Billede af showet SonRise Community Church Evening Seminars

SonRise Community Church Evening Seminars

Podcast af SonRise Community Church

engelsk

Historie & religion

Begrænset tilbud

2 måneder kun 19 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / månedOpsig når som helst.

  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • Gratis podcasts
Kom i gang

Læs mere SonRise Community Church Evening Seminars

Weekly Podcast of our Sunday Evening teaching series.

Alle episoder

30 episoder

episode Psalm 13: Psalms of Lament cover

Psalm 13: Psalms of Lament

Good evening, thank you, hello, hi guys. Thank you for being here for our last Sunday evening of the spring. We're going to continue on, well, continue on. Tonight we're going to finish another installment of the tough text series. Last week we did the psalms of imprecation, or the imprecatory psalms. Tonight we're going to look at a probably not as difficult topic, but I think for many a tough text in its own right, the psalms of lament, specifically those psalms where we read. And we kind of wonder within the soul, is it really okay to talk to God like this? These are not true statements to say, how long, oh Lord, will you forget me forever? Like theologically that's wrong. Is that okay to say to God? Why is that in the psalms? We'll look at that particular tonight, that topic. So you have your Bibles open up, or devices to Psalm 13, the quintessential psalm of lament, or the prototypical psalm of lament. Let's pray as we begin. Father, thank you for this evening. Thank you for the gift of your church. Thank you for the gift of your word. Guide us, teach us, lead us now, we pray in Jesus' name, amen. The psalms of lament are called such because the psalmist has, for whatever reason, sometimes we know it, sometimes we do not, the psalmist has reached a breaking point, and has cracked, if you will. What is the definition of a biblical lament? A lament is, quote, a prayer in pain that leads to trust in God. A prayer in pain that leads to trust in God. Many people feel that the psalms of lament are strange, I think that's maybe a surface level comment on them, or deeper, inappropriate. Because they are themselves filled with complaining, arguing, not just about the hard things in life themselves, but usually the language in these psalms is directed at God. And so to read God-word language directed at Him that is filled with complaining from believers and godly people, we automatically think that's not okay. I mean, don't we know and believe, Romans 8, 28, that all things work according for the good for those who believe? Don't we trust the Lord? Didn't Jesus say He'll always be with us? Then why this language? Well, of course, we do believe that Jesus is with us, we do believe that Romans 8, 28, that God works all things for good, but we also believe we do not always recognize or sense the presence of the Lord with us. He does not promise to keep hard seasons from us, and though all things do work together for good, we also affirm that not everything that happens to us is good. And so we lament, the psalms of lament. How many, if you were to guess at 150 psalms, how many psalms are there that are psalms of lament? What do you think, if you're just to give a guess? 20%. 20%? Half? 30. 30? Any other takers? 100. 100. A third, roughly a third of the 150 psalms are psalms of lament, which makes it the largest category of psalms in the entire book. What do we learn from so many psalms of lament being given to us? us in the book of Psalms, I think by giving us so many, God intends to teach us and invite us to speak the truth about our lives, our pain, our hurt, our anger, and our confusion to speak it back to Him with better vocabulary, and I mean that. I think one thing that horrific events and dark seasons do to us is rob us of words. They rob us of words, they push us into silence because of the thick pain in the human heart. We can generally only think of questions but cannot quickly think of answers. Praise God that in the Psalms He has given us vocabulary to pray, make it our own, back to Him. Generally when we're in pain, we don't speak well. We don't speak well to others, we don't speak well to ourselves, and we certainly don't speak well to God. We are always in need of theological refinement and words that are precise and correct to give to God, and in giving us so many Psalms, He has given us language to speak to Him. And so when we hurt, the Psalms of lament generally teach us we're to hurt with God, not without God. So to show us all this, we're open to Psalm 13, the prototypical Psalm of lament. It's famous for its categories, its questions, its movement from beginning in verse one to very dark to soaring on the heights of praise in verse six in the end. There are three movements to this Psalm. Let me begin by looking at verse one and two, the first movement, the questions. This is how Psalm 13 begins. To the choir master, a Psalm of David, how long, O Lord, will you forget me forever? How long will you hide your face from me? How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day? How long shall my enemy be exalted over me? Many Psalms we're familiar with and quote and know, perhaps that fill the paintings or portraits on our walls and our homes and our churches begin with a very high and lofty praise-filled language, giving evidence that the Psalmist himself is entering into the presence of God. Here, something else is in view right from the beginning. David laments right away in Psalm 13 with an urgency and a sharpness going straight to the source, questioning God three times in verse one. We don't know exactly what's going on that gave rise to the context of these words in Psalm 13 or why he's in such a spot. All attempts really to place this Psalm in a specific moment in David's life are educated guesses which leads us to the conclusion that these words can fit many different spots in David's life. We do know, though, that whatever is going on is certainly not a comfortable place to be in. Look at how he begins in verse one, how long? People who ask the question, how long? Are generally people not looking for answers, right? If you're asking the question, how long? You're not looking for an answer. I know this because of preaching. I look at your faces in the morning when we're all here together and some of us here in the evening and sometimes, you know, when a sermon is bad, really bad, you know, not everything can be a home run. Sometimes you can barely bunt for whatever purpose, but people's faces begin to do something and they begin to almost visibly portray, at least to me is what I feel like, a question on their face. How long is this sermon going to last? And I know that if that question is popping in the head of many, the answer is evident. It's already been long. enough, please end this misery." Something of the same spirit I think is present in David's heart in verse 1. He is crying out, how long? I think that tells us for David it's already been too long. He's already convinced of things that simply aren't true. He says God has forgotten him, that God is distant from him, and that God has hidden himself from him. Theologically we know these things are not true because God is omniscient, knowing all things. He's omnipotent, always strong and able to do anything, and God is omnipresent, always near and present over everything, and especially with his people. But if you've been in a place like David and you've arrived at the point where you're asking how long oh Lord, you know that David's present trouble isn't really just a speed bump in the road of life. To David, he seems to be facing an Everest of pain, and when something is as big as an Everest in front of you in life, it tends to block your view from everything else in life, from everything that is true and good and beautiful. As verse 2 comes in Psalm 13, the painful realities and questions don't stop, they merely change direction. He began asking questions of God, now David asks questions of himself in the start of verse 2, and then question about others at the end of verse 2. How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day? How long shall my enemy be exalted over me? So four times now in verse 1 we have heard, and in verse 2, the phrase, how long flow forth from David. But it seems that his first two how long questions about God lead to his next two how long questions. Or maybe think of it like this, because David believes that God has forgotten him, and because David believes that God has hidden himself, David now feels other woes. His heart has become a raging sea, where concerns and fears and worries and anxieties are swirling all around, ebbing and flowing, rising and falling. It seems that he's filled with pain inside of him, and becomes worried of defeat outside of him. This lament in verse 1 and 2 is quick, it's brief, but if you linger on it you can see the pain that is there. Inside it you feel what David feels. Short as it is, it's language that is condensed, but highly concentrated with one commentator said, electric current, extreme pressure, loaded with agony and misery. This pain in verse 1 and 2, present in David's life, reminds me of the pain that C.S. Lewis expressed as he writes the book, a grief observed, reflecting after the fact on the death of his wife, Joy. In it, Lewis describes how he prayed time and time again for God to heal her cancer, thinking of it, his prayer, as if he's knocking on God's door, initially knocking, then moving to pounding, then moving to banging, then Lewis describes it, I didn't want to knock anymore, my knuckles hurt, it seems like God's not home. This is something of what David is feeling in the beginning of Psalm 13, but don't miss the fact that the painfully obvious fact, who he's addressing in Psalm 13. He's not talking to one of his servants, he's not talking to soldiers, he cries out, how long O Lord? He's lamenting to God himself. I think this shows us David is more than just drained, David seems to be done. But isn't it encouraging that when David Could have gone anywhere with his pain. He brings it to God. I think this is instructive for us. We also see Jesus doing this in the garden of Gethsemane when He said, Let this cup pass from Me. This is prayer. He goes to His Father. And rather than taking pain somewhere else, David brings his pain directly to God. I think we can learn from this. Like I said, we're not just a people, I think, with constant noise around us today. We are a people that contribute to the noise around the world today. We have constant distraction in the palm of our hands with games, Facebook, Instagram, all the other apps the kids are using these days, if you have those things. The interwebs.com right there on our phones. We can access to anything we want at the touch of our fingertips. And so when things get hard on us or things land heavily on our families, when hard seasons linger and don't lift and dark clouds come and don't scatter, do we just turn up the volume on one of our apps or a device of ours? Or do we bring all the pain to God? David is not ashamed to ask questions like this to God. And we should not be ashamed of it either. Questions about the way you feel God is treating you. The struggle in your own soul. The struggle with those around you. And honestly, there's something of a Peter element here too. Remember in his own suffering, disciples are leaving the Lord like crazy at the end of John 6. And then Jesus says to the twelve, will you also depart? Does anyone remember what Peter said? To whom else would we turn? You are our shepherd. To whom else would we turn? That's present even in this darkness in verse 1 and 2. That's the first movement of the psalm. Now look at verse 3 and 4. We go from the questions to the cries. Consider me, and answer me, O Lord my God. Light up my eyes, lest I sleep the sleep of death. Lest my enemies say, I have prevailed over him. Lest my foes rejoice, because I am shaken. It does seem that there's a progression here in these first two movements. David begins with a theological problem. It's with God, which led to an inward psychological problem. Which then leads to an outward social problem. Let me explain that. Even though David's the king, in many other psalms he rejoices in God as the true king. When he's in his right mind. He loves that in his sovereignty, this king, he can take refuge behind the Lord's wings. And under his strong arms. But here, David can't find God. He can't see God. He can't feel God as his refuge. And can't feel the safety of being with or near God. So naturally, this theological problem goes outward. And all of a sudden, he fears other problems that are around him. I think we see progression, just as we did in verse 1 and 2. We see it also in verse 3 and 4 with these requests. Crying out to God. He pleads with God to show up in the start of verse 3. It's as if David is saying, even if you have forgotten me. I've not forgotten you. You're my God. Please look. Please hear me. Please answer me. And please help me. This then moves to the end of verse 3. When David cries out, light up my eyes. Not because he's sensing physical darkness. And he needs physical light. Because he follows a statement with, lest I sleep the sleep of death. Meaning, if God does not show up and save me in this dark mess, I'm done. So light up my eyes means save me, restore me, bring me back to health of soul. Let the sun rise in my heart. I'm in anguish. Show up. Lead me out of this mess or I'm at my end. In this dark night of the soul, David longs for the light of the Lord to return. That's what he's after. And if this light doesn't return, he doesn't only say he'll die. He says his enemies will claim victory over him. He will be at an end. And a consequence is all his enemies will then gloat at his end. Remember in verse 2, it was only my enemy. Now in verse 4, it's my enemy and my foes. In verse 2, the singular enemy was exalted over him. And strangely, now in verse 4, the plural enemies are about to prevail over him entirely, showing us the longer that David lingers in this darkness, the more devastating the results will be. Now just as we're encouraged to ask our own questions to God in seasons of lament and suffering, we saw that in verse 1 and 2, in verse 3 and 4, we learn that in our own suffering, we can do more than just ask God questions. As good and healthy as that is, to do that, we can do more. We can use those questions and let those questions linger in us long enough to drive us to ask God to do something. Not just how long, oh Lord, but consider me, rescue me, relieve me, restore me, deliver me, vindicate me. Those questions lead him to plead with God to intervene. So not only do I think we have in the Psalms of Lament a green light to bring all our lament to God, but we have a green light to plead with God to come and lift the dark things of the soul. Just like David does here in verse 3 and 4. He desires that God intervenes so that God, not his enemies, will have the final word. Look how it ends. We saw the questions, the cries, now we see the singing in verse 5 and 6. But I have trusted in your steadfast love. My heart shall rejoice in your salvation. I will sing to the Lord, because He has dealt bountifully with me. What a change is present in verse 5 with the very first word. The rain has dried up, the storm is gone, night is over, morning has dawned, the dark clouds have burst with deep mercy over David's head and he rejoices in the first word that comes out as he sings in verse 5 and 6 as, but. This word, but, abruptly ends his cries for rescue and ushers him into a new and fresh resolve to know the Lord and to praise the Lord after the clouds have scattered. He praises God in verse 5 and 6. Now in place of these dreadful questions is a delighted trust in God's steadfast love. The phrase steadfast love, as many of you know, is the Hebrew word hesed, which means covenant faithfulness. It's a word that brings to mind ancient promises of old. Abraham heard long ago, I will be your God and you shall be my people. He heard it and he believed it. So did Isaac and Jacob and Joseph. And Israel heard the same thing through Moses all the way down to David. These ancient covenant promises, I will be God to you and you will be my people. God's people have always had to struggle with the reality of remembering God's promises and banking on them and living in light of them. It seems that remembering that reality in the midst of his darkness is the very thing that brings him back. to the light in verse 5. And what does he do once he's back in the light? A new melody begins in his own heart. As verse 5 tells us, he rejoices in God's salvation. And where the heart goes, the tongue soon follows. So naturally then in verse 6, we see the symphony of his heart become the song of his tongue. What forms the content of his song? Notice verse 6 in full. I will sing to the Lord. Why? Because he has dealt bountifully with me. So David has not only moved from questioning to crying to singing. In verse 6, God has fully reversed the content of verse 1. He once believed that God had abandoned him. Now he sees that the Lord has always led him well. And so for David, his joy is all the higher now in verse 6, because his sorrow was all the deeper in verse 1. This is often the experience of the biblical authors. Is this not often also our experience as well? We grow in life not through times of ease, but through times of anguish and suffering and sorrow and slowly but surely the Lord uses these seasons to strip us of our idols, to increase our trust in him and to further root our feeble feet in his firm and ancient promises. Dark days are no new thing to the people of God. If we really want to learn from Psalm 13, we'll learn that in our suffering, we ought to hurt with God, not without him. We'll learn that in his timing, he will bring us out to the light, that in his providence, he'll let us sit in the dark until the time he has deemed where he will scatter the clouds and bring fresh mercy on our heads. Once that happens, our dark dirge will be replaced with songs of bright hope. And so we can be sure of this, David really felt abandoned by God, though he wasn't. We may feel the same, but we're not. We have hope in our laments because even in the dark, there the Lord is a light to us still. So praise God that in dark times, he's given us a vocabulary to make our own, to bring before him. Again, a lament is a prayer in pain that leads to trust. Without a robust theology of lament, without thinking about these things, I don't think Christians are well-equipped to suffer. Believers may feel that real Christians, when asked how they're doing, have to project victory and joy. How are you doing? Blessed. We somehow think that this is the only right and possible answers, but really, in fact, this is thin theology and it suggests that sorrow and doubt, to us, we think are indicators of a failed relationship with God. That if we truly were walking with God, we must always be able to answer, blessed, I'm great, I'm fine, soaring on the heights of praise. Rather, I think a mature theology and an experience and a maturity with the Lord will show us that a legitimate part of our life with God is in the dark, hard seasons. Where we find Him meeting us, where He, by His grace, gives us words to bring back to Him, seasons in the midst of which we will not generally be thankful for, but after which we'll be very thankful for, for what God has done in the midst of them. These seasons, God is eager to meet us in. These are the Psalms of lament. we'll learn that in our suffering, we ought to hurt with God, not without him. We'll learn that in his timing, he will bring us out to the light, that in his providence, he'll let us sit in the dark until the time he has deemed where he will scatter the clouds and bring fresh mercy on our heads. Once that happens, our dark dirge will be replaced with songs of bright hope. And so we can be sure of this, David really felt abandoned by God, though he wasn't. We may feel the same, but we're not. We have hope in our laments because even in the dark, there the Lord is a light to us still. So praise God that in dark times, he's given us a vocabulary to make our own, to bring before him. Again, a lament is a prayer in pain that leads to trust. Without a robust theology of lament, without thinking about these things, I don't think Christians are well-equipped to suffer. Believers may feel that real Christians, when asked how they're doing, have to project victory and joy. How are you doing? Blessed. We somehow think that this is the only right and possible answers, but really, in fact, this is thin theology and it suggests that sorrow and doubt, to us, we think are indicators of a failed relationship with God. That if we truly were walking with God, we must always be able to answer, blessed, I'm great, I'm fine, soaring on the heights of praise. Rather, I think a mature theology and an experience and a maturity with the Lord will show us that a legitimate part of our life with God is in the dark, hard seasons. Where we find Him meeting us, where He, by His grace, gives us words to bring back to Him, seasons in the midst of which we will not generally be thankful for, but after which we'll be very thankful for, for what God has done in the midst of them. These seasons, God is eager to meet us in. These are the Psalms of lament.

I går - 1 h 0 min
episode Smashing Babies??? (Psalm 137) cover

Smashing Babies??? (Psalm 137)

Tonight we turn to Psalm 137. We will read the whole psalm and then dive into it as we unpack it together. Psalm 137 By the waters of Babylon, there we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion. On the willows there we hung up our lyres, for there our captors required of us songs and our tormentors mirth, saying, "Sing us one of the songs of Zion." How shall we sing the Lord's song in a foreign land? If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill. Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy. Remember, O Lord, against the Edomites the day of Jerusalem, how they said, "Lay it bare, lay it bare, down to its foundations." O daughter of Babylon, doomed to be destroyed, blessed shall he be who repays you with what you have done to us. Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock. The word of the Lord from Psalm 137. There is a lot for us to unpack this evening, but first, we begin with the concept of imprecatory psalms. The word "imprecatory" or "imprecate" simply means to invoke a curse upon someone or something. In the Psalter, we have what are called imprecatory psalms. While there is debate over how many actually exist, they are usually classified as a subclass found within the category of laments. You can see this in Psalm 137: it opens with a lament and ends with a curse. They flow from a spirit of lamentationa broken crying out to God. Of the 150 psalms, roughly 30 contain some form of curse language. Eight are usually defined strictly as imprecatory laments, where these elements fill a significant portion of their meaning. These include Psalms 7, 35, 58, 59, 69, 83, 109, and 137. These psalms are all prayers to God, calling for His work to be done. They flow from a cry for justice or vindication, coming from a place of deep need where the speaker is unable to act themselves and must trust fully in Gods work. Most imprecatory psalms are personal, often written by David in the midst of his struggles. However, Psalm 137 is unique; it is a national call for Gods justice, set during the Babylonian exile. The setting is specific: "By the waters of Babylon, there we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion." These singers were likely part of the priesthood, those required to sing the psalms in the temple courts. Now, they have been pulled out of the temple and sent into exile. They sit by the waters of Babylonlikely the Euphrates River or one of its tributaries. Babylon was nothing like Jerusalem. It was a lush city, overflowing with greenery and water in the midst of the desert. Yet, even in this beautiful, immaculate city, the exiles focused on what they had left behind. They did not want to forget that Babylon was not where they belonged. In the midst of this beauty, they wept because their home no longer existed as they knew it. To them, Jerusalem was now a barren wasteland, and the glory that was Zion was no more. As the psalm continues, we see them being taunted: "On the willows there we hung up our lyres, for there our captors required of us songs, and our tormentors mirth, saying, 'Sing us one of the songs of Zion.'" There is debate over whether they hung their lyres simply to rest or as an act of hiding them. Regardless, they were putting away their instruments to avoid being mocked. Their captors ridiculed their faith, essentially saying, "Dance for us! Sing us one of those joyous songs you used to sing in your temple. We've conquered your God and your city, but your songs are prettysing for us." This leads to a profound question: "How shall we sing the Lord's song in a foreign land?" How do you sing of the glory and beauty of God in the midst of destruction? How do you sing the joyous psalms of ascentsongs of journeying to the templewhile that temple lies in ruins? They were tormented by the reminder of all that had been lost. Yet, they could not forget. The psalmist writes, "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill." This is a vow of remembrance. Even if they cannot sing the songs of their glorious land for their captors, they will not forget their home. I am reminded of the song "Jerusalem" by Matisyahu, which reflects on this very line: "If I forget you, let my right hand forget what it's supposed to do." It is a call to never forget what God has done, even when overwhelmed by the "waters of Babylon." The exiles were being assimilated into Babylonian culture, but the prayer here is a resistance to that assimilation. Jeremiah had told the exiles to build homes and pray for the welfare of Babylon, but they were not to become Babylonians. They were to be in the city but not of it. This is a great admonition for us today. It is easy to get wrapped up in our current lives and forget that our true citizenship is in heaven. Like the children of these exiles, we must not forget our roots or become assimilated into the world around us. The psalmist continues, "Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy." In the history of Israel, Jerusalem or Zion represents God Himself. It is not just about a location; it is about the presence of God. Yahweh resided in Jerusalem. When we speak of our home, we speak of where God is. That is our greatest joy. As we reach the end of the psalm, we encounter the harsh language of imprecation: "Remember, O Lord, against the Edomites the day of Jerusalem... O daughter of Babylon... blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock." This sounds shocking to our ears, but it must be understood in context. The Babylonians were notoriously cruel. Historical accounts tell us they slaughtered the sons of King Zedekiah before his eyes before blinding him and taking him in chains. They were a people who showed no mercy. The psalmist is not creating a new category of violence; he is calling on the prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah. Isaiah 13:16 prophesied that those who destroyed Jerusalem would have their own infants dashed in pieces. The psalmist is essentially praying, "Lord, do what You said You would do. Bring Your justice to pass against those who have committed such atrocities." This is not a personal vendetta; it is a cry for divine vindication. It is a trust that God will ultimately be just. We see this echoed in the book of Revelation, where the martyrs under the altar cry out for God to vindicate them. Gods justice has an eternal perspective. The Babylonian captivity lasted 70 to 80 years; the psalmist likely never saw Babylon fall. Yet, in time, God was faithful, and Babylon was brought to ruins. Ultimately, we are called to trust God in the fullness of time. We pray that His majestic name is honored and glorified, and we trust Him with the outcome. No one escapes Gods judgment in the end. We are His children, and we must never lose sight of our true allegiance. Let us pray.

24. maj 2026 - 1 h 0 min
episode Semper Reformanda cover

Semper Reformanda

Semper Reformanda We now come to Semper Reformanda. Although it is not one of the five solas, it is a Reformation teaching that helps tie them all together. Over the last seven weeks, we traced the ecclesiological history of the medieval church, the need for the Reformation, and the development of the five solasScripture alone, grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone, and for the glory of God alone. Together, these reveal how salvation is found in Christ and how the Reformation sought to recapture the gospel. The Origin and Meaning of Semper Reformanda The phrase Semper Reformanda comes from the 17th century, first appearing in a Dutch ministers devotional. The full Latin expression is Ecclesia Reformata, Semper Reformandathe church reformed, always being reformed. In modern usage, you may also see Fides Reformata, Semper Reformandathe Reformed faith, always reforming. Both emphasize the same idea: continual reformation. Reformation, by definition, is the act of improving or correcting somethingbehavior, institutions, or practicesby removing abuses or corruptions. In a biblical sense, reformation aims to restore the church as closely as possible to its original, scriptural state. This is not a call to constant novelty or progressivism. Rather, it is a call to continually evaluate all we say, do, and believe according to Scripture. When we consider the 15th and 16th centuries, it is important to remember that the Reformers did not set out to break from Rome. Luther did not intend to start a new church or create Lutheranism. His 95 Theses were written to correct errors in the church according to Scripture. He remained a Catholic monk and Augustinian until he was pushed out. The Reformation began as a call to reform the church so that the Catholic Churchthe one true church in their understandingwould once again be holy and faithful to Scripture. Every generation, however, tends to drift from the gospel. Scripture warns that people will seek teachers who tickle their ears, and this has been true in every age. Semper Reformanda calls us to examine whether we are following Scripture or merely following tradition. Biblical Foundations for Semper Reformanda Two key passages illustrate this principle: Acts 17 The Bereans The Bereans received the word with eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so. They did not simply accept Pauls teaching because of his authority. They tested it against Scripture. This is a model for the church today: do not accept teaching merely because a pastor or leader says it. Pastors are fallible. Scripture alone is infallible. 1 Thessalonians 5:1922 Test Everything Paul instructs the Thessalonians to test everything; hold fast what is good. This includes testing prophecies, teachings, and practices. The church must remain engaged, discerning whether teachings align with Scripture rather than being carried away by every new doctrine or personality. Semper Reformanda is therefore a call to an active, thoughtful, Scripture-centered faith. Common Errors A. Reformation as Nostalgic Renewal Some interpret reformation as returning to an idealized pastwhether medieval Catholicism, early church asceticism, or Puritanism. Each generation tends to romanticize a previous era. But no era of church history was perfect. Every age had blind spots, including our own. The Reformers did look back to the early church and the original languages (ad fontes), but they did so to better understand Scripturenot to canonize past traditions or personalities. B. Reformation as Endless Progressivism Others believe always reforming means always changing. This leads to churches conforming to cultural trendsaffirming whatever society affirms in the name of love or inclusion. This is not biblical reformation; it is capitulation. C. Reformation as Endless Purification On the opposite extreme, some pursue a pure church through constant division. John Frame famously called this phenomenon Machens Warrior Childrenthose who inherited Machens zeal for doctrinal purity but turned it into perpetual warfare. This leads to fragmentation, where every disagreement becomes grounds for separation. Erasmus warned Luther that schism breeds more schism, and history has proven him right. Every generation faces new distortions of biblical truth: Grace alone can become hyper-grace, denying repentance or holiness. Faith alone can be subtly replaced with faith plus works or faith plus doctrinal precision. Christ alone can become Christ plus tradition, Christ plus sacraments, or Christ plus theological systems. Scripture alone can be overshadowed by favorite theologians, denominations, or cultural assumptions. Semper Reformanda calls us to continually evaluate whether our beliefs and practices align with Scripturenot with tradition, culture, or personal preference. Reformed theology holds two commitments: Reformed Scripture is the foundation of all doctrine and practice. Reforming We continually examine ourselves to ensure we remain faithful to Scripture. This protects the church from: Traditionalism (doing things because weve always done it this way) Cultural accommodation (doing things because the world says we should) Instead, we pursue a thoughtful, Scripture-driven faith that seeks to honor God in all things. Conclusion Semper Reformanda reminds us that the church must never drift into complacency. We must not coast or slide into neutral. Instead, we actively seek the Spirits guidance through the Word, allowing Scripture to teach, correct, admonish, and transform us. That is the heart of Semper Reformanda.

3. maj 2026 - 1 h 0 min
episode Soli Deo Gloria cover

Soli Deo Gloria

Transcription: Soli Deo Gloria So as I said, we come tonight to Soli Deo Gloria, the final sola on our list. So this is the fifth of the five solas, and we've worked through up to this point now. Sola Scriptura, that's at the foundation for everything that we've discussed, that from scripture alone, we understand who God is, we understand who we are, we understand salvation. So it all begins with the scriptures that teach us, that inform us, that drive us. So from there, we then talked about Sola Gratia, so we talked about that grace alone. So it is by grace we are saved, it is not of ourselves. And then from grace, we talked about faith, and it is that grace that gives faith. So Sola Fide, okay? And then from faith, we then saw what is it that, who gives us grace, who gives us faith, but Christ alone, and that there is no other name under heaven by which man can be saved. So we talked about Christ alone. So Christ is our all in all, and that is where we left off last week, as we now come to the ultimate finale in Soli Dei Gloria, for the glory of God alone. So this is our topic, is for the God's glory alone. So we'll look at this in three distinct ways tonight. So first, we'll talk about a historical perspective, we'll talk a little bit about Reformation, some of the misconceptions when people think of this term, then we'll deal with a theological understanding of the term, and then finally, we'll look at a practical or a common way that we can apply this term to our lives. So we think historically, the idea of glory, the glory of God, of God of glory. We come first, of course, to Luther again. We have the Luther rose before us here in the Reformation. And one of the things that people will critique about Soli Deo Gloria is the fact that Luther himself was against a theology of glory, okay? So part of this will become a misunderstanding, but the theology of glory is ultimately Luther's biggest pet peeve. When he looked at the Roman Catholic Church, what he said often is that their theology was all about glory and transcendence in God apart from the humiliation of God. And so one of the things that people will pick up on is how can the Reformers be about the glory of God alone if Luther was so against God's glory? This is to clearly be a straw man argument because Luther in no way, shape, or form was against the glory of God. However, when we think of it, the glory of God must be placed in its proper context. And the proper context of God's full glory begins and ends with the salvation of mankind through the humiliation of God, through the death of Christ. So that it is not simply about doing the proper works and God gets glory as you do great things for him, but rather the ultimate and full glory of God is revealed in his son. So this is what Luther will make his primary theology. It is through Christ alone, the death of Christ alone, that Christ and God get the fullest experience of glory. It's not in the riches, it's not in the big buildings, it's not in all the fancy architecture. That is not where the glory of God is seen. The glory of God is seen ultimately and fully in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ alone. That, the theology of the cross or the theology of humiliation, is the cornerstone of Luther's theology which gives God glory. So again, so one of those things people will highlight, again, thinking of Luther being anti-glory, Luther is not anti-glory, but glory in its proper context. Again, so it's not about the big shiny things, not the big things that are sought for God's glory, but the son alone is what Luther will highlight. The other critique of this in a reformed perspective becomes Calvin. So people will say one of the things that Calvin often spoke about is the glory of God given to humanity, that humanity finds glory in God and therefore in themselves are glorified. That may sound confusing, but there's an emphasis that Calvin highlights a lot of the dignity of mankind. So it's where we get the fact that the humanity begins in Genesis 1 and 2, not Genesis 3. Often people think of reformed doctrine as Genesis 3 over, like we're just worms and dust and humanity is of no value and is just, God was just nice to us. We were of nothing. Though Calvin would be what we say is Genesis 1 and 2, that mankind is made in God's image. God gave mankind image and in such he gave them a form of glory because mankind took on God's perspective. Mankind is of value, not in of his intrinsic self, but in the fact that they bear God's image thus gives them a value greater than creation. Okay. So this will often be Calvin's argument. Okay. It's not that Christ died because he loved his image so much, but that he loved himself to gain the most glory in our salvation. So Calvin has this understanding in view. And so when we look at Calvin.Right, and he's gonna highlight things like Isaiah 43 For I am the Lord your God's okay speaking to Israel in their salvation I am the Lord your God the Holy One of Israel your Savior I gave Egypt as your ransom cush and see but in exchange for you because you are precious in my eyes and honored or Gloried is also a way that is translated and I love you I give men in return for you people in exchange for your life fear not for I am with you I will bring your offspring from the east and from the west. I will gather you I will say to the north give up and to the south do not withhold bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the end of the earth Everyone who is called by my name who I created for my glory whom I formed So gal Calvin will often connect the glory of God To his salvation of mankind that in his love for them. He is most glorified Okay, these are very similar themes but highlighting them from different directions So when people say things like Calvin and Luther were against God's glory as we understand it They were not they approached them from different directions than the Roman Catholic Church and in such we're critiquing a false understanding and As we travel through history the glory of God will become a major theme. There is one famous composer Does anyone know who signed all of his works? With to God's glory Johan Sebastian Bach signed all of his Writings with the solo SDG. So SDG is on all of his writings It's because he believed that every work of mankind should be done for the glory of God So after pouring his heart on it was simply for God's glory and fame. So this becomes a theme throughout History and again, we see it often in the arts that performance for the glory of God supremely and so everything is done for the exaltation of God's name and So that's just a brief kind of touching on some overview historical points Some of the misnomers we'll get into here in our theological understanding So when we think of the glory of God the first thing that it is not The glory of God is not the same thing when you read in Scripture the glory of the Lord Okay, so usually we saw this last week in the book of Exodus that the glory of the Lord would be shown in the morning Okay When the manna would come it said the glory of the Lord would be shown. It's the first time it appears in the Bible The glory of the Lord shown round about them and they were greatly afraid Everyone know when we talk about the shepherds the glory of the Lord is a manifestation of glory in an actual physical sign so that's like you think of the kind of glory they're like, ah God Okay. So when we talk about solo de gloria, this is not that this is different. Okay, so usually we use the word glory of the Lord for the God knocking people down showing himself Different phrase. Okay, just so we are clear on all our terminology Sometimes people get these things mixed up. So we want to begin with this foundation So we talked about the glory of God alone. It is for his prestige for his name So when we think glory, it's that lifted high is that picture so put on a pedestal above all else So glory in that phrase not a physical manifestation of himself, so they are Different and so for our historical theological understand This is the direction that the Reformers went is that everything that happened was for God's glory alone Specifically as I think you've begun to see is salvation is the purpose Is the purpose being driven in the solace? It's who is the one who saves how does God save? How do we understand salvation? This was what the Reformers were fighting for was a true understanding of the gospel So what do we believe and how do we believe it? And so ultimately it is that salvation itself exists to give God the most glory Okay, so each of the pieces along the way culminate here in all of those things must be true for God to be most glorified If anywhere along the way those four first steps break apart God is not perfectly glorified for in each of those other states something else can receive glory Okay, something else can be put on a pedestal as having achieved Something and so this drives the understanding of Soli de Gloria that all of this leads to this beautiful picture that God is supremely God There is no one else who can match his work. And so we begin in Romans 11 So it's the text I want to begin with thinking theologically. This is usually where most people will highlight Romans 1133 through 36. This is the end of the theological section of the book of Romans Okay, one of the thingsthat we highlight in Paul's writing. Paul loves to do theology first, application second. Okay, and there are several points along the way where he'll end with these little doxologies or praises of God as he transitions into application. And so this is what we also see in Romans. And Romans, of course, is the gospel theological text. If you want a deep understanding of the theology of the gospel, it's the book of Romans. Unpacks it, deep theology. There's not any really specific Romans-based issues. What I mean, when you read Paul's letter, he's not addressing any issues in Rome. He doesn't know them. He doesn't really have a relationship with them. He wants to. He wants to go there. He wants to meet them. But I don't know you, and since I don't know you, what am I gonna give you? The thing that I'm most passionate about, the gospel. So I'm gonna give you the theology of it. I'm gonna give you the basic application of it. That's what Romans is. And so you're not lost in any, like, well, what's the culture like? It is the gospel. It's pure and simple and beautifully written. And so this is where we go to even now as Paul finalized his theological discussion and makes this transition, he ends it this way, beginning in 33. Oh, the depth and the riches and the wisdom and the knowledge of God. Okay, after giving all this theology, this is what he says. How unsearchable are his judgments. How inscrutable his ways. For who has known the mind of the Lord or who has been his counselor or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid. For from him and through him and to him are all things to him be glory forever. Amen. All glory, all majesty to him alone. All that is said and done is to make much of him. And we see this throughout the books of Paul's writing. Paul and Peter and Jude and Revelation, or given to us by John, all have these themes and will all have these statements time and time again reflecting on God alone is the one who receives glory. Ephesians 3, 21, to him be glory in the church and in Christ throughout all generations, forever and ever. Philippians 4, which we just went through not that long ago as Sam worked through it. To our God and Father be glory forever and ever, amen. Peter in his works in verse 4, 11, whoever speaks and whoever speaks oracles of God, whoever serves is one who serves with strength in order that everything God may be glorified through Christ. So in 1 Peter 4, he's given this list of how to live out the faith and in the end for the glory of God, that God may be glorified in everything we do, he will be made much of. And so all this begins to point to the fact of for God to be most glorified, for God to be most put on display, it is that he is the one who has done all these things. He is the one who has saved us. So the theological foundation begins with the fact that God alone is the one who causes all things to be. Okay, so in this series, we've been looking at these individual pieces and he is the one who has brought it about. And in so doing, he is most honored and glorified throughout history. So in Egypt, we talked about the fact that he brought them alone through the Red Sea. Did anyone help him accomplish anything in the Exodus? No, he did it all. Even as we got to the fact of the last three weeks, they've hit crisis after crisis and they go to Moses and each time Moses is like, I don't know, I can't fix it. I can't make bitter water sweet, it's a little bit beyond my pay grade. You have no food, congratulations, neither do I. We have no water, neither do I. These are not things that I can accomplish. Only God can accomplish it. And in so doing, he receives all the glory because only he has done these things. They accomplish nothing on their own. They do not have the power and this is what is continually reminded of them. All the more we continually see this in the life of Israel. God reminds them time and time again, he acts for his glory. Isaiah 40 to eight, I am the Lord, that is my name, my glory I give to no other, nor my praise to carved idols. Theological understanding highlights God is glorified alone in the world. So even when we think about life and we think about salvation, we think about one true God, Israel, okay? When we think about Israel's worship of God, it is to be only to him, for he is the only one worthy of being glorified. For all other carved idols are worthless. Again, Isaiah's got long jokes about tossing them into the fires and there's lots of sarcastic points in the book of Isaiah. Enjoy the book of Isaiah, it's fun. So does Ezekiel. They've got many stinging condemnations against idolatry. But we too are quick.to not give full glory to God as we turn to other things in the world. And God continually reminds us, specifically again in the life of Israel, while he is a loving God, that he is slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love, it does not mean he passes over our blatant idolatry. He did not pass over Israel's blatant idolatry, but rather calls them to the mat when the time was right so that these words are true, only I am worthy of glory. Only I will be glorified. So we think at the end of all time, when we get to Revelation, all knees, every tongue will confess that God alone, Christ Jesus is king to his glory alone. It is not anyone else that can receive this glory. For he heard every creature in heaven and earth and on the earth and under the earth and in the sea and all of them saying, to him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be blessing and honor and glory and might forever and ever. When the time ends, this is the song of the elders. This is the song of the saints. To them alone, to God alone is all glory from now until the end of time. For they alone have saved. He alone has saved. He alone is the one worthy. He is the one who commands all of our life. No one compares to him. From beginning to end, he is the one who has created mankind. He is the one who has given life to mankind. He is the one who's given the law to mankind. He is the one who's given resurrection and hope to mankind through repentance and faith in Christ. He is the one who's done all these things, not to make much of us but all the more to make much of him. He is our God. And so our texts continually reinforce this thing that the Apostles were clear that we must remember that everything in our lives must focus on this end. So that's why as we think about that's the theological, it transitions into our practical outworking. So what does this mean? I think we can mentally go, yes, all glory to God. He is the one who has saved us. The Epistles repeat this, but what does that practically look like? How does this shape us? And I think this is actually the most important part when we think of Soli Deo Gloria, is how does it actually work itself out in our lives? Because when we asked last week, Adam asked that question, what is the most ignored of the Solas? This is ultimately what I still think is the most ignored of the five Solas is Soli Deo Gloria, because it kind of becomes a passing, yes, all glory to God. And then we just move on. Like we say it, but do people actually mean it? Or is it simply just a motion people go through? It's like the Emmy speech, I'd like to thank God, my mother, everyone in the world that has helped. Do I actually mean it? Or is like, well that's what I'm supposed to say. So we're supposed to say all glory to God, cool, it's in Scripture. But does that shape who we are? Do we think about our lives in the fact of, do our actions reflect those who live for God's glory? This takes us to 1st Corinthians 10. So again, the book of 1st Corinthians dealing with a church that has lots of issues. Okay, 1st Corinthians, it's probably one of the most messed up churches in Scripture that we have a long epistle to. Again, you can debate some of the churches in Revelation. But 1st Corinthians has a lot of stuff going on, a lot of confusion. Okay, it's also the church Paul probably spent the most time with. He spent a long time with them. Before he left, he wrote them a very lengthy letter addressing some of their issues. Technically, we know roughly he wrote at least three letters. We only have two of them. But he spent a lot of time with them. In the book of 1st Corinthians, it'll also say that they're the proof that he is an apostle because they came to faith. This messed up church with all their problems is proof that Paul's an apostle. It's probably one of my most, I find the most fun statements in the book of 1st Corinthians. But this point is he goes, when looking at all the things, when all of our life come together, so whether you eat or drink, and he's talking about idolatry and how people eat and drink and how they live their lives, do whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. So be purposeful. Okay, so if the aim of our lives is to live for the glory of God, that means that our lives must be lives of purpose. Is the glory of God a passive thing or is a purposeful thing that we strive for? Again, when we talk about the Israelites of old, idolatry was a chosen, that you're choosing idolatry over God. You're choosing to add the Asher poles and the Baal worship and all these other ones. They're willfully choosing that God is not enough. Okay, in our day and age we don't...have it that obvious. Okay, we're not usually going to random bail. I don't even know if you probably could. I'm sure there's some part in Pasco County because it's Pasco County that you can still do that. If people have lived here long enough, you know what I mean. But just we're a weird County. So that picture, though, of idolatry in our context tends to be much more passive idolatry. Okay, we equally turn to the world for all of our answers instead of God. We just don't have graved images that we do it to. Okay, but we will look to the world, we'll look to politicians, we'll look to science, we'll look to all sorts of things to solve our problems and not to God. And this in many ways is idolatry because part of it is we're not thinking volitionally. Again, not that those aren't good things, not that you shouldn't go to a doctor, you should. It's good to have those things. But what is our goal in all of our actions? Day by day, do you think of your life as being lived for the glory of God? Do you stop at all during your day to think, do these actions reflect those who are seeking to glorify God? Or are we passively going through life every single day? Do we passively simply exist? And this is the admonition that we have in our text. Whatever you do, and again this isn't even like a don't do things, this is whatever you do. Whether you eat or drink, however you are choosing to live out the faith in accordance with God's rules and admonitions in Scripture, do it for God's glory. Do it with joy. Do it to make the most of who God is. Because that's ultimately what living for the glory of God is, is living to make God most known. Okay, do we do that? When we go out the door in the morning, do we think about how we can make God known today? So I think about recently I was at a, we had a pastor's conference with some of our friends. They did a conference down here called Practically Pastoring. And one of the guys there is a t-shirt designer. He does t-shirts. You may have seen Adam and I wear them. He's got one that says, how can I pray for you? Okay, it's become like a giant movement all of a sudden, like in the last year. But he actually started it almost three years ago. So when it was just simply the fact that he was traveling around the country, him and his wife, he does t-shirt design. So he has a printing thing so he can travel and just meet people and do stuff. So he's got a lot of flexibility. It was just, what can I do to make the most of God while we're traveling the country in an RV? He's like, I print t-shirts. So one day he, the first he started with just putting a sign out. He just put a sign out like, how can I use my day for the glory of God? Just a little camper sign that says, how can I pray for you? That's it. Just every, every random RV site, they just put the sign out front, go about their day. Said over a year, not one person ever stopped to ask for prayer. Every single day, put it out. Nothing, nothing. Kept praying like, Lord, use this for something. He said they were in Texas, had been about a year, and he was pretty much done. He's like, I don't know. They were at the back of a campground. Like the person sent them to the farthest place possible. He's like, there was no access. Nobody could see us. But he just was like, I guess I'll put the sign out. So he put his sign out out front. He's like, there's not even anyone here. But, so what have you been doing? So he's like, this is what I feel the Lord has for me. So he puts his how I can pray for you out next to his little camper. He's like, no one's gonna see this. And he said later that night, someone knocked on his door. Very confusing. Because also people tend to leave you alone, apparently, at RV parks. But it was actually the camp, it was actually the maintenance guy who runs the camp. And so his immediate reaction is like, this guy's gonna be mad about my sign. It's like, technically it's like it could be advertising. People have made comments. And so he's like, this guy's gonna be mad about my sign. And he's like, and that's not what happened. The guy's actually like, hey is this your sign? It's like, yeah. It's like, will you pray for me right now? And they had a whole conversation. And the guy actually walked him back. He's like, so, like just going through his entire life. Like he was supposed to move back home. Money fell through. His entire life had begun to fall apart. His like father had died. Like it was just a massive, everything was falling apart. Life was bad. I just need someone to pray for me. And so he's prayed with him there. They kept walking. Kind of worked through this whole discussion. And then he took him to a tree. Which personally this still sounds like a creepy moment. He's like, and he's like, and that's where I was gonna hang myself an hour ago before I saw your sign. He's like, I already, the ropes already there. Like it's, which is still a creepy story. But, but there is a fact he's like, and I just, he's like, there's no way anyone could see the sign. The only reason he saw it is because he was riding his bike away to do things. And it's like, I just saw it while I was going. So, I was like.I got a shot. I'll ask this guy to pray for me. Maybe it'll do something. And so that then started a movement. He prayed with him again. He still has contact with him. Not that the guy got saved. That's always what people want to say. But his life began to ask questions. He still apparently has conversations with him. But that began to like, clearly the Lord was doing something. And just every day, being faithful to what he felt the Lord, that I'm gonna give God glory with while we're here. So whatever the Lord has, now there's t-shirts everywhere. It's very popular. He wears them. Airports, people stop him all the time to pray. We have them. It's become a movement of just being purposeful with your day. That's all it was about. It's like, how can I use my day purposely to make much of God? And prayer is a very simple thing that we forget. And not just a like, oh, thank you for your prayer request. Okay. Like, but actually stopping and actively praying for people. And doing that well. As an act of making much of God. And again, some of that sounds very super spiritual. Some of it's literally just hanging out with people. Jesus hung out with sinners. For the purpose of making his father known. For making salvation known. He hung out with people. It wasn't just like, come to church. It was like, I'll come to your place. And we'll hang out. And we'll talk. And we'll get to know each other. It's using the time that we have to make the most of God. And in that is also understanding that the only way people can come to salvation is by God. You can't make them come to faith. It is all the work of God alone who does that. We are just faithful with the message. And that's where we get the encouragement that God is the one who works. And God does amazing things for his glory. To make much of himself. And that's not an egotistical thing. The one who is worthy of all glory, honor, and power is the one who has created all things. If there's anyone who, it's always something, is there anyone who can be egotistical? Clearly it's God. He's the one who has done all things. Worthy of praise, honor, and glory. Thus, he is the one who receives all our praise. And so this is where this historical understanding has continually progressed, is the fact that the glory of God is our pursuit. Now some can abuse it. Of course, as I said, it's been abused by people where it just becomes a passing. I had a professor in Bible college who used to say this all the time. He would quote Isaiah 42 all the time. I am the Lord, that is my name. My glory I give to no other, nor praise to carve idols. Became like a, just beat people over the head that God is amazing and you all suck. This is recorded. But that was like his mantra. It's like, okay, everyone is bad and God is good. Awesome. Okay. That even we had one girl who's like, well, how does this change my life? Well, God is glorified and that will change your life. Okay. It just starts becoming like this blanket statement that loses its, like the glory of God motivates our lives because it does shape us. Our understanding of everything we do is motivated by, should be motivated. Do we do this? Of course not. We understand that that isn't how every single day goes, but the motivation is, but that is what we are called to continue to pursue. And he is the one who continues to do this for us. So we're called to grow in these endeavors. And so I hope that as we continue to push on next week, as I said, we're going to deal with the idea of Semper Reformanda. We're going to unpack each of the five and highlight some different ways that we see that continually being worked out, how each of the five still have their own work, even today, as we look back on them. Well, again, we'll talk about the idea of always reforming. Again, always reforming is not always progressing. Those are different things. Okay. Often people think that the reformation was progress. It was not progress. It was reformation, which simply means to reform around the original. We're going back. Okay. So it's that scripture is our guide. So we reform around the gospel. So reformed. We are reforming it back to as it should be. And so as we see throughout history, it's very easy to get lost in tangents. And so history is full of tangents. Doctrine and theology is full of tangents. And often tangents become priorities, and then we lose the gospel along the way. So next week we'll unpack how those different, how the solos often become tangents that become their own false idols and how we need to continually be reforming back to the gospel, the heart of the faith found in Christ alone. So that is what is on deck next week as we bring our solos to a close. So questions, comments, thoughts, charges of heresy.

26. apr. 2026 - 1 h 0 min
episode Solus Christus cover

Solus Christus

Well, tonight, we're continuing on in the five solas series, the five big themes of the Protestant Reformation, which are sola scriptura. What does this mean? Scripture alone, sola gratia, what's this mean? Sola fide. We come now to solus Christus, or in other words, Christ alone is what this means. That is tonight, Lord willing. Next week, Pastor Andrew will do the penultimate study, soli deo gloria, to the glory of God alone. I say penultimate because it's not the last one. There'll be one more after that on semper reformanda, which means always reforming. But tonight, as we look at solus Christus, I want to, in a sense, do something different. I want to start with my conclusion. I'm going to restate it, but I want to state it first to show you where we're going, why this matters so much. When we turn to solus Christus, we turn to the linchpin, the hub, the apex, and the center of all Reformation theology, indeed the center of all doctrine together. Christ is the glory of sola scriptura, for He alone is the Word made flesh, and He alone is the interpretive end of all Scripture. Christ is the glory of sola gratia, for He alone is the grace of God personified. Christ is the glory of sola fide, for He alone is the object of saving faith. And Christ is the glory of soli deo gloria, for He alone is the radiance of the glory of God. That's where we're going. I now want to make an argument to get there. And to get there, I want to use the book of Hebrews chapter 1. What were you guessing? Oh, okay. Yeah. That would be a good one. I'm the way, the truth, and the life. That's great. We're going Hebrews chapter 1, verse 1 to 4. Sorry for the letdown. But this one's just as good. So the author of Hebrews, whoever it was in these first four verses, brings his readers quickly to the main point. Jesus is better. Jesus is better than all that's come before. Specifically, for us, as we look into these four verses, I have three points to bring to you tonight to show you the glory of solus Christus, of Christ alone. Jesus as prophet, priest, and king. Jesus as prophet, priest, and king. It's in that order in verse 1 to 4 in Hebrews chapter 1. Historically, John Calvin would call these three offices of Christ the menus triplex. He was the first one in all of church history to give these three titles a label and kind of grouped them together. Ever since then, we have been minded to see this. It's not he didn't invent this. He just kind of made the categorizations and gave it the label, and it's stuck ever since, and there's glorious reasons for it. So let's see first. prophet. This is, well gosh, let me read our text and then we'll get into it. Hebrews 1 1 to 4 says this, long ago at many times and in many ways God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom he also created the world. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the majesty on high, having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs. See first, Jesus as prophet. In the first two verses of Hebrews we see a great deal, not of what man has done to get to God, but what God has done to reveal himself to man. It's here where we see Jesus as prophet. Long ago at many times in many ways God spoke. This means God is not a silent God. God is a God who speaks. If God had remained silent, nothing that has been made would have been made. Yet into the dark void of Genesis 1 2 came God's strong and creative word, the power of his word. Genesis 1 3, let there be light, and there was light. God not only spoke all creation into existence, but as the author of Hebrews says here, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets. This means that the same voice that crafted the world called out to God's people through the prophetic office. The calling of the prophet then was to stand in the gap between God and his people as God's representative to speak to the people. This was the role of the prophet. God would reveal his secret counsel to the prophet and then they would reveal the same to God's people. The prophet was not to edit, alter, amend, improve, or remove anything from the message to any degree. They were to give the message as is. This the prophets did in many ways from Moses to Malachi, whether in writing, proclaiming, miracles, or visions. This was how it worked. God revealed himself to his people by his word through his prophet. But in verse 2, notice the transition. In verse 2, there's a transition to something new. But in these last days, God has spoken to us by his Son. So notice firsthand that the author of Hebrews believes that we're not waiting for a future period of time called the last days. No, the author believes that the last days have clearly already begun. Specifically, the event that marked the transition into the last days. God, who once spoke by the prophets, began speaking and spoke through His Son." So here we see that God reveals Himself to His people in two stages according to Hebrews 1. First, to His old covenant people by the prophets, and now to His new covenant church by His Son. We generally could say that these two stages correspond to what we call the Old and New Testament or the Old and New Covenant. God's divine revelation then is progressive. I don't mean the idea that God evolves from one generation to the next. Of course not. God's the same forever and ever. I also do not mean that revelation progresses from something less true to more true, less worthy to more worthy, less mature to more mature. The progression of God's divine revelation from Old Testament to New Testament is a progression from promise to fulfillment or shadow to reality. So there is a true progression here, but be sure to note that God's progression and how He reveals Himself to His people is a progression that leads to Christ. And yet, it's a progression that leads no further than Christ. Prophet after prophet was sent by God to God's people with messages of hope, justice, mercy, judgment, and the promise of a coming Redeemer. Well, when that Redeemer came, God spoke through His Son, the full and final word. The contrast being made in verse 1 and 2 is vast. It is great. God once spoke, once spoke in many ways to Israel by the prophets. God now speaks in one way to the church by His Son. Once the prophets spoke the Word of God to God's people, now Jesus Christ is the very Word of God come to God's people. Therefore, Christ is the perfect, full, and final revelation of who God is and what God requires of man. Or we could just say it, Jesus is true prophet. Hebrews doesn't end there. We now see Jesus as true priest. This picks up in the remainder of verse 2 and in the beginning of verse 3. Here we also learn a great deal, not of what man has done to become right with God, but what God has done to make man right with Himself. This is where we see Jesus stand forth in the text as priest. But before we get to the great priestly statement at the end of verse 3, look at how it begins at the end of verse 2, whom He appointed, the heir of all things, through whom He also created the world. He, Christ, is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of His nature. He upholds the universe by the Word of His power. These identity statements about who Christ is are loaded with life-altering reality. So loaded, in fact, that to do justice to this, we could give one sermon on each of these phrases and that would not be enough. For our purposes tonight, we'll just notice them briefly. Who is Jesus Christ? What does Jesus do? Answer, Jesus is the heir of all things. For his father owns everything and has given everything into his hands. Jesus is the creator of the world, for he is the very word of God, which was God and was with God in the beginning. Jesus is the radiance of the glory of God, for he is the ultimate display of the God we meet in Exodus 3 in the burning bush moment. He is the exact imprint of God's nature. For Jesus, God the Father, was pleased to have all the fullness of the deity dwell in Jesus bodily. And lastly, Jesus is the upholder of the universe, for he is not only the powerful word which made the world, he is the powerful word which sustains the world. This Christ, who created all, sustains all, is fully God, is majestic, is sovereign. This is the one who acted as our priest. You see how that all leads to priest? At the end of verse 3, he and he alone made purification for sins. Now we come to the great priestly work of Christ, and we can make a contrast with prophet and priest. As the prophet was God's representative to the people, so to the priest, just reverse the trajectory, was the people's representative to God. They both stood in the gap, but one was representing God to the people, that's prophet, then priest representing people to God. That is the role of priest. And being the representative of the people, the priest would have to make sacrifices. Sacrifices for their own sins, sacrifices for the people's sins, sacrifices on feast days, on festival days, sacrifice upon sacrifice, standing in the gap for the people of God before God. This was the calling, the duty, and the privilege of the priest. And in this work, we see the glory of the priestly work of Christ, for he too made a sacrifice for sin. He too stood in the gap between God and man, but he made no sacrifice for his own sins. He didn't have any, and he didn't make repeated sacrifices. He made one, and the glory of his sacrifice is that he was the sacrifice. He didn't just offer something else. He was the sacrifice. Two massive realities stand forth here. First, his sacrifice is a one-time event, which covers all the sin of all God's people for all time. He was the sacrifice for the people, as we've mentioned. The Westminster Shorter Catechism quotes it like this, our Redeemer, as our Redeemer Christ served in the office of priest in his once offering up of himself a sacrifice. to satisfy divine justice and reconcile us to God and in making continual intercession for us. So this great high priest, Jesus, not only created the heavens, but came down from the heavens to make new creations out of us. He not only sustains and upholds the universe by the word of His power, but He allowed Himself to be prevailed upon so that we would know the power of the cross. He and He alone stood in the gap between the holy God and sinful man and He and He alone bridged the gap by offering up Himself a sacrifice to satisfy divine justice for sins. In other words, He alone is the true priest. But notice what follows right on the heels in Hebrews 1 of this prophet-priest description. We find Jesus as King right there at the end of verse 3 and 4. After He made purification for sins, what did He do? He sat down. He sat down at the right hand of the majesty on high, having become as much superior to the angels as the name He has inherited is more excellent than theirs. It's worth noting that in the instructions, we're going to get here, Lord willing, one day, TBD on how fast we're going to move through this section of Exodus, but when we get the instruction for the furniture and all the furnishings of the tabernacle and the temple, there is no instruction to make a seat for the high priest. There's no instruction to make a seat for the high priest. It's because He was always up and He was always working, making all kinds of various sacrifices for all kinds of sins that the people and Himself were committing. But here we see something different with Christ. After He made purification for sins once for all, He sat down. Why did He sit down? It was a physical way of showing what He just said verbally. After all His suffering, right before death, He said, it is finished. And then after that verbal statement and the three days in the tomb, He ascends and sits down to show His work as Redeemer is finished. He didn't sit down in a lawn chair or a lazy boy. He sat on a throne. And not just any throne, it was God's throne. What does this mean? He's the King. It means He's the King. Christ is not just true prophet, not just true priest, He is true King. The King that anyone and everyone has always desired. And of course, no surprise, this makes me think of Tolkien's third book in the trilogy, The Return of the King. This moment when all the storylines are coming to a conclusion and all the heroes, they have labored and toiled and they have fought to aid Frodo and Sam in getting the ring into the fires of Mount Doom to destroy the enemy. That all happened, but what happened then after the enemy and his ring were destroyed? Aragorn took his rightful place as King in the city of Gondor and sat down on the throne. What was the result of him being enthroned as King, as really the King of man in Middle-earth? Peace came to all the lands of men, of elves, and dwarves. As wonderful as that is, the events of Hebrews 1, 1-4 are infinitely greater. When we see Christ the King put the devil to an open shame in His crucifixion and resurrection and in His death and in His resurrection, in His ascension, in His enthronement and in His session, His rule over all things, this is a deeper peace that comes from the greatest King of all, reigning over all. creation. This is Christ the King, prophet, priest, king. All the offices, you could say, were instituted in the Old Testament because they really mattered and they played a role for the time and the context that they were first given in, but the ultimate purpose for the role of prophet and priest and king was to prepare the way for the greatest prophet, priest, and king. For every prophet, priest, and king of old, either sinned, was a failure, or was not enough on their own. Only Jesus perfectly, fully, and finally, flawlessly executed all these roles and they all find the pinnacle in Him. So, soulless Christus still matters. As I've done every time, I have ended with an illustration from Martin Luther's life. Let's do another one tonight to answer this question about why soulless Christus is still important. Once Martin Luther began seeing the power of the gospel, grace, and the powerlessness of his own works to save, he was very young at this time. He had just, well, he had not done it yet, but he was still learning these things. He heard of a famous preacher coming to town and he just arrived in Wittenberg and was setting up a stage and his name was John Tetzel. Tetzel came into the town square and he would preach a message like this. Martin Luther would hear this firsthand. Good people of Wittenberg, have you not at one time or another burned your hand in the fire and felt it torment you day and night? How greatly you ought to fear then the fires of hell, which are able to burn and torment your soul for all eternity. Your Pope, Pope Leo X offers you grace for the building of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Tonight and only tonight, you can snatch any loved one or rescue yourself from the fires of hell for a few coins. For when a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs. This was Tetzel's sermon, short to the point and entirely heretical. The technical term for this is an indulgence and Tetzel just so happened to be the most famous indulgence preacher of the 16th century, leading up to the times of the Reformation. Luther heard this firsthand and was vexed in his soul. Why? Because Tetzel's message was clear. Give money to the Pope for the building of this new building and you will be saved. In response to Tetzel's preaching, Luther wrote his famous 95 Theses and posted it on the church door in Wittenberg and he wrote many other numerous books against the preaching of John Tetzel and the wicked doctrines of the Pope's past and present. For writing 95 Theses and all the other books that he did, Pope Leo X sent Luther a written warning called a papal bull, a warning that if you do not repent or recant of your writings, you will be excommunicated from the Holy Catholic Church. Luther responded after receiving this letter by publicly burning the letter. Very Luther-like, right? In the following Sunday, after burning this letter publicly before the townspeople, he said this in his sermon, yes, you've heard it's true, I've been summoned to Rome. While I'm gone, remember, we obsess about indulgences. God is not an angry God who only wants your money. Those who see God as angry do not see Him rightly. If we truly believe that Christ is our Savior and we have a God of love and to see God in faith is to look on His friendly heart. So when the devil throws your sins in your face and declares that you deserve death and hell, tell him this, I admit that I deserve death and hell. what of it? For I know one who suffered and made satisfaction in my behalf. His name is Jesus Christ, Son of God, and where he is one day I shall be also." So you see how in Luther's sermon his response to the indulgence preaching of John Tetzel was to say that Christ's work and nothing that we do, Christ's work alone saves. Now why does this still matter today? You may think that the preaching of indulgences was a thing of the past, but you would be mistaken. The Roman Catholic Church not only still uses and still offers indulgences of all kinds, but the current Pope still upholds the practice. Remember, when an indulgence is offered, what's being communicated is that if you do this, if you go here on this pilgrimage, if you give this amount or that amount of money, you will be saved from the fires and the torment of hell. There seems in this theology no place for Christ standing forth as true prophet, true priest, and true king. The center of Tetzel's preaching is that you save yourself when you contribute money to the Pope. In 1992, Joseph Carl Ratzinger, or Pope Benedict, rewrote the Catholic's official catechism. He did not remove the whole section on indulgences, that was affirmed throughout the ages, and he rewrote it, put it in. It's still affirmed today. To date, the Roman Catholic Church has never denied the preaching or teaching or practice of the indulgence. Luther heard this and it vexed his soul, because the work of Christ was put aside for the work of man. And the same is true today in one of the largest so-called Christian denominations in the world. It ought to vex us that the work of Christ is thrust aside for the work of man. He alone is true prophet, true king, and true priest. We need to return to solus Christus. So what I said in the beginning, I say again, when we turn to this particular sola of the five, we come to the linchpin, the hub, the apex, and the center of all Reformation and biblical theology. Christ is the glory of sola scriptura, for he alone is the Word made flesh, and he alone is the interpretive end of all Scripture. Christ is the glory of sola gratia, for he alone is the grace of God personified. Christ is the glory of sola fide, for he alone is the object of saving faith, and Christ is the glory of sola Deo gloria, for he alone is the radiance of the glory of God. Far be it from any of us to think that the Reformation or any theology that comes out of it boasts a label of Reformed or Luther or Calvin or any other famous man or woman of history. We need to be vexed if any man-centeredness comes into our doctrine, because if it comes in the middle of it, it removes Christ from it. It's his work and his work alone that brings us back to God. We have no need for any other prophet to provide us with new revelation. We have no need for any other priest to mediate between us and God, and we have no need for any other king to rule God's church, for Christ is prophet, priest, and king. He alone stands at the center of God's eternal purposes, and thus Christ and Christ alone must stand at the center of all of our life and doctrine in the church. Amen.

19. apr. 2026 - 1 h 0 min
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
Rigtig god tjeneste med gode eksklusive podcasts og derudover et kæmpe udvalg af podcasts og lydbøger. Kan varmt anbefales, om ikke andet så udelukkende pga Dårligdommerne, Klovn podcast, Hakkedrengene og Han duo 😁 👍
Podimo er blevet uundværlig! Til lange bilture, hverdagen, rengøringen og i det hele taget, når man trænger til lidt adspredelse.

Vælg dit abonnement

Mest populære

Begrænset tilbud

Premium

20 timers lydbøger

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo

  • Ingen reklamer i podcasts fra Podimo

  • Opsig når som helst

2 måneder kun 19 kr.
Derefter 99 kr. / måned

Kom i gang

Premium Plus

100 timers lydbøger

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo

  • Ingen reklamer i podcasts fra Podimo

  • Opsig når som helst

Prøv gratis i 7 dage
Derefter 129 kr. / måned

Prøv gratis

Kun på Podimo

Populære lydbøger

Ofte stillede spørgsmål

Flere spørgsmål og svar
Kom i gang

2 måneder kun 19 kr. Derefter 99 kr. / måned. Opsig når som helst.