The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson

The Global Freedom Report, May 22, 2026

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Jury Nullification, Individual Liberty, and the Power of Citizens to Resist Unjust Laws Truth, Liberty, and the Question of Government Power In this episode of The Global Freedom Report, host Brent Johnson introduces a program centered on truth, justice, liberty, personal privacy, and resistance to government control. He frames freedom as the birthright of Americans and other free people, asking whether individuals govern their own lives or live subject to bureaucratic permission. Brent previews a discussion of jury nullification, along with the recurring segments Lessons in Liberty and Propaganda 101. He also poses a listener question about what immediate effect confirmed extraterrestrial visitation might have on the world. Privacy, Succession, and Freedom Bound Entities Before the main interview, a caller named Freeman from Alaska asks Brent about succession planning involving a Panamanian Private Interest Foundation and an International Business Corporation. Brent describes these structures as tools intended to provide privacy, asset control, and international business flexibility, while explaining the roles of a foundation’s protector, beneficiaries, successor protector, and related corporation. He tells the caller that a foundation may hold passive income while an International Business Corporation may conduct profit-making activity, and he recommends a private consultation for advice tailored to the caller’s proposed structure. Robert Anthony Peters and Jury Nullification Brent then welcomes Robert Anthony Peters, an actor, filmmaker, policy advisor, and chairman of the Fully Informed Jury Association, also referred to as FIJA. The central discussion focuses on jury nullification, which Peters describes as a conscientious acquittal: a situation where jurors may believe the facts support a guilty finding, but also believe that conviction would produce injustice because the law itself is unjust or is being unjustly applied. Brent and Peters present juries as an important safeguard against government abuse and argue that citizens should understand the authority they possess when serving on a jury. Historical Examples and the Modern Jury System Peters discusses historical examples of jury nullification, including the trial of William Penn in England and the colonial trial of publisher John Peter Zenger, whose jury acquitted him after he published criticism of government officials. He also references later examples involving the Fugitive Slave Act and Prohibition, when jurors sometimes refused to convict people accused under laws they regarded as unjust. In discussing the modern system, Peters says jury nullification still exists, but argues that judges, prosecutors, jury-selection procedures, and a lack of public awareness make it difficult for jurors to exercise independent judgment. Callers, Jury Service, and Conscience in Deliberations Several callers join the discussion. Gregory from Los Angeles reflects on his parents’ World War II sacrifices and expresses concern about the direction of the country. Eric from Los Angeles answers the extraterrestrial question by offering his personal theory, then asks about the distinction between “trial by jury” and “jury trial,” along with the loss of jury protections in traffic cases. Brent and Peters continue discussing jury selection, plea bargaining, administrative courts, and what jurors should do when they believe a law is unjust. Peters emphasizes that jurors must be willing to stand by conscience even when facing pressure from fellow jurors or court officials. Propaganda 101 and the Closing Call to Defend Liberty The closing portion returns to Brent’s broader message about government, propaganda, and personal freedom. In the Propaganda 101 segment, he argues that listeners should question government messaging and resist what he views as efforts to manipulate public behavior and undermine liberty. He encourages listeners to ask what they are willing to do to preserve their freedom, whether they told the truth, kept their word, and honored their agreements. Brent closes by promoting Freedom Bound International resources, previewing a future discussion with Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation, and reminding listeners that he regards freedom as a gift from God that must be protected.

The Global Freedom Report, May 10, 2026

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson The Global Freedom Report: Restoring Local Sovereignty and Common Law Truth, Justice, and the Restoration of the Republic This episode of the Global Freedom Report features an in-depth discussion on the constitutional authority of the county sheriff and the foundational principles of common law. Host Brent Johnson and guest Sheriff Richard Mack explore the legal mechanisms used to protect individual liberties against federal and state overreach. The program emphasizes the distinction between a constitutional republic and a democracy, advocating for a return to decentralized, citizen-led governance. Judicial Rulings on Racial Redistricting The program highlights a significant 6-3 Supreme Court decision that struck down Louisiana’s congressional map (SB 8). The court ruled that the state relied too heavily on race when creating a second majority-Black district, noting that such discrimination is only permissible under strict conditions, such as remedying specific past violations or ensuring prison safety. This decision effectively sends the redistricting process back to lower courts and raises the bar for future Voting Rights Act challenges by requiring proof of actual intent rather than just statistical disparity. The Constitutional Authority of the County Sheriff Sheriff Richard Mack, founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), discusses the sheriff's role as the "conservator of the peace" and the most powerful government official within a state. Mack emphasizes that a "peace officer" is distinct from a "policy enforcer"; the former is sworn to protect God-given rights from both foreign and domestic threats, including bureaucratic overreach. He recounts his landmark Supreme Court victory in Mack and Printz v. US, which established that the federal government cannot compel local officials to enforce federal regulatory programs, a major win for the 10th Amendment. Resistance to State and Federal Overreach The discussion covers current legal battles in Washington State, where the legislature has attempted to move from elected to appointed sheriffs and create oversight boards to control who can run for office. Mack reports that these efforts are currently being successfully challenged in court. Furthermore, the dialogue touches upon the "interposition" of sheriffs during COVID-19, where over 550 sheriffs refused to enforce mandates, and instances where local sheriffs protected churches and small farmers from federal agency interference. Lessons in Liberty: The Supremacy of Common Law Host Brent Johnson explains that "Common Law" is the foundational, unwritten law of the land that predates government and is rooted in God's law. He argues that statutory law cannot abrogate or replace common law; rather, statutes must remain in harmony with it. Under common law, individuals have the absolute right to any action that does not violate the life, liberty, or property of another. This framework is the basis for "Pure Trust Organizations," which are used for asset protection to shield property from statutory court attachments and government regulation. The episode concludes that true freedom is a "birthright and a gift from God" that requires active vigilance from "We the People." By supporting constitutional sheriffs and understanding the supremacy of common law over statutory overreach, citizens can effectively reclaim their local sovereignty and protect their fundamental rights.

The Global Freedom Report, May 3, 2026

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Sovereignty in the Age of AI and Surveillance This episode of the Global Freedom Report explores the intersection of constitutional rights, independent education, and revolutionary technology. Host Brent Johnson and guest Jordan Page discuss the erosion of the Sixth Amendment, the rise of AI-driven filmmaking, and the expansion of homeschooling networks as a means to reclaim individual autonomy. The Erosion of Constitutional Protections The program opens with a deep dive into the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, which guarantees a defendant's right to face their accusers. Recent judicial trends have weakened this right, moving away from the strict protections established in Crawford v. Washington toward "judge-made" tests that allow out-of-court statements to be used as evidence without cross-examination. This shift is exemplified by cases like Franklin v. New York, where administrative reports were used to convict defendants without allowing them to challenge the author's testimony. Critics argue that these exceptions prioritize administrative convenience over the fundamental "God-given" right to liberty. Creative Resistance: AI Filmmaking and Music Jordan Page introduces The Book of Atlas, a feature-length epic created using AI animation tools. Page clarifies that while AI assisted in the animation, sound, and voice generation, the story, characters, and dialogue were entirely human-driven. The film serves as a metaphor for decentralization, featuring artifacts like the "Genesis Block" and "Solana Stone" while critiquing international banking cartels. Page also debuts his unreleased song "Red Flag," which addresses the rise of "red flag" laws that allow the confiscation of firearms without due process. His work across music and film is centered on a mission to help families reclaim ownership in a centralized world. Educational Independence: Firefly Education Network In response to what they describe as "indoctrination" in public schools, Jordan Page and his wife Mary launched the Firefly Education Network. This platform acts as an "operating system" for the global homeschooling movement, offering a full K-12 curriculum, parent-facing AI tutoring tools, and a social network for families. The platform includes features like "Firefly Translate+," which uses AI to lip-dub educational content into any language while preserving the original voice. Page emphasizes that homeschooling is the fastest-growing sector in education, doubling from 3 million to over 6 million participants in the U.S. between 2021 and 2024. Lessons in Liberty: The Bar and the "Ward of the Court" Brent Johnson provides a critical analysis of the legal profession, specifically targeting the Bar Association. He asserts that "BAR" is an acronym for the "British Accredited Registry" and that attorneys serve the court and the Bar before their own clients. According to Johnson's interpretation of Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS) Volume 7, individuals who hire attorneys are legally considered "wards of the court" and "mentally incompetent" to stand on their own behalf. This segment warns listeners that the legal system is structurally designed to favor the state over the individual. The broadcast concludes with a philosophical challenge regarding the hierarchy of values: is preserving freedom more important than combating terrorism? The host argues that liberty is a birthright from God that must not be waived for the sake of government-led security measures. The ultimate message is one of vigilance and the proactive use of technology and education to maintain personal sovereignty.

The Global Freedom Report, April 26, 2026

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Reclaiming the Republic: Oaths and Sovereignty This edition of the Global Freedom Report features host Brent Johnson and constitutional researcher Loy Brunson. The discussion centers on a landmark Supreme Court case challenging Congressional immunity, the legal implications of the 2020 election investigation, and practical strategies for maintaining personal liberty in a surveillance society. The Crisis in Urban Governance: The Los Angeles Exodus The program opens with a stark analysis of the deteriorating conditions in Los Angeles County, noting that 53,934 residents fled the area between July 2024 and July 2025. Former residents cite a "joblessness crunch," high rents, and the proliferation of homeless encampments and open drug use as primary drivers for their departure. While Mayor Karen Bass’s office claims violent crime is at a 60-year low, critics argue these statistics are manipulated because the government has stopped prosecuting many criminal acts, effectively legalizing lawlessness. This exodus is contrasted with the growth in Texas counties, such as Harris and Collin, which have gained tens of thousands of new residents during the same period. The Brunson Case: Oaths of Office and Congressional Accountability Loy Brunson discusses his ongoing legal battle, which has reached the U.S. Supreme Court under Rule 11. The lawsuit names 387 members of Congress as defendants, alleging they violated their constitutional oaths by refusing to investigate evidence of a "security breach" during the 2020 election. Brunson argues that while Article VI requires officials to be "bound by oath," the doctrine of "absolute immunity" has rendered these oaths non-binding and ceremonial. The case seeks to remove the "absolute immunity" shield, potentially leading to the removal of officials who failed to protect the electoral process from foreign or domestic threats. Constitutional "Discoveries" and the Illegitimacy of Socialism Brunson presents several "discoveries" within the Constitution that he argues prohibit socialist policies. He specifically points to the Fifth Amendment’s "Takings Clause," asserting that taking private property (including money) for public use without just compensation is the very definition of socialism and is explicitly forbidden. Furthermore, the discussion touches upon the Federal Reserve, describing it as a private corporation that should, by charter, return all profits exceeding operating expenses to the U.S. Treasury—a practice Brunson claims is being bypassed to the tune of trillions of dollars. Propaganda 101: The Redefinition of Law Brent Johnson concludes with a lesson on "Propaganda 101," focusing on how the government uses the redefinition of ordinary words to gain jurisdiction over citizens. He highlights the legal definition of "trade or business" in Title 26, which is limited to the "performance of the functions of a public office." By using these specific legal definitions, the government encourages individuals to "voluntarily" waive their God-given rights and enter into federal jurisdiction without realizing the specific legal constraints involved. The epsiode serves as a call to action for "we the people" to act as "lion tamers" of a government that has exceeded its constitutional bounds. Through a combination of high-level litigation (the Brunson case) and grassroots education on the specific language of the law, the authors argue that the restoration of the Republic depends on holding officials strictly accountable to their oaths of office.

The Global Freedom Report, April 19, 2026

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Navigating Sovereignty and Resisting Soft Tyranny This edition of the Global Freedom Report, hosted by Brent Johnson, explores the principles of individual liberty, the historical foundations of the Declaration of Independence, and practical strategies for maintaining personal sovereignty in an era of increasing government surveillance and regulation. The program highlights current legislative threats to mobility in Massachusetts and provides a critical analysis of the American tax system's origins. The Struggle for Mobility and the "15-minute City" Concept A significant portion of the discussion centers on Massachusetts Senate Bill 2246, which proposes binding goals to reduce statewide vehicle miles traveled. Host Brent Johnson characterizes this as a "fascist" move to ration mobility under the guise of climate goals and equity. He argues that such policies, alongside the "15-minute city" urban planning model, are designed to create a "bureaucratic nightmare" for those traveling outside their immediate neighborhoods, disproportionately affecting rural residents and tradespeople. Critics view these measures as precursors to tech-enabled tracking and permanent surveillance states. Lessons in Liberty: The Declaration and the Tax System The show provides a deep dive into the Declaration of Independence, specifically how King George III’s dissolution of representative houses forced legislative power back to the people, creating a state of vulnerability that the Crown exploited to demand absolute authority. Johnson draws parallels to modern governance, suggesting that current administrations use similar intimidation tactics. Furthermore, the "Lessons in Liberty" segment traces the U.S. income tax to Marxist principles, claiming it was popularized through the "Victory Tax" of 1943. The host argues that the tax system relies on "the definition game," where terms like "employee" and "United States" are legally redefined to ensnare citizens in voluntary compliance regimes. Geopolitical Tensions and the Return of the Draft The program addresses the escalating situation in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, questioning why U.S. gas prices remain high despite domestic oil production. Johnson expresses frustration with the lack of immediate "justice" or price relief under current political leadership. Additionally, the show alerts listeners to a Selective Service rule change starting in December 2026, which will automatically register men aged 18 to 25 for a military draft pool. This is described as a violation of God-given rights, effectively turning citizens into "property of the government." Listener Perspectives and Advocacy Callers contribute practical methods for "awakening" others to these truths. One caller, Eric, suggests the "Feel, Felt, Found" technique to build empathy before sharing controversial facts. Another caller, Mark, describes a low-cost advocacy method: printing short messages and quotes on paper strips to distribute at retail locations like Costco. The overarching message from both the host and participants is a call for non-compliance with regulations deemed unconstitutional. The broadcast serves as both a warning against "soft tyranny" and a manual for individual resistance. By emphasizing the distinction between God-given rights and government-granted privileges, the program encourages listeners to move beyond passive consumption of media and toward active, lawful non-compliance and community education.