Civics In A Year

The Declaration At 250

The Declaration of Independence is 250 years old, but it refuses to sit quietly on a shelf. We end Civics in a Year by asking one question that cuts through politics and posture: what does the Declaration mean 250 years later, and what does it require from us right now? We start with ASU President Michael Crow, who argues that the United States is still early in a long, messy democratic story. His “second inning” metaphor reframes the semi-quincentennial as a marker, not a finish line, and it pushes us to think in decades, not news cycles. We talk about equality as equal chance, the ongoing fight over resources and access, and why civic education and the right to learn belong at the center of a healthy constitutional democracy. Then Dr. Paul Carrese takes us back into the text itself and challenges us to read beyond the famous opening lines. The closing pledge “our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor” becomes a personal standard for citizenship, not a dramatic flourish. Finally, students from ASU’s Civic Leadership Institute bring the Declaration into the present with unfiltered honesty, debating virtue, natural rights, inequality, consent of the governed, and the fear of tyranny. If you care about American history, civic learning, and what self-government actually demands, hit play. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with the line from the Declaration that you think we ignore most. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Jefferson And Madison and the University of Virginia

Jefferson wrote his own epitaph, and the choice still startles: “Father of the University of Virginia” makes the cut, while “President of the United States” does not. That single detail opens a window into how seriously Jefferson took education, not as résumé polish, but as the infrastructure of self-government. We follow the long road from early dreams of a national university to the state-level strategy that finally produces UVA in Charlottesville, with Jefferson politicking, drafting plans, and obsessing over everything from faculty slots to building materials. Along the way, we spotlight James Madison’s role as the indispensable partner. Madison helps shepherd key ideas through the realities of legislatures, public opinion, and constitutional limits, often serving as Jefferson’s pragmatic sounding board. The result is a founding vision that looks more like a broad liberal arts curriculum than a modern research university, built to train “statesmen, legislators, and judges” and to cultivate a shared baseline of constitutional principles before partisan fights begin. We also dig into one of the most consequential design choices: Jefferson’s insistence on a secular public university. No divinity professorship, no official religious dominance, and a theory of church-state separation shaped by Virginia’s disestablishment battles and Madison’s arguments about protecting religion from government power. If you care about civic education, constitutional culture, or the roots of American higher education, this conversation ties the architectural details to the political philosophy underneath. Subscribe for more, share this with a friend who loves early American history, and leave a review with your take: can civic education still create common ground today? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Washington’s Final Act of Statesmanship: Confronting Slavery

George Washington sits at the center of American civic memory, but the hardest truths about him often sit at the edges of what we’re taught. We talk with Dr. Paul Carrese about Washington as an owner of enslaved people and the complicated story behind his decision to free those he legally could through his 1799 will. It’s a conversation that doesn’t look away from the moral contradiction at the founding, and it also refuses to flatten history into easy heroes or easy villains. We trace what Washington seems to understand as early as the imperial crisis: that demanding liberty while holding people in bondage is an injustice that undermines the nation’s claims. Dr. Carrese explains why slavery is politically untouchable during Washington’s presidency, how the Northwest Ordinance draws a boundary around expansion, and why Washington turns to a private act of statesmanship instead. We also dig into the real-world mechanics of manumission at Mount Vernon: family separation risks, Virginia legal constraints, the Custis estate’s ownership, and the costly commitment to support people after emancipation. From there, we zoom out to the civic lesson. If even well-educated Americans rarely hear this story, what does that say about how slavery shaped political culture and historical memory? Dr. Carrese offers two tools for listeners who care about American democracy and civic education: civic humility and reflective patriotism, the Tocqueville-inspired idea that love of country should include honest debate about its failures and its progress. If this changed how you think about George Washington, share the episode with a friend, subscribe for more American history and civics, and leave a review so more listeners can find the show. What part of the story do you think schools should teach more directly? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Hamilton’s Moral Reckoning

Hamilton is easy to caricature: the brilliant operator, the relentless Federalist, the guy who never stops pushing. But the closer you look, the more the story bends toward something unexpected: a late-in-life moral awakening shaped by pride, collapse, and a real confrontation with faith. We sit down with Dr. Beienberg to follow Hamilton’s religious trajectory from early piety to a long stretch of indifference, then to a period in which he uses Christian language as a blunt political instrument against Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans.  Along the way, we dig into the sharp irony historians highlight: the years when “religious slogans” are most on Hamilton’s lips may be the years when he is furthest from God. We talk through the 1800 election, Hamilton’s attempts to maneuver power behind the scenes, and the humiliations that strip away his sense of control. Then the conversation turns personal: the Reynolds affair, the loss of his son in a duel, his daughter’s breakdown, and how grief and disgrace can crack open a person who once seemed untouchable.  What follows is a different Hamilton: reading the Bible, seeking mercy, trying to do right even by political enemies, and wrestling with the idea that politics cannot be an idol. The final moment is the duel with Aaron Burr and Hamilton’s choice not to take a life because he believes it would be unchristian, followed by his urgent request for communion as he’s dying. If you care about Alexander Hamilton, American history, or the role of religion in public life, this one reframes the legend as more human and instructive.  Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with a history-loving friend, and leave a review so more listeners can find the show. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Roger Sherman, The Founder We Missed

He signed all four major American revolutionary documents, helped craft the constitutional structure we still argue about, and yet most people can’t tell you a single detail about him. We’re talking about Roger Sherman, the “forgotten founder that shouldn’t be forgotten,” and we’re making a serious case for bumping him into the Founders’ top tier based on impact, not celebrity.  We walk through Sherman’s improbable rise from shoemaker to self-taught lawyer to one of Connecticut’s most important judges, then trace why he keeps landing at the center of the founding era: the Continental Congress, the Declaration’s drafting committee, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitutional Convention. Along the way, we unpack why he’s so easy to miss in modern history telling: he’s not a clean writer, not a magnetic speaker, deeply pious, and he dies in 1793 before later political battles make other founders famous.  The heart of the conversation is constitutional design. Sherman fights to preserve limited and enumerated powers, helps drive the Connecticut Compromise, and wins key federalism battles against broader national “plenary” power. We also dig into his skepticism of executive power, his concern about war-making authority, and his surprising role in the Bill of Rights debate, including why he insists amendments go at the end and how he helps shape the 10th Amendment. If you care about federalism, states’ rights, checks and balances, and what the Constitution actually means, this one will sharpen your view.  Subscribe for more deep dives, share this episode with a fellow civics nerd, and leave a review telling us whether Roger Sherman belongs on the Founders’ A team. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]