Should Democratic States Opt Into Trump's Stealth School Voucher Plan?

Coping with Declining Enrollment: Fewer Kids, Harder Choices -- and No End In Sight

Enrollment is falling in many schools across the nation, and the ripple effects are showing up everywhere: budget deficits, program cuts, labor tension, and the gut-wrenching necessity in many districts to close schools. We look at the reality many leaders face right now: what do you do when the problem is not temporary and the student population may not stabilize for decades? We’re joined by Julien LaFortune of the Public Policy Institute of California, who breaks down the data behind declining enrollment, from lower birth rates to shifting migration and immigration patterns.  Funding follows students, so districts often have to shrink their systems even when students needs more support, not less.  Then we turn to the lived work of leading through decline with two veteran superintendents: Kyla Johnson-Trammell, former Oakland Unified superintendent, and Roxanne Fuentes, of the Beryessa Union School District in San Jose.  They share what school consolidations and closures really require: transparency, long timelines, empathy for community grief, and realistic plans for improving student experience in their new school settings. We dig into offensive strategies too, like creating specialized programs that will attract families, meeting their after-school needs, and stronger communication with families.  If you care about the future of public education, school finance, and what happens to communities when enrollment drops, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share with a colleague, and leave a review so more people can find Education on the Line. Sign up here [https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/gVZTFcZ] so we can keep you posted on future podcasts on how education leaders are responding to the mounting threats against public schools In the United States.

Should Democratic States Opt Into Trump's Stealth School Voucher Plan?

Here’s a question that Democratic governors across the country will have to wrestle with in the months ahead: should they opt into President Trump’s upcoming federal tax credit scholarship program, or hold the line against what will be the first federally funded private school voucher scheme? Because of the sweeping nature of the plan, this is a follow up to an earlier episode of Education on the Line examining on the issue.  The program, approved by Congress as part of the  One Big Beautiful Bill, allows every taxpayer to "donate" up to $1,700 to scholarship-granting organizations -- and then get the entire amount refunded to them in the form of a tax credit on their federal income taxes.  The scholarship organizations then dole out the money to parents with children enrolled in private and religious schools to cover tuition and other educational costs. Some funds could be used to cover some expenses like computers and extra tutoring not currently covered by taxpayers..  Most Republican governors already have already "opted in."   In our latest episode, we go inside the debate as it’s playing out in Illinois, where two prominent Democrats are publicly at odds. State Comptroller Susana Mendoza says it’s a no-brainer: Illinois taxpayers fund the program either way, and opting out just means that money flows to children in other states. Meanwhile, Gov. Jay Pritzker seems inclined to reject it. In April, The Chicago public school board voted unanimously to oppose it.   Louis Freedberg interviews Comptroller Mendoza and Cassie Creswell of Illinois Families for Public Schools, who see the issue differently, as do dozens of other advocacy organizations. Cresswell says participating in the program would further expand a private school ecosystem the state can’t control, at exactly the moment public schools are already under severe financial and other pressures. We talk with both Mendoza and Cresswell to understand the issues for and against. Their debate offers insights into how the issue could play out in other states. Subscribe and listen wherever you get your podcasts. Sign up here [https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/gVZTFcZ] so we can keep you posted on future podcasts on how education leaders are responding to the mounting threats against public schools In the United States.

As costs rise, and enrollments dip, can school districts meet teacher demands?

School districts across California and the nation are caught in a financial vise.  Enrollments are falling, federal COVID relief funds have been depleted, and costs keep rising. Meanwhile, growing numbers of teacher's can't even  afford to live in the districts  where they work. That’s especially the case in high cost states like California where teachers and other staff are walking off the job in record numbers   So how do you give teachers the raises that almost everyone agrees they need without triggering deep cuts or even risking   insolvency? And is it even possible? In this episode, we explore that question with three guests who are grappling with it from very different vantage points. Marguerite Roza, director of the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University, breaks down the structural forces squeezing district budgets and makes the case that many districts have staffing levels out of alignment with their shrinking enrollments — a reckoning that's now unavoidable. Darin Brawley, superintendent of Compton Unified, has managed a district with five labor unions over 14 years without a strike, and explains how radical transparency about the budget has helped kept his district out of crisis. And Carrie Hahnel a board member at Alameda Unified and a senior associate partner at Bellwether, describes how her district recently navigated a threatened strike and reached a three-year contract — and what trade-offs came with it. The conversation is honest about how hard these choices are.  The challenge is whether districts and unions can make these trade-offs —together.  Sign up here [https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/gVZTFcZ] so we can keep you posted on future podcasts on how education leaders are responding to the mounting threats against public schools In the United States.

The Push to Keep Undocumented Students Out Of School: Will It Succeed?

The Supreme Court's landmark 1982 Plyler v. Doe decision established that every child in America has the right to a public education, regardless of immigration status. For 43 years, that ruling has kept schoolhouse doors open to undocumented children. Now it's under serious attack.    In this episode of Education on the Line, Louis Freedberg talks with two guests on the front lines of protecting Plyler at a national and state level. Tom Saenz is president and general counsel of MALDEF, which argued the original Plyler case before the Supreme Court. Lisa Sherman Luna is executive director TIRRC Votes, the political arm of the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition.  The Tennessee General Assembly, controlled by a Republican supermajority, is attempting to pass legislation designed to keep documented children out of school. It is one of a half dozen states trying to do the same thing.  The Heritage Foundation, author of the controversial Project 2025, recently launched a campaign to encourage states to challenge Plyler. Saenz believes that despite these efforts, the Plyler decision is secure. Sherman Luna says that organizing along the lines of the so-far successful Education for All Tennessee campaign will be needed.  Sign up here [https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/gVZTFcZ] so we can keep you posted on future podcasts on how education leaders are responding to the mounting threats against public schools In the United States.

Inside Trump's Stealth School Voucher Program: What's At Stake

The sweeping federal tax credit scholarship program which President Trump was able to shoehorn into his so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill" will go into effect in less than a year. It has the potential to divert billions of federal tax dollars to private and religious school tuition, with negligible oversight and accountability.  Right now the Trump Administration is drawing up a blueprint for implementing this hugely ambitious "school choice" program which an estimated 90 percent of families in the United States will qualify for.  When the proposed regulations are issued in in advance of the Jan. 1 implementation date, education leaders and advocates must be prepared to respond them.   One big question is whether Democratically controlled  states should participate in the tax credit program - at the moment it appears that almost all won't -- or whether they  can figure out ways public schools could benefit from it in a meaningful way.  To shed light on key unresolved issues like these, host Louis Freedberg talks with Jon Valant, director of the Brookings Brown Center on Education Policy, and Jessica Levin, litigation director of the Education Law Center.  Both are leading experts on what's at stake.  Anyone who cares about the future of public education will learn from their insights and observations.  Sign up here [https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/gVZTFcZ] so we can keep you posted on future podcasts on how education leaders are responding to the mounting threats against public schools In the United States.