Imagen de portada del programa Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Podcast de Christopher Appiah-Thompson

inglés

Actualidad y política

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba.Cancela cuando quieras.

  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • Podcast gratuitos
Prueba gratis

Acerca de Rethinking Approaches to the Study of Electoral Politics and democratisation in Africa

Dr. Christopher Appiah-Thompson’s emphasis on political culture and traditional leadership offers a powerful lens for rethinking constitutional reform, peacebuilding, and electoral design in African countries. He argues that elections without legitimacy or fairness can entrench authoritarianism or spark violence. Cultural norms must underpin democratic practiceWhy Appiah-Thompson’s Framework Works• It moves beyond Western institutionalism, showing how democracy in Africa is shaped by culture, history, and informal authority.• It offers a more accurate lens for policy and peacebuilding, especially in regions where the state is weak or contested.• It encourages rethinking democratic legitimacy, not just as legal compliance but as cultural resonance.Appiah-Thompson’s emphasis on political culture and traditional leadership applies powerfully to Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa, where informal institutions continue to shape democratic outcomes, mediate conflict, and legitimize governance.

Todos los episodios

10 episodios

episode When Courts Dare to Dissent: Judicial Independence and the Power to Strike Down Laws artwork

When Courts Dare to Dissent: Judicial Independence and the Power to Strike Down Laws

Welcome back to the show. Today’s episode dives into a puzzle at the heart of constitutional democracy: why do some courts boldly strike down controversial laws, while others, facing similar laws, hold back. Scholars usually answer with one phrase—judicial independence—the idea that judges need protection from political pressure in order to make tough decisions against the government of the day. Across the next ten minutes, this episode has three goals. First, to unpack what judicial independence really means in practice, and how it differs from judicial review itself. Second, to explain the article’s core claim that independence should be treated as a conditional factor that moderates the relationship between ideology and decisions, rather than just another additive variable in our models. Third, to explore what this conditional view tells us about famous US Supreme Court cases on important federal statutes, and what it implies for anyone who wants courts to both protect rights and remain accountable

10 de ene de 2026 - 5 min
Muy buenos Podcasts , entretenido y con historias educativas y divertidas depende de lo que cada uno busque. Yo lo suelo usar en el trabajo ya que estoy muchas horas y necesito cancelar el ruido de al rededor , Auriculares y a disfrutar ..!!
Muy buenos Podcasts , entretenido y con historias educativas y divertidas depende de lo que cada uno busque. Yo lo suelo usar en el trabajo ya que estoy muchas horas y necesito cancelar el ruido de al rededor , Auriculares y a disfrutar ..!!
Fantástica aplicación. Yo solo uso los podcast. Por un precio módico los tienes variados y cada vez más.
Me encanta la app, concentra los mejores podcast y bueno ya era ora de pagarles a todos estos creadores de contenido

Elige tu suscripción

Más populares

Premium

20 horas de audiolibros

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo

  • Disfruta los shows de Podimo sin anuncios

  • Cancela cuando quieras

Empieza 7 días de prueba
Después $99 / mes

Prueba gratis

Sólo en Podimo

Audiolibros populares

Preguntas frecuentes

Más preguntas y respuestas
Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba. $99 / mes después de la prueba. Cancela cuando quieras.