Forsidebilde av showet Data Science x Public Health

Data Science x Public Health

Podkast av BJANALYTICS

engelsk

Teknologi og vitenskap

Deretter 99 kr / Måned. Avslutt når som helst.

  • 20 timer lydbøker i måneden
  • Eksklusive podkaster
  • Gratis podkaster

Les mer Data Science x Public Health

This podcast discusses the concepts of data science and public health, and then delves into their intersection, exploring the connection between the two fields in greater detail.

Alle episoder

166 Episoder

episode In Theory, Model Averaging Works. In Reality… It Doesn’t cover

In Theory, Model Averaging Works. In Reality… It Doesn’t

Model averaging is often presented as a more careful and uncertainty-aware alternative to choosing one model specification. It is supposed to reduce overconfidence and make analysis more robust. But what if all the models being averaged share the same blind spots from the start?  In this episode, we break down why model averaging often overpromises, how shared structural weaknesses survive the averaging process, and why uncertainty cannot be handled simply by blending similar models.  👉 Enjoyed the episode? Follow the show to get new episodes automatically. If you found the content helpful, consider leaving a rating or review—it helps support the podcast. For business and sponsorship inquiries, email us at:  📧 contact@bjanalytics.com [contact@bjanalytics.com] Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS [https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/ [https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/] Twitter/X: https://x.com/BJANALYTICS [https://x.com/BJANALYTICS] Threads: https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting [https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting]

13. mai 2026 - 4 min
episode Everyone Uses Censoring Assumptions… But They Fail When Leaving the Study Is Part of the Outcome cover

Everyone Uses Censoring Assumptions… But They Fail When Leaving the Study Is Part of the Outcome

Censoring is one of the most common assumptions in epidemiology and survival analysis. It is often treated as a routine technical step for handling people who leave observation before the study ends. But what if leaving the study is not random noise—and is actually part of the outcome process itself?  In this episode, we break down why censoring assumptions often fail, how loss to follow-up can distort longitudinal research, and why disappearing from the dataset is not the same thing as disappearing from risk. 👉 Enjoyed the episode? Follow the show to get new episodes automatically. If you found the content helpful, consider leaving a rating or review—it helps support the podcast. For business and sponsorship inquiries, email us at: 📧 contact@bjanalytics.com Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS [https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/ [https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/] Twitter/X: https://x.com/BJANALYTICS [https://x.com/BJANALYTICS] Threads: https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting [https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting]

13. mai 2026 - 4 min
episode This Is Why Resource Allocation Models Don’t Work (And Nobody Talks About It) cover

This Is Why Resource Allocation Models Don’t Work (And Nobody Talks About It)

Resource allocation models are supposed to help public health systems distribute scarce resources more intelligently. They promise better targeting, more efficient deployment, and stronger impact under constraint. But what if the model is optimizing inside a system whose deepest constraints should never have been treated as fixed? In this episode, we break down why resource allocation models often fail in practice, how optimization can normalize structural scarcity, and why better public health modeling has to question the system—not just distribute within it. 👉 Enjoyed the episode? Follow the show to get new episodes automatically. If you found the content helpful, consider leaving a rating or review—it helps support the podcast. For business and sponsorship inquiries, email us at: 📧 contact@bjanalytics.com Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS [https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/ [https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/] Twitter/X: https://x.com/BJANALYTICS [https://x.com/BJANALYTICS] Threads: https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting [https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting]

13. mai 2026 - 5 min
episode This Is Why Competing Risks Don’t Work (And Nobody Talks About It) cover

This Is Why Competing Risks Don’t Work (And Nobody Talks About It)

Competing risks methods are often presented as a more realistic way to analyze time-to-event data in epidemiology and public health. They promise to handle situations where other events prevent the outcome of interest from ever occurring. But what if the method becomes more sophisticated while the interpretation becomes less clear?  In this episode, we break down why competing risks analyses are often overtrusted, how the choice of estimand quietly changes what the result means, and why better methods do not remove the need for sharper scientific thinking. 👉 Enjoyed the episode? Follow the show to get new episodes automatically. If you found the content helpful, consider leaving a rating or review—it helps support the podcast. For business and sponsorship inquiries, email us at: 📧 contact@bjanalytics.com [contact@bjanalytics.com] Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS [https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/ [https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/] Twitter/X: https://x.com/BJANALYTICS [https://x.com/BJANALYTICS] Threads: https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting [https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting]

6. mai 2026 - 4 min
episode In Theory, External Validation Works. In Reality… It Doesn’t cover

In Theory, External Validation Works. In Reality… It Doesn’t

External validation is often presented as the gold standard for proving that a predictive model works beyond its original dataset. It is supposed to show that the model can generalize to the real world. But what if one external dataset is still far too small a test of the outside world?  In this episode, we break down why external validation often overpromises, how “different” datasets can still be too similar, and why transportability is a much harder claim than validation language suggests. 👉 Enjoyed the episode? Follow the show to get new episodes automatically. If you found the content helpful, consider leaving a rating or review—it helps support the podcast. For business and sponsorship inquiries, email us at: 📧 contact@bjanalytics.com [contact@bjanalytics.com] Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS [https://www.youtube.com/@BJANALYTICS] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/ [https://www.instagram.com/bjanalyticsconsulting/] Twitter/X: https://x.com/BJANALYTICS [https://x.com/BJANALYTICS] Threads: https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting [https://www.threads.com/@bjanalyticsconsulting]

6. mai 2026 - 4 min
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Liker at det er både Podcaster (godt utvalg) og lydbøker i samme app, pluss at man kan holde Podcaster og lydbøker atskilt i biblioteket.
Bra app. Oversiktlig og ryddig. MYE bra innhold⭐️⭐️⭐️

Velg abonnementet ditt

Mest populær

Tidsbegrenset tilbud

Premium

20 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

2 Måneder for 19 kr
Deretter 99 kr / Måned

Kom i gang

Premium Plus

100 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

Prøv gratis i 14 dager
Deretter 169 kr / måned

Prøv gratis

Bare på Podimo

Populære lydbøker

Ofte stilte spørsmål

Flere spørsmål og svar
Kom i gang

2 Måneder for 19 kr. Deretter 99 kr / Måned. Avslutt når som helst.