with their blank page now in terms of moving forward and building their lives again. I guess language, I guess it's just different ways of framing things, but I think it fits really naturally with CT-PTST and actually everything we're trying to do in terms of updating key appraisals and cognitons. But then also like fits really well with the reclaiming and rebuilding your life. Religious leaders have often clients I've worked with I guess around specific actions they can do in terms of moving forwards after life. Sometimes there's really specific examples that I would never be able to have generated myself, hold so much meaning for a client and to then be able to start moving on after the events. Steph: And just from a journal perspective, really, because I'm always curious to ask our guests this, but how did you find the peer review process? Can you remember now? Because it was quite a while ago. Because it's a clinical guidance paper. Did you find the reviewers quite helpful with you in that? Katherine: Yeah, we did. I had a really good experience. Obviously, I liaised with you quite a little bit when I was sort of working out if it was appropriate for the journal and had specific questions. And yeah, you were really, really fantastic and really responsive. So I felt quite confident submitting that it was felt relevant and appropriate for the journal and then had really fantastic feedback from the reviewers. Both actually were probably the most overwhelmingly positive reviewing experience I've had because reviewing can sometimes feel quite critical. I guess the big point that came out probably from the reviewing process which we tried to tweak the paper to still convey, I guess the key point is that, and hopefully this comes off, is we can all do this. And I guess also about it not being something that necessarily takes extra time, that actually I guess this is something that can routinely slip into our practice. And guess often when we are in time limited practices or companies or cultures or whatever, it can be tempting to cut out, I guess, cut out a lot of CBT, I guess, some of these behavioural experiments, things you do live together and things like surveying or interviewing people. But I guess certainly, I guess the message of the paper, hopefully, if it comes across is that actually by investing just a little bit of time in doing that, you will save yourself many, many, many sessions after that where you're still going round and round on the same cognition you haven't been able to update it. But actually, this builds the effectiveness and certainly what we found in our clinical work. And actually, if we can get to this as soon as possible, then actually you'll have a much, much greater likelihood of completing successful treatment outcomes in your time-limited number of sessions that you've got. Steph: And I'm really glad that you've got that good feedback then. And I think that definitely comes across in the paper now. And that's a really important message to have, I think, in there too. So finally, before I let you get back to your afternoon, what's next for you? Is there anything that you're working on now that you'd like to share with us that you'd like us to know about? Katherine: Yeah, I'm working with a couple of other colleagues, going through and Hibbah Hassan, and we're writing another paper at the moment, I guess, trying to , this paper will be specifically about cognitive therapy for PTSD in moral injury. I guess our next paper we're working on is more generally encouraging clinicians to think about how we can discuss religion in CBT when therapists have their concerns, so think about CBT more broadly. I guess thinking about apprehensions or concerns or questions they often have around how do I raise this as topic, what terms if I get it wrong, ones that highlights the differences between me and my client or actually I just don't have enough time to do this justice. All of those key concerns that we've found highlighted in literature and our own clinical practice is writing a practical paper I guess trying to sort of address each of the concerns and give clinicians, I guess, practical ways to try and think about overcoming them more generally in CBT. Steph: Brilliant, I can't wait to read that when it comes out. So Katherine, thank you so much, this has been such a nice talk. Thank you so much for coming on. Katherine: It's a real pleasure. Thank you for having me, Steph. Steph: Thanks so much for listening. You'll find a link to the paper we discussed along with any other useful resources in the show notes, so please do go and check those out. If you enjoyed this episode please take a moment to rate, review and subscribe. It really helps others to find us. And if you have any feedback then I would love to hear from you. You can reach me at podcasts@babcp.com or follow us on Instagram and BlueSky @babcppodcasts. Our journals are there too, sharing all the latest research as soon as it is published. And don't forget to check out our sister podcasts, Let's Talk About CBT and Let's Talk About CBT Practice Matters. Whether you're new to CBT or just looking to enhance your practice, they're full of insightful discussions and some really helpful tips. Thanks for tuning again, and I'll see you next time on research matters. Bye

30. juli 2025 - 31 min
episode How to treat someone suffering with PTSD following rape in adulthood with Dr Kerry Young cover

How to treat someone suffering with PTSD following rape in adulthood with Dr Kerry Young

In this episode, Steph Curnow is joined by consultant clinical psychologist Dr Kerry Young to discuss the paper "How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood", published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Kerry shares the motivation behind the paper and reflects on over two decades of clinical experience in trauma services. Listeners will gain insight into: * Why evidence-based trauma-focused therapy for PTSD following rape is so effective * Common myths that prevent therapists from engaging in this work * Practical guidance for assessment and treatment using CT-PTSD * The importance of addressing dissociation, self-blame, and shame * Strategies therapists can use to protect their own wellbeing while doing this work * The powerful impact this intervention can have on clients' lives This episode also highlights the invaluable video resources linked to the paper, which show exactly how to put the guidance into practice. Kerry offers encouragement to therapists: if you know how to do CT-PTSD, you already have the skills to help survivors of rape and it's some of the most rewarding work you can do Read the full paper here [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/how-to-treat-someone-suffering-with-ptsd-following-rape-in-adulthood/0093F5DFA9648F5D55F8809CC609EFD0] Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/special-issues/being-an-anti-racist-cbt-therapist] Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here [https://babcp.com/Podcasts]: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com [podcasts@babcp.com] Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. Today I'm talking to Dr Kerry Young. Kerry is one of several authors on the paper How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood published in the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Hi Kerry, welcome to the podcast. So, it's so nice of you to come on and talk to us today about this paper. I think most people will probably know who you are already, but for any listeners that don't, would you mind just introducing yourself and telling everyone a bit about you and the areas that you work in? Kerry: Yes, hi. So I'm Kerry Young. I'm a consultant clinical psychologist and I've worked in specialist trauma services. I worked it out just now for 28 years. I'm a bit tired. And at the moment I run a PTSD service for refugees and asylum seekers in West London near Paddington station. Steph: So, the paper we are talking about today is How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood. That's the title of the paper and it does exactly what it says on the tin. So, I really wanted to get you onto the podcast to talk about it because it's such a comprehensive and helpful paper. Would you mind just talking a little bit about where the motivation to write this paper came from? How did it come about? Kerry: Yeah, so as I said, I've been working in trauma services since the late 1990s. And I think when you start out working in specialist trauma services, you really appreciate how treatable PTSD is. So we would be expecting, if we treat PTSD for someone really not to have any symptoms anymore. So it really is a wonderful thing to treat. And over the years, I've done more and more supervising in other services. And in fact, I've been part of the NHS England funded top up for NHS Talking Therapies to work with PTSD. And what I think all of our supervisors noticed doing this is that people are a bit sheepish about treating PTSD following sexual violence. There's lots of myths and there's lots of things that get in the way, but for good reasons, I think. But we were, all of us, I think, feeling really worried, not just in NHS Talking Therapies, but in other people we supervise that, you know, if someone has PTSD to rape or sexual violence, their chances of getting someone to treat it in an evidence-based way were quite variable, I think. And I just found that really upsetting really, because you'll hear all of these stories about people being raped, you know, maybe in their teens, in their twenties, and it changing the whole course of their life. And them going through the rest of their life really feeling to blame for what happened or feeling really bad about themselves. And this sort of one moment really kind of can change the course of someone's life and that's very particularly the case if they have PTSD. And so what I was noticing is that people are flashing back to being raped day in, day out, dreaming about it when they're asleep. And it's reinforcing this, they're feeling really bad about themselves, feeling really responsible for what happened and then, making choices about their life on the basis of that. And I just sort of thought, I think we all thought, oh my God, you know, if we could just 10 sessions and the person will stop re-experiencing it, they'll be able to make choices about themselves and their lives that aren't based on re-experiencing rape. And we just thought, how can we get people to do this evidence-based therapy? And it's not just me that's written the paper, you'll see there's an enormous number of people who've written it. So don't think for a minute it was just me, but we thought, well, look, I think the problem is that people really just don't know quite how to do it. They don't know how to ask these questions about body parts and stuff. And there's lots of myths about what you should and shouldn't do. So we thought, look, we'll just tell them. We'll just tell them how to do it and show them how to do it. And so what's brilliant about this paper is this film showing you how to do it. And then hopefully people will just have a go. So that was what was behind it. Steph: Yeah, yeah. And that really nicely segues into my next question then, which was to say, in the beginning of the paper, you do talk about, about therapist fears and maybe some myths around working with sexual violence. I think it'd be really helpful if you could just take us through some of these and actually what might be barriers for therapists working with these clients. As you just said, you know, there are so many that are shy about working with this. Kerry: Yeah, and I just want to make it clear that we're all a bit shy of working with sexual violence. When they invent the thing that means we don't have to talk about it with people, I'll be the first to sign up but there isn't anything else that works as well as trauma-focused therapy. Please don't, I don't want people to think I'm thinking they shouldn't, you know, not want to talk about this stuff because I think it's very natural. There's lots of myths, I think. People often think that someone has to be stable to be able to do this work. They need to be in stable housing. They need to not be waiting for a court case. It all needs to be well in their life. And actually, so often that's the reason why people don't do the therapy. And actually, that is not the case at all. And there's very good evidence in fact, there was a great systematic review that came out last year by someone called Vanessa Yim that really looked into that and found out that actually even when you're in a war zone or even when you're still in a domestically violent relationship, you can still benefit from trauma-focused therapy. So the stability thing is a myth. Now obviously some people might not want to do it when they're unstable, but we shouldn't make that choice for them. In other myths, the things like you can't sort of on a similar vein, you can't treat people who've been raped and have PTSD if they're substance misusing. Again, that's one of those really kind of widely put about beliefs. And actually, again, the evidence not only doesn't back it up, but backs up the opposite, that people can benefit from trauma focused therapy while they're still actively substance misusing. And if you treat the PTSD, the substance misuse comes down alongside it. those sorts of things. So people don't have to be stable. They don't have to not be drinking or taking drugs. And then I suppose the main thing that people worry about is, because the therapy involves talking about the rape in some detail, people think it will be too shame inducing for the client. And on the surface, that makes perfect sense. You think, yeah, no, fair enough. But if you just think about it a little bit more, what the problem with rape is nobody can really tell anybody about the details of it. Not even your best friend, I don't think would you would say this happened and then this and then this. And so people tend to feel ashamed when they've been raped and they never really get the chance to tell anyone exactly what happened. And then, so if you actually, you're with a therapist and you tell a therapist exactly what happened and the therapist goes, oh no, I'm so sorry, poor you, that's just dreadful, what a horrible man. I'm so sorry that happened to you. And the therapist remains compassionate and caring and doesn't blame them and doesn't run out of the room horrified, the client learns that actually the person isn't judging them, and it actually reduces their shame. So the act of telling something that you're ashamed of tends to actually reduce the shame because someone reacts nicely to it. And indeed there's research that backs that up that actually talking about sexual violence reduces the shame associated with it, doesn't increase it. So I think that's the big one. And I suppose related to that, people often think as well that talking about sexual violence will be too much for the client and that they'll just drop out of therapy or something. And again, that's just not backed up by the research. The dropout rate for PTSD to rape is incredibly low. It's no higher than any other PTSD treatment. And in fact, all of the early PTSD research that was done in the 80s was done in America and almost all of it was on rape and sexual violence. So, we've known for 40 odd years that actually trauma focused therapy really works with that client group. Steph: Yeah. And I remember when we had Nick Grey on the podcast quite a while ago now, and we're talking about PTSD more generally and misconceptions around it. We were talking about then, is it that we're worried about the client and the client can't handle it? Or is it maybe the therapist is actually shying away from it and the therapist is actually thinking, can I handle this? Can I manage it? Kerry: Yeah, well, yeah, no, you're right. I should have said that really. And I think that's really understandable. It's not something we do in everyday life. And I think it's a particular skill in working with PTSD to, you know, I often say to trainees when they're working with me, if you get an overwhelming urge not to ask about something in trauma work, that's your cue that you should. And it's a really paradoxical thing to do to get someone to talk about something that's really upsetting. And it is upsetting, it is upsetting listening to somebody talk about being raped, because, particularly with reliving, you kind of have to picture it yourself in your head, you're sort of there nearly, it's uniquely upsetting. There's no doubt about it. And I suppose it's only, it's only really worth doing to you yourself, I think, if you know it's going to help. Yeah? And so whenever I sit with someone and they're talking about sexual violence, which is basically every day in my job, I take a breath and I say to myself, I'm going to help you. Yeah? I'm going to make you stop having to think about this. And I say it to myself in my head and I'm confident that I can make it stop for people. So it's sort of easy for me to put myself through it because I know I can help. And I think if you don't know you can help, you're not quite sure what to do, you are exposing yourself to some horrible stuff without really quite being sure why. And so again, I wanted the paper to be a bit of a rallying cry to say it is worth listening to this stuff. You will help people. And the research on vicarious traumatization and burnout around PTSD therapy is that if you know that you can help and you know that you're being affected, you're much, much less likely to be traumatized by what you hear. Yeah, so I mean, I think there are some things that you can do to help you cope. And think we're going to come on to them in a bit. Steph: Yes, yeah, we'll definitely come on to that in a later question. It must be really difficult for a client coming to seek treatment following a rape. I think that must be a really brave and difficult thing to do. Would you be able to talk us through some of the things that therapists maybe should be taking into consideration when assessing clients in this context? And also, how do they know it's PTSD? Kerry: I mean, it's quite hard to know if it's PTSD and lots of things look a bit like PTSD as well. I think the first thing that that's useful to know is that the rate of PTSD after one rate is 50%. Okay. So it's incredibly likely. It's the most likely thing that someone's going to suffer from after a rape. And of course, once it's more than one rape, you get this load effect. So the more times you have been raped, the more likely you are to get PTSD. So it is quite likely. So I would definitely have PTSD glasses on when assessing a survivor of rape. But yes, someone has come to you. If they have PTSD, the key thing about PTSD is that the person can't bear to think about the rape. One third of the symptoms of PTSD are avoidance. And so the person is really, really not going to want to talk to you about it. So they've done the most incredibly brave thing to come to talk to you because they sort of know you're going to ask them about it, and they can't stand it. So, you know, really making sure that you're, I'm sure most therapists would anyway, really encouraging the enormous effort that someone's gone to, I think, pitching up for therapy for PTSD following rape is a bit like sort of, I don't know, pitching up to a doctor and saying, go on chop off my arm or saw it off really slowly. It's going to feel that painful, you know, in anticipation. Obviously it's not in reality. So it's an incredibly brave thing to do. So really, really encouraging people. And then coming in very quickly with something encouraging about how treatable it is. So if someone has PTSD to one off rate, I would be expecting them to get all better, to stop re-experiencing it in 10, 12 weeks. So it's not something that has to be with you for the rest of your life. I mean, you're not going to be unaffected by it, but you shouldn't have PTSD to it with a good bit of evidence-based treatment. So coming with a very kind of positive now then, this is worth talking about. And then how do you know it's PTSD? I mean, I think the real key to knowing if something's PTSD is thinking what exactly it looks like. So with PTSD, I sort of think about it like imagining that your brain has made a multi-sensory video of the rape. So it's got a picture track and a soundtrack, but there'll also be a body sensation track, smell, taste. So you've got this multi-sensory video and then it's as if that's shoved away somewhere in your brain. And then to have PTSD, you're going to have to have actual bits of that video pinging into your head when you absolutely don't want them to. So it might just be a frozen image of it, or it might be a clip of film with sound in it, or it might just be the taste of something or the smell of something that that belongs to that recording. But the key is it does belong to that video. So I often talk about it a bit like as if, old video tape and there's some sort of pixie sitting in your head, chopping up bits of it and throwing them into your mind. It has to be part of the original recording. And then because this multi-sensory video is so frightening and so shame-inducing and so disgusting, you will do anything at all to get it out of your head again. So it's like its burning oil, like someone has just poured burning oil into your mind. Oh so frightened, so ashamed. So you just immediately try and do something to push it out. And those are the avoidance symptoms of PTSD. And if you know that talking to someone will make this stuff come into your head, you're going to avoid talking to them. If you know that walking down a certain street will make it ping into your head, you won't go there. And if you know that seeing a man will make it come into your head, you're going to avoid men and you're going to avoid anything that makes this stuff come into your head. But I think it is quite difficult to really pin down PTSD. And of course, the person who has PTSD is not going to want to talk about it. So it's quite hard to really get that. There's a very good film hyperlinked into the paper telling you how to assess PTSD that really goes through it in about an hour of very sort of fine detail. But yeah. It's really sort of thinking about, it part of this film? And really encouraging the person that you can do something very early on, I think. Steph: Yeah, and it's one of the really lovely things about this paper as well. And we very much want people to encourage people to go and read the paper really thoroughly as well, because each bits that we're talking about will have so much more detail in the paper. And one of the really lovely bits is that you have interspersed all the sections with videos too, so people can really see in really practical terms how this can work. Kerry: We thought that was really important. So we thought it's really important for people to see someone saying the words, you know, when he did that, what did that feel like? How did that, you know what did you think? What happened next? Then what? You know, just to show that you can do this and you can say these words out. Steph: So should we get into the guidance that you've laid out then for working with clients experiencing PTSD after rape? As we've already mentioned, this is kind of a how-to guide for working with this client group and there's so much information in there. Are there any particular parts of the guidance that you would particularly like to highlight or to point out? It's a very long paper, so it could be quite a long record if we went through it all. Kerry: I'm sorry it's such a long paper people. What I suggest you do is actually ignore Steph and don't read the whole paper in one go. What I suggest you do is you decide hopefully at the end of listening to this to try treating someone in this evidence-based way and then just read the few bits that are relevant to the session you're going to do next and then read the next bit. Otherwise you forget it. Steph: Yeah, maybe that is a better way of doing it. Kerry: Yes, apologies for that. But at least because you can watch the films as well, to be fair, I think watching the films and reading the paper is the perfect combo. But you could always just watch the films. But I shouldn't say that in front of someone who works for journal. So I suppose the message is that you do not have to do anything different in terms of the bare bones of what you're going to do. You're going to do Cognitive therapy for PTSD, that's what we're going to take you through in the whole paper. You're going to do the same outline that you do for anybody in a car accident, in a disaster, mugging, whatever it is, you're going to do the same basic process of CT-PTSD. And the paper kind of runs through it in that order too. And there are just a few sort of little flexes that you need to think about or things that we're just going to say a bit more on. And so the first thing is that you're probably going to be dealing with dissociation. Now you might in other areas too, but we know that people are most likely to dissociate during a trauma if it's an inescapable trauma like a rape. And to be fair, I have never met someone with PTSD to a rape who didn't dissociate. It's an entirely adaptive thing to do when you're being raped. And in the paper, there's a load of stuff about how to explain it to a patient, including a film, how to manage it and so on. So number one is expect dissociation and we've got film and words on that. Number two, and I think this is really important, is you're going to have to give this person of all people a really good rationale for why you think reliving this event is a good idea. Yeah? And they need that because it's a very paradoxical thing to ask someone for details about rape. It's going to feel very uncomfortable for you and it's going to feel very uncomfortable for them unless you really, really know why. And so we can talk about evidence and so on, but in the end, I think you need a sort of user friendly explanation. the explanation that we give in the paper, I think is genius even though I made it up myself. Steph: I think that's fine. Own it. Own it. Kerry: Which is a lock and key metaphor. So we talk about the hotspots in trauma, the moments that we're going to update has been a bit like a lock and our updates are a key. And so if you wanted to design, if you were, what's his name? So what's it Timpson and you were making keys, you'd want to make, I can't remember his name, you'd want to. James Timpson, lovely guy, you'd want to make, if you wanted to make the best key to most likely slide into a lock, in order to make the best key, you'd take a mould or something with the lock, wouldn't you? I don't know how they do it. And so when we're really going into loads of detail with hot spots, know, what can you feel, what can you smell, what can you taste, we're doing that because we're trying to understand every single indentation in a lock. And we're not doing it for the hell of it. We're not doing it for any other reason than the better we understand the lock, the better we can design a key to update that moment and help someone stop re-experiencing the trauma. So a very good rationale is really important. And again, we show you how to explain that and how to do it. So expecting dissociation, a very good rationale. And then just, you're going to talk about rape, you're going to talk about people's body parts, how to do that. And there's a film in which we just get some outlines of people's bodies and look at which parts of their bodies involved in this incident. And then we agree what terms we're going to use, because you don't want to use a term that someone finds offensive. And then that's very straightforward explanation that's dealt with, two or three minutes. I think the other thing that is worth knowing again, you're just doing normal CT-PTSD. But you know, it's only really the kind of understanding the hotspots and updating them where you're going to have to go into loads of detail. With the reliving, you can do the best you can. You'll see in the paper that we don't go into loads of detail with that. We're only doing reliving so that the person can tell us what the hotspots are. And in fact, most people who are raped don't remember quite big parts of what happened anyway. So the reliving is not such a big deal and there probably will be lots of gaps in it. In terms of updating hotspots again, the usual way, but just being aware already that you're going to probably have some very somatic elements to it, pain or smells or tastes. And so again, we go through in the paper and in the films how to update somatic elements of hotspots, which you do with another sensation. And the same really, some of the things that happen in during a rape, words might not update them as well as maybe images. And so we go through some of the ways in which you might want to use imagery to update hotspots, escaping or having your say. And there's a film of us doing a joyous imagery update of a hotspot that involved Michelle Obama and me telling off this rapist, which was a nice way to end our day of filming. The last thing and the probably the most important thing. So doing normal CT-PTSD with just expecting dissociation, good rationales, bit sensory updating, bit of imagery updating maybe, how to agree the terms. But probably the most important thing is that every single person I've ever seen with PTSD following rape blames herself for it in some way. And the guilt will keep the PTSD going, the self-blame will keep the PTSD going. And so it's really, really, really important to get working on that and really not to accept someone blaming themselves for rape and to work really hard with every technique you can come up with to reduce that self-blame down as low as you can possibly get it. And I think in this regard, it's also worth just having a little chat with yourself as a therapist. think, you know, most therapists are lovely people, but we do come with our own stuff from our own background. And I think we do have to be super clear about the law and about what it says. And, you know, what it says very clearly is that there is no mitigation for rape. So even if you're really drunk or even if you're off your face on drugs or whatever, it is still a crime of equal level of severity. And that's really important because if we're aiming to help someone see that, we need to be very clear about it ourselves. And I always say to people when I'm teaching about this, and I think it leaves an appalling image in their mind, which they don't easily forget, is that I, a 56 year old woman have the right to be down the town centre of Oxford where I live at 11.30 on Saturday night with no clothes on, absolutely off my face on drink and drugs and not to be raped. And that if I am raped it is solely the responsibility of the person who chooses to rape me. It is against the law to have sex with someone if they cannot consent. So it's an image, it works better if you can see what I look like. But you know, I think it's a really important point. And that's not a radical feminist idea. That's the law. So I think we need to have that in our heads. Because we want to get people, we want to help people to get to something approaching that themselves, because nobody should be blaming themselves for a rape ever. Steph: No, absolutely. It reminds me of something my supervisor has always said when we work with survivors of sexual violence, which is put the guilt and shame back where it belongs because it's not with you. Kerry: Yeah, absolutely. There's one person who should be ashamed of himself in a rape scenario and that's someone who raped someone. And that self-blame and shame keeps PTSD going. It's not something we can leave. We need as therapists to try and reduce it with people somehow. Steph: Mm, yeah, I think that's so, so important. I think we've touched on this a little bit already, but is there anything you would like therapists to know specifically before they start this work with clients? And also, it's kind of a twofold question really, but then how do they keep themselves safe too? Kerry: Well I suppose in terms of keeping yourself safe, I think it's very important that you know yourself as a therapist and a very high proportion of therapists are female and a very high proportion of women have got some sexual violence in their past, we know that. Now it depends what's happened and what therapy you've had or what you've managed to do with it, whether or not you think that if you have that in your past, you want to or can do the work. And there's no rules about that. But I do think it's really important that if you think that you can't because it's too upsetting for you, too close to the bone, that's fine. People should not be made to do this work by their managers. And there are, unfortunately, I write quite a lot of emails to managers saying, this is unreasonable. This is not trauma informed. You know, you have to be trauma informed with your staff and you should not be forcing them to see cases that are too triggering for them. There's a list of stuff I don't like to do, for example, I'm absolutely terrified of dogs and I don't want to do any traumas that involve dogs. I can't, because I just know it's going to make me too frightened. It's a minor example, but knowing yourself is important. So number one to looking after yourself is, you know, really knowing that it's a reasonable and sensible thing to do to opt out if it's too triggering for you. Number two, I would say is don't have an entire caseload of people who've been raped if you can help it. Now, obviously, if you work in somewhere where that's all you do, you've done that with your eyes open, but mix it up a bit. No matter how long in the tooth you are, no matter how good you are at it, it will grind away at you. So see some other kinds of trauma for a light relief or something. I think the key to keeping well is to know that it's worth it. Yes. So to know that you're going to be effective. And that's what the research tells us. So if you read the paper, watch the films, if you're still not sure attend some extra training on it. Get yourself feeling up to speed on it so that you know that it's worth putting yourself through this because it's going to work. And do what we do with our clients as well. If someone said something that you're finding particularly upsetting, say it out loud to somebody else in your team. So we have the system in our clinic, which we call the corridor march and blurt. And you know, I'm listening to terrible things all day, but it's just some things that get to me. And I never know which it's going to be, but I can feel it inside me when I'm listening to it. And that's my key really. And what I do is as soon as I finished with that patient, I walked down and I grab a qualified member of staff and I say, can I just tell you what they've told me? And I say it out loud and we've got that deal in our team that we all do it with each other. And you have to have that deal because we never really tell someone something upsetting deliberately. Yeah, we would kind of summarise it. No we need to say exactly what it was that was so upsetting, the exact words. And what we found almost without exception is if you say it out loud to somebody, it stops pinging around in your head. So yeah, I think that's it really. allowing yourself to opt out, the corridor march and blurt, spacing these kinds of cases out so it's not all day rape. More training, more supervision if you need it. And then I suppose the final thing that I want to say about that is it is worth it. Yeah, I mean, I do, you know, I'm a terribly soft-hearted person and I can't watch horror films and I can't watch violent films. I never have been able to. It's got nothing to do with trauma and I'm a very soft person. But I do do this work because it's really worth it. I can't tell you what a buzz is to know that you have stopped someone re-experiencing being raped day in, day out in 10 sessions, in 12. So to know that you've done that is the best reason to have got out of bed this year. I know it's frightening but it really does feel good when you've done it. So I really, really want to encourage people to try it. Steph: Yeah. And that reminded me what you said towards the beginning when you were saying you have to give a really good rationale for your clients. But imagine saying to someone in 10 to 12 sessions, we can fix this. That must be magical. Kerry: Yeah, it's wonderful. It's, can't tell you what a buzz it is. And in a world in which there are, let's face it, some bad guys at the moment, particularly going around making everybody's lives miserable. We can't do much about that, but we can as CBT therapists, stop someone doing this kind of Groundhog Day, jumping back in time, re-experiencing being raped, feeling just ashamed, feeling full of self-blame, we can make that stop really in not very much time. Everybody who knows how to do PTSD knows how to do this. Steph: And I think we've very clearly answered this question already, which would have been what impact do you hope the paper will have on the world of CBT? So I might slightly rephrase it and say, what impact do you hope it will have? But also, have you seen any impact already? Kerry: Well, I mean, the papers only just come out. We did make the films about a year ago and I have been giving them out to people I supervise and others. And people have come back saying, people write me emails quite a lot saying, I was going to have to do reliving to a rape and I watched your film and I thought, I can do this and I did it. And it was fine. And she said she was so relieved that we managed to do it. And now she's not blaming herself so much. So you get this really good feedback really quickly. What I wanted, and again, it's not just me, I did kick it off, but about 20 people wrote the paper bits and we sort of smudged it all together. Was that wanted someone, I wanted to be more confident that a woman or a man had been raped and turned up to a CBT therapist or psychologist somewhere, anywhere in the country, that their chances of getting effective evidence-based therapy was greater, so that they could stop re-experiencing rape all of the time. And alongside that, that they would get this evidence-based therapy so that they would get better. And really for me and my kind of sense of justice in the world, I don't want a single rape survivor blaming themselves at all. I just don't, it's wrong. And so I want to give people effective tools to help rape survivors stop blaming themselves because they are never responsible for being raped. And so within the paper, there is also a resource document that we put together of all of the sorts of reasons that people blame themselves and sort of arguments to go through to take them through that the therapist can use. And so every single sort of helpful thing is there in one document that you can look at with your patient. And in fact, there's also reference to a paper we did a few years ago on how to work with guilt in PTSD. And again, that has film showing you all the kind of responsibility too. So again, I think it's entirely possible if you know what you're doing to help people not blame themselves for rape. And for me, I just can't stand the idea of people blaming themselves for rape. And we've got the technology to make that stop or really reduce it. So that's what I wanted, I really hoped for. My colleagues, Sam Akbar and Millay Vann did a webinar for the BABCP on it two weeks ago, three weeks ago, and had 500 people came to that. And they're doing another one on the 20th of November for BABCP in the morning. I've offered to do one for NHS England as well, which would be free, I think. They haven't come back to me yet, but hopefully they'll say yes. Can't think why they wouldn't. When we looked at the films have been viewed 1200 times so far. So, they've only really been widely available for about a month, isn't it? So hopefully we're looking at thousands of people watching them, which should be brilliant. Steph: Yeah, we're doing what we can to spread this paper far and wide as well so that people really do read it because it is, it's just so helpful. yeah, we really do. And maybe a slightly more left field question then, but if you had to do this all again, is there anything you would change about the paper or anything you'd want to do differently? Kerry: Hmm, make it a bit shorter. I don't know how to do that. There are a few films I wish we'd made actually, the more I thought about it. So I've probably made it longer unfortunately. I've made a few more films I think. No, I'm really very pleased with it. Steph: Well, that's great. That's what we want. I always like it when people say, actually, I'm really proud of this. It's really good. And I always like to ask our guests, as the journals managing editor, it's always interests me. If they have any reflections on the peer review process, if you can remember it, not everyone can. So was it helpful? How did the review was fine looking at this paper? Because it is slightly different to some of the papers that we get in. Kerry: Yeah. I was very interested to see what they made of it because, you know, it's not like quite a normal paper. There's no data. It's just, you know, this is what we think you should do in films as well. So my first sort of main thing was feeling very grateful to the poor people that had read this incredibly long paper and must have watched at least some of the films. And so I was really grateful. And I think it's very important because as I said, there's about 20 people who are authors on the paper but they're basically all my friends or colleagues. We've all worked together in the past and that's why we're authors. And so I was a little bit worried that we were a bit of an echo chamber and because we all think the same way. And so, you is there some massive thing we've missed out or is there some angle on it that we've just assumed,? So it's really helpful. And the reviews did point out some assumptions that we were making that we hadn't really thought about. And actually, you know, they just made so many detailed, helpful... There wasn't a single suggestion that I thought, that's ludicrous. I thought, gosh, that's a good point, let's put that in. So, it's so thoughtful, so much time was spent on it. It improved it. It did. Steph: Yeah. And I remember me and Richard looking at this paper when it came in and being like, who are we to ask to review it? They're all authors. Who's going to look at it? They're all on it Kerry: I don't know who you found because everybody that I would have thought of was an author on the paper. Steph: Yeah, a real diverse mix actually, so we were really grateful for that. Kerry: Yeah, well, we wanted, I didn't want it just to be clinical psychologist trauma specialists. I wanted a load of CBT therapists from NHS Talking Therapies there as well, and some survivors who are also therapists. So really wanting it as wide as possible. Steph: What would be the one thing, if you could narrow it down to one thing, that you would like clinicians to be able to take away from reading this paper? Kerry: That you have the skills to do this. If you know how to do CT-PTSD, you know how to do CT-PTSD with rape survivors. And please do it because I can't tell you how wonderful it feels to make someone stop re-experiencing rape. Honestly, if you do that once a year, it was worth you going to work for the whole year. Someone's life will change direction if they're no longer jumping back to being raped. How can you move forward if you're jumping back to being raped all the time? Day in, day out, even when you're asleep. So you can help someone change direction and sort put one of the terrible wrongs in the world slightly right. That was just wonderful. Steph: Yeah, and that's a message that's really reiterated throughout the paper as well. And it's such a hopeful one as well, because in what is such a dark, dark topic, something that just can be just really hopeful that you can change someone's life and it will be, it will, it will be life changing for them. Kerry: Yeah, and I know that sounds really like a megalomania thing to say, but someone's life does pivot around rape, particularly if have PTSD and goes down one direction. So you really can turn that the other way. Steph: This has been such a lovely chat, Kerry. Thank you so much. Just before I let you go, what's coming up next for you? Is there anything else you're working on that we can look out for or that we should be looking out for? Kerry: Yes, so despite promising everybody that I work with that we'd give it a rest, well that's not what's going to happen… Steph: I know there's at least two papers in our system from you at the moment. Kerry: We're on to something else now, which is I actually, so again, it's my experience of supervising around the country and in talking to all my colleagues, particularly the ones we've written the paper with, I think there is the same issue that's just slightly different with providing evidence-based trauma-focused therapy to adult survivors of childhood abuse. And I think that's people in NHS Talking Therapies particularly have been asked to do some of this work now. There was guidance last year that sort of said you can work with survivors of childhood abuse under certain conditions. And that's lovely, but you might say, how do we do it? Yeah. And if there's a lot of myths about rape, there's tenfold myths about childhood abuse. So we want to do exactly the same paper, hopefully not quite as long, on what to do with adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse in NHS Talking Therapies. And it will be do this, then this, consider this, films, films, films. And I'm thinking of calling it Don't silence the silenced. So I think that people who are adult survivors of childhood abuse go from service to service trying to find someone who will hear their story. And they were silenced as children and unfortunately, unknowingly, I think a lot of us silenced them as therapists. And again, I just don't want that to happen. I want us as therapists to help release people from jumping back in time to being scared little children all of the time. So that is the next project. And I have signed up already about 15 people to help me write it. Grudgingly they've signed up. Steph: Well, that sounds amazing. I'm really looking forward to that coming out. Well, as well as all the other papers you've got on the go as well. I know you've been very busy. So thank you so much, Kerry, for talking to me today. It's been really great to hear about the paper and we really encourage people to go read it, watch the videos and really put it into practice. Thank you. Kerry: Thank you. Steph: Thanks so much for listening. You'll find a link to the paper we discussed along with any other useful resources in the show notes, so please do go and check those out. If you enjoyed this episode please take a moment to rate, review and subscribe. It really helps others to find us. And if you have any feedback then I would love to hear from you. You can reach me at podcasts@babcp.com or follow us on Instagram and BlueSky @babcppodcasts. Our journals are there too, sharing all the latest research as soon as it is published. And don't forget to check out our sister podcasts, Let's Talk About CBT and Let's Talk About CBT Practice Matters. Whether you're new to CBT or just looking to enhance your practice, they're full of insightful discussions and some really helpful tips. Thanks for tuning again, and I'll see you next time on research matters. Bye

12. juni 2025 - 42 min
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
Rigtig god tjeneste med gode eksklusive podcasts og derudover et kæmpe udvalg af podcasts og lydbøger. Kan varmt anbefales, om ikke andet så udelukkende pga Dårligdommerne, Klovn podcast, Hakkedrengene og Han duo 😁 👍
Podimo er blevet uundværlig! Til lange bilture, hverdagen, rengøringen og i det hele taget, når man trænger til lidt adspredelse.

Vælg dit abonnement

Mest populære

Begrænset tilbud

Premium

20 timers lydbøger

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo

  • Ingen reklamer i podcasts fra Podimo

  • Opsig når som helst

2 måneder kun 19 kr.
Derefter 99 kr. / måned

Kom i gang

Premium Plus

100 timers lydbøger

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo

  • Ingen reklamer i podcasts fra Podimo

  • Opsig når som helst

Prøv gratis i 7 dage
Derefter 129 kr. / måned

Prøv gratis

Kun på Podimo

Populære lydbøger

Ofte stillede spørgsmål

Flere spørgsmål og svar
Kom i gang

2 måneder kun 19 kr. Derefter 99 kr. / måned. Opsig når som helst.