Forsidebilde av showet The Arrogant Independent

The Arrogant Independent

Podkast av Shawn Havens

engelsk

Nyheter og politikk

Deretter 99 kr / Måned. Avslutt når som helst.

  • 20 timer lydbøker i måneden
  • Eksklusive podkaster
  • Gratis podkaster

Les mer The Arrogant Independent

They say silence is safe — but safe never changed anything. The Arrogant Independent is a movement of thinkers, skeptics, and truth-seekers breaking free from media control. From politics to pop culture, censorship to faith, we question everything — and we’re not afraid to say what others won’t. Join the rebellion of reason.

Alle episoder

154 Episoder

episode Revised - Interrupted by Grace Audiobook cover

Revised - Interrupted by Grace Audiobook

The story they tried to discredit. The memories he struggled to hold onto. The questions no one wanted answered. It’s a true story. He survived combat in Iraq. What happened afterward was harder to explain. After twenty years of military service, Shawn Havens believed the war was finally behind him. A decorated combat engineer and senior noncommissioned officer, he returned home carrying the invisible weight of Iraq—grief, trauma, exhaustion, and memories that refused to stay buried. But the deeper he moved into civilian life, the more reality itself began to fracture. What first appeared to be the collapse of a struggling veteran slowly evolved into something far more disturbing: unexplained interference, missing pieces of memory, reputational attacks, workplace manipulation, psychological pressure, and a growing sense that the narrative surrounding his life was being shaped by forces he could neither fully understand nor escape. As events escalated, those around him increasingly reframed his experiences as instability, paranoia, or PTSD alone—even as the patterns themselves became harder to ignore. Then came the morning he nearly died. Moments before taking his own life, a phone call interrupted everything. What followed forced him to confront a terrifying possibility: what if his collapse had not been entirely natural? What if trauma had not simply damaged him—but made him vulnerable to something far more deliberate? Interrupted by Grace is part military memoir, part psychological survival story, and part deeply personal investigation into memory, manipulation, corruption, and truth. Moving from the battlefields of Ramadi to the quiet isolation of a Georgia home, Havens reconstructs the events that nearly erased him while wrestling with the terrifying uncertainty of what was real, what was forgotten, and whether parts of his story had been intentionally buried beneath a more convenient narrative. This is not a book about easy answers. It is a book about what happens when a man begins to realize that losing control of his own narrative may be more dangerous than losing his life. At its heart, Interrupted by Grace is the story of a father, a survivor, and a man who was expected to disappear. And didn’t.

25. mai 2026 - 7 h 9 min
episode Does Conscience Belong to the Individual… or the State? cover

Does Conscience Belong to the Individual… or the State?

Throughout history, societies have repeatedly attempted to enforce conformity in the name of unity, morality, safety, religion, or national identity.   But forced conformity rarely creates harmony.   It creates fear. It creates coercion. And eventually, it places power over the individual conscience into the hands of institutions, governments, movements, or majorities.   In this episode, I go deep into one of the most important and misunderstood principles behind the American founding:   Why liberty of conscience became essential to the survival of a free republic.   This episode explores:   • Europe’s religious wars and the dangers of state-controlled belief • Why the founders rejected a national church • The persecution of Baptists and religious dissenters in colonial America • James Madison’s defense of liberty of conscience • The true meaning of separation of church and state • Why E Pluribus Unum originally represented unity without forced conformity • How constitutional liberty protects disagreement without collapsing society • Why conscience must remain beyond the ownership of power   This is not an attack on faith.   It is a defense of the individual conscience — religious or nonreligious — against systems that attempt to command belief through power.   One republic. Many consciences.   📘 Based on my book: E Pluribus Unum: One Republic from Many Consciences Now available in Paperback, Kindle, and Audiobook.   — Shawn Havens The Arrogant Independent

14. mai 2026 - 16 min
episode E Pluribus Unum: One Republic from Many Consciences — Audiobook Edition cover

E Pluribus Unum: One Republic from Many Consciences — Audiobook Edition

Why did the founders of the United States reject a national church while building a republic shaped by deeply religious people? E Pluribus Unum explores one of the most important and misunderstood questions in American history: how the American founding emerged from centuries of religious conflict, persecution, state churches, and struggles over liberty of conscience. Drawing from constitutional debates, founding-era letters, legal documents, and historical records, this audiobook traces the development of religious liberty and the separation of church and state from Europe’s religious wars to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Topics include: • Europe’s religious wars and state churches • Religious persecution in colonial America • Baptist dissenters jailed for preaching without licenses • The constitutional arguments of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson • Article VI and the ban on religious tests • The First Amendment and liberty of conscience • The later addition of “under God” during the Cold War • The ongoing challenge of preserving liberty within a morally diverse society Rather than portraying the founding as either purely secular or purely theocratic, this work presents a historically grounded examination of how the founders attempted to create one constitutional republic without requiring one government-approved faith. At the center of the American experiment was a difficult but enduring principle: A free republic can survive deep disagreement only when government does not claim ownership of conscience. Ideal for listeners interested in: American history, constitutional history, the First Amendment, religious liberty, political philosophy, church and state, and the American founding. Written and narrated by Shawn Havens.

14. mai 2026 - 8 h 34 min
episode Some systems do not seek morality. They seek obedience. cover

Some systems do not seek morality. They seek obedience.

Some systems do not seek morality.   They seek obedience.   In tonight’s episode of The Arrogant Independent, we examine a difficult question:   If people believe they have the right to morally judge, socially punish, economically isolate, or psychologically pressure others based on personal conduct…   Should those same individuals be required to live fully under the exact same standards themselves?   Or does liberty suddenly matter once scrutiny turns toward them?   This episode explores: • Conditional liberty • Selective morality • Public shame culture • Social power structures • Constitutional protections • The danger of unequal standards in a free society   This is not about revenge. It is about consistency.   Because freedom only survives when standards apply equally.   🎙️ New Episode: “Conditional Liberty — Should the Judges Live Under Their Own Rules?”   Spotify Link: [INSERT SPOTIFY LINK]   #TheArrogantIndependent #ConditionalLiberty #FreeSpeech #CivilLiberties #EqualJustice #Constitution #Liberty #Podcast #IndependentMedia #DueProcess #SocialPressure #Freedom

12. mai 2026 - 12 min
episode Selective Freedom: Federal Money, Moral Judgment, and the Veteran Double Standard cover

Selective Freedom: Federal Money, Moral Judgment, and the Veteran Double Standard

🇺🇸 NEW EPISODE — Selective Freedom: Federal Money, Moral Judgment, and the Veteran Double Standard What happens when freedom stops being equal? This episode examines a difficult question: If politicians and institutions believe they have the moral authority to judge individual citizens for lawful personal behavior… should governments, states, and federally funded systems be held to the exact same standard? The discussion explores: — Federal funding and selective moral scrutiny — Veterans, liberty, and conditional citizenship — Louisiana, disaster recovery, and economic contradiction — The difference between liberty and permission — Whether America still applies equal standards under the Constitution This is not an attack on culture, tourism, or political affiliation. It is a challenge to the growing idea that ordinary citizens can be morally managed while institutions and powerful systems operate under entirely different rules. If freedom only exists when authority approves of how you live, that is not liberty. That is permission. “The flag does not fly for selective freedom. It flies for all Americans.” — The Arrogant Independent

11. mai 2026 - 11 min
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Liker at det er både Podcaster (godt utvalg) og lydbøker i samme app, pluss at man kan holde Podcaster og lydbøker atskilt i biblioteket.
Bra app. Oversiktlig og ryddig. MYE bra innhold⭐️⭐️⭐️

Velg abonnementet ditt

Mest populær

Tidsbegrenset tilbud

Premium

20 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

2 Måneder for 19 kr
Deretter 99 kr / Måned

Kom i gang

Premium Plus

100 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

Prøv gratis i 14 dager
Deretter 169 kr / måned

Prøv gratis

Bare på Podimo

Populære lydbøker

Ofte stilte spørsmål

Flere spørsmål og svar
Kom i gang

2 Måneder for 19 kr. Deretter 99 kr / Måned. Avslutt når som helst.