
According2Sam Podcast
Podkast av Samuel Winchester
Prøv gratis i 14 dager
99 kr / Måned etter prøveperioden.Avslutt når som helst.

Mer enn 1 million lyttere
Du vil elske Podimo, og du er ikke alene
Vurdert til 4,7 stjerner i App Store
Les mer According2Sam Podcast
My personal Substack www.according2sam.com
Alle episoder
325 Episoder
For nearly a decade, we’ve been told that Russian operatives hacked the Democratic National Committee and stole emails and other documents, which were then passed to WikiLeaks and published ahead of the 2016 election. Both WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and the Russian government have denied that Russia was the source of the leaked DNC materials. Although no definitive evidence has been publicly presented to prove Russia was responsible, many Americans still accept this claim as fact. However, recent declassifications and disclosures from the current Director of National Intelligence cast doubt on that narrative, revealing that parts of the intelligence community had only low confidence in Russia’s involvement. What, then, is the most likely source of the leaked DNC documents in 2016? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #340. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.according2sam.com [https://www.according2sam.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

The stakes are high for the 2026 Congressional midterm elections, and both Democrats and Republicans know it. This urgency is driving the mid-decade redistricting efforts now underway in several states. In Republican-controlled states, district lines are being redrawn to boost the party’s chances of retaining control of the House of Representatives. Meanwhile, Democrats are pursuing redistricting in the states they govern in hopes of regaining power in Congress. If Democrats succeed, it could mark the end of President Trump's agenda—and potentially lead to his impeachment. That’s why the stakes are so high. However, what happens if Democrats fall short? What would that mean for the future of their party? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #339. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.according2sam.com [https://www.according2sam.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

A new analytical report from The New York Times, published this week, reveals a significant disparity in voter registration between the two major political parties from 2020 to 2024. In the 30 states that track party affiliation, Democrats lost registered voters to Republicans in every single one—often by a large margin. The report describes the Democratic Party as “bleeding support” and in a state of “crisis.” This has left many Democrats questioning why they are losing ground. Yet, based on their current strategy, the answer seems to elude them. Rather than adjusting course, the party appears to be doubling down on everything they have been doing. Why are voters turning away from the Democratic Party, and can they repair the damage before the midterm elections next year? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #338. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.according2sam.com [https://www.according2sam.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

A recent talking point among some Democrats and members of the legacy media is that President Trump’s efforts to resolve global conflicts are motivated primarily by a desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Some go further, suggesting his interest stems from envy over President Obama’s receipt of the award. Regardless of his motivations, what is undeniable is that President Trump has taken active steps toward peace in several international conflicts. In just six months, he has done more in pursuit of peace than President Obama accomplished in eight years. Has opposition to President Trump become so deeply rooted that it obscures any objective assessment of his actions—even when those actions contribute to global peace? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #337. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.according2sam.com [https://www.according2sam.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

President Trump set a goal for his second administration: to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. He famously stated during last year's campaign that he would end the war on his first day. While he did not achieve that ambitious timeline, he has been aggressively pursuing a peace agreement between the two nations. It marks a significant policy shift from the Biden administration, which made no attempts at diplomacy or peace. The latest effort is hosting a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Many foreign policy experts have criticized this move, suggesting they preferred Biden's approach more. Why is Trump's approach correct, if the objective is really peace? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #336. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.according2sam.com [https://www.according2sam.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Vurdert til 4,7 stjerner i App Store
Prøv gratis i 14 dager
99 kr / Måned etter prøveperioden.Avslutt når som helst.
Eksklusive podkaster
Uten reklame
Gratis podkaster
Lydbøker
20 timer i måneden