Radical Empathy: Civil Rights and The Humanist Ideas That Changed Two Nations
In February 1965, James Baldwin and William F. Buckley Jr. faced each other across a packed Cambridge Union, debating whether "the American dream is at the expense of the American Negro." Baldwin won the vote by a landslide. But that famous moment was one flashpoint in a much wider struggle. Across the United States and here in Britain, activists, writers and thinkers were challenging injustice, confronting systems of power, and asking fundamental questions about equality, dignity and how we ought to live. Many looked to humanist ideas of reason, shared humanity, and a vision of ethics grounded in human experience.
This episode traces the humanist threads that ran through the civil rights movements on both sides of the Atlantic, from Baldwin and Lorraine Hansberry in the United States to the Windrush generation, the 1965 Race Relations Act, and the Black British radical tradition of C.L.R. James, Claudia Jones and Darcus Howe.
Guests:
Dr Nicholas Buccola, Dr Jules K. Whitehill Professor of Humanism and Ethics at Claremont McKenna College, and author of The Fire Is upon Us: James Baldwin, William F. Buckley Jr., and the Debate over Race in America (Princeton, 2019). nicholasbuccola.com
Dr Angelina Osborne, British historian, researcher and heritage consultant, and co-author with Patrick Vernon of 100 Great Black Britons (Robinson, 2020). 100greatblackbritons.co.uk
For all references to people, places, and events in this episode and the full series, visit heritage.humanists.uk/podcast
Join Humanists UK: humanists.uk/join [https://humanists.uk/join/]
Discover more Humanist Heritage: heritage.humanists.uk [https://heritage.humanists.uk/]
Send us your questions or feedback: Unholy@Humanise.Live [unholy@humanise.live]
Unholy Histories is produced by Humanise Live a production agency creating values-led podcast content. Start podcasting today at humanise.live [https://www.humanise.live/]
Music: Small Things by Simon Folwar
Podcast transcripts are AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided to make our content more accessible, but should not be considered a fully accurate record of the conversation.