Your Undivided Attention

Here’s Our Roadmap to a Better AI Future

In order to shift the incentives of AI — the trillions of dollars in investment, the race to geopolitical power and dominance — it’s not enough to simply understand the problem, we need real action.  That’s why CHT is proud to release "The AI Roadmap," a report outlining seven core principles for how AI should be built, deployed, and governed, each grounded in real, implementable solutions across three domains: norms, laws, and product design. In this episode, Camille Carlton and Pete Furlong from CHT’s policy team explore the concrete steps we can take today to get off the default path and forge a better AI future. You can read “The AI Roadmap” on our website: humanetech.com/ai-roadmap  RECOMMENDED MEDIA  The AI Roadmap [https://www.humanetech.com/ai-roadmap] The Human Movement [http://thehumanmovement.org]   RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODES AI Is Moving Fast. We Need Laws that Will Too. [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/ai-is-moving-fast-we-need-laws-that-will-too] A Conversation with the Team Behind "The AI Doc" [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/a-conversation-with-the-team-behind-the-ai-doc] The Narrow Path: Sam Hammond on AI, Institutions, and the Fragile Future [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/the-narrow-path-sam-hammond-on-ai-institutions-and-the-fragile-future]   CLARIFICATIONS  In this episode, Tristan includes Spain in a list of countries that are all banning social media for underage teens. The Spanish law that would do this still needs parliamentary approval.  At one point, Tristan says, “We now have age gating in every Apple device.” Although Apple has the capability to introduce age restrictions across its devices, such restrictions are only in place for residents of Louisiana, Utah, and several other countries to comply with local laws - not across the rest of the U.S.  In a discussion of whistleblower protections, Pete Furlong mentions laws in New York, California and Colorado that all try to address the broader issues around transparency (of which whistleblower protections are a piece). The laws are CA SB53, which has whistleblower protections; the RAISE Act in NY, which was amended to include the same provisions as CA SB53; and the Colorado AI Act, which does not have whistleblower protections, but does require risk assessments and transparency measures, consistent with the other parts of the principle.  At one point Tristan discusses the recent skirmish between Anthropic and the U.S. Department of War, saying, “Anthropic’s downloads surges by like 250% or something like that.” It was actually daily active users, not downloads, which tripled in the first quarter of 2026, according to the company. The number of paid subscribers doubled. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Why the Meta Verdicts Are a Big Deal (And What It Was Like to Testify)

In two landmark cases, juries in California and New Mexico found Meta and Google liable for creating addictive, harmful products and failing to protect children from exploitation and abuse. These verdicts signal that the era of tech impunity may finally be closing. State attorneys general are finding ways around the broad immunity of Section 230 — seeking not just fines, but changes to the design of these products. Our very own Aza Raskin testified at the New Mexico trial as a fact witness, drawing on his firsthand experience as the inventor of infinite scroll, one of the core mechanics of addictive design. In this episode, Tristan and Aza discuss what it was like to take the stand for tech justice, what the companies knew and when, and why the real significance of these cases lies not in the dollar amounts but in the injunctive relief still to come. In the 1990s, a series of landmark cases held Big Tobacco accountable for the harms of their toxic products. This could be that moment for social media. RECOMMENDED MEDIA Further reading on the New Mexico trial [https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/24/jury-reaches-verdict-in-meta-child-safety-trial-in-new-mexico.html] Further reading on the California trial [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/technology/social-media-trial-verdict.html] Arturo Béjar’s “Broken Promises” Report [https://fairplayforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Teen-Accounts-Broken-Promises-How-Instagram-is-failing-to-protect-minors.pdf]   RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODES What if we had fixed social media? [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/what-if-we-had-fixed-social-media] Jonathan Haidt On How to Solve the Teen Mental Health Crisis [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/jonathan-haidt-on-how-to-solve-the-teen-mental-health-crisis] Social Media Victims Lawyer Up with Laura Marquez-Garrett [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/social-media-victims-lawyer-up-with-laura-marquez-garrett] Real Social Media Solutions, Now with Frances Haugen [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/real-social-media-solutions-now-with-frances-haugen] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

A Conversation with the Team Behind "The AI Doc"

“The AI Doc: Or How I Became An Apocaloptimist” opens in theaters across the U.S. this Friday, March 27. In this episode, we sit down with the team behind this groundbreaking documentary — Oscar-winning producers Daniel Kwan, Jonathan Wang, and Ted Tremper. They explore how they navigated the overwhelming complexity of AI, held space for radically different perspectives, and created a film designed not just to inform but to be experienced together.  At CHT, we believe clarity creates agency. This film has the power to create the shared clarity we need to steer the direction of AI towards a better, more humane technological future. With every new technology, there’s a brief window to set the rules of the road that determine the future we live in. This is ours. So grab your friends, your family and go see “The AI Doc.”  RECOMMENDED MEDIA Buy tickets for The AI Doc [https://www.amctheatres.com/movies/the-ai-doc-or-how-i-became-an-apocaloptimist-82383/showtimes] The trailer for The AI Doc [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkPbV3IRe4Y] The website for the Creators Coalition on AI [https://www.creatorscoalitionai.com/] Further reading on The Day After [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/movies/the-day-after-documentary-television-event.html]   RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODES A Problem Well-Stated Is Half-Solved with Daniel Schmachtenberger [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/a-problem-well-stated-is-half-solved] The AI Dilemma [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/the-ai-dilemma] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

AI Is Breaking Education. Rebecca Winthrop Has the Blueprint to Fix It.

The promise of AI in education is incredible: picture infinitely patient tutors that can teach every student exactly the way they need to be taught. But the history of education technology tells us that these kinds of simple, optimistic stories are naive. Ask any teacher or student whether they feel unleashed by technology to do their best work.  Because AI has the potential to completely transform education — is already transforming it — faster than educators can keep up, it’s essential that we start asking the big questions: how should these tools be used in the classroom? What’s the purpose of education in an AI age? And how do we prepare students for a future that’s still so radically uncertain? Our guest this week actually has some answers. Rebecca Winthrop leads the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution, and they just released a report called A New Direction for Students in an AI World [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/a-new-direction-for-students-in-an-ai-world-prosper-prepare-protect/]. She and her colleagues conducted an extensive ‘pre-mortem’ of AI in the classroom, speaking with hundreds of educators, students, policy-makers, and technologists worldwide.  In this episode, Rebecca walks us through what she's learned — what's working, what's not, and most importantly, what are the concrete steps that parents, teachers, and administrators can and should take right now?   RECOMMENDED MEDIA A New Direction for Students in An AI World [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/a-new-direction-for-students-in-an-ai-world-prosper-prepare-protect/] The Disengaged Teen by Rebecca Winthrop and Jenny Anderson [https://www.thedisengagedteen.com/]   RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODES Rethinking School in the Age of AI [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/rethinking-school-in-the-age-of-ai] Attachment Hacking and the Rise of AI Psychosis [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/attachment-hacking-and-the-rise-of-ai-psychosis] How OpenAI's ChatGPT Guided a Teen to His Death [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/how-openai-s-chatgpt-guided-a-teen-to-his-death] AI and the Future of Work: What You Need to Know [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/ai-work] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Race to Build God: AI's Existential Gamble — Yoshua Bengio & Tristan Harris at Davos

This week on Your Undivided Attention, Tristan Harris and Daniel Barcay offer a backstage recap of what it was like to be at the Davos World Economic Forum meeting this year as the world’s power brokers woke up to the risks of uncontrolled AI.  Amidst all the money and politics, the Human Change House staged a weeklong series of remarkable conversations between scientists and experts about technology and society. This episode is a discussion between Tristan and Professor Yoshua Bengio, who is considered one of the world’s leaders in AI and deep learning, and the most cited scientist in the field.  Yoshua and Tristan had a frank exchange about the AI we’re building, and the incentives we’re using to train models. What happens when a model has its own goals, and those goals are ‘misaligned’ with the human-centered outcomes we need? In fact this is already happening, and the consequences are tragic.  Truthfully, there may not be a way to ‘nudge’ or regulate companies toward better incentives. Yoshua has launched a nonprofit AI safety research initiative called Law Zero that isn't just about safety testing, but really a new form of advanced AI that's fundamentally safe by design. RECOMMENDED MEDIA  All the panels that Tristan and Daniel did with Human Change House  [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UPINK7zeek&list=PLkfXGKkp7xBJ-8zMiCZ3VLADRjtTT9Vcf] LawZero: Safe AI for Humanity  [https://lawzero.org/en] Anthropic’s internal research on ‘agentic misalignment’  [https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment] RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODES  Attachment Hacking and the Rise of AI Psychosis [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/attachment-hacking-and-the-rise-of-ai-psychosis] How OpenAI's ChatGPT Guided a Teen to His Death [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/how-openai-s-chatgpt-guided-a-teen-to-his-death] What if we had fixed social media? [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/what-if-we-had-fixed-social-media] What Can We Do About Abusive Chatbots? With Meetali Jain and Camille Carlton [https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/what-can-we-do-about-abusive-chatbots-with-meetali-jain-and-camille-carlton] CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS  1) In this episode, Tristan Harris discussed AI chatbot safety concerns. The core issues are substantiated by investigative reporting, with these clarifications: Grok: The Washington Post reported [https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/08/07/grok-ai-child-safety-csam/] in August 2024 that Grok generated sexualized images involving minors and had weaker content moderation than competitors.  Meta: The Wall Street Journal reported [https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-ai-chatbot-safety-restrictions-e9e8ce3f] in December 2024 that Meta reduced safety restrictions on its AI chatbots. Testing showed inappropriate responses when researchers posed as 13-year-olds (Meta's minimum age). Our discussion referenced "eight year olds" to emphasize concerns about young children accessing these systems; the documented testing involved 13-year-old personas. Bottom line: The fundamental concern stands—major AI companies have reduced safety guardrails due to competitive pressure, creating documented risks for young users. 2) There was no Google House at Davos in 2026, as stated by Tristan. It was a collaboration at Goals House.  3) Tristan states that in 2025, the total funding going into AI safety organizations was “on the order of about $150 million.” This number is not strictly verifiable.  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.