Conrad Speaks

In the wake of Facebook’s downtime, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, NSA-whistleblower Edward Snowden, and several other prominent figures all chimed in to condemn the spread of “misinformation” on social media platforms. This points to a simple conspiracy, namely that either the downtime or the response to it were coordinated. It also suggests state powers, especially those in the U.S., have an apparent need to begin controlling the flow of information. And that’s called censorship. Edward Snowden took it to the extreme yesterday and published an article titled “Apophenia [https://edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/conspiracy-pt2]”. This condition, first coined by Nazi psychologist Klaus Conrad, involves people looking for confirmation of their own biases, and then finding said confirmation in random coincidences. In his blog post, Snowden seems to argue that ordinary people who think they see patterns in information are likely conspiracy theorists, and that proper thinking is best left to professionally trained social theorists. This is Marxism in a nutshell, for it denies people can trust their own senses, and claims that those who try are “victims of institutions”. Where have we heard that before? Snowden further writes, “The easier it becomes to produce information, the harder that information becomes to consume.” Snowden means to say that when ordinary people—rather than trained experts—start writing blog posts on the internet, the information overload makes it harder for everyone to figure out what is true. If that sounds like an argument for censoring the internet … well that’s exactly what Snowden is suggesting. Except, it isn’t so. Snowden falsely assumes that by now limiting the production of information (say, through “fact-checking”), we somehow regain access to higher quality, more truthful information. But once we start censoring information, we don’t somehow get more condensed truths, rather, we get more refined b******t. What he really means to say is that common people shouldn’t be allowed to freely use social media anymore, for they may end up believing things that aren’t true. This is a threat to states and state media, for the public’s own opinions drown out the voices of state-sanctioned outlets. The greater diversity of thoughts among the public that social media has enabled diminishes the effectiveness of state propaganda. I find it odd that Snowden would not see that value in that. Whose side is he on, really? Snowden next calls human beings “meaning-making machines” and I thought that was a peculiar phrase, for two reasons. One, people are not machines. Does Snowden think of himself as a machine? Does he believe people ought to be programmed like computers? And two, people don’t just make meaning. They more often absorb it or cultivate it slowly. We are not meaning-making machines, we are sense-absorbing beings. Basically, Snowden’s grand argument is that the general public cannot be trusted to filter out truths from untruths on their own, and therefore, we ought to somehow start restricting people’s use of social media. Can you smell the internet passport already? Because I smell the internet passport and I wonder if the unvaccinated will still be allowed to have opinions online. We’ll see. (Apparently, Snowden himself is still allowed to “produce information” on his blog, and he perfectly timed his post for Facebook’s outage, as though he hadn’t already prepared the article long in advance.) No, people do not seek “order in the chaos”, either, as Snowden claims. This is a typical leftist trope based on the Left’s own inability to understand the populist Right. They mistakenly think right-wingers need order and closure, but we, on the Right, actually excell at dealing with unpredictable circumstances, whereas it is the Left that has the incessant need to make everything predictable. It is the Left that wants to capture the workings of the whole universe in unchanging scientific formulae and fixed constants. The Left must deny anything they cannot predict. Hence, the Left’s fear and hatred of the unpredictably superior Right, for the man who has the intuitive senses and his wits about him to deal with an unsure future can succeed without calculation. Snowden: “But we now live in a dystopian digital landscape purpose-built to undermine these capabilities, training us to mistake planned patterns for convenient and even meaningful coincidences.” What he calls a dystopian digital landscape is his way of saying social media. In other words, he believes social media, which has enabled ordinary people to communicate among themselves for the first time in human history, is the state planner’s worst nightmare, and it has to be stopped, in some form or way, for it apparently trains people to think wrongly. Wrongthink! We might, for example, mistakenly assume Snowden has been working for the World Economic Forum all this time, now pushing precisely Klaus Schwab’s and George Soros’s policy of dismantling social media. I don’t deny that a lot of what is said online is nonsense. I say that social media actually provides some people with a way to puncture through the gigantic historical and present State lies and find a glimpse of the truth, some of the time. By removing this tool from the public’s hands, no one will only be able to access true information, for the fact-checkers are employed by the State. Their alleged independence is a sham. The technocrats have given us, the people, a tool for searching the truth, but it has proven so dangerous to state interests that we may no longer have it. Social media were supposed to help the blue checkmark crowd spread their version of the truth, but now we cannot have a rebellious population finding out alternative truths, for example, that it was the CIA who killed Kennedy, or that Zionists embedded within the U.S. government such as Paul Wolfowitz actually did 9/11? It’s very, very strange to find Snowden in this camp of what is, in essence, a call for internet censorship, reeling social media outlets back in, and letting the blue-checkmark fact-checking crowd tell us what is true from now on. But there he is, masterminding the new Ministry of Truth. Snowden believes that people’s access to and participation in information production “has ‘turned back’ and ‘reorganized [the universe]’ to revolve around the individual, performing and corroborating his suspicions.” What he means to say is he believes social media have made people fall for their own preconceptions by finding lucky coincidences here and there. In other words, he is arguing against common people doing their own research, for he believes you have to be a trained expert to do so. So, I repeat what I stated earlier. Even if this is so, and most people using the internet somehow end up believing nonsense, there are still immeasurable benefits won here, namely that people’s personal conspiracies help drown out the official state-sanctioned versions, thereby diminishing the power of the state (which I think is a good thing), and that some people do actually manage to find out the truth by critically scrutinizing their thinking. Without stating any facts to back it up, Snowden feels the need to say “Hitler was one of greatest conspiracy theorists of all time.” Really? Which conspiracies did Hitler believe in? The one where he said that the Russian communist leadership under Lenin was majority Jewish? Oh wait, that’s the one Winston Churchill disclosed in his article Zionism versus Bolshevism [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism]. Without the internet, I would never have found that article, and I would never have been able to confirm that, indeed, most of the Soviet Russian leadership under Lenin was majority Jewish, nor would I have found out that Soviet Russia invaded Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic States, and Czechoslovakia before Hitler invaded the Sudetenland of which mainstream historians still say “that’s what started World War 2”. Meaning, the Soviets invaded Europe first, but no one in the so-called international community batted an eye until the Germans began to defend themselves. Without the internet, I could not have known that Lenin and Stalin always meant to invade and occupy all of Europe and that neither the French, the British, nor the Poles could have stopped them. But one country might have been able to stop the Russian advance, and despite all lies told about WW2, the Germans really did stop the Russians at Berlin, thereby granting Western Europe almost 75 years of freedom and peace. The real conspiracy theorists, I believe, are the censors of history who have deliberately warped our understanding of that period. Of course they fear the free internet that lets critical minds painstakingly piece together what really happened. Snowden: “In fact [Klaus Conrad, who coined the condition of apophenia] ended up being one of the only Nazi scientists to be producing science without rockets, torture, or pentagrams.” I suppose they also invented the transistor radio, cryptography, the Autobahn, consumer cars, Olympic torch relays, particle board, Jägermeister, and the jerrycan. I jokingly mention these, because Snowden here actually does what he warns others not to do. He relies on his own apophenic nonsense to justify his literal conspiracy theory that says German scientists were only involved in drawing pentagrams and torturing people. That’s not true. “In an apophenic state,” he continues, “everything’s a pattern.” Yes, but only to machine-minded men like Snowden. Most people worldwide never ever find themselves in an apophenic state, meaning, to them, the use of and access to mass quantities of information still provides them with a healthy glimpse into the inner workings of reality. It generally does not fool people into believing nonsense. Snowden goes on to complain about “the narcissism of living online.” But most people online aren’t narcisssists. Sure, we all know Joey B. Toonz’s showcase of the TikTok narcissists, but although social media offers narcissists tools to promote themselves, using the internet doesn’t make anyone a narcissist. Now this might be a conspiracy theory, but I do believe Edward Snowden is a narcissist. According to Snowden, on social media, “you can basically find evidence for any theory you want”. That still doesn’t say most people who go looking for evidence for their theories end up believing them. Most people don’t. The threat of misinformation is highly exaggerated and must stem from another fear, namely the fear people are waking up to the truths that censors of the past so carefully tried to hide. It also isn’t true that everybody is always looking for evidence for their made-up theories online, since very few people bother to think up their own theories. In fact, it would be beneficial to society if more people started thinking up their own theories rather than not to think at all. Most people, today, still swallow whatever the mainstream media tell them to believe despite having acess to an internet full of insights that might help falsify the mainstream narrative. The belief that mainstream media and mainstream historians are telling us the truth is a lie. At this point, Snowden feels like showing his true colors by citing a Jewish conspiracy theorist named Karl Popper, who, for example, believed that the entire canon of Western philosophy since Plato inevitably led to the Holocaust and the Gulags. That’s not true. That’s a conspiracy theory. Snowden: “Popper believed conspiracy theories are exactly what feeds a totalitarian state like Hitler’s Germany, playing on and playing up the public’s paranoia of The Other. And authoritarians get away with it precisely because their pseudoscientific claims, masquerading as sound research, are designed to be difficult to prove ‘false’ in the heat of the moment, when data sets—not to mention a sense of the historical consequences—are necessarily incomplete.” Wow, just wow. He’s so whiny he sounds like Greta Thunberg going blah-blah-blah. For starters, actual science, as we know it, rests on the unproven and unprovable assumption of materialism, which is the belief that everything in existence in the universe is matter in motion, denying the existence of souls, a free will, a spiritual dimension, the existence of minds, and God. That means all science is pseudoscience, since all science is materialist science, which, as of today, has no sound and proven basis in reality. Materialism has never yet been proven true. So it is certainly not just “the authoritarans” who make up arguments that are difficult to prove ‘false’. It is the entire leftish ideology, too, that itself rests on yet unproven assumptions. However, the assumptions of the Left do seem to be a lot easier to falsify. Make of that what you will. Snowden then ends his blog post with a typical left-wing anti-fascist trope: “The conspiracy theorist will believe that institutions can be understood completely as the result of conscious design; and as collectives, he usually ascribes to them a kind of group-personality, treating them as conspiring agents, just as if they were individual men.” Sure, we already know Snowden sees people as machines. Himself clearly lacking a personality, he cannot grasp the concept of groups of people behaving as an organism. But groups do behave as one, some of the time. Herds of deer, for example, can collectively respond to a threat. They do not respond as isolated individuals. Snowden believes that people who recognize that biologically related people with shared values and beliefs can act as “groups” are, in his view, “conspiracy theorists”. In other words, he thinks people who see families as families and not as random collections of thrown-together individuals are all right-wing conspiracists. Snowden also believes that only the social scientist who forces himself to see the world in terms of atomized individuals, just as he sees the physical world as collections of atoms devoid of any soul or mind, is a “public thinker, oriented toward improving society”, whereas the family-oriented men who see the ties between individuals and how they bond individuals together into groups “is a victim of institutions that lie beyond their control.” Do I need to say more? Notice that I don’t accuse Snowden of having a personality, and that is because communists, as a group, are too single-minded to be suspected of having a personality. They have been regurgitating the exact same unchanging philosophy at least since the revolution of 1917, and they have not progressed their understanding of the world one iota since Karl Marx. Snowden is a classical communist whose mind is broken, and who wants to put social scientists—pseudoscientists—in charge of our world. Haven’t we learned enough from history to make sure that may never happen again? LinksAmazon [https://www.amazon.com/Mathijs-Koenraadt/e/B00QMUJSGO],YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSC57HOxerCh0Rxoo6Baurw],Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/conradspeaks],Twitter [https://twitter.com/RoftheWest],Discord [https://discord.gg/scQDFGWm2H],Telegram [https://t.me/conradspeaks],Apple Podcast [https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/conrad-speaks/id1572183042] Subscribewww.jmk.info [https://www.jmk.info/] Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe [https://www.jmk.info/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast]

I talk about the post-national world, the age of empires, where elites are battling it out for global power. They are the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations, the U.S. Empire, the Islamic/Arabic OPEC nations, the post-Soviet Russia, and China. LinksAmazon [https://www.amazon.com/Mathijs-Koenraadt/e/B00QMUJSGO],YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSC57HOxerCh0Rxoo6Baurw],Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/conradspeaks],Twitter [https://twitter.com/RoftheWest],Discord [https://discord.gg/scQDFGWm2H],Telegram [https://t.me/conradspeaks],Apple Podcast [https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/conrad-speaks/id1572183042] Subscribewww.jmk.info [https://www.jmk.info/] Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe [https://www.jmk.info/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast]

In times of economic collapse, the rich and powerful are overcome by a panic response. They will tighten the belts of society and begin cutting away middle-class fat. To avoid being eaten by the rich, I recommend people join the rebellion against them. But being a rebel also means the control state will come after you, for you represent the Unpredictable. (You are watching drone footage from the south of The Netherlands. I recorded it with a DJI Mini 2.) LinksAmazon [https://www.amazon.com/Mathijs-Koenraadt/e/B00QMUJSGO],YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSC57HOxerCh0Rxoo6Baurw],Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/conradspeaks],Twitter [https://twitter.com/RoftheWest],Discord [https://discord.gg/scQDFGWm2H],Telegram [https://t.me/conradspeaks],Apple Podcast [https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/conrad-speaks/id1572183042] Subscribewww.jmk.info [https://www.jmk.info/] Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe [https://www.jmk.info/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast]

Today is the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York City. Many people born since that day will only know of the event as historical. And though many more who lived through the deception no longer believe the official narrative, few people have a clue what really happened. I could give you the names of some of the high-ranking conspirators who perpetrated 9/11. I could tell you they were former Secretaries of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld, former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and Condoleeza Rice, owner of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, and on the Israeli side, former Mossad agents Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, the later premier, and former deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz. I could tell you the conspirators publicly organized themselves behind PNAC, the Project for the New American Century, or that the Bush family was deeply involved, but that we must consider George W. Bush a puppet cast for his Christian family appeal rather than for his involvement, let alone for his intellect. Before I explain more about motive, let me shed a light on how it was done. German journalist Gerhard Wisnewski seems to have been the first who put the missing pieces together in his book Operation 9/11, so here’s a summary added with my own insights: No civilian planes ever hit the Twin Towers. What you saw on TV was computer-generated imagery to make it look like planes hit the Towers, thereby causing the explosions. The explosions were real, but the planes were not. Most of the fake footage was produced by MIT’s own Media Lab, at the time the most advanced cgi facility. Some of the videos you’ve seen were staged by secret service actors dressed as firefighters and police officers (such as this one [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miA8Td4oNcY]). Other civilian home videos were hunted down by secret police, and some were coerced into redubbing their footage to fit the ‘correct’ narrative. Actual planes did take off from JFK and other airports but were rerouted hundreds of miles to the west of New York City. Under normal circumstances, hijacked planes should have been intercepted by fighter jets, as has happened over a hundred times before. On 9/11, however, drones intercepted the aircraft. The conspirators directing the attacks from somewhere within the United States managed to switch over the transponder signals from the civilian airliners to the drones in mid-air, suggesting the drones turned on preprogrammed devices while those of the civilian planes were switched off. Two drones then continued en route to Manhattan, and possibly two missiles or smaller drones set course for the Pentagon and the White House. The four passenger planes, each carrying around fifty passengers, landed at various airports nearby. Flight United Airlines 175, for example, which was supposed to have hit the North Tower, actually landed at Cleveland airport. The American FAA, the Federal Aviation Authority, listed flights UA 175 and UA 93 as “active duty” aircraft until September 28th, 2005. Only when conspiracy theorists began writing the FAA asking about these planes did the FAA change the planes’ status from “active duty” to “canceled”--but not to “destroyed” as is customary if planes have crashed. In other words, the FAA’s actions suggest both these planes kept operating regular flights around the USA, even after 2005, and were never destroyed, proving the drone theory is right. No planes ever hit the Towers. The passengers aboard these planes were mostly government employees who had volunteered to participate in a military exercise, which indeed took place that day, as civilian and military branches coincidentally staged a mock terrorist attack that very morning. That means it’s possible some of the families left behind were also in on the conspiracy, but others were not. The military exercise certainly added greatly to the confusion among air traffic control employees who couldn’t tell the difference between their exercise and the ongoing terror attack. Secret servicemen ushered the disembarked passengers into hangars, where some were ordered to record fake phone calls to family and friends just before the drones hit any of their targets. Problem is, in 2001, consumer cell phones couldn’t have had a working connection at such altitudes. The cell-phone calls were all staged on the ground, but so were several phone calls from stewards and stewardesses. Although the FBI found some of the alleged Muslim attackers’ passports among the burning rubble, no passengers’ bodies were ever found. The conspirators murdered them elsewhere and families buried empty casqets. The drones that allegedly hit the Twin Towers should have disintegrated upon impact. Considering the impossibility of timing an explosion to the exact moment of an airplane’s high-speed impact, I say not even the drones hit the towers. Nothing hit the towers. The drones flew over their intended targets and then switched off the transponders to disappear from the radar, merely suggesting an impact. Without a doubt, the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. When owner Larry Silverstein purchased the Twin Towers, he was legally required to strip each floor of the asbestos that had been used during construction. This was going to be a very costly operation but now also served as a perfect cover for rigging the buildings with explosives. During the weeks before the attacks, secret servicemen posing as construction workers were heard using heavy machinery, preparing every floor and every column of the buildings for their demolition. As firefighters and others on the ground consistently reported, the first explosions heard came from the Twin Towers’ basements, several seconds before the planes supposedly hit, i.e., before the main explosions up top went off. These basement explosions are the reason why hardly 15% of the buildings’ mass was ever retrieved from the site after their collapse. The new Freedom Tower was, in fact, built right on top of where much of the older buildings’ rubble still lies buried today, signaling the victory of Zionism over Heritage America. Owner Larry Silverstein can be heard spilling too much of the beans when he admitted on live television that they also decided to “pull” World Trade Center 7. A day of fun for him, but to the victims of 9/11, the event was a literal Holocaust. In Italian, the word holocausto means: “burnt offering”, and I say it in reference to the innocent souls trapped on the upper floors of the towers whose bodies melted alive as the buildings went up in abnormally hellish flames. These men and women were sacrificed to Moloch to secure a future for U.S. Empire, for Greater Israel, and for Saudi Arabia. Several interests were served here, and it would be wrong to suggest Israel alone benefited from the War on Terror, though in hindsight, the State of Israel gained the most from the 9/11 attacks, whereas the United States ended up drawing the short straw. Twenty years later, Afghanistan has fallen back into Taliban hands, Syria’s Assad allied with Russia to beat the U.S. Army, and China is even better equipped to win the global power game. The War on Terror was sold to the general public as a nation-building exercise. We were going to bring democracy and women’s rights to rogue states. In reality, the U.S. did everything it could to topple democratically elected leaders and replace them with loyal dictators. Regime change had nothing to do with bringing the vote to the poor and the oppressed. All 9/11 did was provide U.S. Congress with an excuse to funnel trillions of U.S. taxpayers’ dollars to the Pentagon’s warmachine. Not some high-brow, low-IQ camel herders from Torah Borah, but Zionists in high places did 9/11, and they got away with it without even so much as a parking ticket. Colluding with foreign actors to stage a terrorist attack on one’s own soil is called treason, yet we find the most treasonous elements that made 9/11 possible among those who weren’t even part of the conspiracy, namely: mainstream journalists. The majority of our news analysts never even bothered to question the official narrative, while eagerly mocking and humiliating the truth movement. Guys like Wolf Blitzer, idiots without a heart or a brain, greedily sold us the Lie. Without such silent complicity of tens of thousands of so-called journalists in the West, the 9/11 conspirators could never have pulled it off. We must, therefore, above all, incriminate the media, for if the mainstream media lied to us about 9/11, they lied about everything. LinksAmazon [https://www.amazon.com/Mathijs-Koenraadt/e/B00QMUJSGO],YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSC57HOxerCh0Rxoo6Baurw],Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/conradspeaks],Twitter [https://twitter.com/RoftheWest],Discord [https://discord.gg/scQDFGWm2H],Telegram [https://t.me/conradspeaks],Apple Podcast [https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/conrad-speaks/id1572183042] Subscribewww.jmk.info [https://www.jmk.info/] Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe [https://www.jmk.info/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast]

Western civilization, spiritually and racially speaking, reached its pinnacle around the 1870s. That’s almost 150 years back. The seeds of our modern age—telephones, photography, the headphone jack, and consumer cars—had just been invented. This was the age of Richard Wagner’s Ring of the Nibelungs, of Jules Verne’s Around the World in Eighty Days, and the beginning of the German Empire, the Second Reich. In that same decade, however, everything came crashing down. The Industrial Age that had uprooted millions of rural families looking for a better life in the new bustling cities proved an illusion. It was the Panic of 1873, following the collapse of the Viennese Stock Market in May of that year, which set in motion the events leading up to the First and Second World Wars. Earlier that century, in 1806, the Holy Roman Empire had been dissolved, i.e., the First Reich, a deeply religious Catholic empire ruled by a feudal Germanic backbone stretching across Central Europe from Southern Denmark to Northern Italy. Now, a small but cunning financial clique had bankrupted Europe. The colonial powers in the West, such as France, Britain, and Spain, won great riches overseas and wrestled themselves free from Germanic feudalism. By the late nineteenth century, French socialists had won the culture war, and governments around the West began playing to the new tune of scientific atheism, for the age of machines and computers had started. Laborers across the world saw their demand diminish as machines took over, a trend that still continues into our time as robots and algorithms are filling ever more job openings. At least Western Europe’s populations still kept growing in absolute numbers until around the year 1990 when most of Western Europe’s native populations began stalling in absolute numbers and have since seen a slow but steady decline. Quality of life has panned out. The struggle for life is noticeably worsening; the loss of our freedoms is casually mentioned on the daily news. The financial implosion of nineteenth-century Europe ultimately gave birth to the United States as the global superpower, and for some time, Americans proudly carried on the European soul. But the U.S., too, today, is falling for the same scams that killed Europe before, namely: mass immigration of rural peoples into the cities, mass exploitation of said peoples, and the inevitable financial rug-pulling as soon as another banking elite decides the time is right. Ordinary people have been bred for the slaughterhouse. There is no chivalric white nobility left, so to speak, no self-respecting class of whites in leading positions willing to brave uncertainty and doubt. There seem to be no higher-ups willing to win victories for the people. There is only the sort of misfits left with billions of dollars to spend on their personal reigns of terror. I presume the people in power of Western media and politics are handing down the abuse they themselves suffered as children, now taking it out on society at large. The speed at which they brought the communist dystopia online says two things: 1. The new totalitarians had been planning to cancel our freedoms for decades if not centuries in advance, and 2. Most of the technology used to control the herd is Made in China. You see, we are still living with the consequences of what happened in Vienna in 1873. For almost 150 years, white people have had no faith in themselves, only in money and technology. If we do nothing, China is going to win the war on the West, not by firing a single shot but by buying us out, by bribing the traitors who presently pose as our leaders, by making deals with our depressed ruling classes. Western peoples are at risk of being put up for sale to Chinese bidders. How much Chinese yuan do we get for the Eiffel Tower? How much for the Akropolis? How much is our nation worth to your investors? Having effectively lost the Cold War and the Gulf Wars and the War on Terror and the Afghan War, and basically every war the U.S. ever started, there is no reason to suggest our once honorable elites have any shot at winning a Great War against the East. It goes against their financial interests. And so, our so-called elites go against their own peoples. As we are waking up to what life under global communism means—extreme control and humiliation—what choice do we have but to think of rebellion? Perhaps what our elites couldn’t do, we the people can do. This point in history is what I call Our Teutoburg, our Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, that time when ordinary men, workers, and peasants rise to meet the world’s largest army in the forests of Eurasia. Our rich and powerful have turned traitors. When the next stock market crash comes, they are going to grab all the money they can, dumping the majority of us in poverty. Our new communist overlords shall step out from behind the curtains and openly declare themselves masters of the world. And then, when the snake believes it has subdued the men of Europa, our peoples shall bring forth a Siegfried, a leader who shall unite the peoples of the West, a man who shall father a New White Nobility, and secure a future for our children. LinksAmazon [https://www.amazon.com/Mathijs-Koenraadt/e/B00QMUJSGO],YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSC57HOxerCh0Rxoo6Baurw],Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/conradspeaks],Twitter [https://twitter.com/RoftheWest],Discord [https://discord.gg/scQDFGWm2H],Telegram [https://t.me/conradspeaks],Apple Podcast [https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/conrad-speaks/id1572183042] Subscribewww.jmk.info [https://www.jmk.info/] Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe [https://www.jmk.info/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast]