Forsidebilde av showet Aging Reversing Blueprint Podcast

Aging Reversing Blueprint Podcast

Podkast av Dr Joel Rosen

engelsk

Teknologi og vitenskap

Tidsbegrenset tilbud

2 Måneder for 19 kr

Deretter 99 kr / MånedAvslutt når som helst.

  • 20 timer lydbøker i måneden
  • Eksklusive podkaster
  • Gratis podkaster
Kom i gang

Les mer Aging Reversing Blueprint Podcast

Age Reversing Tips For The Modern Day Men and Women, Search For The Fountain Of Youth That Resides In Their Own Bodies, So That They Can Be The Best Version Of Their Selves.

Alle episoder

17 Episoder

episode [EP.17]Mastering Your Genetic Code for Optimal Health: Dr. Bob Miller’s Latest Insights cover

[EP.17]Mastering Your Genetic Code for Optimal Health: Dr. Bob Miller’s Latest Insights

Dr. Joel Rosen: I would like to welcome Bayou Ck. I believe this is our third interview with Bob. Yeah, he is a traditional naturopath specializing in the field of genetics-specific nutrition. Bob is also an educator. He lectures nationally and internationally at seminars to educate health practitioners about genetic variants and nutritional supplementation for obtaining optimal health. Bob is also a researcher. He’s expanding his genetic research efforts. He founded and personally funded the NutriGenetic Research Institute to study the relationship between genetic variants and presenting symptoms. He’s also a nutritional supplement formulator and a genetic analysis software creator. Bob here is going to help us learn about cracking the code. So, Bob, welcome once again to another edition of helping people get their health back. Dr. Bob Miller: Oh, it was a pleasure to be with you. It’s um, I always enjoy these interviews because we’ve, we always have a good time, we kind of geek out a little bit on some of the deep dives on biochemistry, and it was a lot of fun. So yeah, do the same thing today. Dr. Joel Rosen: Excellent. So okay, so Bob, go ahead and share your screen and give our listeners what’s the latest and greatest, in what you’re researching. Dr. Bob Miller: Already? Well, our subject today is going to be superoxide. Now, you know, the traditional naturopathic philosophy has always been that most problems we see come from inflammation, from excess free radicals. We’ve been on that path for all of our time working: what is creating extra free radicals, and then what is causing us to not be able to break those free radicals down. Now, on the other hand, free radicals are bad if they’re in excess, but they can be our friend. One of my favorite sayings has been, you know, they can be your friend unless they’re not. So we need free radicals to kill viruses and bacteria. And even if we have bad cells inside the body, we need inflammation to kill them. But on the other hand, if it goes to the extreme, that’s when we have a problem. So we tend to villainize free radicals, and rightfully so. But on the other hand, we have to be careful that we don’t eradicate all free radicals, that they do play a role for us. Our subject again is superoxide. And again, we always mention that we’re not treating any disease here. This is for educational purposes only and informational. So our learning objectives today are what superoxides, and random superoxide, and then we’re going to delve into how excess superoxide impacts. We’re going to look at pathways of how we make superoxide and pathways of how we reduce it. And then we’re going to dig into something called ferroptosis, where superoxide causes iron to do some really bad things. So, you’ll see here it’s all about balance. Superoxide plays a role in the body at times, but in excess, it can cause all kinds of problems for us. Now, this little chart here that you see. You’ll see on the left there it says oxygen o2 and unfortunately, that too got knocked off. But as you know, oxygen is o2. So what you’re seeing and by the way, do you see my little love? Okay, good. So the oxygen is two oxygen atoms, and you see these two little dots there. That’s electrons. So we all remember even from high school that, you know, you’ve got the neutron-proton and the electron, and they need to be paired. So here’s two together, here’s two together, here’s two together, they’re all paired up. This superoxide occurs when an extra electron comes on here that shouldn’t be there, and that makes it very unstable. And I’m going to show you in a little bit why this can be the root cause of a lot of our problems. Now, the body is pretty amazing. There are multiple ways here, but I’m going to show you one of the main ways. There’s an enzyme called superoxide dismutase. Number two, so this is superoxide. Dismutase means to break it down. And it takes the mineral manganese, not magnesium, manganese. And I’ll show you a better chart later, but it turns it into oxygen. But it also turns it into hydrogen peroxide. And hydrogen peroxide again, is not all bad. Sometimes we use hydrogen peroxide to kill pathogens. But if we have too much of it and we have dysregulated iron, we’ll make what are called hydroxyl radicals that damage the DNA and just wreak havoc throughout the body. However, we do have other mechanisms. If we have enough catalase, that’ll turn that hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. And there’s something called glutathione that we’ll dig into a little bit later. And there’s an enzyme called glutathione peroxidase that takes that glutathione and turns it into two water molecules. So there’s a lot that can go wrong here; we can overproduce superoxide. We’re going to show you how you can have less than optimal production, less than optimal catalase glutathione, where you can have iron dysregulation. So this is a rather complex, sometimes we call it Joel, the 3d chess game played underwater, multiple factors going together. And I believe in the past, we’ve done live on podcasts on iron, haven’t we? Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, what I’ll do, Bob is I’ll put a link to those two other podcasts that we’ve done so the listeners can go deep dive deep into there, but yes, we’ve talked about that as well. And I Dr. Bob Miller: believe we did we do a podcast on Lyme disease? No, Dr. Joel Rosen: I don’t think we did. We talked about it at some level, I think we did G six PD. Right. And I think we also did just NADPH Dr. Bob Miller: Right. Right. Okay, so this is the crux of what we’re going to be talking about today. Now, I’d like to introduce you to a biochemist named Erwin Friedovitch. He went to Duke University as a student and then returned as a biochemist. He was there for a total of 60 years. If anyone you know, a researcher, goes on PubMed, this name will come up quite often because he published more than 500 academic papers that have been cited more than 51,000 times. When you look at a lot of research papers today, they refer to who did the work, and you’ll see this name come up. One of his papers was published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry all the way back in 1969 and has been cited 9,300 times. Now, here’s this gentleman at the age of 85, back in 2014, still lecturing. By the way, Joel, I’d like to still be able to lecture at 85. We’ll see if I can do that. He identified the two forms of superoxide dismutase. That’s what breaks down superoxide. There’s one that’s based on copper and zinc and another one on manganese. Our topic today is going to be the manganese one. He proposed the superoxide theory, that superoxide is the origin—the beginning of most reactive oxygen species, which is inflammation. It undergoes a chain reaction in a cell, playing a central role in that inflammation. That damages the cells and can lead to all kinds of things—Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ALS, all kinds of things. I’m going to show a couple of slides of things related to excess superoxide. He said superoxide is the major factor in oxygen toxicity. Inside your mitochondria, as you all know, you’re made up of 60 to 100 trillion cells—amazing. There are mitochondria in there that make energy, and manganese superoxide dismutase is what degrades superoxide. Manganese is a mineral, not magnesium, manganese. It’s your essential defense against superoxide. So, how many people do you see that are just dead tired, and no matter what they do, no matter what kind of things they take for energy, they just can’t get on top of it? How many people do you see that are dead tired and can barely function, and no matter what you try, it doesn’t seem to work? How common is that in your practice? Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, I mean, I think everyone that we see comes in with a chief complaint of being exhausted and tired. They are the toughest of the tough, like you. They’ve been to so many other practitioners, and now they’re just throwing their hands up in the air. I think that what you’ve mentioned in the past is that one day we’ll look back at all of the environmental triggers we put in place and say, “Oops,” because we’ve created this perfect storm. But yes, I think probably everyone that we work with, to one extent or another, has had very little success and is completely exhausted and burnt out. Dr. Bob Miller: Absolutely. Now, I’m not going to say this is the case in every one of those who are, that would be a little too optimistic, but this is probably a factor in many of the people who are experiencing exhaustion. Now, let’s look at what this mitochondrial superoxide does—a key player in Alzheimer’s disease. So, this is a peer-reviewed study. For people who are not familiar, this is on PubMed, not somebody blathering on the internet. Our findings have reinforced the idea that mitochondrial superoxide plays a critical role in Alzheimer’s disease. That’s one of the things that people are so scared of. We were able to show that increasing the expression of the mitochondrial antioxidant, SOD2, prevents memory deficits and amyloid plaque deposition associated. Wow, that’s pretty astonishing there because that’s one of the things that seems to be on the rise. You know, people know that they’re going to leave this earth someday and they’re pretty much okay with that. What really scares them is if they don’t know who they are and there’s a burden to their family. That’s a real, that’s a real realistic fear. Right here is diabetic complications. Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the development of diabetes complications, both microvascular and cardiovascular. The metabolic abnormalities of diabetes cause mitochondrial superoxide overproduction in endothelial cells, both large and small vessels. And of course, diabetes is becoming a serious problem. The increased superoxide production causes the activation of five major pathways involved in the complications. So we didn’t have time today to go through all those when somebody really wants to dig into them, just Google oxidative stress and diabetic complications, and the whole paper will pull up, and they can read it. I found this fascinating: orally administered superoxide dismutase can exhibit a glucose-lowering effect. Isn’t that fascinating? So even if someone is diabetic, making sure you have SOD may be able to help you lower the glucose levels. So, we were talking about manganese working with the enzyme superoxide. This was fascinating: overexpression inhibits the growth of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. I found that fascinating because, the subject for another day, but if we have cancer, we have to be careful with the antioxidants. Because your body is using free radicals to kill the tumor. That’s why people get chemotherapy. So if you do too many antioxidants while being treated for cancer, you can actually protect the cancer cell. But I found this one to be an exception. It affects cell proliferation. Our results are consistent with manganese SOD being a tumor suppressor gene in human prostate cancer. I found that particularly interesting. Alright, arteriosclerosis, I mean, this is atherosclerosis. A serious issue that might be number one or number two on our concerns. As we all know, it’s a chronic inflammatory disease of the vascular system, the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases worldwide. Here we go. Excessive generation of reactive oxygen species leads to a state of oxidative stress, which is a major risk factor for the progression of this disease. Now, we’re going to talk later about nitric oxide. And there’s an enzyme called eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase), and that is what makes the nitric oxide that dilates your blood vessels. If you Google nitric oxide Nobel Prize, you’ll see three scientists won an award in 1998 for their research on cardiovascular and nitric oxide. So when it says it becomes uncoupled, in other words, rather than making nitric oxide, we make superoxide. So what they’re saying is your oxidized LDL stimulates an enzyme called NADPH oxidase, and that increases your superoxide production. Then superoxide reacts with nitric oxide to form peroxynitrite. And we’re going to show you that in a little bit, which oxidizes that essential eNOS cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin BH4 and we have this whole graph out. You’ll see that in a little bit. So then eNOS becomes uncoupled and generates superoxide. So that’s a lot of biochemistry there. But bottom line is when we create more superoxide that is a contributing factor to it. Heart disease. So, cataracts, a huge problem among those of us as we get older. It was concluded that oxidative stress plays an important role in the onset and progression of cataracts. The Pro-oxidant serum MDA levels were increased in the cataract patients. The blood levels of the enzymatic antioxidant SOD and GPX (glutathione peroxidase), an enzyme that uses glutathione to neutralize free radicals, was decreased. Macular degeneration, the study showed that low glutathione peroxidase activity and total antioxidant status are associated with age-related macular degeneration. SOD modulates the association of glutathione peroxidase and advanced macular degeneration. The antioxidant enzymes’ activity and serum total antioxidant status could be promising markers for the prediction of macular degeneration. Bone fragility, of course, particularly for women, osteopenia, osteoporosis, a serious condition. These results imply that intracellular redox imbalance caused by SOD deficiency plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of bone fragility. We present a valuable model for investigating the effects of oxidative stress on bone fragility. And again, if someone really wants to read this one, just type those words into Google, and that whole paper will come up. I just took like one sentence that summarized it. Alright, skin aging. As you know, you can see some people that are 65 and they look like 55 and some people are 65 and they look like. Oxidative stress is a consequence of the imbalance of pro-oxidants and antioxidants. With increased inflammation concentrations, it has been demonstrated in aged skin, suggesting the important role of the antioxidant balance. Heart failure, a mechanism responsible for impaired endothelial function and heart failure, is enhanced biodegradation of nitric oxide by the superoxide anion. Now, that sounds pretty complex, but again, I’ll show you a chart later, that superoxide takes that nitric oxide, remember that won a Nobel Prize, and actually turns it into something bad. Both nitric oxide and superoxide, when exposed to one another, undergo a limited radical reaction to form something called peroxynitrite. Again, I have charts I’m going to show this because just I’m sure hearing these words gets confusing. So hang in there, don’t give up on us. We’ll show you the charts on this. Now, as you know, we are seeing such a dramatic rise in autism. I mean, this is a catastrophe. There’s decrease in the expression of SOD2 and SOD3 from autism patients compared to healthy control participants. I’m going to be speaking in the middle of May 2024 at a medical conference, and I’m going to be presenting this concept for all of these mental health issues, autism, ATD, ADHD, multiple reasons, but one of them being extra superoxide. Not enough superoxide dismutase. So the study also found differences in who the found peroxidase and GPX3 was downregulated. Here’s another one on Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, you know, it’s interesting, Bob, I don’t have the same referral network as you do with practitioners. But ultimately, when the parents come and see me And we help them then it gets more into well, oh, my son has autism, or my son or my daughter has is on the spectrum. And you did so well with me. Ultimately, can you help them? It’s more of that. But, yeah, Dr. Bob Miller: yeah, it’s frightening how serious this is getting. Now, even among adults ATD ADHD, you know, I’m sure you’re seeing in our clinic, we are here that, you know, people are having a harder time understanding their mom or are frustrated. The nitric oxide levels in patients were significantly higher than those of controls, and the SSD activity was significantly lower. So high levels of oxidative nitric oxide, low s OD, oxidative imbalance in that attention deficit disorder. This is the first study evaluating the oxidative metabolism in ADHD. So, Crohn’s disease and autoimmune oxidative stress can be a major contributing factor to the tissue industry in injury in Crohn’s disease. When we get to two arthritis superoxide is over produced in joint inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, increased superoxide production leads to tissue damage articular, degeneration and pain. The in these conditions, the defense superoxide dismutase is decreased. So we keep seeing the same thing over and over again, as people do studies. All right, now we’re going to look at, well, if this is bad, how do we make it so we’re going to talk about what’s called the electron transport chain. Nos uncoupling. The Knox enzyme, over activation of what’s called the NMDA receptor will explain that glutathione your master and ox are not being recycled. Interestingly, poly aromatic hydrocarbons, that’s when we get from our air pollution that can even create superoxide and a new one here, Joel called the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor. So there’s so many ways now that we can make superoxide. So we’re not gonna get too deep in the woods here. But inside your cells, you know what’s called the mitochondria. And inside there, we have what’s called the electron transport chain. And this appears to be the largest source of superoxide. So what happens, nutrients come in, including co q 10. And they go through these steps, and the end result is ATP. That’s your adenosine triphosphate. That’s your energy. We spoke earlier about people being tired. Well, what can happen is that there can be problems in here. And we don’t have time to dig into this today. But it’ll create superoxide. And then, as we showed you earlier than the sod two enzyme makes hydrogen peroxide, we need glutathione peroxidase. One, we need hydrogen peroxide. If we don’t, it’ll combine with iron to make hydroxyl radicals. These little green boxes are supplement formulas that we formulated. So if somebody’s got peroxynitrite, we have formulas that calm that down, there’s formulas to clear hydrogen peroxide. We’re not going to get into Thrive toxin today, but that’s another way to clear it. And we have glutathione peroxidase. So there are ways if this is occurring, we can slow this down. And I’ll tell you what, Joel, I’m beginning to believe that this may be the major source of inflammation that we’re creating more superoxide. And then we do not have the mechanisms to to break it down. So there’s the first one electron transport chain. Now, this is the other one that want to spend a little more time on this. As we said earlier, nitric oxide is really important. It’s a gas and it dilates your blood vessels. This is not nitrous oxide that the dentist’s gives you. This is nitric oxide. Again, as I said, Nobel Prize 1998. Now people think they may have never heard of it, but they probably have. If you know of anyone who carries nitroglycerin with them. They get chest pain. They put the nitroglycerin under their tongue. They dilate their blood vessels. And if you haven’t heard of that, everyone’s heard of Viagra and Cialis. You know, men need good blood flow for the penis for erectile function. And those drugs help with the nitric oxide or blood flow. So what happens is we make something called BH for tetrahydrobiopterin. We make BH four. And then there’s you can have genetic or environmental issues that you don’t make enough of this. Then that combines with something called NADPH and arginine to make nitric oxide. So I’m sure people have anyone who’s in unnatural health I’ve seen formulas for nitric oxide that have arginine. And sometimes that works. And sometimes it backfires. Because if you don’t have enough BH four, and you take arginine, what you can actually do is rather than making nitric oxide, you can make superoxide. So that’s what we said earlier. Remember, we talked about the nozzle, uncoupling the nozzle, uncoupling, is when we make superoxide, free radicals are over to the left here and over here, so we can make superoxide rather than nitric oxide, then that superoxide combines with nitric oxide, and makes her oxynitride. The peroxynitrite Then further inhibits the BH four. And I’ll tell you what, Joel, you’re on a not-very-fun merry-go-round. Now, unfortunately, is one of your opening statements was about environmental factors. One of my favorite jokes is I was born in 1954 when Earth was a completely different planet. We didn’t have many of these other things. And I believe that’s one of the major reasons why we’re seeing so many difficulties today. So look at what will stimulate that no, two, oh, I should explain. Nas three is what makes the nitric oxide that dilates your blood vessels. Nos two makes a lot of nitric oxide to kill pathogens because not nitric oxide. Although it can be a dilator. It can also be oxidative. And nos two is designed if you have a bacteria or a parasite, totally speculation, but I have to wonder if there was a time in man’s history when there were a lot of parasites, and having nos to being upregulated was to your to your benefit. But now if nos two is upregulated, it will suppress nos three. One of the telltale signs of that occurring is cold hands and feet. And in the extreme something called Raynaud’s or rhinitis, people say in different ways. That’s where the hands turn white or purple because they’re not getting good circulation because nos two is suppressing the NOS three. So look at the who’s who here, aluminum. So what are we doing? Many people are smearing aluminum into their armpits. We’re going to look back on this someday and say, What were we thinking? And there are other sources of aluminum that we’re getting. Mercury, uranium, BPA from plastics, ethanol, electromagnetic fields, high fructose corn syrup, which came about in the late 1970s, horrible gluten, fluorine, fluoride, Roundup, glyphosate, high homocysteine, high iron, iron overload, all of these will stimulate that no to enzyme to suppress the e nos enzyme, burn out your BH four, start making superoxide I believe this is a very common thing that’s, that’s going on. And even your BH for, again, mercury, lead, aluminum, iron, high protein diet, hydrogen peroxide, high ammonia peroxynitrite Sun on ultraviolet. And we’re not going to get into this today. But BH four is needed to make serotonin. So depression, oh, my goodness, this is going through the roof. multiple factors. I’m not saying this is the only cause. But if you don’t have enough pH four, you’re gonna have a hard time making serotonin depression seem to be on the rise. So we have done some really bad things with our environmental factors. And if you’ve got a genetic weakness on top of it, it just compounds. So we could do a whole lecture here today just on this whole process. But I just want to get the major point. That one environmental factor combined with those who have genetic weakness, because there are two ends to Rs numbers as part of your genetics that will cause this to be overactive. And there’s genetics that will cause this to be underactive. Well, if this guy’s inherently overactive, this guy is underactive, you’re exposed to all these environmental factors. And you can’t clear them, or you have genetic issues that you don’t make enough BH for. We’ve created the perfect storm to be a superoxide factor to make sense from Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah. Can I ask questions? Last observation? As far as all of the different ways you’re demonstrating that we can make this superoxide or add that extra electron to oxygen? You’re showing this pathway here. But would it be safe to say that all of these factors would also upregulate the production of superoxide in the electron transport chain pathway as well-meaning everything that you see here that is creating more superoxide It would be the same factors that would spill off superoxide in our, in our demand to make energy? To keep up with all of this, I hope you’re getting tremendous value from our content and learning how to slow your rate of aging. I have a really exciting announcement, I’ve just completed the complete age reversing blueprint, User Guide, complete with learning how to not just slow your rate of aging, learn nutritional bioenergetics learning about circadian rhythm entrainment, the six key factors that you need to be aware of learning how to make sure that the environment isn’t accelerating your age-related biomarkers, and of course, mastering your sleep, this course is going to be retailing for $997. But as a gift for me to you for watching our content and subscribing to our channel. I’m going to be giving this away for free with just for a limited time only. Leave your name and email and I’ll be sure to send you the complete age reversing blueprint user’s guide right away. Dr. Bob Miller: I mean, I haven’t seen any papers on that. But I mean, it just makes total sense. I mean, that’s a that’s great observation don’t really be right. Now let’s move on to the next to the next one. And this again is one of my favorite subjects NADPH oxidase. So, NOx NADPH oxidase I often say this is our friend unless it isn’t. If you take an animal and knock out their NOx enzyme, in about a week you’ll be dead from infection. Because this is the guy who says, Oh, bad guy here, we need to take you out. So very important. The problem becomes, and you’ve probably already guessed it if it’s overactive. That’s the problem. So what happens is, there’s an enzyme called TNF a and NF kappa b. Again, our friends unless they’re not, you know, if we didn’t have these again, we die of infection. So but when we’re exposed to mycotoxins, virus level, polysaccharides, Clostridium glyphosate, Lyme disease, beryllium, we stimulate TNF A, then NF kappa b, then the KNOX enzyme, then there’s an enzyme called interleukin six, a cytokine, a whole subject of its own. And by the way, if anyone’s really interested in il six, I have done an excellent interview with Dr. Joe Carnahan, just go on YouTube, Joe Carnahan, il six, we spend an hour and 45 minutes just on this subject right here. So there’s multiple things here, that will cause it, and there’s actually even genetic mutations, these two right here, that will cause tumor necrosis factor to be overactive. Now, interestingly, there’s an enzyme called cert one that holds back the inflammation. And there’s a whole enzyme process called heme oxygenase that makes biliverdin bilirubin that holds this back. This is controlled by Nerf Two and heme oxygenase. We need to make him again if you find this fascinating. Go on YouTube, Joe Carnahan, heme, we geek out for an hour and a half, just on this subject right here. But here’s again, our glyphosate, possibly messing with this sessional COA from the Krebs cycle. So if our Krebs cycle or energy production is less than optimal, this process isn’t going to work. We’re not going to have the heme we need to support the heme oxygenase to make the believer in bilirubin, and we’re not going to hold this back. And in case you’re already looking ahead liquinox makes superoxide combined with nitric oxide to make peroxynitrite. Here’s our sod two and manganese, to try to bleed some of that off and turn it into oxygen. This was one of the subjects we spoke about, I believe it was 20 sets 16 or 17. We were in Hershey, Pennsylvania where we presented now was Denver, Denver, Colorado, where we presented what I call the NADPH steel. Were NADPH is critical for so many functions, if you remember we needed to make nitric oxide is overused by the NOx enzyme. And I call that the NADPH steel so you’re using it here. So you don’t have it for the many other functions. So if somebody lives in a moldy house, okay, mycotoxins, and it does appear as though mold is getting stronger. You’re going to stimulate these enzymes. If you have a gain of function on here, that’s amplified. So one of the things we often see in people who are really struggling. They’ve got genetic mutations that are gain of function. They’ve got they’re living in a moldy house. They may be the sort of One maybe not doing his job. Sadly, high fructose corn syrup inhibits this. So if you’re consuming high fructose corn syrup if you’re being exposed to a lot of glyphosate, and then also if you have a gain of function, interleukin six, and then weakness inside to perfect storm. And I believe that’s what we’re seeing in so many individuals. Dr. Joel Rosen: A quick question sorry, sorry to interrupt. So just for the listener because they may not understand what gain of function is. So when you look at these genes, and you see that they’ve inherited, an alteration in that gene, ultimately, they think that that gene might be slower. And it’s, it’s a loss of function, and it’s not working at the level that it should. Whereas there is research that shows that when they inherit a gene that is not functioning at full capacity from mom, or from God, or from both, again, a function can mean it is creating more of that enzyme than it’s designed to do. You made an observation earlier, that you think that potentially the gain of function was protective in the past. And now because of so many environmental factors, these these gains of functions are actually detrimental. Is that what you’re noticing Bob with? Dr. Bob Miller: Absolutely, Dr. Julia, thank you for pointing that out. That’s one point that I forgot to make it so there is that gain of function. So hypothetically, if there was a culture somewhere where there was a lot of bacteria or virus, and this tumor necrosis factor was overactive, that actually was protective to them. You know, the one that’s very well known is the hemochromatosis gene, extremely high in the English and the Irish. Now, if anybody knows the Irish history, the reason many of them migrated to America was the potato famine. So people were starving to death. However, if you had a genetic mutation, where you actually absorbed more iron, these were the ones who survived. So it was protective. And now, you know, here in today’s culture, we don’t have we don’t have a problem. Many of our foods are fortified with iron. So that genetic mutation is now at your disadvantage. Dr. Joel? So in the same way with G six PD, we did the webinar on how G six PD is what helps make NADPH very common in Africa, and South America. Well, what’s interesting is the UN I don’t know the mechanism, but that G six PD deficiency protected you from malaria. So again, in a time of malaria, having that G six PD was to your advantage. But back then they didn’t have all these other problems. Now that G six PD mutation is to our disadvantage. And just as a side note, clinical observation is only when people seem to have the iron mutation, that they absorb more iron and G six PD, these are the people that have a lot of inflammation. So thank you, Dr. Doe, for pointing that out. Thank you for explaining it. Yes, no gain of gain of function. All right, calcium. We all know that calcium is critical. We need it for our bones, we need it for our teeth, we need it for our muscles, we need it for all kinds of things. But we need calcium in the right place. And the wrong place is inside too much of it inside the mitochondria. And there’s something called the NMDA receptor that we’re going to talk about in a little bit, that will bring calcium into the cell. And this is an area we have really been researching because electromagnetic fields will stimulate this NMDA receptor to bring too much calcium at the wrong place. And we get higher what’s called intracellular calcium that stimulates what are called mast cells. And again, we could do a whole program on mast cells. But the cliff notes are, it’s a white blood cell that protects you, but it harms you if it’s overactive. It can create the production of arachidonic acid. And then we’re gonna get into how environmental factors stimulate something called the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor. So bottom line is, again, we have multiple environmental factors that we weren’t exposed to before. Remember, I said I was born on a different planet in 1954. We didn’t have EMF, one of my favorite jokes is back then if we wanted to make a phone call and we weren’t home, we had to find this funny thing called a phone booth. But now we’re all exposed to electromagnetic fields, no matter where we go. I mean, unless you’re in a cave, probably 20 feet under, you’re being exposed to high levels of electromagnetic field. And we really don’t know what the long-term effect of that of that is. Now, here is the chart that we made that I actually presented my art to some conferences. There is no evidence that there are higher levels of intracellular calcium in the autistic child. But what does it do through the KNOX enzyme, it makes superoxide. But let’s look at what doesn’t. glyphosate or Roundup stimulates the NMDA receptor. There’s an enzyme called Pon one, that helps clear it. And there’s the RS number, if somebody’s got a mutation there, there’s the potential that they don’t clear glyphosate white as well. homocysteine stimulates it, arsenic, and we’re finding now more arsenic in rice and chicken, high fructose corn syrup can’t emphasize enough how bad this is. Then also the electromagnetic fields will stimulate, here the NMDA receptor bringing excess calcium in, and making superoxide. Now, one other environmental factor that is finally getting attention, you know, those of us in the functional world, we talked about microplastics years ago, and everybody was like, oh, yeah, whatever that is. But if anybody’s paying attention you’re seeing even the mainstream media is now starting to talk about microplastics. And that is what breaks off from all of our plastic bottles. January, I mean, if somebody just Googles microplastics in plastic bottles, a University did a study, and they found there are 10 to 100 times more microplastics in bottled water than anticipated. And it’s not just bottled water, things are wrapped in it. The oceans, or you know, we’re dumping huge amounts of plastics. I understand there’s plastic, the size of Texas floating around and some of the big oceans, and the fish are eating that. So these microplastics are getting in the fish. And it’s creating all kinds of problems. There’s even just recently some concern that these microplastics are part of the plaquing of the arteries. And it’s estimated that each of us consumes a credit card a week in plastic. That’s scary. Dr. Doe. Now, the term is 30 late. That’s what we get from these microplastics. These are more insidious than you ever thought. I mean, if somebody said, how can we really hurt people? I don’t think we could have been this creative as what these things are. As we make something called NAD, which is critical. If anybody’s studying longevity, they’re looking at NAD. NAD is what you need at the electron transport chain to make the energy we spoke about fatigue earlier. It’s part of recycling you’re going to find recycling your or making your nitric oxide. It also calms down mast cells that are a product of this. As we come down what’s called the Kira Nene pathway, we make something called when Olynyk acid the QPR T enzyme needs to turn that quinolinic into an ad. Look what the latest do. So here’s what they do. Dr. Joel, they inhibit the QPR T enzyme. Ouch. Now, the quinolinic acid also stimulates the NMDA receptor. Oh my goodness. So we’re stimulating NMDA we’re making superoxide and mast cells in our defense against it is impaired. This is a big deal, Dr. Doe, then zinc is really important for the body because one of the things that zinc does, it calm down the NMDA receptor for zinc to be carried around we need Pika linic acid. This enzyme right here, this AC MSD is what takes this molecule that I’m not even going to try to pronounce and turns it into Pika clinic acid. So you can have genetic mutations, right, this one right here. There’s the RS number. If you’ve got a mutation on there, this gene doesn’t do its job as well. But if you’re exposed to 30 leads, that also impacts it. So if you’ve got a genetic mutation, you’re drinking out of plastic bottles you’re microwaving and plastic. And also, sadly, personal care products that have fragrance are a feeling. So that’s why some people are sensitive to so many personal care products because these elites are impacting them. Show the quick clinical story. And a lady an elderly lady who was just barely functioning and we determined that she was going to get coffee every morning in a huge plastic cup. And as soon as she stopped doing that, I mean, she’s still not 100% But dramatic improvement when she wasn’t putting hot coffee in a plastic cup. Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: and even the cups that make you know, the little cups that make the I don’t know the name brands but they now sell them everywhere where they have just a cup and you put it in the machine and it’s in the package that ready. Absolutely Dr. Bob Miller: Knoxville. Yeah, it’s a big promo recommend they don’t do that. Just as a side note for me, for my children and son-in-law for Christmas, I got their soap, shampoo, and conditioner. That was the lead-free. Right? Yeah, they they kind of shook their head Oh Dad, but you know, someday they’ll appreciate that. So I think we have to be aware of our affiliates. So if somebody’s struggling, make sure you’re not microwaving in plastic. Make sure you’re not putting hot food in plastic. And then also look at your personal care products. If it’s got fragrance, that can be a problem. So even some people they have those little dryer sheets they put in and or they have those little things they plug in on the wall, you know, to smell good, and you’re getting the leads. So anyway, this is a this is a big deal. We could do a whole hour on this subject right here. So I’m not going to dig into this too much. But here they’re just saying how pickle linic acid helps the human brain neuro-protective pickle linic acid. Pickle linic acid increases the turnover of zinc in addition to enhancing the absorption and excretion and it’s helpful with zinc deficiency. Here they’re talking about homocysteine activating and I’m not going to read this whole thing but it’s you know, it’s important that you have good homocysteine levels. Fructose modifies the NMDA receptor and can make seizures worse. So, fructose will increase activation of the NMDA receptor function. And how many people are getting a lot of fructose, the latest comes from ingestion and inhalation, and dermal absorption, it can leak into the food. Even now some of our dairy products, fish, seafood, and oils have high levels of elites, personal care products, people who live near the lead manufacturing industries are more likely to have the leads in their bodies through dermal absorption. One of the best ways to get the leads out is a sauna. research suggested because of the late structural similarity to tryptophan metabolites. And I should have mentioned that it’s tryptophan that comes down that pathway. Several elites are capable of inhibiting those enzymes, therefore decreasing the clearance of quinolinic acid. And they are associated with neurotoxicity. So here’s a little chart that again, shows this is the thing elites are going to inhibit your body from making peak Olynyk acid. And it’s going to inhibit your body’s ability to make that critical NAD. When you think about this, Dr. Joel is like the perfect storm. You can’t imagine the damage that this is that this is doing to us. And then the net result is superoxide. Now we saw this part before Dr. Joel but now what we’re going to do is going to show how this stimulates glutamate. Now glutamate makes you intelligent, highly motivated, go-getter. It appears his own Northern Europeans seem to have a more predisposition to glutamate. There are genetic mutations on the DAO enzyme that can make more, we can have genetic mutations that we don’t turn glutamate into GABA, which is relaxing. And we can if we have trouble with our biotin or some of these other enzymes, we don’t make something called oxaloacetate. That turns glutamate into energy. So glutamate makes you intelligent, highly motivated, go-getter, but can make you extremely anxious. And it will also keep you from sleeping. Make people sensitive to bright loud lights and loud noise. mind races, they can’t focus. They’re brilliant, but yet they can’t focus. Now, here’s one other insidious little thing it does. Glutathione, which most people have probably heard of Dr. Joel is an important antioxidant. And it does all kinds of good things for us. But the body needs to assemble it. And it’s made out of cysteine glycine and glutamate. The CES team has to use his enzyme called X c t, to come inside the cell to make glutathione. And look what happens. Glutamate inhibits that enzyme. Ouch. So I don’t know if you’ve heard this, Dr. Joe, but you know, people are learning about acetylcysteine. And they think oh, it makes glutathione that’s going to be good for me. And they feel horrible. Because the cysteine is not coming into the cell and actually turning into a soul fight and being inflammatory. So is that irritating? When you think you’re going to take something that’s going to help you and it hurts you? Same way with glutathione. I heard this dozens of times. I went to a doctor and he said I’m going to give you intravenous glutathione you’re going to feel one Wonderful. They were sick for weeks. Because this glutamate was inhibiting this and was actually making them worse. So you have to make sure your glutamate is down. Before you start, start taking glutathione. And unfortunately, some of these people are just horrible. You must be imagining things that can’t be happening. Well, it can. So now they’re sick and somebody tries to make them feel guilty. Like, there’s something wrong with you. You’re imagining this, you’re a hypochondriac. And they just get so discouraged because somebody yells at them that who found the mark the perfect antioxidant, we need it. Absolutely true. But if you have this going on, it can backfire on you. So I can’t tell you how many people were relieved when I told them that. Nope, you’re not crazy. There’s nothing wrong with you. It’s glutamate. Get the glutamate knocked down. Then all of a sudden, glutathione is good for you. And that amazing Dr. Joe? It Dr. Joel Rosen: is are you finding too, Bob that a lot of people happen to have that x CT challenges as well genetically on top of the glutamate being? Dr. Bob Miller: Actually I’m not finding very many FCT mutations, maybe we haven’t found them all. Now, there might be some, but I’m not seeing a lot of mutations on Fct. But when you think about the glyphosate, the arsenic, the high fructose corn syrup that they lead, the electromagnetic fields, all of those stimulating glutamate. You know, there’s an I think that’s why we’re seeing so much difficulty. I mean, when I talked to elementary school teachers who’ve taught just more than five years, you know, how are the kids today versus five years ago, and systole. They can’t focus, they’re agitated. And we’re seeing that in the world with people being more, more agitated, more angry. Because the glutamate is going up because of all these environmental factors Dr. Joel Rosen: to mention the food supply, right with all the artificial stimulants that are in the food that produce glutamate. Dr. Bob Miller: Sure, oh, and by the way, these people cannot handle MSG, right? So they’re exposed to MSG, and boom, they’re over the they’re over the top. So this high glutamate is a real, real problem. But we’re going to talk about a little bit of ferroptosis ferroptosis is where the iron starts damaging your lipids. And we’ll have a chart on that. We desperately need our glutathione to handle that. And if we can’t bring our glutathione in runaway inflammation in the mind in the cell membranes. So speaking of glutathione Dr. Dole here is how we make glutathione. This is somewhat of an oxymoron, you think reduced means less, but in biochemistry, reduced means it has a spare electron on it to neutralize free radicals. So what the body does, is it takes glycine. Actually that glutamate if it’s used properly, turns into glutathione, and cysteine, cystine, glutamate, and glycine, all go together to make glutathione then glutathione, through glutathione, ‘s transferases. And Glenavon. peroxidase does all kinds of good things. But in doing so it gives away its electron and it becomes oxidized. Now what happens is again, one a miracle the body is there’s an enzyme called GSR that takes if ad from riboflavin NADPH controlled by something called Nerf two, which is a subject all on its own. And it recycles it. What a beautiful thing Dr. Dole. It uses it recycles it. But if the GSR enzyme is mutated, if we don’t have enough riboflavin, and there are multiple mutations in these enzymes and compare riboflavin transport, if we don’t have enough NADPH because of mutations or because NOx enzymes are upregulated or because of nerf to problems. We don’t recycle our glutathione and look what happens superoxide nitric oxide combines with peroxynitrite In all these greens are nutrients that can intervene. So we’re finding where it is level now that we can actually find out where there’s weakness and compensate. So these are the people that if you if this has mutated, this has mutated, you don’t have NADPH. You don’t have FTD. You take glutathione it feels good for a day or two and then you crash because we don’t recycle. All right, poly aromatic hydrocarbons. They’re chemicals consisting of numerous carbon atoms joined together to form multiple rings. There are 10,000 different pH compounds. Oh my goodness, from the incomplete combustion plan. Under animal matter, carbon fuels, coal or petroleum, and there’s smoke or ash and all of these can have an impact on us. So, this is one of my most interesting subjects here, Dr. Tool. It’s called the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Outside of Academia, most people don’t know about this, but we really need to learn about this in the functional world. Now, most enzymes, take one substance, combine it with something else and make something new. And they either do that slowly, they do it at the right pace, or as we discussed earlier, they can be overactive. Well, the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a different animal. It all depends on what goes in it. What it does. Smoke Kleinereneene mold and mold are becoming such a serious problem. High homocysteine, high iron, and arachidonic acid that we’ll talk about a little bit, and here are those aromatic hydrocarbons that will stimulate this guy to make massive inflammation. Drive the intracellular calcium that drives the superoxide that drives the ferroptosis is one bundle of inflammation. Reduce these and start putting in Rosemary resveratrol is which in quercetin, milk thistle indole, and three carbinol, we turn on what’s called Nerf two, and n q o one that’s anti-inflammatory. So there’s a lot to learn about this, and then the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor through CYP one, b1, makes superoxide. And then il six and NOx stimulates new stimulates the superoxide. So you can see here we’ve just got so many ways that we can make more superoxide. And even here, as we drive the intracellular calcium, we make more superoxide. Now there’s an enzyme called N q o one nerf two controls. And it’s also dependent upon riboflavin. It maintains your mitochondrial membrane potential and restricts oxygen protection. So you know, you’re going to be as healthy as your cell membranes are. And using NADPH as a cofactor, and reduces what are called Quinones. I’ll show a picture of this in a minute. It also helps recycle your co Q 10 and vitamin eat, which are important, very important inside the body. And balance keeps the balance of NADH and NAD plus it’s been found to reduce superoxide and use NADPH as the reducing agent. It has been suggested that relatively significant quantities would be needed. So it’s not as powerful as other things, but it does calm down that superoxide, and guess what, I’m sure he figured it out already, Dr. Joel, you can have genetic mutations on in Cuba, one that lowers its function. So here’s one of the ways that there are many ways that in Cuba one helps us. But when there’s Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is stimulated from these polyaromatic hydrocarbons, the cytochrome P 450s. create what’s called a coin own, then it turns into loops and it turns into a semi coin own, then it turns oxygen into superoxide. However, if MQL, one is doing its job, and we have adequate NADPH and we have adequate hydrogen, we turn it into oxygen. So here again, another source of superoxide ferroptosis When iron goes bad, you know iron is critical for life. I mean, we didn’t have iron, we wouldn’t carry oxygen around. If we’re too low in iron, we’re in trouble. But there’s a two-edged sword iron. Iron can be used to actually cause oxidative damage that can lead to cell death. It’s driven by loss of activity of the glutathione peroxidase and it creates what is called lipid-based reactive oxygen species, particularly something called lipid hydroperoxides. It’s iron-dependent, and it’s distinct from other ways of killing the cells. It’s involved with autism, acute lung injury, kidney injury, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, sepsis, neuralgia, neurodegenerative diseases, it’s even related to autism. There’s a correlation between ferroptosis and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Now here’s how ferroptosis works. Dr. Joel, when we’re exposed to mycotoxins, lipo, polysaccharides, Borrelia, and glyphosate clostridia, we stimulate tufa. And remember we said earlier, you can have genetic issues where this guy overreacts Knox enzyme oxygen into superoxide superoxide dismutase then makes hydrogen peroxide, your thumbs iron. The iron then combines with hydrogen peroxide and makes a hydroxyl radical damaging your lipid membranes. Here’s that MCT that we spoke about. Here’s where cysteine comes in. And I really should have included glutamate on here that glutamate inhibits this driven by Nerf two, and glutathione peroxidase. Fourth is what does the repair BH for that we talked about does the repair. And so it is CO q 10. So, if we have excess over here, deficiency over here, cell damage to the membranes. So here’s what happens. Iron, hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxides ferroptosis, cell membrane damage. And this, I believe, is behind a lot of conditions that people are having. We need glutathione peroxidase to cut this off in the past. But if we’re having trouble making a recycling glutathione, we don’t have that. So again, another mechanism can cause damage to the cell membrane. All right, now we spoke about all the ways that we can make superoxide. Now, how do we take care of how do we take that electron off? Manganese, not magnesium, manganese, the enzyme sought to superoxide. Here’s the keyword dismutase. That’s what breaks it down. People get confused and say well that way, you’re saying superoxide is bad. But this superoxide is good. superoxide dismutase, using manganese to reduce the superoxide. And that’s one of the ways that we do it. Another one is actually B 12. Fascinating. And an enzyme called Pon one. So here’s how manganese does its magic. This is the symbol for superoxide. It’s oxygen with an extra electron. The sod to enzyme says Mr. Manganese, I need you to help me out here. Why don’t you just grab that electron? So we can turn superoxide and oxygen. Now the manganese then has that spare electron, then what it does, is it takes two hydrogens and superoxide and makes hydrogen peroxide. Now that’s okay. But hydrogen peroxide can be damaging as well. So we need catalase glutathione and something called Thrive toxin, declare that because I’ve noticed over the years, that sometimes he gives people sad. And they feel phenomenal, and some people feel worse. So, Dr. Doe, we got to make sure what I’ve been doing is I’ve been observing that many times before we give S O D, we got to make sure we’re clearing hydrogen peroxide. Because even the manganese so D is good as it is. If it starts making hydrogen peroxide, and you can’t clear it, you’re going to be worse. So you’ve really got to do things in the right order. Now talk about environmental factors, glyphosate, and Roundup, will interfere with the uptake and read treelines and translocation of calcium, magnesium, iron, and manganese by binding and mobilizing. So that’s the way glyphosate works as an herbicide, it ki latest those minerals. So I don’t know if I put this slide in here, I don’t if I did it, I think I might have. Studies have shown that when cows eat glyphosate feed, their manganese is inadequate. Now there’s a delicate balance of manganese. So you shouldn’t go out and just take boatloads of manganese. Because if you get too little, we have a problem. But you can get manganese toxicity. So I want to caution people just because we’re talking about this today. Don’t go out and buy manganese and start taking boatloads of it thinking you’re doing yourself a lot of good work with a qualified practitioner on this because too little is a problem. Too much is a problem. So there’s a delicate balance one of my favorite jokes is all you need to do is follow Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Not too hot, not too cold. So warning, don’t go out and you know, go on the internet and find manganese and start digging boatloads of it. You can hurt yourself badly. I mean serious problems if you have excess manganese, but to fish shunt is a problem as well. Now, Dr. Dole, this is one of the things that I’ve been most intrigued by over the years, I don’t think I’ve seen anything quite so fascinating. Here’s your manganese’s OD. And it does all these wonderful things. We spoke earlier about how you can be lighter, I mean one second we get a drink here. Now when nitric oxide uncouples, we make peroxynitrite peroxynitrite, nitrates tyrosine, which is a big part of your manganese so D working and hold on your head here Dr. Joel peroxynitrite can inhibit manganese SVOD up to 97%. Oh, my goodness. So this very critical to our well being SLD can be basically shut down by peroxynitrite. Yikes. Then there I’m going to show you later. There’s an amino acid called lysine and Altair, I have a map that’ll show you that later. But if we have lots of lack of activity on cert three, we mess with the lysine as well. So if we reduce the peroxynitrite and we boost up cert two and three that again, I’ll show later, the manganese so D can do his job. So here’s a little chart we made Dr. Dole. And it shows here’s manganese s od right in the middle. And here’s manganese taking superoxide in the oxygen, then it takes and then it takes a superoxide and two hydrogens to make hydrogen peroxide. Now there’s a lot that can go wrong here. We can have genetic mutations in the enzymes that transport manganese. And we can also have too much glyphosate which will happen if we get mutations on pond one that we don’t get the manganese over here. Then here we said this tyrosine can be nitrated by peroxynitrite. So if we have peroxynitrite, it can nitrate the tyrosine. So that that shuts us down. CERT one that we spoke about earlier also supports sod two, you can have genetic mutations on cert one clinical observation only. When both parents are given a mutation on a certain one these people are usually struggling greatly. High fructose corn syrup, I should have put that on here. High fructose corn syrup shuts this down. We recently found another mutation called f 12. That shuts down sod too. And then lysine, again another amino acid has a positive charge to it. So it takes that negative electron and says Hey, Mr. Electron, come on in the weather’s fine. I want to introduce you to Mr. Manganese. However, there’s a process called acetylation that takes that positive charge off and the body is so amazing here ductile because there’s an enzyme called cert three, that deacetylates lysing. So, therefore, it says to the electron come on in the weather’s fine. We want to take care of you here. But if we have mutations on cert three, and here you can see snip in this one, this is the one that impairs the ability of DSC to lead micing. Okay, now, cert three and cert one are also dependent upon NAD. And remember, we just spoke about 30 late, reducing your NAD. So that’s why some people need to supplement with NAD. But you have to be careful because if Knox enzyme is overactive, it’ll make more superoxide. So you got to calm down NOx before you give NAD once again, people are learning about NAD and it’s like it’s the anti-aging, it’s the miracle. Yep, it is. Unless Knox upregulates, then it becomes a problem. So here we map out how tryptophan comes down in NAD. And I don’t have that in here. But if you remember the theory leads can just cut this off in the past. So if you got three late and you don’t have enough NAD and there’s genetic markers that will have genetic mutations that will impact your body’s ability to make NAD then if you got mutations on cert three, your lysine is not going to be able to do its job. So you can see there’s a heck of a lot that can happen here. Dr. Joel, it shuts this down. 3d chess game played underwater. And finally, you can have fun attic mutations in aisle 13. That results in a gain of function, thus inhibiting Sed. A lot that can go wrong here. We’ll just have some literature on that F 12 mutation, and how it will impact mitochondria, you can see in this example here from our genetic software, that homozygous from both parents causes a shutdown of about shutdown, but a reduction in his od activity. And then I’m not going to read this, this family really wants to geek out. There’s way too much to cover today. But we have mutations in il 13 that make them more active, which can shut down the sod know what happens is that manganese as 32 is an antioxidant. But if we have deficient manganese, we might have excessive iron. Interestingly, I’m sure people know the periodic table of elements, Dr. Joel, manganese and iron sit right next to each other. So they’re somewhat similar in their makeup. For whatever reason, iron can go into that side rather than manganese. Oh, oh. So mitochondria incorporated with iron is a pro-oxidant peroxidase. So the cells and animals accumulate this, when manganese iron levels are low iron, this hoody in cells leads to oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, you’re going to be in pain, and you’re going to be tired. So here’s that same chart. But we’re showing iron being there rather than manganese. So this doesn’t work. So your superoxide is going to stimulate ferroptosis and wreak havoc inside the body. So guess who’s really struggling? Those who have genes that absorb more iron, they’ve got an F towel. Or they’ve got no uncoupling. Or they’re sort of threes now working or they’re il 13 is overactive. Now, you’ll see down here it says glutathione inhalation. We don’t have this down yet. We’re in a, we’re in a research phase on this. But this is another serious way that we’ll shut this down. Can’t speak about it yet. If you want to know we’ll come back someday to speak about that. But this is another serious way that the Sistine gets impacted. Now, again, we don’t know yet. You know, maybe that’s affecting the way you make glutathione. I don’t know. For those who are practitioners, we do a webinar every other Thursday evening. And at the end of May, June, probably July, we’re going to be talking about this. So we’re in a research phase, but you can see Dr. Dollar has so many things that can go wrong here that it can really mess things up. All right, B 12. You know, we tend to think of B 12. As you know, it gives you energy and all it does. But there are three kinds of Eatwell eyedrops all methyl adenosine, there’s an enzyme called TC n one and TC N two that helps get it into the stomach. And then from the blood into the tissue, particularly this one right here, there’s the RS number. When you’ve got mutations here, you can have all this B12. In the blood, it’s not to the tissue. And when that happens, somebody measures their B12. And so you’re taking too much B 12. You got to cut back. And sometimes they’ll say but I’m not taking B 12. Well, you must be taking the 12 to heart. Well, the problem is it’s not getting into the tissue, and they actually need those high levels to at least push them in. So one of the I mean be 12 does a lot but for illustrated purposes here. The Cabal lemon, which is cobalt, by the way, we’ll turn that superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Now once again, you’ve got to have adequate catalase. thyroid oxygen and glutathione peroxidase from glutathione to do that, if not this won’t work. And I believe that’s why some people don’t do well on v 12. Because they’re not clearing this hydrogen peroxide. But B12 is so much neater I don’t have it on here but you know the adenosylcobalamin is what helps make energy inside the mitochondria. Now Pon once again this is a little too deep. If somebody wants to read it just get get the study or just pause here. But one works in a collaboration against oxidative stress, especially superoxide radical scavenging. We know for sure that Pon one helps with oxidized LDL and helps reduce those that stimulate superoxide. We believe there’s a way that it breaks down superoxide. But we don’t have it down yet. But there are genetic mutations on pond one that are pathological, that don’t allow you to clear glyphosate. So here’s the oxidized low-density lipoproteins increased superoxide production by the endothelial nitric oxide synthesis. So these results indicate that a decrease in the activity of the endothelial cells is associated with the D phosphorylation of e nos, this association of the NA signaling complex, and the enhanced production of superoxide. So you can see all roads coming back to this. So peroxidase inhibits the oxidized LDL, and I think everybody knows that’s the bad cholesterol. So here’s the study, it says the main conclusive judgment is the presence of Pon one in the plasma, isolated or CO ligated to other proteins, and HDL favors the activity of e nos, that’s the good one. And then that supports the production of nitric oxide, which are vasodilators and platelet anti-aggregate. So as you know, we’re seeing such a dramatic increase in blood clots, and strokes. So that’s it, if anyone wants to contact our clinic, there’s Tree of Life Health, there’s our phone number 717733 2003, tell, health.com. Practitioners, please only, we have software that that does all this analysis. And there’s the information on our executive director who can help you get an account. And of course, Dr. Joel, you have been studying this for a long time. And you’re quite capable, of doing this, this work as well. So you know, people can reach out to you to do the genetic test, and do the analysis and try to figure this all out. Oh, that’s Dr. Joel Rosen: awesome stuff. Bob, thank you so much for sharing your May your years of coming to where we are right now, in this information, I always do these interviews selfishly, because I like to get the front seat of the accelerated what you’ve learned recently, and I appreciate your time, a couple of things I wanted to discuss is, you mentioned that we’re getting to a level where the where we can understand the clinical picture with the software, and then be able to support patients. And I think it’s really important to stress that like you mentioned the Goldilocks, not too much, not too little, don’t run out and just buy massive amounts of manganese and expect that to be the trick. And same thing for superoxide dismutase. Because if you’re producing too much hydrogen peroxide, and you take a superoxide dismutase supporting nutrient, and you make more hydrogen peroxide and you have challenges with clearing that then you need to get rid of that hydrogen peroxide first. And that’s where having the printout and, and the graphs and the sort of the understanding the lay of the lie or the land of the lay of the land, and having a sort of a genetic blueprint as to what the potentials for this patient may be so that you can understand when to implement the strategies first. And I think that takes a lot of practice from the practitioner to understand that. And what has your software done to help the practitioner I know they’re

19. juni 2024 - 1 h 0 min
episode [EP.16]Enzyme Secrets Unlocking the Key to a Longer, Healthier Life cover

[EP.16]Enzyme Secrets Unlocking the Key to a Longer, Healthier Life

Dr. Joel Rosen: All right, so today I’m joined by Jeff Owen. He has been an ASD enzyme US retail private label practitioner educator trainer since 2021. He’s worked in the natural industry for over three decades and I’m really interested to know Ask him about his experiences. And he represented a number of large supplement supplement manufacturers. And I told Jeff before we get started, we’d want to hear about sort of The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly if he’s willing to tell us about all that. But without further ado, Jeff, thank you so much for being here today. Jeff Owen: Dr. Rosen, thank you so much for having me as your guest. I really feel privileged. Oh, good. Well, listen, Dr. Joel Rosen: I’ve had some guests in the past where their same position as you and I, and I’m always interested to hear about your experiences, and most importantly, what the listener can glean from that to help their own health journey and feel younger at heart and younger physically, mentally, emotionally. So Jeff, what tell me just give us sort of an overview of, why you got into this industry, you were telling me you have a sort of a unique background in your health journey. Jeff Owen: So in terms, in terms of the chronology, of how the company makes the enzyme and probiotic products, the raw materials themselves were made in Mumbai, India, and then they’re shipped to Chino, California, where there are four NS-certified manufacturing facilities, the first of which opened in 1985. And as you can imagine, what our company is committed to is rigorous rigorous testing. So the products are tested, tested, tested, and set at a GMP-certified facility. And then the fermentation, the extraction, the blending, the formulating all that is done at in Chino, California. And what I like about this company, Dr. Rosen is that they’re not trying to be all things to all people. In other words, this company, their, their, the mission of this company, is to be a pre-eminent science manufacturing company. And of course, the challenge for any company that’s involved with nutritional manufacturing, supply manufacturing, is to get the science, if you will, the pure science and apply it, you know, commercially, if you will, so that they’re linked together. And they were aligned. And I feel like of all the companies that I’ve had the opportunity to work with, in 30 plus years in the natural products industry, this company does it as well as anybody. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, well, there, you said a lot there, which is, which is interesting. So a couple of things that I would want to touch upon is obviously enzymology. And that’s the purpose of our call today, and what that is and what enzymes are and how they differ from digestive purposes and systemic, like breaking down the purposes which we’ll get to in a second, I have seen that I’ve had another interview with the guests and talking about how some of these companies that were privately got sold to pharmaceutical companies and the concern with the I guess the goal of the company, does it change in terms of providing the best quality or are they trying to cut corners and get the cheapest product and make a higher profit. Also, the concern is that he did the other guests talked about how you get a trade-off, you can be darn sure that the the cleanliness of the lab and making sure that they are getting quality control in there is going to be top-notch, but at the same time is the products going to be top notch. So thank you for sharing your insight with your new company. Just before we get into the enzymes, and what they are one of the questions I like to ask guests is that we talk about supplements and the the purity of their products and the the emphasis that goes into the quality right from sourcing it themselves. I had the privilege of going through a lab and I liked that they teach this or they emphasize this to their sales reps because they need to know that their quality of the product that they’re representing is of the highest quality so that you feel good about what you’re promoting to other people. So with that being said, I had a chance to walk through a lab that is a supplement company that does the same thing or has the same emphasis. I guess the question to you Jeff is the they use the what’s the name of the just last off the top of my head but they will it is a way that they scan the products to fo photometry or how they Jeff Owen: Go to liquid chromatography or HPLC. Yes. Dr. Joel Rosen: So thank you. So maybe I’m sure they use that to tell our listeners what that is and how that’s able to discern the quality of the product with purities, or impurities if that’s being used or not, or also with another concern that I typically have is they’ll use a lot of flow through agents that will have some excipients in there that are told, Well, it’s not that much of a problem, or you shouldn’t worry about it, but in the reality is, if you’re taking a supplement over and over and over and over again, could it be more of a problem than something that’s just benign and not problematic? So sort of twofold question. Does the company use that? And how about excipients in the products Jeff Owen: in terms of the company’s, like you said, commitment to following you know, the highest, you know, regulatory analytical protocols. I, you know, I’ve been to the facility in Chino, California, on two occasions, I wish had, if I lived closer, obviously, I wouldn’t have more access to the facility, I would probably have more of an intimate, you know, knowledge about this, but what I can say is this, with respect to the in the analytical protocols, you know, that the company follows, they are always using the most advanced protocols, including high photo liquid chromatography. You know, enzymes are, are precision-based manufacturing, and it does take a real deep understanding, to make enzymes. The interesting thing is often, when you, you know if you’re a consumer and you’re in a health food store, trying to discern, you know, what is a high-quality enzyme supplement. One of the things like you said, you look at is not just the active ingredients, but the excipients that are used or flow agents, with ASP enzymes as much as possible. The formulas use minimal, minimal amounts of excipients or flow agents. So typically, if you’re looking at any one of our products, you know, one thing you will see, of course, is that the capsules themselves are made from vegetarian cellulose. And we use in some occasions, you know, just Manute really, the finished product is nearly undetectable. You know, flow agents such as, um, actually, we don’t eat at one time, I think we were using silicon dioxide, but we don’t use that anymore. In the last year, though, we did list it on the label. And because we want to be a transparent company, that we do use as a medium, you know, to grow the bacterium that makes the enzymes that we do use maltodextrin. But now that put them out of dextran that we use from wood is a corn source, but it is non-GMO. And the finished product of the resulting product, the amount of maltodextrin that’s in there is minute, minuscule, nearly undetectable. The interesting thing is that every company that is involved in the enzyme Manufacturing Practice has to use some type of a medium, a growth factor to make the bacterium. And when they don’t list it, it’s somewhat disingenuous. But this is something as a company that we made a decision, you know, make sure that the labels indicated that because we want to also be fully compliant with the law, the dietary supplement Health and Education Act. And of course, you know, like with anything else, you know, science, I would like to say it’s not dogmatic, it’s ever-changing. And we, as a company, always look to make, you know, changes. I’ll give you one other example, too. From a manufacturing perspective. Dr. Rosen, I think truly, truly distinguishes us. with ASD enzymes, we actually are the preeminent serrapeptase manufacturer, we manufacture 80% of serrapeptase. And we’ll maybe have the opportunity to talk about that later. But one of the things that we understand about serrapeptase enzyme is that it’s extremely hydrophilic and various, very susceptible to the low stomach acid environment. So when you take it the question is always how much ultimately are you absorbing through the small intestine through the small intestine? And we understand because it’s very, very sensitive nature, that you have to have some type of a protect, you know, protection. And it’s this, you know, series of ways to protect serrapeptase you could use you could use a moat. In, our case, we use an enteric coating, other companies might use micronized. Features, but, when you pick up a product of serrapeptase, and it’s and it doesn’t say that it’s enteric coated, it really is an open question of how much of it the body is actually utilizing absorbing. So in our case, we use a trademarked enteric coating that is free of phthalates, polymers acrylics, we actually spray the serrapeptase material, not the capsule itself, so that therefore you’re getting, you know, the full activity when it gets into the small intestine. then. And that’s important too, because obviously when people are taking an enzyme such as that, for a variety of health conditions, people want to obviously get the intended benefits associated with this. So that’s the thing that not trying to play that fast and loose with the manufacturing or trying to maybe give people a misleading impression that something, you know, maybe unsafe when the reality is that it is safe. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, well, the liquid spectrometer, I think, is really important that I don’t know how many companies actually use it. But I think that it’s able to give you an identification of what ingredients are in there, and what impurities or what other types of toxic mold or other types of metals or things that people have to really be aware of. And when you’re talking about enzymes, which we’ll talk about why enzymes, why are we talking about enzymes in the first place, but when you’re talking about enzymes, I would agree, you have to have some kind of medium to create that bacteria naturally so that it’s going to be able to break down and be able to be utilized. So that’s a good segue what, you know, for the listener, who most of our listeners are sophisticated, but if they just want to have a, a recap of what actually are enzymes, and how do they work, maybe kind of get into that, Jeff Owen: that’s a good place to start. Um, enzymes are a are defined as protein catalysts. And they are made up of amino acids. And just as proteins generally are, and their main function is to act as a biocatalyst, that’s the term you often use with respect to enzymes. They act as bio catalysts to spark chemical reactions in the cells of living organisms, from bacteria to humans. Presently, we understand there are more than 5000 biochemical reactions that are directed by enzymes. And probably the most classic examples that people would understand is breaking down, let’s say starches and proteins in the digestive tract, and the digestive system, I should say, coercing muscles to contract, or promoting cell signaling, regulating your metabolism. And more recently, this has really been fascinating Dr. Rosen, because I read a book, you may have read this book yourself, it came out about two or three years ago called Breaking the code, about this whole research regarding genetic testing and editing, the CRISPR project. And what they have found is that enzymes also are involved in splicing and dicing, if you will, RNA and DNA. So truly, truly, enzymes are truly profound. And they’re unique. Enzymes, because they’re bio, they are unique, because they are biologically active, meaning they contain energy. And it’s the energy that makes it possible for the enzymes to perform the roles that they do in the human body, the work of life, I like to say, so the enzyme that so the energy that can take that is contained in enzymes, that should be noted, though, it’s not unlimited, they will go on and on and on and on. Until they get to a point where they no longer have any biological activity. And then at that point, it ceases being a catalyst. And because like any other protein, they will be absorbed by the body. But every biochemical reaction, again, that is taking place in the human body is directed by enzymes, which is why I think they play such a profound role in human nutrition. There are two different types of enzymes, the one that is probably most familiar to people is digestive enzymes, of course, these are enzymes that are involved in the digestion of food, the assimilation of nutrients, and the elimination of nonessential toxic ingredients in the body. Less familiar to the audience, or what I refer to as systemic or affiliate terms, that’s more probably uses Metabolic Enzymes, which are involved in all the vital processes taking place within the 100 trillion cells that are in the human body. So they provide the metabolic energy, if you will, that, ultimately allows us to see here think, walk, and talk. And I always like to say simply put, you know that enzymes, you know, life wouldn’t, would cease to exist. function, the thing we also really understand about enzymes is that because they are involved in energy, you know, without them, yes, you could imagine there’s no living organism could exist, if you have to just hope, you know, spontaneously that, you know, biochemical reactions, you know, would take place. Obviously, that’s just, there’s no way that any kind of living organism, you know, from an evolutionary standpoint, could adapt to that. So this process is literally going on, you know, quicker than the wink of an eye, on and on and on and on and on. And the other thing that we understand about enzymes, and this is a term that’s often used as they have what’s called specificity, meaning they have a specific specific role. So for instance, like enzymes that will break down proteins proteases are not going to work on breaking down fats, those are enzymes referred to as lipases. In some cases, they have similar roles. But they’re different. I always like to say, if you could use an analogy, you wouldn’t, you wouldn’t use like a half-inch wrench to try to put in a, you know, like a one-inch screw, you will try and try and try to make it work, but it won’t fit. And that’s how it is with enzymes, they may look, and they may have similar functionalities and structures. But literally, one enzyme will do a specific role in breaking down a protein, and another enzyme will come in and do that. So it’s like a chain reaction that’s going on all the time in the human body. Dr. Joel Rosen: Well, that’s great. And I will look up the breaking the code, I haven’t read that. And I don’t know if you know, I do, one of the things that I do is I do a lot of genomic test interpretations, which means they either have the raw data from different companies, or we have a kit that we we promote, people are always concerned about giving their their DNA information to out there in the public. So we have safety measures, and we don’t use the big clearing houses and so forth. So anyway, that’s a whole other side. But when we look at those different 23,000 genes, what they’re doing is they’re coding for enzymes. So I use the example of credit to a lot of people. It’s funny, Jeff, on that older generation, where I say, Well, it’s the analogy is kind of like when you put your credit card in the credit card machine, and you do like this, and you get it and people look at me like what the heck is that? What is it? So another analogy I use as well think about is if you put a piece of paper in the photocopying machine, and it’s either moving or it goes in there sideways. And it’s not able to create a good replica of what GNA is doing in its coding for enzymes. And these enzymes are very important for cellular processes in the body, for being able to make an energy to be able to break down tissue, to be able to deal with stress, to be able to detox to be able to, you know, basically create your neurochemicals. So they are responsible for every phase of your body. So thank you for sharing that. As far as digestive enzymes go, not all enzymes are created equal. And there are different forms of enzymes, I guess, going from there. There are systemic enzymes as far as other places. And I like that term. I don’t think I’ve actually heard about the term Metabolic Enzymes versus systemic enzymes. And so I guess I’d like to know your insight on what is systemic systemic enzyme therapy, that the ASD labs have focused on. You mentioned serrapeptase and having 70 to 80% of the production, what exactly are the areas that systemic enzymes that your company produces, focus on? What are their sort of the goals of the products they’ve produced? Jeff Owen: Yes, the thing that people need to understand is that, unlike digestive enzymes, Metabolic Enzymes are, are used in the human body, you know, for detoxification, as you said, breaking down tissues on tissues that are unwanted or unhealthy, necrotic tissue, obviously, boosting our body’s immune system wasn’t making our adaptive immune system work better, that what’s interesting is that the endogenous Metabolic Enzymes are very, very difficult to manufacture from a commercial basis. Otherwise, we would probably see them quote unquote, in health food stores or in therapeutics. But what we have discovered, though, and ASD enzymes have discovered in six decades of research is that there are these enzymes that are referred to as systemic enzymes that you can get from food sources, well, bacterial sources. The one enzyme in particular I know people are probably very familiar with is bromelain enzyme, sometimes referred to as protein stem enzyme, that’s an enzyme that’s known as being proteolytic, meaning it helps the body digest proteins, and you can use but often, you can take it with food to help the body digest protein-based foods, but you can take it away from food to help with conditions like swelling, and inflammation. serrapeptase in answer to your question, fascinating story, Dr. Rosen, it was discovered some decades ago going back to the 1950s in Japan, sometimes it’s referred to as the silkworm enzyme. It turns out that silkworms during their cocoon phase before they become a morph, will make this enzyme in their intestinal tract. Akt through a bacteria called marcescens bacterium. It produces this enzyme called Soroush to peptidase, sometimes now known by the term serrapeptase. And what they have discovered with serrapeptase. In research studies, going back to the late 1950s is that serrapeptase is a very, very powerful proteolytic enzyme, it seems to have a particular affinity to help with reducing inflammation and has anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. It’s also known as an anti-adimec. It can be particularly helpful for ear nose and throat issues, and respiratory and pulmonary issues. And one of its hallmarks is that it’s involved in scar tissue management and fibrin management. And you know, for those who may or may have heard the term fibrin, sometimes people know about conditions that are fibrotic in nature, like uterine fibroids for women or pulmonary fibrosis. fibrin is an insoluble protein that’s critical for proper blood clotting. And, and for also helping people fight viruses and bacteria. It’s part of the body’s inflammation process. So it’s critically important. The body makes fibrin through an enzyme called thrombin. From fibrinogen. And, as you can imagine, without without proper blood clotting, you know, if we had a simple cut, we would be you know, we could literally like hemorrhage or bleed. So clotting, you know, the clotting factor is very, very critical. However having unhealthy fibrin management, which often happens when people’s inflammation response doesn’t resolve itself can be problematic. So one of the hallmarks of serrapeptase is its ability to help dissolve and break down fibrin. And it particularly seems to be helpful when people have a lot of mucus and phlegm conditions. For conditions like Sinusitis one of the things that people should know is that we have worked with ASTM enzymes, for instance, with the pulmonary fibrosis society, doing collaborative research. Pulmonary Fibrosis could be a serious, if not fatal disorder, where literally the body’s developing, you know, scar tissue in the lungs, and your body’s ability to breathe becomes greatly diminished. So people who have a lot of excess mucus and phlegm it could be very helpful. What’s interesting about serrapeptase Dr. Rosen, was when the Japanese discovered that it had mucolytic properties, its ability to thin and mucus dislodged mucus, mucus has very viscous and thick, when they analyze the spot of that did spot them conversion studies with these patients who had this these excessive mucus conditions, when they analyze the spot them, what they found is that the neutrophils activity in the spot was high. And that was the first indication that serrapeptase also seems to play a role in immune modulation, or mitigation. That’s why when I made that reference earlier about cell signaling, that’s kind of what I was referring to. Many people probably in the last few years Dr. Rosen have because of COVID, the advent of COVID have heard this term called you know, a so-called cytokine storm, where the immune system literally, you know, over expresses itself. And the body goes into this hyper-inflammatory state. One of the things that we feel very excited about with serrapeptase is that it has the ability to help modulate the immune response. But most of the research I will tell you on serrapeptase that has been done thus far, both in vivo and in vitro studies, clinical have been on its ability to help with inflammation, being a natural anti-inflammatory, and analgesic. The last thing I would note about serrapeptase is more recently, there have been some very, very promising studies on serrapeptase being a so-called anti-biofilm agent. And as you probably know, as a doctor, this is becoming a real problem. You know, biofilm is like this nasty biotic, that could really be problematic in hospital and Doctor settings. It is very difficult to treat even with antibiotics because of the cellular structure, and degree of the membrane of the biofilm. And, you know, of course, we know that we’re almost at an inflection point with antibiotics because of their overuse. But what they found with serrapeptase is that it seems to have the ability to manage biofilm. And that becomes particularly critical because millions of Americans, you know, unfortunately, you know, are on prosthetics, artificial devices, they may be the artificial limbs. And as you can imagine, when you have artificial devices or prosthetics in the body, it’s always an invitation for unwanted pathogens and bacteria. So, there are studies that we have done. In fact, in 2021, Dr. Rosen, our ASP enzyme submitted to the National Institute of Health an abstract, submitted abstracts showing, you know, the latest research studies on serrapeptase with biofilm is one of the sub-chapters. The studies have been very promising because serrapeptase seems to help even enhance the effectiveness of the antibiotic. sort of classically used to help treat biofilm. So I think this is something that you’re going to hear more and more about is, as the research continues to evolve. Dr. Joel Rosen: I hope you’re getting tremendous value from our content and learning how to slow your rate of aging. I have a really exciting announcement. I’ve just completed the complete age reversing blueprint, User Guide, and complete with learning how to not just slow your rate of aging, learn nutritional bioenergetics learning about circadian rhythm entrainment, the six key factors that you need to be aware of learning how to make sure that the environment isn’t accelerating your age-related biomarkers, and of course, mastering your sleep. This course is going to be retailing for $997. But as a gift for me to you for watching our content and subscribing to our channel. I’m going to be giving this away for free just for a limited time only. Leave your name and email and I’ll be sure to send you the complete age-reversing blueprint user’s guide right away. That’s a great insight. Thank you Jeff for sharing that. And I’ve been going down the biofilm rabbit holes now. And I know that there are actually different kinds of biofilms Yes. And you know, bacteria create biofilms, I think they’re showing even viruses create biofilms, and our body creates a biofilm. Depending on the topic, a typical pathogen will depend on the type of biofilm that is produced. And the reality is okay, so this is an age-reversing blueprint podcast, why are we talking about this? What does this have to do with aging I think the reality is, as we get older specialists are working with anyone now I’d even say over 40, let alone 50 and 60, you just lose the ability to manage your secretions and or make your secretions. And that means that your supply of the juices if you will, I call it milking the cow, your supply of the juices gets depleted. But the reality is your demand for them gets increased, right because of just you’re on the planet longer. And you get exposed to more toxins and stress and bacteria and communicable diseases and so forth, that your body starts to have a demand and supply problem not just for energy, but for secretions for immune management for bacteria breakdown for biofilm map all of that stuff. And so I think it’s really important that that has to be part of your tool and your toolkit to be able to make sure that you’re digesting your food. Number one, if you’re not digesting your food, let alone you’re you’re getting older, you’re not getting as much good quality food, you’re not getting as much food in general. And that’s one of the main things I look at it is okay, well, we can go down these genetic rabbit holes, and we can look at your bloodwork. But the reality is you’re just not, you’re just not converting the little food that you’re getting that isn’t maybe the best nutrients and contaminated and adulterated and maybe it has bacteria or whatever you’re not, you’re not squeezing that and getting the juice out of. And on top of that if you’re not getting the juice out of what’s happening to the foods that aren’t being digested. Right. So it’s really important to be proactive and reactive and be able to have the digestive secretions, and then be able to have the systemic protocols to help break down some of these fibrin-based bacteria and pathogens that are building up in the body. So with that long-winded recap, is there any concern with taking too much sera peptidase? I mean, let’s just say I go in and I buy a product like yours, and it’s really good. Is there any concern that I didn’t really have a physician look at it, and I’m just taking it and you know what, the more the better? So heck, why not? Tell me Tell us a little bit about that. Jeff Owen: That’s a great question. Because, you know, with serrapeptase enzyme being a protein, there is always, you know, the potential risk that someone could be sensitive to a protein, or have a reaction and we do, you know, get these calls every now and then at our office about this with serrapeptase because of the fact that, you know, it is generally speaking not it’s hydrophilic and not greatly absorbed, you know, especially if it’s not, you know, in some type of an enteric coating, or delivery process that protects it, you do usually have to take high amounts of it to realize efficacy. However, as a company, we always, always recommend serrapeptase because we do sell it by itself and we also have blended Systemic Formulas that you start off with, with a low dosage. So normally we would recommend let’s say with you serrapeptase by itself one capsule a day, preferably on an empty stomach. The reason why you take serrapeptase away from food either 30 to 60 minutes before eating or two hours after eating is that it’s not competing with the food in your stomach for it to work as you want it to as a proteolytic enzyme. But the idea is to take a small amount just to see what your body’s tolerance to it is. Usually, after a few days a person hasn’t had an adverse reaction, they can incrementally increase the dosage as warranted. However, what we also do know about serrapeptase is that in addition to it being proteolytic, it is because it’s a proteolytic, anti-inflammatory enzyme. Millions of Americans in the United States are on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, it could be a sinner medicine, ibuprofen, or even more severely, you know, corticosteroids like prednisone, cortisone, there are studies suggesting and in fact, we submitted this in the abstract at the NIH, that if you are taking serrapeptase, wants to take syrup ethics, excuse me, but you are presently on some kind of a course of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids, or even more severely, opioids, that the syrup peptides could actually make these drugs more potent. So it really, it really needs to have that monitored, you know, under the auspices of a physician or practitioner. Because of that, of course, on the converse, the hope is that if the serrapeptase is working, to help reduce, you know, chronic inflammation and pain, that one can then over time wean themselves off or lessen the dosage. But that’s, I think one of the challenges with enzymes, systemically, we don’t really see this with digestive enzymes, per se, but certainly with systemic enzymes like serrapeptase, or natto. kinase is that with certain medications, like with natto kinase, or people on anticoagulant drugs or so-called blood thinners, you always have to be careful about the potential interactions. So um, you know, these are powerful men, these are powerful supplements. And as you said, they can’t just be taken, you know, willy-nilly. So we do recommend always, you know, we always hope that people follow the label instructions on the label. One of the things I can tell you, Dr. Rosen, you know, kind of going back to the beginning of the broadcast is, in the 30 years, I’ve worked in the natural products industry, I’ve probably talked to 1000s and 1000s of customers in health food stores. As you can imagine, you get a lot of insights from customers about how in so many cases, their experiences with conventional medicine have been less than stellar. Or just getting contrary advice, feeling that the practitioner doesn’t want to work in partnership with them to follow a more natural Pathak or functional medicine approach. But too often, I think the people that even come in health food stores think that, you know, taking supplements, you know, are just Safe, safe, safe, and that there’s no potential toxicity. But that’s not necessarily always the case. I mean, you know, with certain supplements, like vitamin D is an example of taking, you know, taking excessive amounts of vitamin E or omega three fish oils. So, we always hope that customers will read the labels that we have. One of the things that we do as a company is we’re a very information-oriented company. So I know from a consumer standpoint, also when I’m in health food stores working there, we have these wonderful booklets are focused on health booklets, which we have like on five different categories to help one on arthritis, one on diabetes, one of fibromyalgia, heart health, and lastly, pulmonary fibrosis. And those booklets are great because they really give the consumer an insight as to how these supplements work and potential interactions with them. And with testimonials and the fact that they’re written in such a way that not only can a layperson understand them, but they can’t share them with their practitioner. So it’s Yeah, so it was then with systemic enzymes in particular, you know, it’s always cautionary to start off with a lower dosage. And, you know, and incrementally increase the dosage if the situation warrants it. And hopefully, you want us doing that, like I said, under the auspices of a position like yourself. Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: well, I think it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy prophecy in this case is that if you’re not just if you’re the, I guess, the weekend warrior, if you will, and you’re going into the nutrition store. serrapeptase isn’t really on your radar unless you’ve done some kind of research to get to that in the first place. But with that being said, I love the fact that the company submits articles and research-based peer reviews I’m interested to know why potentially serrapeptase would make the painkillers and or the anti-inflammatory stronger is that because it’s getting rid of some of the debris so it has more of an open field to bind To receptors to potentiate, the effect of the medication Do you happen to know, I know that I don’t want to put you on the spot. But do you happen to know why it could potentially increase the impact of those types of medications? Jeff Owen: Admittedly, I don’t, you did say something that was revealing what one of the hallmarks, of course of systemic enzymes, such as serrapeptase, is their ability, you know, to break down when I call them, you know, cellular debris in the body, whether it’s circulating fibrin, unwanted proteins, circulating immune complexes, you know, all of these things that can trigger the body’s immune system to, you know, to stay in an overactive state, that what’s fascinating about systemic enzymes like serrapeptase, is that when taken on an empty stomach, they can circulate in the bloodstream for up to six to 12 hours targeting areas of need. So when they make contact with an unwanted protein, you know, like necrotic, tissue, scar tissue, potentially like a cyst, a fibroid, something that’s mutated even a tumor, it goes back to what we were talking about earlier, by their very definition, they’re known as bio catalysts. And they’re going to break down and dissolve the unwanted proteins, ultimately into their amino acid components. So, therefore, the body can either dispel them outright through your stool or repackage them into healthy protein. So it does seem to be the case with serrapeptase and other proteolytic enzymes, like bromelain, for pain that are kinase, that they can play a complementary and a junk at adjunctive role with other medications. But you’re right, there’s no question. The abstract that we submitted to the NIH said that there’s more research that needs to be done to understand what you know, why these interactions are related to why the serrapeptase makes these, these aspirin type drugs more, more potent. And it could be just as you said, it could have to do with the fact that, you know, its ability to break down and dispel these unwanted proteins. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, and chemical signaling. I know also vocal signaling. Absolutely. Yeah. I think that I, and again, I’m just interested, because these are thoughts that are coming off the top of my head, but senolytics and the zombie cells and these misfolded proteins, and these cells that just sort of hang around forever. So there’s this whole new study of senolytic-type cells that break down the senescent cells that just kind of hang there. Jeff Owen: I found your podcast about this, it was fascinating. Yeah, well, Dr. Joel Rosen: I’m interested to know because there are companies out there that make these quote-unquote analytics. But I would imagine that you could put a systemic enzyme under the category of Sinhala ISIS because it helps to break down some of these, these debris, if you will. So do you know if your company is going towards more of a so lytic complementary role? Or if that’s in the future? Or if senolytics themselves are composed of systemic tech enzymes? Do you know about anything about that? Jeff? Jeff Owen: I haven’t heard anything, you know, from from a s t enzymes, about using, you know, senolytics, in combination with systemic enzymes, I am sure, you know, being a science based company, that, that that’s something that they’re always always looking at, you know, as I said earlier, you know, science is an ever evolving adapting field is funnily enough, as somebody who has been, you know, a member of Life Extension Foundation, you know, thinking for years and decades, I know that the whole idea, you know, the whole area of senolytics. And, as you mentioned, zombie cells and cell senescence is a real real, not just an emerging field, that there’s just a tremendous amount of interest there. I mean, if I were to speculate with my nonscience background, I would think that you know, that they would have a role to play. Because obviously, the whole idea of being able to help modulate the body’s immune response, helping the body get rid of, if you will, cellular debris, that is causing the body’s immune system to be over expressive, I would think we’d have a synergistic complementary role to play. I think, as a company, we always want to strive to have formulas that reflect, you know, where the cutting edge sciences, I think, you know, the end of the day, you know, the enzymes are always going to be the vanguard of what we’re about. But well, you know, it is worth noting, Dr. Rosen, because we are an actual actual manufacturer, will material manufacturer and Finnish manufacturer that often we do have, you know, formulators, developers, researchers that come to us to help them develop products. So it’s certainly foreseeable that we could have somebody as we speak, who is who is in contact with a company that is doing something like that and but that’s what happens with our companies. We do have people, you know, with a real site, you know, with a real scientific, formulating bent that asks our company, because the interesting thing is to, in a number of our formulas that we use systemic enzyme formulas, we do use other ingredients, like we use, for instance, amla fruit. In our systemic enzymes, it’s a very powerful sort of great source of vitamin C has antioxidant properties, we also use fulvic, minerals, ionic minerals. So we use things that have a complementary relationship, because often what people don’t realize, sometimes by enzymes is while they are classified as proteins, they’re often our CO enzyme components to enzymes. And so again, we make sure that that’s incorporated into the formulas. And because of that we have these long, long standing relationships often with suppliers, you know, where we can get these ingredients and make these formulas. So yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: that’s great. That’s why I really liked the genomic testing that we do, because people say, Well, why, like, genes don’t dictate everything. And that’s true. We talked about epi genetics and stress and pathogens, and Wi Fi, and toxic metals and so forth, that cause the genes to express less or more. But what the reason I like it, Jeff is because you can see sort of my mentor calls it a 3d chess game played underwater, where you can see these, these cofactors these inhibitors, these promoters, these upstream supporting stuff downstream supporting stuff. And really, once you kind of get a lay of the of the of the blueprint, then you know what you can do to specifically support that, not just at that level reductionistic, we take this and it’s a magic wand, it fixes everything. But this is where maybe one of the the I guess the weak links in the chain is or where the build up is where we can try to help support that through a proper function. And she ultimately your pain, your brain fog, your energy levels, your quality of life and prove which is, which is pretty cool. So I appreciate your insight on that. One of the questions I wanted to ask you, which I’m kind of curious about which you suggested we talk about is the Jekyll and Hyde of inflammation. So what did you mean by that? Yes. Jeff Owen: And that’s something that we actually, ASD enzymes talk about, in our focus on health booklets in our enzyme therapy guide. You know, inflammation is a term, you know, that people hear all the time, you know, it’s on their lips, often when they come into a health food store, they’re looking for, you know, something to help reduce their inflammation, like, like curcumin, as an example. Inflammation is your body’s natural response to an injury irritation or infection. When the body is an example, if you’re in the kitchen, and you’re cutting an onion, and you cut yourself, you know, immediately what happens is there’s a cascade event of series of events that are going on in the body, to help protect yourself, you know, from that cut, so that you know, it doesn’t turn into something that’s life-threatening, your body actually starts emitting chemicals, you know, to the site of injury, it not surprisingly, you know, that area is usually hot to the touch. That’s because of the fact that the body does that intentionally to help protect itself from invading microbes, the blood vessels become more porous, allowing the immune chemicals to come into the site of injury. So inflammation is necessary, you know, to protect ourselves from you know, for an infection or cut a fever, and hopefully, you know, when the body is generally in a healthy state, the inflammation response will subside and resolve itself. But we’re seeing this phenomenon now in our society where it doesn’t, where the inflammation, you know, goes from an acute situation to one that is chronic and unceasing where the symptoms continue to perpetuate themselves to go on and on, and eventually if unresolved, it manifests itself in chronic disease, probably a good example would be like rheumatoid arthritis, where the body’s own healthy tissue is attacking itself, the body starts making over overexpressing pro-inflammatory, more markers like interleukin six, a tumor necrosis factor, and that becomes problematic. People probably saw this themselves again, in the last three years with COVID where people’s immune systems went, when the inflammation response did not, you know, in essence, resolve itself. I remember seeing this one picture of a gentleman in a hospital where literally his, his lung tissue was just filled, filled, you know, with like fibrin type material and it was like his lung tissues were literally suffocating, resulting in double pneumonia. And, obviously, you know, it was a very, very sobering situation for us as a society to see so many Americans, you know, succumbing to this illness and you know, I continue to read articles About people three years later, still having the symptoms of COVID and not entirely resolving themselves. So onethe one of the things that systemic enzymes can do is promote a more modulating, inflammation response, hoping to get the inflammation under contand rol manageable. And again, because of the hallmark of what enzymes are being the bio catalyst, you know, breaking down dissolving those factors in the body that cause the inflammation to perpetuate themselves. So whether it’s debris, if you will, fibrin, the circulating factors in the bloodstream, which is why we feel as a company, that when you look at a whole range of chronic illnesses that are characterized by inflammation that is chronic, whether it’s autism, if you will, to uterine fibroids, Alzheimer’s disease, hypertension, fibromyalgia, lupus, all of these conditions, the getting the inflammation, you know, to be manageable, or hopefully, resolving itself is just critical. It’s critical. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, absolutely. So, and I think it shouldn’t be understated that the digestive component is, is upstream from the systemic component, right, because if you’re not breaking down your foods, and you’re not extracting them, I talked about stepping on the grapes to make the wine, you know, if you’re not getting the juice out of the food that you’re eating, then you’re not gonna increase your ability to increase your supply for other demanders in the body as well. And that’s, that’s a really important process for people. And I think because we cook, I call it cook the snot out of the food at such high temperatures. And it demands a lot of those gastric secretions of milking the cow, that you can’t keep up with that. And then that creates a vicious cycle of undigested food particles increased demand to have to break that down, further reduce supply, and then it just becomes this vicious cycle. So thank you for much for sharing your your insights and your knowledge, with all the years that you’ve done this, I’m always excited to talk to people like yourself I say you went to the school of hard knocks, and you learned a lot of this stuff, through necessity, and talking to the reps and squeezing them for as much information as you can and talking to people and getting their feedback. And, then, of course, the training and the research that your company provides and continues to, to expand upon. So thank you so much. I always like to ask the question, knowing what you know, now, Jeff, what are you doinge do you think is the most important information you would have told your younger self that perhaps would have helped you or accelerate, your healthy aging or slowed your rate of aging? What do you think would have been the best advice to your younger self? Jeff Owen: Oh, that’s a great conclusory question. Dr. Rosen, I think, knowing now what I didn’t know, t is understanding the inextricable relationship between digestive health and overall health, starting with, you know, eating the proper foods. I mean, we probably grew up in a similar culture, you know, with TV dinners, and, and, you know, foods and plastic wrap. And, you know, our culture of course, you know, the thing about Americans spend an enormous amount of time thinking about food in the course of a day, you know, we’re bombarded with commercials about whateatting. The thing is that when you watch food commercials, they never talk about the nutritive value because they don’t have any. So the thing that I really come to appreciate is how critically important food is, I always like to make an adage that the most powerful drug that there is this the foods we eat, it could be either your liberty or your prisoner. And then, now that I, you know, worked for this company for three years, you know, digestive health is so critical. So I think supplemental digestive enzymes can be such a powerful adjunct to people because when your digestive system is working more efficiently, and your body, as you said, it’s probably breaking down the foods and being able to absorb the nutrients, and then it has a salutary effect on your bowel health. That has that anas an overall effect on all the organ systems in the body, whether it’s your cardiovascular system, your pulmonary system, your excretory, urinary system, everything, everything, your hormones, everything will be benefited. So people should understand, make the good, proper choices about food, eat, you know, eat a wholesome diet, minimally procesed, if you will stay away from those bad terrible seed oils that are so ever present in our food supply. And, you know, be cognizant of that, be cognizant of that. And then and then probably typically as you get older, if after the age of 30, I would say you should definitely consider digestive enzyme supplementation of the fabric pack. The last thing I want to say this Dr. Rosen is one of the things I’m always amazed about, and particularly when I’m talking to senior citizens and health food stores, is how little protein they often get in their diet. And that’s another thing that people need to consider. You need to look at, you know, what, you know, in terms of what your food groups are, that you’re making sure you’re getting the adequate levels of protein, you know, healthy fats and carbohydrates. So people be conscious about food. Yeah, absolutely. Dr. Joel Rosen: I think I would echo that sentiment in terms of okay, well, I’m not feeling healthy, I’m exhausted, I’m tired. I feel like I’m rapidly aging. And I have a Santa Claus about a heck of supplements, right? A lot of people these do. And I would say, well put them in categories and think about what you just said, in terms of, okay, am I getting good quality food, am I having both feet down sitting at a table, having as many bytes as I need, and I’m not on the go, and it’s not in fast food, or it’s not a five minute and not in the drive, I’m not driving, I’m sitting down, I’m digesting my food. And I’m squeezing it for all the nutrients that it’s giving me. And if I need support digestive, ly, then I’m doing that too. And if you didn’t have a lot of disposable income to spend on a whole bunch of supplements, then digesting is going to be part of the number one, especially if we’re older. And getting that getting that diet food not only digesting for the nutrients that it’s giving you. But avoiding the undigested expense of it sitting there and fermenting and creating a whole slew of chemical signals that is going to rapidly aid you. So I appreciate your time. Jeff, thank you so much for being here. And for anyone that’s interested in learning more about your company and the different products that you have, I’ll have a link underneath the show notes so that they can do that. And I thank you for your time today. Jeff, thank you for sharing your knowledge. Jeff Owen: Thank you so much for having me, Dr. Rosen. It’s it’s been a real privilege. [Free Access]: 🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png]🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png] The Age Reversing Blueprint User’s Guide Course [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide] Get Started Today before this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity expires, and learn how to customize your age-reversing routine for Metabolic Optimization [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide]. The post [EP.16]Enzyme Secrets Unlocking the Key to a Longer, Healthier Life [https://drjoelrosen.com/enzyme-secrets-unlocking-the-key-to-a-longer-healthier-life/] appeared first on Joel Rosen D.C. [https://drjoelrosen.com].

1. mai 2024 - 57 min
episode [EP.15]TOXIC SUPERFOODS  With Sally K Norton MPH cover

[EP.15]TOXIC SUPERFOODS  With Sally K Norton MPH

Dr. Joel Rosen: Right Hello, everyone, and welcome back to another edition of the age-reversing blueprint podcast. And I’m excited to talk to our next guest. She is Sally Norton, who is an Ivy League nutritionist and author of her new book Toxic Superfoods How Opposite Overload Is Making You Sick, and How to Get Better. Today we will be talking about genetic testing oxalates and identifying foods that may be making you worse or better. And ultimately, in the overall clinical picture, Sally recovered from her health issues by lowering her oxygen intake and burden. And she’s here to talk to us about that today. So thank you so much for being here today, Sally. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Thanks for having me. You’re gonna enjoy it. Dr. Joel Rosen: So yeah, we were talking a little bit beforehand before we got started. And but I always like to ask my guests you know, tell us your story. Because your story is usually yours is why you’re doing what you’re doing. So maybe give us the listeners a little bit about what you’re dealing with I know, when you were younger you were planting a farmer. And you’re, I’ve heard some of the stuff that you’ve talked about in the past. So maybe take us through a cliff notes version of your health challenges. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Well, I got committed to learning about what I teach and what I’ve written about with the book. Because when I did finally figure out what had been dogging my health since I was a kid, particularly at age 12, but probably very much earlier in life. You know, I was 49, about to turn 50 When I figured this out. And, because in my career, I’ve worked in medical schools, multiple ones, and been in the public health field my entire life. And I had all these great connections with doctors who do integrative medicine, functional medicine, all the complementary and alternative therapists, I’ve seen them all, I’ve spent tons of money on it, and no one can help me. I couldn’t help myself, I have a degree from Cornell Nutrition and a public health degree from a major Institute here in the US. And nobody could help me. Despite my, you know, affluence of connections, and knowledge and information, I was ignorant, and we all were ignorant about what was messing up my health. And I realized that I couldn’t be the only person who was sick because of sweet potatoes, swiss chard, and healthy eating, which is ultimately what I found out, which is heartbreaking. Because yeah, I have this big organic garden. And a lifetime of being a goody two shoes at the dinner table, to you know, my siblings didn’t like that I was a bad example at the table who would eat her vegetables. You know, so it’s all worked against me doing the right thing. And it turns out that many other people have this problem of being sick because of stuff that we eat all the time that we think is fine to eat. And that’s a pretty shocking message to run into. Luckily, I live long enough to figure it out. But it takes a while to recover from it. So where I am now with my health is I no longer have the arthritis, but I no longer have a uterus or ovaries. I mean, you lose things along the way of being sick and not knowing why I still have back problems. I have all kinds of problems in my spine, which include pits and holes and the bones and stenosis and, bone spurs and for set joint arthritis up and down, very flattened and bulging discs, all kinds of degeneration of the tissues in here and year 11. I’ve started my 11th year without a high oxalate diet, I feel like my body’s still working on and proof spine, how much of that tissue can recover? I don’t know. Eating a high oxalate diet causes calcifications and fascia and connective tissue, it turns on all kinds of genetic weirdnesses in the body where suddenly perfectly innocent cells become aberrant cells and you get this calcification and so on. So, you know, a lifetime of healthy eating led to a lot of oxidative stress, connective tissue damage, hormonal damage, thyroid damage, brain damage, digestive problems, rheumatoid rheumatism, and so on. So I had the whole gamut. For the most part, I spent years in crutches and wheelchairs, I had to leave Cornell for four years of medical leave because my feet were so bad. And it was after I changed my diet at age 49, that my feet finally started working. Dr. Joel Rosen: Well, yeah, you know, and it’s you met going back to having the wealth of practitioners and competent people around, you would suggest that it’s new, and relatively for myself speaking oxalates up until maybe 656 years ago, was like, what is that? But the research goes back, you know, 100 years, maybe talk about the early research that shed light on what oxalates are and how deleterious they are, and maybe give us an idea as to why you think it’s usually it’s 17 years behind the research before the field generals catch up with the ivory towers, but we’re talking about hundreds of years. So at least 100 years. Well, maybe you can give us some ideas as to why you think that Sally K. Norton, MPH: is? Well, you know, the first significant study on Oxley damaging human beings, was published in 1823. By the new, it was a new position of a forensic toxicologist for Edinburgh. And what was happening at the time, especially during the 18 teens was a lot of people were dying of oxalic acid poisoning by accidental ingestion of oxalic acid. This is because it was a household cleaner, just like Barkeeper’s friend which has oxalic acid didn’t clean oxalic acid was a standard cleaner that was used in the industry starting in the 1700s. To prepare cotton for dying for bleaching all kinds of materials including wood and, cotton, and taking the rust out of engines and just it’s an incredible cleaner, you can use oxalic acid, which comes from Spanish that’s naturally made, it’s managed to clean the rust out of your patio. You know how your metal furniture leaves, so you can do that. And so it turns out that in the household, there was a lot of illiteracy in the early 1800s. So your household staff who would go to the druggist to get your Epsom salts for your stomach issue, could pick up a product from another illiterate person who’s at the desk of the druggist and bring home something and put it somewhere in the wrong place in the house. And you think it’s Epsom salts, and it’s oxalic acid. So you take a spoonful of oxalic acid by mistake and you’re dead in two hours. And what they realized is that people were using something that was called salts of lemon at the time, and they they could put a little pinch of it in the water with a lemonade and make your lemonade more tart and stretch out your lemons. Right. So they would use it for all kinds of things. And it was clear to them that this was the perfect murder weapon. So the forensic guy, you know, working for the state, we wanted to be able to tell when a body of a dead cadaver came into the morgue was this murder. So he he grabbed like 50 different animals, I don’t know if they were stray dogs and cats and bunnies and all this and he forced various dilutions of oxalic acid down them watched how they died, and then immediately autopsy them to see what was going on. So they could study the tissues and see if you could see this in human cadavers as well. So you’d be more able to identify a murder victim. And it turns out, it’s very hard to do that even when you’re looking for it. Okay. Now, when people come into the morgue, we should look and see if there’s oxalate poisoning. But still, to this day, we can’t do that when the same thing can occur with ethylene glycol ingestion, which is antifreeze. People will do that on purpose to commit suicide or you can use that to kill your lover or your husband and get the insurance a lady tried to do that, and that was written up in a TV show in England. She tried to do this to her husband on their seventh wedding anniversary. And she, they he ended up in the hospital in a coma pretty quickly, like four or five days later. They stayed in a coma for was it four months, and survived it, and the whole time, they never knew what was wrong with him that he had oxalate poisoning, they could not tell in the case of a man who nearly died when he woke up, he was blind and deaf had liver damage, other forms of damage and brain damage as well. But he lived, luckily. And the other good part was that the neighbor was told by the wife that she was going to do this and the neighbor tasted the wine ahead of time to see if you could taste the ethylene glycol and the wine. And there’s no you can’t taste that’s okay. Like so she did when she realized that that guy was an asshole. She went and told the police and that’s how they found out what nearly killed the man, not because clinically, they know how to recognize it. So here we are. We went from 1823 to like 2008 or something. And we do not know clinically how to identify franc poisoning when a person is about to die. We can’t recognize it, let alone the more subtle day-to-day version where you have arthritis and aging and aches and pains and anxiety. Yeah. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right. So okay, so as far as thank you for sharing that. So as far as identifying 100 years ago as a toxic compound, but yet not know how to identify it. And mentioning also it’s the same, same ingredient that’s found in vegetables, so maybe we can start from that or specific vegetables, and why they’re in there. And I think that the people who listen to this podcast are sophisticated, but yet can use brush up on what is oxalates. And why is it so rampant in our food source or our food bill? Yeah, Sally K. Norton, MPH: so it’s a tiny compound. oxalic acid becomes oxalates when it binds with a mineral. So when you take in the rest of your patio, you’re turning a soluble oxalic acid into iron oxalate, so we call them oxalates when they bind with minerals, and then they start gathering together and forming little crystals, and it’s really easy to make this stuff in nature because it’s just two carbons in for oxygen. So it’s it’s sort of an end product of oxidation vitamin C oxidizes into oxalate, and that’s how most plants as far as a botanist can tell, the majority of plants make vitamin C first and make oxalic acid and often make calcium oxalate crystals because calcium and oxalate love each other, so it’s just naturally tends to migrate into the calcium oxalate direction. And of course in soils and plants, calcium is abundant. So it’s pretty interesting that the plants deliberately build crystals of certain shapes by making vitamin C oxalic acid, and then these proteins that they build amino acid structures these sort of scaffoldings to create a specific shape of a calcium oxalate crystals. So some plants are good at making these rapide shapes with our Double Pointed arrows are little tiny, tiny toothpicks in bundles. And those are deliberately designed to be self-defense where it can be projected out and damage plant tissues when somebody chews on it, an insect or whatever, and then injures them enough to send them off, discourage them. In tree bark, the plants build blocks instead of arrows, they build chunky blocks and it creates an armor in the bark, so that when beetles are trying to bore into the bark, it’s too hard because this calcium oxide crystal is harder than teeth. And you can Human beings wear down their teeth by chewing on calcium oxalate crystals and plants like cactuses, for example. So in like old skeleton skeletons in the southwest, there was a while where some, you know, we’re talking 50,000 years ago, trying to live on the cactus and stuff. Those people all lost their teeth by the time they were 25 years old because the oxalic acid on the inside of the body and the oxalate crystals were chewing on both sides, ruining the jaws and teeth. So the plants are trying to defend our teeth, these crystals and discourage us from eating them, whether we’re a fungus which interesting the way that plants use oxalates to discourage funguses from consuming them is that they turn the oxalic acid into hydrogen peroxide in that is an antifungal element. This is pretty cool. Plants are smart, but it’s convenient molecules in nature because they kind of make even polluted air. You know how, and there’s such a thing as acid rain coming out of the pollution from the air, the major acid and acid rain turns out to be oxalic acid. So major cities like Beijing and LA that are famous for pollution, and probably Washington DC ought to be on that list. There’s oxalic acid in the air and you’re breathing it. It’s toxic to the lungs and all tissues. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, it’s really interesting. I know if you were to look underneath the microscope at the actual crystals and how gnarly and shredded and shoddy they are. It’s not hard to think that the, the, I guess just the shredding of the mitochondria and the leaching of our minerals, and the impact that’s having on our energy production is an obvious connection. I like the analogy of bark to trees as oxalates are to plants, right? It’s an interesting analogy. So as far as you’ve written this book, toxic superfoods, superfoods are sort of in vogue, wanting to live longer and healthier and stronger and more vital and going the plant way. But at the same time, trading one challenge for the next or even a bigger worse a bigger enemy than the one you’re seemingly getting rid of. So maybe talk us through some of the superfoods that are foods that we normally think of as healthy that aren’t so healthy Sally? Sally K. Norton, MPH: Yeah, so some of them are super trusted and popular like spinach. And its friends are greens and chard, which all come to go together, and mescaline mixes, and so on. Right and now beets are really big right now and you can get them in all kinds of supplements and all that so the beets are not as bad as the greens but if you’re eating them a lot, even making Baek DeVos and things like this, which I used to do, that’s not a good idea. And sweet potatoes are trusted as a gluten-free starch you know better than white potatoes. They’re probably a little worse than the baking potato Those are both high in oxalate and then there are all those nuts Now people think nuts are healthy fats and suddenly fats are okay and nuts or I don’t know why we trust the nuts come on. It’s the seed that is the future of a tree. Do you think a tree built that nut for you? gotta be kidding. Almonds are one of the most toxic foods. There are all kinds of problems with these things that are designed to destroy your digestive tract. And I think if you want to destroy your digestive tract, which is your immune system and your protection and your nervous system, start eating almond flour a lot and you could get into trouble. So the Oh almonds, cashews, and peanuts aren’t great. There are certain fruits like blackberries. starfruit horrible. In the grain department, the bran, you know how it’s in the outside of the bark of the trees. It’s also on the outside of the coatings on the seeds. And of course, grains are seeds. And so just under that brand layer and in that brand layer is quite a bit of oxalate. So adding more brands even oat bran and all these things. That’s more oxalate Dr. Joel Rosen: rice branding as well. Yeah. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Yes, some of these protein powders will throw rice bran in there and there’s enough oxalate in that rice bran in those protein powders where some of my clients got into trouble. They’re trying to be low. And they weren’t noticing the rice bran, you know, hidden in the ingredient list. And then when their symptoms started coming back, they looked around and like, oh, the rice bran that was it, and took it out. They feel better without it. Yeah, so what was the other one I was gonna mention, we’ll get around to it. There’s chocolate. Dr. Joel Rosen: Chocolate, right? Talk to Chocolate. Oh, Sally K. Norton, MPH: yeah. And then this whole thing of having to go gluten-free to save your gut. Because you’re ruining it with too many beans and too many oxalates. The gluten-free things are high in oxalates and not just the almond flour, but it’s the arrowroot and the what’s other starch that’s fine oxalate and then there’s the quinoa, the teff what’s the other one? It’s like all these gluten-free things are mostly high in oxalate a cassava. Sally cassava is high plantains are high and those are all in chips. Now. They’re supposed to be better than potato chips, Dr. Joel Rosen: right? Yeah, yeah. And chia seeds as well. Oh, yeah. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Chia seeds and hemp seeds. Right now people trust Chia like, it’s the again, it’s this superfood mentality. Not human food. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, you know, I can hear some of my patients talking to me, Oh, what am I supposed to eat now? Right because they go gluten-free, which I think gluten-free is more of a problem of the adulterated glyphosate ID GMO-based grain than the actual which has been adulterated now and your immune system tags it so. But usually, they’ll exchange that for a plant-based alternative. And now they’re being told that these plant-based alternatives almond flour and sweet potatoes and so forth are problematic. So I guess in the book do you get into? I think I heard you say getting into diets or recipes and good alternatives. Maybe you can kind of give our listeners a clue as to what they could be doing instead. Yeah, Sally K. Norton, MPH: the book does have several tables in there of alternatives, swaps, and so on and provide swaps. So yeah, you can. So interesting, because you get hooked on your favorite 10 foods, and you think that’s the whole food universe. That’s not how it works. There’s always an alternative. You’re just not used to working with it. Like I didn’t know what to do with a turnip or rutabaga. I never thought I liked rutabagas. The one time I had, I was like, No, thank you. And I’ve never bothered to learn how to work with them. So a lot of it is just that we’re sticking with what’s familiar, we have busy lives, and it’s everyone else recognizes this food. They’re available in the store. I mean, it’s sometimes it’s hard to find some of the alternative greens, for example, all the other greens are fine. There are some cool ones Mosh and you know, the standard lettuces are all fine. But sometimes it’s like a wall of Swiss chard, or a wall of spinach. Give me something else. So it’s not just that you’re not being creative. It’s that so many of us are overlaying on these foods. And it looks like that’s all there is to eat. But there’s always other things. So mostly, people need to take a deep breath and go, Yeah, change is hard, but I’ll be okay. And you don’t have to do it all at once. So the important thing is just to have them relax and realize, hey, you’re going to love this when you learn how to do this. All change leads to something better, usually if it’s done, you know, in a human way. And so you have to honor the human humaneness of yourself as a person. How well do you do with change? Can you find romaine lettuce instead of spinach? I bet you can. Don’t undersell yourself, you can handle this. Right? You can do it? Well, especially Dr. Joel Rosen: I mean the changes for better health right? And they’ve already made a lot of changes for better health. And now they’re being told, okay, wait a minute, the change that you’ve done so far is in the shade of gray of getting to the other side of the spectrum. As far as Okay, so now we’re I’m listening to this. It’s this toxic compound it’s in plants. Let’s go on metabolically in the body that it’s so disruptive. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Oh, this is such a great question. And there’s 1000s of answers to it. It’s surprising how many ways oxalate is messing things up. Dr. Joel Rosen: All the ways that it’s helped. It’s hurting Sally K. Norton, MPH: Oh my God. Let me count the Whereas I can’t even remember them. There’s Dr. Joel Rosen: so many reasons, right? Yeah, so Sally K. Norton, MPH: many reasons. So you know it’s coming into you with food like you’re eating oxalic acid and calcium oxalate crystals, the crystals just kind of ruin your teeth and irritate your gut and up your inflammation level because they’re an abrasive irritant, that probably destroys membranes, but frankly, actually damage the cells, but you don’t absorb the crystals. You absorb the oxalic acid. And oxalic acid is immediately causing stress in the blood right away. So it’s affecting the circulating immune system. And right away, you’ve got now distressed immune cells putting out pro-inflammatory cytokines that are no longer able to handle infection, right after your spinach smoothie within 40 minutes of what’s going on. And now this oxalic acid is moving from your mouth to the other end, over about 24 hours. So it’s in that first 10 hours or so that you’re absorbing most of the oxalate in fact, there’s a peak at about four hours later. So if you are eating a high oxalate diet, you want to stop and think somewhere between two to five hours after eating. Are you feeling worse, that might be a way to kind of judge Hey, wait a minute, maybe I won’t feel so good two hours later. But in the meantime, the oxalic acid and the crystals can start forming because they’ll start grabbing calcium and other minerals from your blood or your tissues. It also can stick to tissues, especially where there’s inflammation, infection, reproducing cells, so you’re just healing from a good workout or you scratched yourself somewhere or something, you know, you’ve got tissue regeneration, just as part of the normal maintenance of life, those cells, those young cells that are duplicating, or have a certain profile that makes them stickier at oxalate, so actually starts hanging up in tissues. But it doesn’t even have to adhere to tissues or stick to them to cause problems because there’s an electromagnetic field around this ion that scrambles the structure of cell membranes. So you can see it with this Phosphatidyl serine flip, they call it supposed to be on the inner leaflet of cells, it now flips to the outer and you’ve scrambled the structure of life, all of the enzymes, and all the life structures are happening on membranes, the cellular membrane, and the mitochondria double membrane structure. You don’t even have to touch these membranes when you start breaking down their basic structure which denotes it’s, you know, allows for function to occur. So now the proteins in those membranes that are doing these enzymatic reactions and shunting things back and forth, and doing all the things they do, don’t work very well, because their supportive environment is now scrambled. That turns on the immune system and says, Oh, we got to take that cell away. And then it raises oxidative stress in the cells as well. Also, oxalic acid sits on them, the Metabolic Enzymes, there are at least four places where it blocks enzyme function. So the last step in glycolysis, so important, is blocked box light. So you don’t get your ATP when you’re trying to burn your glucose. In a red blood cell, that’s pretty dangerous, because they don’t have another thing way around it. And you get a low ATP level in cells. And so all the various pumps that are fueled by ATP, start slowing down. And with red blood cells, you can get a nice, you can cause water to come in because you’re not pumping your sodium out very well in the cell. So excess sodium in the red blood cells, because of low ATP causes an inflamed cell that bursts high, the lifespan of your red blood cells is also shorter, when it’s happening, in addition to your white cells are dying because they’re damaged. And then your phase two complex in the Lectron transport chain is another place where you’re blocking enzyme function. So that’s a brief overview of some of the damages it’s doing. Dr. Joel Rosen: Is some of them. Yeah, you know, a couple of ones that I would want to add on just from my side of the view, is when you mentioned before with the iron clusters and mixing with iron, I mean, I think most people because of some of the same challenges with minerals in our soils and iron in our food supply, and the lack of the ability to move it out of tissues, that also causes oxidation of iron, which if we’re not recycling our red blood cells, we’re not respiring at that cellular level effectively and thus forcing glycolysis and glycolysis is like you just said, broken down because of oxalates. But another really important one because you mentioned earlier about glutathione and the body’s natural ability to detox and put out anti-inflammatory signals. One of the major cofactors for recycling GSR which is glutathione reductase is NAD NADPH and oxalates In their immune chaos, they’re signaling, and the free radicals that they’re generating are the preacher NADPH. So you’re not going to be able to recycle your glutathione even further, in more ways, and have so many different ways that it can go wrong. Which is why I think, I guess the question would be to you, do you see now more so than at other points in time that this is an accelerated problem, maybe for the reasons that we’re changing our diet, or maybe for the amount of supplements that can make it worse? Or maybe for just the product of, our wanting to eat healthier, supposedly, I mean, do you see this being a bigger problem in the world today than it’s ever been, even though it’s not known? Yeah, Sally K. Norton, MPH: there is, there is evidence that it is a bigger problem because we’re seeing so many diseases move into childhood, like kidney stones, and moving into very rare populations, and used to be rare in young women. But now Kidney stones are happening and children and teenagers, and a lot of females are getting kidney stones and kidney stones are the one thing in medicine is quite aware that oxalate causes because you have to excrete all the Sox Li You don’t metabolize it, you have to excrete it through the kidneys, and certain people just don’t have enough of the defenses in place. And the more you have this oxidative stress occurring, the more you have a likelihood problem were there, you know, and then just to circle back around the glutathione question, your liver is a major place of detoxing using glutathione, right? So when you absorb your oxalic acid from your spinach smoothie, your keto muffin, and your chocolate balm made with sweet potatoes and almond butter, which is a real thing now, in your g of all, you are depleting glutathione in your liver, because the liver is the first big organ besides your bloodstream, where these oxalates go. So from your food, it goes straight to your liver. And the liver is an open sinusoidal thing where all this stuff you’re absorbing goes right into the cells. And the cells have to defend themselves to survive. So they use a lot of glutathione to just protect themselves. So you’re depleting. Glutathione is well established and well known in the literature of people who read literature, which your doctor doesn’t. The other thing is that over time, the oxalates end up migrating into the bony structures in the bone marrow. And in the genetic version of this disease. Almost all those patients have anemia that is untreatable because you’re destroying the production quality of the red blood cells and the white blood cells right there in the bone marrow. And until we get the oxalate down, you can’t treat the anemia. I think anemia again is one of those and other examples of things that have become way too common. Dr. Joel Rosen: Would you say just to get on it and not to get too much on a side tangent that it’s anemia of chronic inflammation or it’s anemia of iron deficiency? Well, Sally K. Norton, MPH: the the literature from from the oxalate side of the problem, what is about the deposition of oxalate in the bones, as far as they can tell is that it’s messing with the metabolism and the creation of proper cells. So the cells themself and then you have a deficiency in the cells because they don’t live as long they’re pushed out of the bone marrow immature, and they don’t live as long. So like, for me, I had a low white count for years, an unexplained low white count that immediately fixed itself when I quit eating sweet potatoes. Like, right, so there’s both there’s two phases to this. There’s the acute phase, and that 10 hours after you ate something are intense, and like two to six hours after you eat something that’s causing a lot of these problems, where you have inflammatory stress and all of this, but then there’s that chronic phase, well, wait a minute, you’ve got crystals forming in your bone marrow, and your thyroid gland and your tendons in your eyeballs. And you’re stressing your kidneys out and that. So a whole lot is going on when you’ve got both the acute and the chronic problem. And once you take away the acute and you change your diet, you might get this little honeymoon period, where are ya I feel better for five days or two weeks. And then the chronic problem shows its head because the body’s like, hey, the coast is clear. Maybe I can clean up this thyroid gland today and start moving out that accumulation and that’s what makes us so dangerous is that you can silently be raised as a poor innocent child on sweet potatoes and white potatoes and chocolate and peanut butter and whole brand and this and that and healthy eating it gets added and the older you get the more you add in the healthy stuff. But you start with potato chips and candies that are full of peanut butter and chocolate and baby foods made of beets and sweet potatoes. And over these years even as a fetus you can have an oxalate problem because it goes right it doesn’t get a man I think that the placenta picks up a lot of oxalates and is slightly protective, but it’s not it’s not like a sealed deal. Dr. Joel Rosen: I hope you’re getting tremendous value from our content and learning how to slow your rate of aging. I have a really exciting announcement, I’ve just completed the complete age reversing blueprint, User Guide, complete with learning how to not just slow your rate of aging, learn nutritional bioenergetics learning about circadian rhythm entrainment, the six key factors that you need to be aware of learning how to make sure that the environment isn’t accelerating your age-related biomarkers, and of course, mastering your sleep, this course is going to be retailing for $997. But as a gift to you for watching our content and subscribing to our channel, I’m going to be giving this away for free just for a limited time only. Leave your name and email and I’ll be sure to send you the complete age-reversing blueprint user’s guide right away. You know, it’s interesting because we talked about what should we talk about, should we get into the weeds. And, at the end of the day, no matter how sophisticated you get, whether it’s an iron deficiency problem, or anemia of chronic inflammation, at the end of the day, instead of sort of yelling at the deaf person louder and putting an earpiece on them. And what I mean by that is lowering your intake of oxalates. Right. So that, you know, you don’t have to crack the atom on this, it’s just a matter of making sure that you’re not taking in more than you’re able to remove. And so I guess, I guess that would be a good transition because you mentioned we don’t break oxalates down. But we can accumulate them through our ingestion. How are we getting rid of them? And what is an oxalate dump? And should we be aware, Sally, of making sure that we do it minimally per week or that too much is too much, is there a bell-shaped curve of not too much, but also too much kind of give us some insight on that? Sally K. Norton, MPH: Yeah, this is a really important topic, which you won’t find anything in the literature about, this all comes from the clinical experience of all of us as a community living through this mess and helping each other out. This is sad because it would be nice to understand more of these mechanisms, is it one of the problems is these crystals are very difficult for the immune cells, it’s the immune cells that have to go clean out your tissues. So every time your body attempts to get rid of this particulate pollution your body has tried to wall off and keep from causing any symptoms. So they get wrapped up by dead immune cells, the immune cells extrude their DNA, like a big net, like a spider-man, and in case them and dead DNA. And so a lot of these crystals are down there quietly hiding in your thyroid gland, and so on. And it’s when your immune system comes along, goes, Hey, this is a mess, I gotta try to get this out, where you get a lot of symptoms. So it can be kind of, it’s worse on the way out, it’s more inflammatory on the way out than it was in the win. And that’s discouraging because some people that’s why you really can’t tell that oxalate is causing problems because there you go on and off these foods, just unaware of oxalate and where the oxalates are, you stop eating your sweet potatoes, and you’re like, huh, and then you put them back in and you feel better. And then the reason you might feel better when you add back your sweet potatoes is that you stop the body’s desire to clean out the tissues. And so you stop the inflammation of the D accumulation process. So that makes the clinical picture. That’s why you cannot tell when you’re eating oxalates that that’s what’s causing the problem. There’s that four-hour lag but there’s also this complete confusion on the symptoms. So it is important to like learn how to go down slowly and not trigger a big signal because the body you know works on these signals. It’s a big signal if you go from eating 1000 milligrams of oxalate a day which is truly dangerous, down to a high oxalate diet like an extremely high oxalate diet, and like 600 to a high oxalate diet of 250 to a kind of okay oxalate diet of 100 a day. That process once you get down any big step, the body notices it. And it’s looking for this opportunity to clean the thyroid gland and the eyeballs and whatever. So, a big jump down tells the body opportunity coming. And I think historically, we had seasons of oxalate exposure, which might have been in the northern hemisphere, August to November. Right when blackberries and things are ripe and ready to be harvested and whatever amounts we could dry and store and carry around. We’re pretty limited. We didn’t have massive pantries and big houses for storing food. We were pretty mobile. We were following the herd and following the food the water and the weather. And we didn’t just park ourselves in suburbia, and hang out and wait for food to come by in an Uber truck. No, that’s not how it works. So you would go through seasons where you rely on fishing and caribou and Buffalo. And none of those animal foods have the oxalate it’s really in the plant food. So we would annually clean out our oxalates we couldn’t do we wouldn’t bother with nuts as a full-time deal if we weren’t desperate. And so, you know, the body knows about this change from a high oxalate season to a low oxalate season. So if you do that for a week, it’s like, oh, wintertime, time for housekeeping. And then you, you know, you don’t understand what’s going on. So we need to not run to winter too fast. Because we now most of us have way too much oxalate in our system, and very deranged immune systems and having little crystal and particulates in tissues, isn’t osis disease, you know, asbestosis kind of disease, where you’ve got nanoparticles and microparticles of junk that shouldn’t be there in their crystalline. And nature, which is especially difficult for the immune system, and especially irritating. So you don’t want to turn on a bear of an immune system and get it enraged. And that is what can happen. And when there’s a lot of that going on to the body, you can mobilize enough Oxley to be sick. And you could have huge electrolyte problems with your blood where the calcium is not reliable, and the heart starts fibbing and your blood pressure goes up, and you’re running to the emergency room with what feels like a heart attack or stroke. So you don’t want to be messing with the release of a big toxic flood from the Superfund sites hanging out in your tissues. Right. Well, yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: that’s a little low, like the tortoise and the hare. Right. So yeah. You know, it’s interesting. So if you’re listening to this, I would think okay, it’s if you’re tired, exhausted, brain fog, muscle pain, fatigue, weakness, I mean, you check, check, check. Most people are saying that it’s safe to assume that there’s some form of oxalic burden, especially if you’ve been health conscious, you’ve shifted your diet away from certain foods to these plants sorry, talk to the superfoods. And now you ended up making the problem potentially worse than better, you should know to start with knowing what your numbers are in the sense of having an idea, Sally, of what your intake is on daily is that what’s something you suggest and then from there, try to figure out if it’s extremely high, or if it’s moderately high, or minimally high, or just off the charts, that you’re gradually stair stepping. But if you don’t know how high up you are on the staircase, would necessitate Well, you don’t have Sally K. Norton, MPH: to make it a big math challenge. This is not a game of math. You learn the high oxalate food, which you can in my beginner’s guide, and in the book all over the place, the list multiple times you learn, figure out in your diet, what the top five things that you’re relying on to often, right, that are really in the high zone and you start picking one to work with, like get rid of the almonds start with that this finds something else pumpkin seeds have almost no oxalate, there’s still seeds, they may not be tolerated if you’ve ruined your gut. But if you need a seed, hard, chunky thing, there are some options there. So just work with one at a time and cut them down by half and then all the way and then the next one might be your spinach. There are easy substitutes for that learner for a couple of weeks, and then the next one might be your sweet potatoes. There are easy substitutes for that, try the winter squash, for example, substitute that and just work your way out in what you’re substituting with, or food, you know, had been tested. We know that they’re lower and oxalate. So you don’t have to know any math to do it. But if you need the math, it’s mostly because you’ve gone so low and oxalate that you are in these crises of Oxlade de accumulation that’s causing these toxic stressful times, which is not good. Then you want to add in equivalent amounts with different foods like you can add in some beet juice as medicine to signal back to the body because we’re talking this signaling process to say no, not winter. Oh, we’re back in the BlackBerry patch. It’s August. And you take your little shot of beet juice to tell your body No, not winter, and that some people if they get that high enough, a lot of where this is happening when people go to full carnivore, and that cuts out all the plant foods and so they’re on a super low oxalate diet, and they can start adding in measured amounts and having the data then you can tell well, maybe I need three ounces of beet juice or a half cup of sweet potatoes or I need six spinach leaves and you can learn the equivalence of how much you need. But really, it’s about the feedback in your body. You can if you cut way back which some people just have to do constitutionally once they realize what’s been ruining their health. They have no tolerance for like what keep eating this thing you’re telling me to keep eating So everyone’s a little different how they can do this emotionally and just structurally in their lives. So don’t worry about even coming down gradually, in a perfect way. You’re just stressing yourself out. That’s not what you need to do right now you need compassion, kindness, patience, naps, but not self-flagellation. Right. So don’t make it harder than it is. But when you do need the data, you can get some from the book, the main book, toxic superfoods, and very soon here in February of 2024, I’ll have a data companion to the book available through my website where you get all the nitty-gritty of actual data that’s been vetted, cleaned out, averaged out an easy color-coded, but is complete are we there, so you can use true useful information, a lot of what’s on the internet is full of gross mistakes. And I explain in the frontmatter of the book where all these mistakes are coming from, to help you understand how this works. And people think, well, if someone published it, it must be perfectly right. Dr. Joel Rosen: Or if it’s on the internet. Yeah, no, those are great clues or at least some tips for sure. Like not needing to become an Oxalic bean counter. Just know what identifies your top five foods or even your number one top food and work with that. I love that. Just curious. I noticed you have the aura ring. I work with my patients and I’m completely ironic. I have like three things on me right now. Do you look at or have you seen if someone’s in a dorm or they’re accelerating their release so much that their HRV goes up or down? Or do their readiness scores go up? Or down? Have you correlated that at all with your with your cohort, or the people you work with? Sally, Sally K. Norton, MPH: wouldn’t it be nice if we had a couple of million dollars to collect the kind of data takes a lot to collect that level of subjective data where people are evaluating their subjective symptoms to say yes, this is a dump moment, I see this cloud of urine and the grisly junk on my teeth and crystals out of my eyes and my skin’s breaking out. And I’ve got crystal and stools and I feel like garbage and I’m having panic attacks. And this muscle knot is driving me crazy, you know, I have a little bit of neuropathy, like, okay, whatever it is, this is an oxalate, you know, illness, the clearing illness, and we don’t have, it takes a lot of forethought and structured and to collect data well, and to have data be meaningful, it’s fine to think you have data and guesstimate what’s going on. And we sort of do that more casually, I don’t have a good structured way to do that. And I’m, unfortunately, more of an artist than a biomonitor person. Now I do care about details. And I’m really careful about logic and getting it right. But I don’t even have the patience to look at my aura data. I’m terrible at this person. Dr. Joel Rosen: Well, you don’t have to go crazy with it. But as you could, it’s just another data point. And I, there’s too, you run the risk of now you’re micromanaging your numbers to write. But if you have another data point in terms of, hey, I’ve been feeling pretty good, or vice versa, I don’t feel like I’m doing as well. And I’m missing maybe some of the endogenous peptides that are released from a food that is giving you a little bit of an addictive quality to it and feel like you’re going through a lull, but at the same time you are lowering your Oxalic burden and your heart rate variability is going up and you might be confused. It’s one of those data points that can tell you you know what, I’m going in the right direction, what are the things that I’m doing that are different? Oh, you know what, I have not been eating my spinach three times a day or you know, so you can sometimes use it in that way, not in the way in terms of like really crunching the numbers and doing regression analysis or anything like that. Yeah, Sally K. Norton, MPH: well, it is important to honor your body’s journey and learn to hear the language of your body. And honestly, I implore people to sign up to be the servant of their body. Like, honestly, do what your body’s asking you to do. Stop doing what you’re supposed to do because it’s a Super Bowl party. You know, just bring your food and eat ahead of time and take care of yourself. That’s important. And I think having the aura ring and all that kind of thing can be a way for you to do that. But being overly nervous and obsessing about it and not living your life is not the point. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: Well, we talked about that earlier too, is a fine line between knowing objectively what’s going on in your body and not letting that supersede how you’re feeling. Right, and we talked about that earlier. And I think that comes down to the key is okay, well hey, I know what I want to feel like not what I don’t want to feel like, and if I were feeling great, I would mean that I could do this that the other not I wouldn’t be doing this I wouldn’t be doing that. So looking in the head not in the rearview mirror as to where you’re going number one. And then number two, being okay with the numbers, or realizing that as you get healthier I use the analogy of when your body is at a deficit. It’s like you don’t have enough income for your, for your expenses daily. And you’re figuring out at this point, do I keep the power on? Or do I, you know, put food on the table? But when you start having a surplus, and you start paying bills that you haven’t paid for in a long time, as it pertains to the body, you may interpret that as oh my gosh, I’m getting worse. I gotta stop this. And that’s where we run into trouble, I guess. Do you talk about that in the book as well, Sally? Oh, Sally K. Norton, MPH: yeah, this is so important in this community of people who have discovered that oxalates are a major reason why they’ve had all these struggles the journey back out of this mess is very up and down. And so you get little moments where you feel great again, and sometimes their brief moments, and then it’s taken away from you. And in five minutes, you can get spoiled, like, oh, yeah, I want to feel like that. I want to feel invincible and clear-headed, and unstressed and competent, and all of that because there’s a lot of neurotoxicity going on. It’s a neurotoxin, and it’s causing all the muscle knots and tremors and, you know, IBS and all kinds of issues. So you know, you also get this like, it feels like God put a sunbeam on your head, and you’re like, oh, everything’s great. And then it’s not great. Because of this oxalate clearing requires all this inflammation, and it’s putting a toxin back into your bloodstream back into your tissues, and consuming a lot of resources consuming energy, making you wake up at night to pee, because your poor urinary tract is busy cleaning you out, and you’re like back to waking up again. And back to paying too much or leaking on yourself or getting a little interstitial cystitis again, which is that bladder pain, those things are going to come and go and you’re going to feel frustrated. And it gets worse. By the time you get to year three, it’s worse than it was in year one. And you think, oh my gosh, how can I carry on or you think, oh, it’s got to be something else in it isn’t it? So having the patience to be on this up-and-down process where the overall line is, everything’s getting better. And you take it for granted instantly because we all want to feel awesome and run with it. But in that process of climbing this giant Mount Everest, I call the path a slippery wet, and it’s never a straight line up. It’s not an escalator or a staircase. It’s a rough, rugged process. But at least you have the benefit of being out of that confusion zone down in the valley when you were confused for years. What’s wrong? Now you’re up above that you can look back and go, that was not good. I’m going this way. And you just may be patient with this kind of up and down thing coming to group meetings where you can meet more people like me, and things like that, when you connect and get someone you can relate to that can help a lot. Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: that’s important because a lot of people will forget where they were. Right. And I was like, well, totally for when you couldn’t do this, or you felt that Oh, yeah. Well, are you still feeling that? No, but I feel like, well, you got you know, like, it’s a journey. It’s a verb, I tell them it’s a verb. So I Sally K. Norton, MPH: try to teach people the gains mindset. When you remind yourself every day, at the end of the day, what is better, I no longer have arthritis, I no longer am bleeding to death, I no longer have headaches, I no longer have this and that. But I still have this back pain. Well, fine, your back is still working on it. But you are better. You’re doing more things. You wrote a book, you know, it’s fine. You’re okay. Like, you can have that gains mindset and say, you know, what, how I got here is that I was very diligent about my hydration and my nutrients and my minerals and my diet. And I’ve been loyal to that. And I’m awesome. I’m going to keep doing that tomorrow. Right? Absolutely. You’re right on the path of climbing the mountain and feeling good about this progress. Dr. Joel Rosen: It’s so key, you know, because even still, like getting into the weeds of not counting the numbers or knowing what’s going on metabolically in your body. Then the day I’ve had conversations with my patients, okay, what, what would if you were feeling great? What would you be doing that you’re not doing? Like, what you’d be writing a book, would you be traveling, you know, we don’t get to the airport and decide, okay, I think I’ll go to Chicago today, you know like you got to figure out in advance what you’re going to be doing. And if you’re going to be doing it less than perfect, but you’re able to at least take that first step. That’s what it comes down to versus just looking at the numbers and figuring out how terrible you feel and what hasn’t worked because I think there’s that plasticity in the brain as well that gets somewhat I won’t say addicted but somewhat reinforced negatively to continue on the same pathway. And it’s not it’s nothing different except the flip of the mind switch as well. Sally K. Norton, MPH: You got to take your spirit with you and with everything you’re doing, you need to keep lifting yourself. So you can enjoy life and not be the older you get, the weirder you get. To not be an old curmudgeon, you’d have to keep that youthful optimism self-encouragement, and a spirit of gratitude. Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: for sure. So that’s great. So what I always like to ask you there are so many things I could have asked you and I’m sorry I did I would love to have maybe a part two if you’re open to it. But as far as you know, the name of this podcast is Age Reversing Blueprint. So what do you wish you would have known then that you know now that may have accelerated your rate of aging or slowed your rate of aging at a faster rate? Let’s put it that way. Yeah. Sally K. Norton, MPH: Well, I believe so many of my followers believe that a low oxalate diet is the fountain of youth, which is pretty damn exciting. Like he means, you can eat stuff like meat and not eat this healthy stuff. And you’re going to be doing better. You know, you can get rid of junk food and the factory if you don’t let factories produce your food. And you know about oxalate. You know, you’re not eating margarine and mayonnaise and this other junk in the middle of the store. Right? And you’re, you know, finding something of purpose, something you love, and you’re honoring the things you’re interested in and giving yourself a chance to get out there and meet other people who like the things you like. You’re just going to have a good time. And that keeps you young. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, no, that’s great advice. So the book is about toxic superfoods, how oxalate overload is making you sick, and how to get better, you can find that wherever books are sold. You could follow Sally at SK Norton on Instagram and also at Toxic Superfood Oxalic book, or any other places that you would want the listener to try to find out or seek your help or your information, Sally, Sally K. Norton, MPH: the main place is to come to my website, which is Sally Kay norton.com. You can write to us there, ask questions. Tell us your story. Sign up for group class, and check out my YouTube channel, which is Sally Kay Norton. It used to be called Better with Sally Kay Norton, I just changed it. So you might find it either way. But we’re putting out a testimonial video which people find very encouraging and inspiring. So yeah. Come hang out with us Oxley where people were having an interesting experience. It’s fun. Awesome. Dr. Joel Rosen: Well, thank you for your time, Sally, I appreciate it, and to the next time, potentially, and continued success with your information your message, and your purpose. And thank you so much for what you do. Thank you. Hi, thank you so much for watching our age-reversing blueprint podcast. If you’ve made it this far, we sincerely thank you for your attention and your interest in reversing your age. If you’re looking to get more information on today’s topic or other podcasts that we’ve had, be sure to check out the show notes and be sure to check out Dr. Joel rosen.com. Have an awesome day. [Free Access]: 🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png]🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png] The Age Reversing Blueprint User’s Guide Course [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide] Get Started Today before this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity expires, and learn how to customize your age-reversing routine for Metabolic Optimization [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide]. The post [EP.15]TOXIC SUPERFOODS  With Sally K Norton MPH [https://drjoelrosen.com/toxic-superfoods-with-sally-k-norton-mph/] appeared first on Joel Rosen D.C. [https://drjoelrosen.com].

27. mars 2024 - 58 min
episode [EP.14] Why Omega 3 Accomplishes Longevity & Why Omega 6 isn’t the Almighty Devil? cover

[EP.14] Why Omega 3 Accomplishes Longevity & Why Omega 6 isn’t the Almighty Devil?

Dr. Joel Rosen: Hey guys, welcome back to another edition where I’m excited to announce our amazing guest Dr. Bill Harris as he’s been a leader and leading researcher in the omega-3 three fatty acid field for over 40 years. He has over 300 scientific papers on fatty acids and health, the vast majority on omega threes. He has been on the faculty of three medical schools and has received five NIH grants to study omega threes. He was the co-author of three h A statements on fatty acid and heart health as the CO inventor of the Omega three index, which we’ll be getting into, and the Omega three blood tests and founder of mega quant analytics, Dr. Harris has been ranked among the top 2% of scientists worldwide based on the impact that he’s had with his research. Dr. Bill, thank you so much for being here today. Dr. Bill Harris: Great to be here. Yes. Dr. Joel Rosen: So I always like to do some research so that I can ask intelligent questions before we get here. I know that initially in the 70s, you were asked to study dietary fat and its effects on cholesterol. At that time, we knew that animal fats raised cholesterol, or at least now we know triglycerides and vegetable oils lowered cholesterol or triglycerides. But as you mentioned there we weren’t sure why. So potentially over the 40 years, I guess that’s a good starting point to know where we started from and where we are now. You know. Dr. Bill Harris: And so do we know why liquid oils, lower cholesterol, and saturated fats raise cholesterol? I think we know better. I think we know now that you’re changing membrane fatty acid composition with the different fats that we’re eating. and a high saturated fat diet does change the the way that the liver and liver cells process or remove LDL cholesterol LDL particles from the blood that’s of course, that’s the way statins work they upregulate the LDL receptors and remove more LDL from the blood. And if you’re getting more saturated fat versus polyunsaturated fat, those LDL receptors are not as efficient at moving LDL out of circulation. So LDL levels go up. That’s kind of shorthand of what we know now but there is a physical selling biochemical reason for why different fats have different effects on cholesterol outs. Dr. Joel Rosen: Okay, great. So So then as far as springing forward from that we know so much about the Omega threes and the longevity studies and why they’re so important for human health. Maybe we can get into that. Dr. Bill Harris: Sure. Yeah. We’ve been interested in, of course, Omega Three for a lot of time. And until now, I don’t know maybe 10 or 15 years ago, nobody looked at total mortality or effects. They’ve looked and looked at people with cardiovascular disease and the effects of Omega three on those people typically lower the risk for cardiovascular events, which should translate into a longer lifespan. You have fewer events. More recently we’ve been part of a group called Force fo RCE, which stands for Fatty Acid Outcomes Research Consortium, it’s a group that started at Tufts University in Boston. And it’s a collaboration of multiple individuals who have access to different research cohorts like the Framingham cohort, or like epic, or Mesa, or Eric, are these acronyms that we throw around the most people don’t know, but they’re fundamentally groups of people that have volunteered to be in a lifetime study. You know, like in Framingham, they took like 4000 people out of the town of Framingham, Massachusetts, in the 1940s, when they started, and they did every test known to man in on these people, they’re all healthy people, you know, middle-aged people. And then they just followed him for years and looked for the relationship between some something, they measured either a sum, they developed the term risk factor, the Framingham group, there’s nobody used that term before. And nobody knew it that nobody knew that smoking was related to a high risk for cancer or heart disease, they didn’t know high blood pressure was they didn’t know high cholesterol. So that’s how they discovered these risk factors. And so they’re like Framingham, there are cohorts like that all around the world. And so we have a collaboration with many of those cohorts, and the ones that have measured fatty acids in the blood and the ones we work together. And we found when we asked the question, of all these cohorts and several, several 1000 people together, is there a relationship between the blood Omega three-level and your risk for dying over time? And of course, you know, the window, the average window of time between blood drawing and when we stopped following up on people, it’s like 16 years, 1316 years, something like that. So it’s a, you know if you study Omega three levels and 10-year-olds, and ask, what’s the mortality in the next 10 years, you’re not going to find anything because nobody’s gonna die. You’ve got to study people toward the end of life, if you’re gonna look about look at prolonging life. We found that the higher the Omega three level, the lower the risk for death from not just total mortality, which was everything all in, but for cardiovascular disease, for cancer, and for non-cardiovascular, noncancer, whatever else is in that bucket, the whole thing. So omega three, high omega three was associated with just a generalized slowing of the aging process. And we had been part of a study some years ago, where they looked at omega-three levels and how they predicted the rate of telomere shrinkage. And that was another study where we found that people who had the highest Omega three levels had the slowest rate of change over time in their telomeres, which is an anti-aging outcome. And then the final one would be, look, just look at what we call ecological studies, or studies of this country versus that country, or this culture in that culture. And you look at Japan, which is a very high omega-three intake country, they also have, what a surprise, one of the longest lifespans on the planet, about four years longer than Americans on average. So we think we’re so great. Well, you know, so that’s, that’s also kind of a consistent story with the high omega three length with longer outcomes, longer excuse me lifespans, Dr. Joel Rosen: right. So mentioning risk risk factors, and the studies and the longevity studies that you’ve done. And have pretty clear consensus data that higher levels are correlated with longevity yet any any speculation as to when the FDA or whoever deems a risk factor variable to be a risk factor that omega three will become one as it isn’t at this time? Dr. Bill Harris: Yeah, that’s a great question. I’m not sure I’ll live to see it. I’d love to live longer than I would otherwise, because I’m taking all my omega threes might not be long enough, you know. So yeah, it’s not the FDA that determines that it would be medical societies. So like, a joint consensus conference by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, for example, that those guys get together periodically, and say, Hey, here’s a here’s a new risk factor. Let’s have a consensus conference on it and let’s make a decision and then advise our community that this is important. So that’s The way it would happen, that someone would have to bang on the door loud enough to get their attention. And the Omega three I mean, it’s, I know we’ve got 45 minutes here, but you Dr. Joel Rosen: no longer if we need it. Okay. Right, right. Dr. Bill Harris: I mean, it’s complicated because there have been many randomized trials with Omega three, many successful, but not, not a few that have been neutral, no, no benefit. And they’re, of course, they’re the when these studies are done, they’re done with the drug model in mind, you know, take people in their mid-60s, give them either a placebo, or give them Omega three, just like you’ve given them a placebo, or you give them a statin, and then wait 234 years and see if you’ve had any effect on heart disease rates. Well, sometimes that doesn’t work with Omega three, and I would not expect it to work with Omega three, but the medical, because it’s on the Omega three benefits of life’s lifetime thing. It’s not a start when you’re already old and sick and on a bunch of drugs and trying to turn that battleship around with the nutrient. They didn’t want it to happen. And so I’m not surprised, but the medical community doesn’t think that way. They think if you do what studies like that, and you don’t get an effective Omega three then Omega threes don’t work. And that’s the message that goes out to the community. They don’t work without any caveats without an A Yeah, but they don’t work. Well. They do work if you test them in the right way. But nobody’s going to do a 40-year randomized trial, with a placebo and Omega Three to prove that they do have these effects. You can’t do it. So anyway, that’s because of that mindset in the cardiology community, particularly, most of them dismiss Omega three, as irrelevant. So back to your point about when are we going to get this test approved by the cardiovascular community? It’s gonna be a while because they have this idea that they don’t work. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right, gotcha. Yeah, thanks for sharing your insight on that. So as far as the mega Quan company and the company you founded, maybe tell us about exactly what an Omega quant test is? How would differ from an Omega three test that is being done through a different company, I know both tests aren’t necessarily created equal. So it’s a two-part question. No. Dr. Bill Harris: This raises yet another reason why testing is going to be hard to get into routine medical tests because there are different ways to do it. Right? There’s only one way to measure your serum cholesterol. Now, it is several things in the plasma or serum. With Omega three, you can measure fatty acids and all kinds of places in the blood, you can measure them in red blood cells, which is what we like to do because it’s a representative cell. But most clinical laboratories are and don’t think about red blood cells, they think about everything being measured in the serum or plasma. And so all the methodologies are set up for that type that approach and, and so it’ll make it quant our laboratory, we, we measure whole blood Omega three levels, we measure red blood cell, we measure we can measure Plasma, we can do all that, and we do for different customers. But our flagship test, we think is called the Omega three index, which is EPA plus DHA, the sum of those two in red blood cell membranes, we can get that number from either a direct red blood cell assay, which would be a blood sample would have to come in a tube. So we could isolate the red cells. Or we can do it from a dried blood spot, which is much more convenient, of course, to stay dried spot on a piece of paper. And so we get the Omega three index, that test we created, we developed, invented whatever you want to call it 20 years ago. Next year is our anniversary. And we came up with it based on a lot of good scientific evidence at the time. And we proposed then back in 2004, that an Omega three index over 8% is the target value. That’s that’s what you want to go for. And that’ll make it three levels are not just a marker of how much fish you eat. They’re, in fact as much of a risk factor. As cholesterol is more than it’s a better risk factor, a better predictor of adverse outcomes. The lower it is. It goes the other way high. Omega three is good. Low cholesterol is good, right? So yeah, it’s kind of like HDL cholesterol in that sense, the higher the better. So the Omega three index game was created, then we started the laboratory and around 2009. And now we’ve been just doing our thing and providing assays we, as you mentioned, there’s different ways of expressing it. And there are some labs, I think it’s Quest that does a plasma phospholipid Omega three level. So that’s what they’re doing and that is different than the red blood cell, it gets a different number. The numbers are fair, I mean, the metrics are fairly highly correlated. So you can put on a graph the red blood cell level, and the plasma phospholipid level and make a nice line. So you can infer one from the other with an equation. And we do that a lot to make sense of numbers that are not the red blood cell per se. So it gets confusing to be another lab, I believe it’s Boston, Boston Heart does whole plasma Omega three-level, some people. And to add to the confusion, if I might, we present our data as a percent of total fatty acids, Some labs will present their values as a concentration in like micromoles per mil, or micrograms per milliliter, things like that. When the numbers are completely hooey to me, You have no idea what one means relative to the other. So that’s part of the problem. Again, by moving this thing into the clinic and making it a standardized test, we have to get everybody in the community together on one metric. And we’re that’s what we’re going to report. And then the doctors would know, we have one standard reference range, one target, healthy value, and then we can move forward. But unfortunately, it’s it’s more complicated. Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: thank you for sharing. And so I mean, you’re comparing apples, oranges, grapes, rains, when you have different units. But I’ve also heard you say that it’s a lot more noisier when you’re looking at plasma. So what is that extra noise bail wet that on top of those challenges that you’re getting these other information going on as well? Dr. Bill Harris: Yeah, yeah, exactly. Um, plasma eight levels of Omega three are noisier, they vary more day to day, it’s very much I mean, I’m sure your audience is very familiar with this serum glucose versus or plasma glucose versus hemoglobin a one c value was a monitoring glycemic status in patients. And of course, hemoglobin eight, one C is a much, a much longer term more stable, and less noisy marker. That’s exactly what the Omega three index is a red blood cell. It’s measured also in like hemoglobin is measured in red cells. And it’s a long-term marker plasma, you know, if you have a high omega three meal last night, your tomorrow’s, your plasma level is going to be much higher. And it’s going to misrepresent to the clinician what your general status is because it’s an aberration. You take big loads of fish oil pills, three hours before you go to have your blood drawn, your doctor is and you’re going to have a higher plasma level than you’d normally do. And we’ll look like you great, you know, but we look at the red cells, they tell a different story. So we prefer patient care. The most important thing for patient care is that you always use the same lab. I mean, I would love to say everybody needs to use Omega Quant it did not happen. We’re not a big international conglomerate of laboratory stuff. So I know people are going to get omega-three testing in different different ways in different labs. And if you don’t want to be confused, just use the same metric all the time. And if you want to change your diet and you start taking supplements, you should watch that metric improve, it should improve. You know, and I’m thankful that anybody’s even caring to manage anything about Omega three in the blood. You know, there was 20 years ago, nobody gives a hoot, nobody. Now, even the big boys are starting to offer it. I don’t know how many doctors use it. But that I think is a step in the right direction and acknowledging the importance of Omega three in the blood panel. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, no doubt. And I mean, the Omega Quan is so, so versatile. I mean, first, it’s affordable. And secondly, it can be sent all over which is great because it’s just a it’s a bloodspot. But you you mentioned before there’s a huge difference between taking it and then a huge difference between assimilating it, utilizing it, and having a subsequent increase in your percentage which we suggest that An RPC level should be a percent or higher. I guess there’s a lot of ways we can go. And I know research is still getting into that. But, if you’re doing a plasma or serum level, it’s not indicating it’s giving you a better idea that there may be a lot more challenges going on. If you were to compare that to an A mega quant and see that the numbers are, are telling a different story, that it isn’t being utilized and getting into the red blood cell and being an elevating and increasing you’re, I guess, chances for longevity and reduction of inflammation, long-winded commentary, I guess, what would be some of the reasons if you would bill on why not all, not all people utilize and build up their Omega three levels, compared to everyone that does it? What are some of the differences in variations here? Dr. Bill Harris: Well, one is certainly going to be I guess, we’re going to assume the same intake, right? Not Omega three is going in the mouth? What explains the differences in blood levels and the differences in response to supplementation? So there are two different questions, right? Differences in chronic blood levels, just based on your standard diet are going to be more complicated than Why would there be a difference in Person A versus Person B taking 1000 milligrams a day? Right? And, well, one thing is, what do you take the Omega threes with what kind of food or if you take Omega three, certain kinds of Omega three products, take them on an empty stomach, you’re not gonna get much absorption. Other forms are the triglyceride form, or five phospholipid form even if you take it on an empty stomach, it’s going to absorb pretty well. But the ethyl Ester form, which is the drug, the drug form, of Omega three, does not absorb well without other fat around it to stimulate the lipases and other pancreatic and biliary secretions to help digest fat and absorb fat. So it’s always best to take omega threes or whatever form it is, with with food. And there’s almost always some fat in the food. So it’s, you don’t have to do this, you need dry toast and orange juice, there’s not much fat there, okay, but a standard meal, take the fish oil with that for best absorption. So that’s that’s one variability, one variance. But then you get into some of the few studies that looked like maybe your intake of choline might also affect how well you absorb or incorporate Omega-3 three into phospholipids. That’s, that needs to be developed further to be understood. Well, there are certainly some interactions with Omega three. I mean, I’m jumping over to dementia at the moment here. However, there have been studies that have shown that for people who take Omega three with B vitamins or have good B vitamin status, the level of Omega three for them, does correlate with their risk for dementia. But if you got lousy beat B, vitamin status, the omega threes don’t relate. So there’s some interaction going on with B vitamins and Omega three that’s favorable? That’s not really, to your question. And that’s not changing your blood levels, where your response is, and I think we don’t have too many good ideas, or good data to compare different responses in different people, partly because you need to do it in a lot of people. And you’d have to look at their genetic makeup. And you have to be sure they’re taking the stuff because noncompliance can screw that up in a minute. You know, people say they’re taking or they’re not. You know, they’re, of course, some products are probably poorly absorbed, because of an enteric coating kind of thing. And you got to know how much Omega Three you’re taking. You can’t just look at the front of the bottle and see 1000 milligrams and think you’re getting 1000 milligrams of EPA and DHA because you’re not. Hi, I Dr. Joel Rosen: hope you’re getting a lot of value from our podcast today. I know I had an excellent time interviewing Dr. Bill Harris, and the entire Omega quant information that he provided for us. If you’re frustrated that you’re not getting any information about your health challenges your blood tests are normal and you’re looking to do this test. I highly suggest it whether it’s the complete profile or just the basic profile. He’s been kind enough to give us a discount link if you click on the link below and use the discount code Dr. Joel, it will save you about 5% Something small but I still encourage you to do it. So now back to the interview. Right? Oh, good, oh, good examples. But I think the importance is to have a baseline. People who are listening to this are typically taking, their health into their own hands. A good reason for a mega quant is because a lot of the people that I do work with personally hear about it, my blood tests are normal and nothing’s wrong with me, I feel awful. But when you have a baseline of an Omega quant that’s less than eight, or it’s in the threes or fours. And you know that there’s some form of inflammatory cascade going on, and use yourself as a study of one and retest and see how that’s going. You know, I showed you the the genomic pyramid that we did before we began in that fatty acids section, they do have biosynthesis and utilization and pemt is one of those enzymes, but there are other CYP enzymes and other enzymes that are used for absorption and flow. And so that could that’s where I was thinking that could be helpful as well. You know, if that makes sense, right, Dr. Bill Harris: right. I mean, if you gotta if you’re looking at levels of anything in the blood, you got to consider the rate into the blood and the rate out of the blood. All right. And so some of those enzymes we were talking about earlier, are the synthetic side, on the synthesis of Omega three, the talk about the breakdown of or the use of the Omega threes throughout the body and what enzymes are, or genes produce enzymes are affected, that might affect that cascade, I think there’s a ton of work to be done. on just that very question. What are the genetic determinants of the Omega three-level? Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah. And where are the bees fit? And I mean, people just reduce Utley says I have MTHFR. And I can’t convert folic into folate, or methyl folate. What I explained to them is, that that’s a small income to the major expenses of histamine production, and other types of stressors, and that uses up the supply of that little income as well. So now you’re getting very dynamic, but keeping it back to your test. As far as the complete go. So you have a basic profile, where you can look at just the Omega three index, and ideally looking to get it above 8%. I guess, before we move on to what’s on the complete test, maybe give us a little idea about the calculator, I think that a great tool that you guys have is the Omega three calculator. So let’s say you get that test result back here in the 5% range, and you have an Omega three calculator, where does that fit in? Yeah, so Dr. Bill Harris: , I’m glad you brought the calculator up. We did a paper with a gal named Rachel Walker at Penn State some years ago. We asked the question, how much Omega three dozen do you need to go from a 4% to 8% Omega three index, and we did it with a bunch of data that we had collected. And we produced a calculator that is on our website now. And what you do is you put in your, your current Omega three index value, and then it’s sort of it’s it’s set the equation button, the background is set to tell you how much more omega three you need to take to go from your value update percent. And for your example, 5%, you need roughly 1000 milligrams on average. I mean, that’s, again, coming from an equation from 1100 people, it’s a good place to start. Aim for 1000 additional grams of heat and milligrams of EPA and DHA per day and over three to four months, you should see an increase of up to 8%. And I think that’s a nice feature. But they’re always the caveat, and you’ve brought it up earlier, the response is different for different people. So that’s why you would have to test and retest and see if you are the product you’re using your lifestyle and your jeans and your food and are you smoking I’m sure most people are not smoking who are doing this, but smoking lowers Omega three levels in the blood. So you have to take all that into account and test and retest. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right and not all you’ve talked about earlier not all Omega three sources are created equal. We have the triglyceride ethyl ester and the phospholipid. Maybe just touch upon that a little bit Bill because a lot of people ask the question what’s the best form or what why do I burp and get a fishy smell or why do I refrigerate it? What maybe we can get into that a little bit? Yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: so the forms the classic form is triglyceride, which is a standard fish oil. There is an ethyl Ester which is chemically produced or I mean biochemically produced from triglycerides. Everything starts with oil from fish. All the products do, I guess except crude Loyle which starts from krill, which is a little crustacean that’s at the base of the food chain. But the fish oils, it’s the crude fish oils from Peru where they usually come from anchovies sardines, they, the companies will take those then they will concentrate the Omega threes meaning they will remove another non-omega three fatty acids, throw them away, keep the Omega threes and keep concentrating and for different kept by different chemical processes. And one way to concentrate is just to make an ethyl ester. Instead of a glycerol Ester, which is triglycerides. And the ethyl esters as I mentioned, they’re more concentrated per pill, typically, more molecules of EPA and DHA, but you have to be sure you’re taken with them to make them be absorbed. There are things called restructured triglycerides, reduce terrified triglycerides, where you prefer to start with the raw oil, cut off all the fatty acids from the glycerol backbone and triglyceride, throw away the non-omega threes, and then keep all the Omega threes and then re-esterified back to a glycerol backbone. And again, now you’re back to triglyceride. It’s not exactly a natural triglyceride because they don’t exist like this in nature with all three fatty acids being omega threes on our triglycerides, usually, it’s one out of three, that’s the fatty acid Omega three. So anyway, it’s a good absorption form, the triglycerides are phosphor lipids which we get typically from krill oil, which is lower in the concentration of Omega three, but absorption is good. It’s it’s, it’s a good form. And it’s kind of an expensive form. It’s it’s hard to hard to get right or to make. But it’s still a very effective form and learning rate for using Omega three levels. And there are a bunch of others that are coming out there as algebra, Algebra oils are primarily for vegans, and vegetarians, who don’t want any animal products, and those are fine. That’s an that’s a triglyceride-based oil. It just comes from originally from algae and I’m not talking seaweed, I’m talking about micro you know, single-celled algae that naturally make EPA naturally make DHA. They’ve been discovered by scientists and harvested and concentrated to produce oils that way. And I think you didn’t ask this. But that’s kind of what I think the future of Omega three supplements is going to be more and more. Well, we’re going to get into God go Dr. Joel Rosen: yeah, we can get into that right now. segue, because Dr. Bill Harris: there, the goal is, for many people, to have a land-based plant, like soybeans, like corn, corn is not being used. But that idea of something you can grow from the ground that will produce EPA and DHA and the oil. And they’ve done this and limited levels. And researchers around the world are still working on this. But they’ve had transplant genes into these into the seed crops, the seed oil crops, that will convert Omega six to Omega three, and then we’ll make EPA and DHA in the oil. And so they can essentially there’s no you don’t have to kill any fish anymore. To make EPA DHA, they’re these molecules are very, very difficult to make chemically. Just like starting from raw materials in a chemistry factory. You can’t make them like drugs, many drugs are made, you know, but chemically synthesized from nothing up. Can’t do that for omega three, it’s just much too expensive. So we’ve got to have nature make them and then we isolate them and concentrate them. And I think I think we’re going to see over the next 1020 years, more and more profit-based if we can get past the GMO craziness. My opinion, right, yeah, that’s the paint. Everything is GMO is bad. Right, right. I mean, let’s think about this for a minute. So I think that one of the best uses of GMO technology is to increase omega-three, production so we don’t have to harvest fish to get it. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right. Right. Which, which I think opens the door, though, as far as a lot of people and you said before we began just battling the whole Omega six is bad. blanket statement, and I guess the skeptics would think, okay, GMO aside, how am I going to get the good without getting the bad? I guess that would be sort of the question or maybe we can start to tackle linoleic acid or omega sixes and the good is bad that you in your research of over 40 years have can distill down for us. Yeah, yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: I’ve, it seems like there is this idea that if you’re a fan of Omega three, you have to be, you have to hate Omega six, that you have to have a black hat and a white hat. And it’s just got to be that simple. Because the Omega sixes and omega threes compete for different pathways, yada, yada, yada. And we eat a lot of linoleic acid and essential, it’s an essential fatty acid, everybody knows that. People are at one end, I think it’s poisoned. I think it’s good for you. I mean, the evidence we have from blood level. There are a lot of studies like this, though, we’re, we’ve published already, as part of this force research group, two studies, one looked at blood levels of linoleic acid 18 to omega six. And then we looked at the risk of developing heart disease. And in another study, we looked at the risk of developing diabetes. And we found that maybe somewhat to someone’s surprise, the higher the level of linoleic acid, the lower the risk of developing heart disease or diabetes, so those aren’t the only diseases on the planet, God knows. But for those two major ones, higher linoleic acid levels predict better outcomes. And I’ll just tell you, right now, we’re working on another paper, looking at omega six in a very large cohort, the UK Biobank, and we are seeing the same thing the higher the linoleic acid level, the lower the risk for death, from cardiovascular from cancer from everything else. It’s just so clear. So the folks that are squawking about Omega Little Lake acid being somehow poisoned. They need to address those findings they need to what what I see people do is just to go, oh, this is just epidemiology. Wow. Come on. It’s life and death. I mean, we’re talking about human beings and do they live. Do they die? Do they get sick or not? And you gotta tell me why. high omega six in the plasma predicts better at Highland or lake predicts better outcomes. Tell me why that’s a poison. Right? You can’t just brush it off. You’ve got to address the issue if you’re gonna be scientific. And Dr. Joel Rosen: that’s, that’s the thing if you’re gonna be scientific about it. That’s right. And so as far as was there a difference between the form of the Omega six pill or was it was that Dr. Bill Harris: yeah, so arachidonic acids, the other one we typically measure in the blood. If we think about plasma levels, about 75% of the Omega six, family in plasma is linoleic acid. Of what’s left 75% of that is arachidonic acid. So those are the two big ones, but the little leg is much bigger. And what we’re seeing for the cardiovascular outcomes and diabetic outcomes, is there was no relationship between arachidonic acid levels and either of those outcomes, developing diabetes or developing heart disease. So no signal there that Hi arachidonic I mean, that’s that is the if there’s a poster child, that’s it’s got a skull and crossbones across it, it’s, it’s arachidonic acid. But we haven’t seen any effect there. Now, I will say in this new analysis, we’re looking at total mortality, there are some outcomes, particularly the other causes of death were a high level of what we’ll call non-linoleic acid Omega six, we don’t know in this particular dataset, we don’t have the granularity. We don’t know arachidonic acid levels per se, but we know the non la Omega six, which is mostly arachidonic we know and so for total deaths and non-cardiovascular noncancer outcomes, there’s a higher risk for death with higher levels of that non non la and six so I think that’s, that’s interesting, and it’s, it just tells you how nuanced you got to be. And what it says to me It screams to me that people who want to lump all Omega sixes into one pot, and say they’re all the same thing are way off, that the evidence does not support that view. You got to be more careful and you got to talk about specific fatty acids. And some of them you can control some of them are dietary little leg is and to some extent arachidonic is we eat it anyway, but not very much. But the other Omega sixes are all metabolic. Fundamentally, they’re produced in the body from those But those precursors, and so to some extent are kind of hard to manipulate through changes in your ratios of some of the odd Omega sixes. So there’s a lot to learn here. And I think we don’t do a disservice to the field by just hanging all of them with a with a, a, they’re bad. All Omega sixes are bad. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right? Dr. Bill Harris: Maybe something to this the concern about, about seed oils, and diseases, you know, I hear people make that make that argument. And I’m not saying that’s not true. I haven’t studied it that well, I seed oil question, right? But to link it to linoleic acid, that’s wrong. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: And also to not to necessarily have those ratios and I’ve, you know, that’s a good sort of next conversation is the complete test looks at the six to the three, which can be or can’t be useful information. But do not know, I mean, all things being equal the recommendation from a mega Kwan is to get those threes up, no matter what. The thing I was thinking about, though, before is that those other non-L A omega sixes are metabolic, I always look at it as if the pump is already primed. And is that person already having smoke coming out of the chimney? if you will? Are they already having a problem with combining the food they eat with the air they breathe to produce ATP, CO2, and water? And typically, if that’s the case, then you’re already gonna have those Plinko chips going down the inflammatory pathways already? Anyways, if that makes sense. Does that make sense? Yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: yeah. I mean, it could be like, you’re you’re not sure what a Plinko chip is, though, you know, so do you remember the? Dr. Joel Rosen: I don’t know, he probably didn’t watch prices, right? So there was a game where they had to get into the $1,000. And it would go down the different ways, right? So based on inflammatory enzymes, up regulations and down regulations, they go down the wrong pathways and go down the Omega six and local trains and the prostaglandins and so forth. So, right. Dr. Bill Harris: I think to me, I mean, you’re kind of hinting around the Omega six Omega three ratio. Right, which we do provide in our complete analysis. Right. Right. So because people want it, you know, and we’ve got the data, so we give it to him, right? Am I a fan of it? No, you know, but I don’t call the shots of America. You know, just because I don’t like it doesn’t mean the whole world can’t see it, you know, right? So the problem with it is the number one thing I just mentioned, it’s assuming all Omega sixes are bad. Right? And all omega threes are good. Yeah. Just very black, and white. Don’t think about it, look at a ratio. That’s a problem number two with that ratio, I think it’s not very actionable, because it leads people to think, Oh, well, I can fix my ratio by just eating less Omega six and not increasing my omega three, well, that’s not going to help at all, that’s gonna hurt twice, because you’re not increasing Omega three, and lowering your omega six is probably going to hurt you in the long run. So that would fix the ratio, the right way to fix the ratio is to increase your EPA DHA. And that you can do based on the Omega three index, you learn that, and that will improve your ratio. But I don’t I may have another problem with the ratio you can have high levels of both EPA Omega three and Omega Six or low levels of Omega three and Omega Six and the same ratio. Right? So mathematically, it doesn’t make Dr. Joel Rosen: the sense that those studies ever do it going back to the ones that you were talking about, did they ever look at that high or low ratio are those ratios of six to three to see, Dr. Bill Harris: some of the ones we did, we did not in the forest group, but we’ve done it with a couple of with Women’s Health Initiative and with Framingham. And the omega, the Omega six Omega three ratio is driven by the Omega threes, or omega-six is quite pretty steady in the blood, and doesn’t vary very much between people but omega threes do and so that ratio is driven by so what the story that the low Omega three tells us the same is that high omega six Omega three ratio because the Omega threes driving the ratio. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right, gotcha. Yeah, I mean, I think the were that pervasive of the Omega six is the the oils that are that are hydrogenated or processed and high temperature used when you get a food that has a very high omega six Omega three ratio. I think that translates to the layman’s mind wanting to see what it looks like in the blood as well. Dr. Bill Harris: That’s it’s a great point because I think We labor under the illusion that what we eat all the fatty acids when saturated fats, monounsaturated fats, them all the Omega six, determine your blood pressure and fatty acid or your tissue fatty acid profile. And it isn’t that simple. You can’t control that much. I mean, your body has been designed to have so many checks and balances. And you know, like, for example, the red blood cell, when it’s made in the bone marrow, it takes fatty acids from the blood and picks the ones that want and puts them in that membrane. So the membrane will have the properties it needs to, you know, squeeze through the capillaries and all that. You don’t you’re not in control. I mean, at one level, we do provide a complete report of all your fatty acids in the whole blood fatty acid profile. And it’s there we have the data, some people like to see it. My question is, how actionable is it? From a physician’s point of view? Particularly, you know, what do you what are you going to do with, here’s some fatty acid that comprises, say, 1% of the total. And, you know, you’re in the 90th percentile or the 10th percentile, and we get phone calls from people saying, What do I do to fix that? I don’t know, you can’t do anything to fix that. It’s what it is. So I think there can be too much information. And I’m, you know I’m talking like a scientist, not a business business person. But you know, that’s the way it is. Some people love that complete profile, and we’re happy to give it to him. And some people dig deeply into those fatty acids and try to make changes in their lifestyle, and you know, God bless them. That’s fine. Right? We just don’t know if it’s gonna work. That’s all right. Dr. Joel Rosen: No, it’s, you’re right, I think there’s a Goldilocks zone of too much and too little information, I do have a couple of friend practitioners who liked building the complete profile, because they’re looking at the saturated fatty acid component of it and trying to extrapolate the the membrane integrity, but then they also use the genomics that I was showing you earlier. But it’s good enough for a good area to start to talk about what’s your insight? Or what could you tell the listener that more likely than not, is going to have some problems with listening to hearing about Omega six aren’t as bad as they originally put them in the category that they thought and heard about? But furthermore, on the other side of the switch, they’ve said that saturated fats are the only source of fats that I want. I guess, with the Omega Quan and all the studies that you’ve done, what would you be your insight on? Notwithstanding everything we’ve talked about before boosting up your Omega three ratio and having an above 8%? Where do saturated fats come in on this? Yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: well, it almost gets counterintuitive, because one of the ways there are two ways to raise your, saturated fat levels the primary saturated fat, is a fatty acid in the blood, and the membranes are palmitic acids and 16 carbon, with no double bonds. And the thing is, you can get that into your blood in two different ways. One, you can eat it in saturated meat, you know, solid fats, butter, yada, yada, Crisco, or you can make it that’s not essential fatty acids, your body will make it from protein or carbohydrate. One way to raise levels of palmitic acid is to lower your fat intake and raise your carbohydrate intake, our high-carb diet will cause the liver to make more palmitic acid and put it out there. So when we’ve seen high palmitic acid levels, it’s like well, is it because you’re eating a lot of it, or because you’re on a high-carb diet, and you’re making a lot of it? And it’s, it’s a seesaw. And it’s a little hard to counsel people on what to do about that. If they know they’re going out of their way to eat a really sad low-carb diet, which would be a low-carb diet typically a high-fat diet. And that may lower your levels of saturated fat. Because you’re not synthesizing as much, Dr. Joel Rosen: right? Yeah. Should be lower. Not higher. Yeah. Dr. Bill Harris: Hi. So Hi, Paul. Medic levels are one of the predictors of diabetes for example, right hallmarks are one of the whatever the word is predictors. Yeah. Right moving that, you know, do you do that by eating a high-fat diet or a low-fat diet? Wow. can go either way. Dr. Joel Rosen: Do you see their omega threes being low with those types of cohorts or Dr. Bill Harris: independent omega threes or not? Not even though it’s a percent of total fatty acids, and some people get a little wacky about, oh, my God is the if I change that one over there and raise it, then that’s going to lower the Omega three. Well, it doesn’t work that way in biology. If there is a, a, a seesaw, in any fatty acids, it’s all in the polyunsaturated. The year when we looked at studies where people’s Omega three levels went way up because they took supplements, and what happened was their Omega 6 went down, but their saturates and monounsaturated stayed the same, unaffected. So there is a switching off of percent. percent, one goes up percent and the other one goes down. But it’s Omega six Omega three, that’s what switching naturally, because you make mistakes, no matter if you’re competing for different for the same spot on a membrane. saturates and models are not competing with those spots. Right. So anyway, Dr. Joel Rosen: it gets it gets complicated, but you know, it’s interesting. Yeah, yeah. I think that as far as the back to the original, will it ever be a risk factor? I think there are a lot of sacred cows in LDL is bad. HDL is good. And cholesterol is the overarching number that we need to look at. I think some doctors come out and say they’re not looking at cholesterol markers per se, in Ireland of its own, but they’re looking at triglycerides to HDL markers, or we’re looking at the small density particles and so forth. I guess the question would be Bill, how would that change around the recommendations or the inferences that you would have from the Omega quant? Dr. Bill Harris: Unrelated? I mean, I, you know, if you’re looking those are lipid lipid protein majors, right? I’m talking about TG HDL ratios, and LDL particle size ALP levels, right? Omega threes don’t well, to the extent that a fairly high dose of Omega three will lower your triglycerides, which it will, right, that will change your triglyceride ratio, right to the extent that that’s a predictor of metabolic syndrome, right should improve, right, mega threes aren’t going to do much for LDL cholesterol, right? Values, particle numbers, or otherwise, they don’t play much in that in that sandbox. They otherwise, you know, unrelated to cholesterol, there’s a whole bunch of other things that affect risk. Reward, right? I mean, right? The last example is aspirin, you know, take a baby aspirin, you’ll reduce your risk for heart attacks doesn’t lower your cholesterol. All right, ladies in a different field. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right. And that pay there’s a play because of the controversy, or at least what I’ve been studying, and I said, I’d like to know a lot more than I know now to ask you better questions is that the polyunsaturated fatty acids are a lot more combustible. And I believe it from an oxidative standpoint versus oxidizable. Yeah, oxidizable Sorry. And so if your pump is already primed as I said, and you’re not combining the food, you eat in the air, you breathe, and you have these free radicals that you’re in this excessive state of reduction for and there’s all these ancient hydrogen bonds are looking for oxidants to get reduced. That can cause again, the shifting of those arachidonic acid pathways and so forth. I guess if there’s a question in there, where do you think the science is going? I know you know, I remember reading on your website about the palmitic acid and higher reflection of carbohydrate intake, but there’s still yet more information to be gleaned from the way that all the Saudi saturated fatty acids play together. I guess, if there is a question in there, where do you think the science is going towards and how can your test be helpful in in seeing some of these patterns? Yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: it’s a good question. Yeah, and I’ll just jump back to the polyunsaturated being susceptible to oxidation, right? applies even more omega three. Because there are more double bonds in a given omega-three fatty acid, no, four, five, and six double bonds are supposed to recognize it with its four and little leg with its two. Dr. Joel Rosen: So it’s more it’s just for the person listening. It’s more oxidizable with more oxygen, Dr. Bill Harris: more bonds you have right? In a test tube, and a testing unit test tube, right, you’re more likely to the fatty acids going to break down due to oxygen, we call it per Dr. Joel Rosen: oxidation, oxidation, right? Dr. Bill Harris: So but the yet the Omega threes are good, Dr. Joel Rosen: but Right, the longevity studies and Dr. Bill Harris: there are a lot of antioxidant systems in the body that protect these things. Right. And so to take what happens in a test tube With the hype of high levels of double bonds polyunsaturated are more oxidizable. Therefore, Bab is right. Wait a minute. No, you can’t do that. It’s simple-minded thinking. But Becky, I think your question is what there’s more information in fatty acid profiles than we know Dr. Joel Rosen: that’s right, right? Yeah. Thank you for getting that out of my question. Thank Dr. Bill Harris: you. But yeah, so and I think that’s true. I think there’s, it’s like a fingerprint. Golly, 10 years ago, we did a study in the Framingham group we looked at, we looked at all the fatty acids in the red blood cell and asked which ones are predictive of who’s going to have a cardiovascular event or not. And we just told the computer. So we had, we had the full fatty acid profile of, you know, 4000 people, and we knew who had developed heart disease in-app, you know, sometime, after we’ve measured their fatty acid levels. And we said, the computer hears, it’s almost like machine learning or AI, you know, that kind of thing. Tell us what fatty acid is most linked most highly correlated with a reduced risk for heart disease. And the first fatty acid picked was linoleic acid. Course, higher levels, better outcomes. Okay. So then we told the computer, okay, put that aside. Now, of all the other fatty acids, which one is next most associated with beneficial outcomes? And we picked another one, and we did that 10 times over. So we get 10, fatty acids that together predict that as a fingerprint. And so some of them are high levels, good. Some of them are high levels bad, you know, but just knowing what the fingerprint is. So we published that, and that was a lot of fun. So now we’re taking that same idea. Oh, we just got two NIH grants to study this. These are called Small Business Innovation Research grants. Dr. Joel Rosen: There’s me, I’m so sorry. Yes. Go ahead. Dr. Bill Harris: So we just got two grants, one of them is to develop a red blood cell-based profile fingerprint that would predict the risk of developing diabetes. So you get basically, is there more information in that blood fatty acid pattern than we realize? Can we dig deeper, and then we have the say, another grant that’s doing the same idea, but looking for risk for dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and dementia? Because these are two profiles that we theoretically if we find something that’s predictive, instead of just one fatty acid, maybe they’re seven, right? That’s Sing Sing a song together, one of them’s not singing. If we find that, then we have we have a new product or our small business. That’s why the government likes to fund these things to stimulate new ideas in small businesses. So that’s cool. So yeah, we’ll see how that goes. Next. That’s Dr. Joel Rosen: what machine learning the being able to find that fingerprint. Yeah, Dr. Bill Harris: that’s yeah, that’s the cool name for it. Right. People biostatisticians have been doing this for years anyway, with the right multivariate analysis and things, but now it’s got a cool name, machine learning AI Dr. Joel Rosen: and right. Multivariate learning, though. That’s right. That’s great. That’s great. I like I like the complete test. But at the same time, the, the, like you said, the, the basic profile of looking at your Omega three index, which is a percentage of omega threes to your whole blood, right, based on your RBC, which correlates, what 9890 99%, right, and be able to test it over time, and be able to use a calculator. At the end of the day, there’s no refuting the fact that these studies are showing that omega threes that have more double bonds that are easily or potentially in a test tube more oxidizable extend your lifespan. So, Dr. Bill Harris: so much for the idea that just because it’s highly oxidizable it’s gonna be bad for you. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, I mean, if you have, the thing is, it’s like saying, you know, you have a barn that has dry wood and if there’s a fire on the left side of the building, that right side is more burnable. Right? I mean, at the end of the day, if you have more inflammation in your body, and you know, the pumps already primed, then that’s the problem, I think so Dr. Bill Harris: then oxidized the ability of a fatty acid is a whole different thing than inflammation. Those are different questions completely. You’re buying the inflammatory response to typically a pathogen, you know, some foreign object that is mounting a response to that’s immune-based. I mean, it’s the mixture of the inflammatory system and the immune system. It’s right by complicated you thought fattier. super complicated. Oh my god. Yeah, I’d be, Dr. Joel Rosen: I’ve started to put my toe on that rabbit hole a little bit in terms of how exactly those cytokines and the inflammatory immune response, communicate back and forth with, the entire fatty acid profile as well, you Dr. Bill Harris: know, I it’s it’s a crazy complex mix and it’s we haven’t talked about the resolvins protections. The quick Yeah, Dr. Joel Rosen: let’s talk about that. So I was gonna ask you thank you for what is your feeling of that, is it? Can you should you take that? Or what are protections and resolvins? And I know you don’t like this specify that s PMS the names but uh, as far as Yeah, yeah. Dr. Bill Harris: So these are sometimes called PMS or specialized proinflammatory resulting molecules. They’re made from omega threes primary, some are made from arachidonic acid. And they’re good, healthy. And another one of the reasons why Omega Six should not be considered bad. But primarily these protection resolvins are made from Omega three, EPA, and DHA. They are supposed to be a little controversial these days, but they’re supposed to actively suppress or rather reverse an inflammatory response that’s appropriately been initiated by some system but needs to be shut down after a while. And that’s what the resolvers do they resolve inflammation. And that’s good if you haven’t got the Omega threes around, and there’s nothing to make the resolvins from. And so you don’t make them and so you’re Musa nice story. And so, your inflammation persists longer than it otherwise would have. Right? Part of the there’s its omega threes are anti-inflammatory at the front end they can slow the inflammatory response at the beginning, and they can accelerate the resolution of that response. So those are good now whether you should take and some companies are selling SPM, or what I call the pro-inflammatory, or rather inflammation resolving molecules. IRM is what I’d call the whatever, whatever. I like that. Yeah. So you know, and they’ll sell a pill that’s got some of these and it’s got a lot of EPA DHA in it too. But there are some of these ESP PMS there. To me, I mean, they’re like 100 of them, you know, and you pick two, you pick three, to put into your pill, or that just happened to be in the fish oil that you’re using, and you just decide to identify it. I prefer to let the body make the molecules it needs in each cell type each cell type is going to be a different molecule at once. Give it the precursors, give it the EPA and DHA, give it the food to do the work well, and then let your body make the molecules that are as much cheaper. I mean, there’s no, I haven’t I haven’t seen clinical evidence that it makes a difference. Dr. Joel Rosen: So no, it’s good. I want to show you when we’re done here some of the pathways that I look at so it connects that thought in terms of Furthermore, those SPMs are those resolving mediators, they can inhibit platelet aggregation as well if I’m correct, but I believe that the platelet aggregation can be I guess, backdoor stimulated through uncoupling of nitric oxide or too much of a histamine response or these inflammatory mediators that end up pulling on the platelets weak link of the chain right so that’s where some of those connections end up coming together. But I agree with you at the end of the day you’re taking a finger prick analysis, just black and white Where are you we see studies show that keep it simple and maybe we’ve lost you along the way here but caviar percentage of red blood cells from a mega US EPA and DHA be at least 8% And if you’re not getting that then go out of your way to get that and foods I guess we can talk about that before we go here but what am I mean what’s nice about your company is you give a detailed explanation of the different foods both plant-based and I guess there’s not really I guess the algae now base but where you can be getting just you don’t have to get it all in supplements, but you can go out of your way to get it from foods. What do we what are they typically looking at? Dr. Bill Harris: Yes, obviously. So we do have a table report that lists a bunch of seafood from the highest EPA and DHA per serving to the lowest and of course there some some fish that are quite popular. They have almost no Omega Three in them. Tilapia is the one that leaps to mind. Tastes like doesn’t taste like fish. Well, I wonder why. He’s like a chicken because you feed them like chickens anyway. So, at the top of the list, we have what kind of acronym this kind of comes around to smash fish. So SMA sh if you’ve got sardines, or I like to start with salmon, anchovies, mackerel, herring, and anchovies, and maybe albacore tuna is in there somewhere to write macros. They’re the um, I think so those are oily fish. Those are the best sources and you can get all the Omega three you need just means you don’t have to take supplements. It can be done the diet just so it’s a rare American that will do that. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, no, that’s been awesome. I mean, I always learn on these on these shows that I say, selfishly, I just let everyone else listen in when I publish it, because it’s, it’s for my, for my benefit, I love I’d love to hear about the results of the new studies and the NIH grants that you got going forward and keep an open invitation. One of the questions I always ask Bill of my guests is knowing kind of what you’ve known or learned over the research of 40 plus years and would have talked to the young, bright-eyed, and bushy-tailed Bill back in the day, what would you have told yourself, that would have helped slow your ad rate of aging? Or would have been good information for you? Dr. Bill Harris: Oh, what would I have done differently? I might have. I mean, I’ve been taking omega-three supplements for a long time, and trying to increase dog fish intake being from the Midwest now in South Dakota, but most of the time I was in Kansas, Missouri. And that’s where most of my original research was and not exactly a high fish-consuming area. And if it’s it is it’s you know, fried cat test, you know, or something like that. Bass. So I would probably start taking omega-3 three earlier. I did do pretty well, though. Got my omega-three index around 10%. And I just tried to keep it there. And I take about 1400 milligrams of EPA DHA a day, encapsulated restructured triglyceride form, right? That’s it, that’s a good form. So you know, otherwise, I would have started exercising regularly earlier in my life. I didn’t have to quit smoking, so I’m good with that. Anyway, it’s been a good run, I was blessed to be able to get into a research field that I had no idea where it was going. And to get on the Omega Three train early and be able to stay on it. And so getting more and more interesting all the time. So it’s been a fast, fast, and fun career. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, and those are good and also just without you saying it is your continual flexing of the frontal lobe and, and the different parts of the brain and never losing that, lose it or use it or lose it mentality of, of keeping the brain and the neurons firing. So thank you so much for being here today. I enjoyed our conversation and look forward to maybe Part Two when you have some more juicy information to share with us Dr. Bill Harris: anytime Joel loved it, and I appreciate being on. Hi, thank Dr. Joel Rosen: you so much for watching our age-reversing blueprint podcast. If you’ve made it this far, we sincerely thank you for your attention and your interest in reversing your age. If you’re looking to get more information on today’s topic or other podcasts that we’ve had, be sure to check out the show notes and be sure to check out Dr. Joel rosen.com. Have an awesome day. 🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png]Omega Quant [https://bit.ly/DRJOELOMEGA] | discount code “DRJOEL” The post [EP.14] Why Omega 3 Accomplishes Longevity & Why Omega 6 isn’t the Almighty Devil? [https://drjoelrosen.com/omega-3-good-omega-6-bad-debunking-the-myths/] appeared first on Joel Rosen D.C. [https://drjoelrosen.com].

3. jan. 2024 - 1 h 9 min
episode [EP.13] Why Extra Stem Cells Really Accomplishes A Slower Rate Of Aging cover

[EP.13] Why Extra Stem Cells Really Accomplishes A Slower Rate Of Aging

Dr. Joel Rosen: Alright, so our next guest is Christian Drapeau. He is a stem cell scientist, author, and creator of this first stem cell supplement. He holds a graduate degree in neurophysiology, and he’s been involved in medical research for 30-plus years, of which the last 20 years have specifically been dedicated to stem cell research. He’s the author of five books, including the best-selling Cracking the Stem Cell Code, he has published dozens of scientific papers on brain research and biological process processes, which we’ll be asking about endogenous stem cell mobilization. He’s lectured over 50 countries on stem cell research. He is known by scientists, physicians, and biohackers alike as the expert and pioneer in this field. Thank you so much for being here today. Christian, I could go on but I want to get the good stuff here today. Christian Drapeau: Thank you. Thank you. My pleasure. Yeah, so Dr. Joel Rosen: I you know, I like to prepare for these, these interviews, and I’ve done some research I know that in 94, you started with your blue-green algae research, but it wasn’t really until 2001 Were the article that you read turned blood into the brain. And like you said, as well, a lot of these times these amazing research articles come out, but they don’t register a glitch in the radar. Why was it that that article turning blood into the brain was so profoundly changing for you? Christian Drapeau: Well, to tell the truth, this article was sent to me soon after it was published, and it sat on my desk for probably three, or four months. So I read it the first time and it did not register. And I was cleaning my desk, and that paper was still there on my desk, and I read it again. And then that’s when slowly the thoughts started to trickle, and we need to look at it in the context of where we were at the time. So we had published not long before, that polysaccharides from that blue-green algae, were stimulating NK cell migration in tissues. So in the back of my mind was that data that there was something it is blue-green algae that mobilized immune cells taken in very broadly, my background is brain research, I know, we know, we were told that we cannot make new neurons. So finally reading that paper, and reading that stem cells from the bone marrow, could go to the brain and become a brain cell, which is a type of cell that we were told in neurology, you cannot regenerate your brain. I knew from just my basic class of med class that stem cells are only known to be precursors to blood cells. And suddenly, I’m thinking about when we were talking about the release of stem cells migrating into a tissue, and we showed that blue-green algae were supporting the migration of NK cells. So this sort of amorphous idea started to shape itself in my brain thinking that what if that plant could support the migration of stem cells in tissues? So it’s just reading it? And it started to be an answer a potential answer to a question that, that we had for several years, we did not have a way of explaining how this plant was leading to benefits touching so many aspects of human health. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: Okay, so going forward from there, because I want to get your insight on this, and how research continues to propel us forward. But there’s been a lot of skepticism about the landscape and the controversy of stem cells. So given that, that article just sort of planted the seed for you, Christian, to tell us about where we come from, or what the initial, I guess, the landscape was, in terms of how stem cells and even more plant-based support for stem cells has been was initially received and where it is now? You know, Christian Drapeau: I liked these questions, because, to me, everything that we’re facing, and we’re looking at right now, in terms of what we have done with plants, but also the whole landscape of stem cell research, is an amazing example of the real life of scientific discoveries and scientific development, the interaction of scientific development, with business development, with policy development. All of this was so complex that if we knew today, so if we knew then what we know today, I guarantee you, we would not have today, the landscape that we have, things would have evolved differently. So and I’ll come back to that in a second. So when the first observations were made, we’re in early 2000 and 2001, that stem cells known for decades to be precursors to blood cells, were finally known to have the ability to become cells of many different tissues. At first, the observation or the belief was that, Okay, we’re ready to accept that they can be more than just blood cells, but we’re not ready to accept that they can become everything, yet. The data was there, right there. When I’m talking about the process of scientific discovery, we can observe and document the only things that we can accept, if there’s something that we cannot accept, we can observe it but we’re blind to its observation to a degree. So my point is that in early 2000, already data was already clear stem cells could become everything in the body, but there was a reluctance to accept it. And then accepting that the stem cells in your bone marrow can do it very well. So pushed into the direction of Okay, then let’s go to the causes that we have to inbuilt to embryonic stem cells, which is umbilical stem cells. So now led to the development of all these banking of cells and everything that is done with umbilical stem cells, which I’m not saying is not good or does not have its place. But it did develop at a time when we did not fully accept stem cells from the bone marrow. Arrow at all the potential that we know today that they have, if we knew that and accepted that from from from first, like from the beginning, we probably would not have the incentive of going and collecting umbilical cord stem cells. So I’m giving snippets here of the whole development of this world if you want the stem cell world. Now, when all of this has been developed systems of collection system of banking, systems of multiplication, cryopreservation, and all of that, you just don’t say, well, let’s drop all of this. And let’s turn to bone marrow stem cells, because they’re just as good, which is not like 100%. True. All I’m saying is that the landscape would be different today. And we knew these things earlier on. So the knowledge developed, but essentially what emerged, and which is the area that I’ve pushed a lot is this understanding that if stem cells have enormous regenerative potential, they’re not better because we take them out of a source and put them back in, they have intrinsically this kinds of regenerative potential. So if they do have this, what is their role in the body? And when we discover that stem cells are the natural role, the natural repair system of the body, then the question is, is there anything stronger, to help you be healthy, or improve your health if you have a problem, than to tap into your body’s ability to repair. And that is where I have studied the most because we ended up discovering plants, the one that we talked about earlier, we discovered plants that triggered the release of stem cells from the bone marrow. So it created this old view of saying, okay, instead of removing stem cells and re-injecting them, which is increasing the number of stem cells in circulation through an injection, what if we increase the number of stem cells in circulation, simply by boosting the release of our stem cells, which is the whole field now of plant-based stem cell enhancers? Dr. Joel Rosen: Right? No, that’s great. And you know, the name of this podcast is The Reversing Blueprint. And I like the idea that you have shared in the sense that the real marker of age is how well our stem cells can be released to be this protective layer, of renewables. And with that being said, maybe just let’s kind of start from the beginning, where someone that might be listening to this where we do tend to go a little deeper and into the weeds, but are wondering, what are stem cells? And what do they do? And I’ve heard that there are different kinds, maybe just kind of give us an overview of their first question, and then we can kind of elaborate going forward. Christian Drapeau: Okay, without going too deep into the various types of stem cells. Let’s put it this way. The best way to define me stem cell is first to define what is not a stem cell, and then we exclude that every cell of the body is called a somatic cell, they’re cells that have one specific function, and they will never change their function. Like if you have an injury to your muscle because you went to the gym, the gym, and you sort of over-exercise, you want to have a cell of your skin, looking down to your bicep and just say, Gee, that muscle needs assistance. Let me go and become a muscle cell. It won’t happen. A somatic cell does one thing, it will never change to a large extent it will never multiply. This is a somatic cell. At the other end of the spectrum, you have stem cells, they are sort of blank cells, mother cells having the ability to become everything in the body, and not only do they have the ability, but they do so during the entire life of an individual. So these are stem cells. There is one type of stem sales. By more you’ll sales, if you want in your bone marrow when you’re born, your bone marrow as these stem cells, they are the remnant of what it was one day, your embryonic stem cell, when you were one cell on the day of your conception. So these evolve, you become the whole organism and you’re born with a bank of stem cells in your bone marrow, these stem cells and you also have stem cells in every single one of your tissue. They are tissue resident-specific stem cells specific for that tissue. Now, these stem cells in tissues are normally known as progenitor cells. And then you have cells for various tissues. For example, one that is sort of well talked about is endothelial progenitor cells, there are stem cells in your blood that will become blood vessels, but you have these progenitor cells in every single one of your tissue. Their job is to repair that tissue and to maintain that tissue during your life. But these stem cells will get exhausted fairly rapidly, fairly early in life. So they need to be replenished. So they are replenished by stem cells from the bone marrow going into your blood. Replenishing these tissues, as they reach tissues gets into these tissues and sometimes gets released again, gets recaptured by the bone marrow. As we age it brings a level of ethereal Janessa t if you want in your Bone Marrow where you can start to have all kinds of different stem cells in your bone marrow. So I won’t go into all these different subtypes because the end, what is, I think important to understand is that there are stem cells in your bone marrow, they’re released, they go into your tissue. And that cycle of providing stem cells to tissues continues during the entire life of an individual. Let me just state one type of stem cell that I think is very important to know. And there, they have been referred into the scientific history if you want over the past 15 years or so, as in different names. They’ve been called embryonic-like stem cells, they’ve been called blessed to me are like stem cells. So you embryonic-like very small, embryonic-like stem cells, blessed to me are like stem cells and a few other names. Essentially, they are a stem cell that is the size of a platelet. And you identify them or they were discovered, when you suddenly start to because platelets don’t have DNA. So you suddenly start to tag for DNA. And you see that cell that is the size of a platelet, that is DNA. And if you use a marker for stem cells, you see that it marks with stem cells as well. So they are full-blown stem cells, and they happen to be the most potent stem cells in the human body. So they reside in the bone marrow in muscle, they’re in different places. And they’re interesting because right now, it’s growing in the scientific literature, different ways of tapping into very small embryonic-like stem cells. So they’re interesting to know. But essentially, that’s sort of the landscape of stem cells. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: Okay. And then the other classification that I’ve heard you say, is just the embryonic stem cells up until what they ate, it is that, and then anything after that we considered adult stem cells, and that the embryonic stem cells not to be confused with the embryonic-like stem cells are being used more for medical drug purposes and not to be injected into the human body. One of the questions I had, as an aside was, are they starting to study the teratomas? In terms of Okay, so a teratoma is this gnarly, you know, has all these different types of cells, whether it’s bone or AI, or heart, and the danger of trying to put that in the heart and differentiating into cardiac tissue. I’m curious, though, if they’re doing studies to see how different I guess signaling molecules are the terrain is for that teratoma to have that specific characteristic to be able to have more idea of why it differentiated into those types of cells. Do you know if there’s, Christian Drapeau: I don’t know if they’re studying that specifically. But they’re doing something similar in the sense that the embryonic stem cells are designed to become various types of tissues. So it’s hard to make the embryonic stem cells not become these different tissues. But right now, most of that work is done with induced pluripotent stem cells. So they take like a cell of your skin, for example. And they go in, they turn on the four or so genes that normally are turned on in a stem cell in an embryonic stem cell. So, they give back stemness, if you want in one of your cells, so it’s taking one of yourself as an individual today, turning it back as what looks like an embryonic stem cell in what is technically an embryonic stem cell. And then we’re trying to make those stem cells become cells of your heart, for example, to rebuild a new heart for you. So this is now a big, big line of research. But the problem is, indeed, that is a cancer cell. a cancer cell is a cell that has reactivated those same genes. So it is like playing with like a bomb and yourself, it can develop into a tumor and that’s what a teratoma is. So there are things they’re trying to restrict the conversion of these induced pluripotent stem cells in tissues other than the one that we want. So that is really where it is right now. And I think when you were asking the question, Joel, I think it was, I felt like it might be interesting to give just a little bit of background on this old world of embryonic stem cells. We have had the sheep Dolly, we have had you remember in the 80s, where they started to clone sheep, they cloned dogs, they cloned mice, they cloned the clone different types of animals, but they had never been able to clone a human embryonic stem cell. That is D discovery in 1998 that reopened this whole field because if you can clone a sheep or a dog, then it’s giving us human scientists this idea. What if we could in a test in a test tube in a lab? What if we could clone you as a human as a human, just to make a new heart for you so that I can replace your heart for you with your own heart? That was the whole idea of this dream of what we could do eventually one day if we can grow human embryonic stem cells I was in 1998, and this became possible. So it just brought back this whole idea that my goodness, we could be able to grow organs, but rapidly we face conflict. Number one, the ethical conflict of cloning human bodies, human beings, which we never went over. And I don’t think we should, I think it was a good thing. But number two is that it’s not a doable thing because embryonic stem cells are not made to become a heart or a liver, they’re made to become a whole fully formed organism. So and that is teratoma. So if you implant embryonic stem cells in the skin, for example, it’s going to form a teratoma, which is all kinds of tissues, a lump of everything, which is a tumor. And that’s the limitation of embryonic stem cells. So people look back at bone stem cells in the bone marrow, adult stem cells. And the thought was like, well, but they’re limited. They’re just stem cells in the bone marrow, they don’t have the same power. It took many years to realize that adult stem cells have the same power as embryonic stem cells with one difference, which is a mega difference, but it works to our advantage that adult stem cells will become cells with the tissue in which it migrates or in which you place it. So you put it in the heart, it will become a hard sale, like embryonic stem cells, but just a heart cell, not other types of tissues. So it’s the power of embryonic stem cells to an extent, but without the risk of tumor formation. So now stem cells from the bone marrow have become the focus of everything that we have today, you know, in the world of stem cells. So it’s sort of a summary here of the historical development of this, this excitement in stem cell research. Okay, continue Dr. Joel Rosen: the conversation along this, this idea, Christian is in terms of, I know that the new research is if we further classify that into mesenchymal and Hamato poetic, we now know a lot more than Hamato poetic is not just for, necessarily so maybe give us some insight on what we’ve learned with those now going forward. You know, Christian Drapeau: this is another when I was talking about this being a good example of scientific development, that is another amazing example. And it is the fact that what do we do as scientists I mean, I’m not criticizing this process, it’s just a natural thing to do. We classify things just look at you go in nature, and you find a new plant species, you put a label on it, you put a name on it, and of that name, you can go into literature and find tons of things, no, none that plan that is in front of you. But all the research that was done with other plants, that because of the name, now you’re associated with the plan that is in front of you, that’s what we do in science, we label things. And then we start to manage the labels more than the thing itself. And that’s what happened with stem cells. So you have a matter of poetic stem cells, and you put a label on it. Now, these could only do this. Now you have another type of stem cells, we call them mesenchymal stem cells because they were originally into embryonic development, they come from the mesoderm, which is one of the layers of the embryos. So they got the name of where they come from MS and Kaimal, stem cells, and they are essentially in the bone marrow. But when people start to isolate mesenchymal stem cells, they just happen. The observation is that if you take them, you put them in a test tube, and you just turn around the test tube, empty your test tube, those MS in Kaimal, stem cells stick to the glass. So it became a very simple method two is to isolate mesenchymal stem cells. Later it was discovered that if you take liver tissue, for example, you grind it and you do the same thing. You have liver stem cells, that now stick to the the vial, and stem cells from various tissues. So that means they are missing Kaimal stem cells, but they no longer come from the mesoderm. So the point is that suddenly that term that describes where they’re coming from, which was the label and the understanding that we have of cell lineage, now, we realize it’s completely changed. They have used stem cells from the liver, which they transformed into pancreatic cells to make insulin, for example, they have used metabolic stem cells believed to only be blood precursors, and they were able to transform them into muscle cells into liver cells. So my point here is just to say, we’ve classified cells and that’s why I was telling you earlier on to go into all these different types of stem cells, I think opening Pandora’s box is not as clear that these are truly different stem cells and not stem cells at different stem cells globally, at a different stage in development. There is such a thing as classifying them, but I don’t think that that classification is as clear and fixed as we would like to see them. Dr. Joel Rosen: Right. No, thank you for elucidating that as far as I remember Are you talking about speaking at a conference and then talking to a doctor? And you said that you were the person that was presenting? And he was skeptical about the research? Where are we now I mean, as research advances, we realize that the differentiation of, different categorized, stem cells can now break the mold and go to different places where we didn’t know before. Where are we now in this? Because I know there’s controversy in terms of you know, you’re using embryos and so forth. And it can’t, once there are enough stem cells in circulation, that doesn’t mean anything. I mean, wherever we come from the trajectory of where we’ve been, Christian Drapeau: I mean, in terms of that event that you’re referring to, and for the listeners, just to understand, I’m using that as an example not because it affected me it did not Dr. Joel Rosen: perfect person, but in general, good. Yeah. Good. So yeah, yeah. Christian Drapeau: So in 2007, I was talking about several events or instances where people just told me, I’m summarizing here and the funny statement, but these are actual words that were said, Son, let me just tell you thinking that stem cells can become brain cells, you know, you’re just an idiot. The point is that in 2007, although going back to this article, turning blood into brain, this was 2001, there were six years of documentation, and publication of stem cells capable of becoming brain sales. And yet the gap between research and academia, research and medical practice is such that in 2007, this was still largely unknown. But the concept itself has gone so far in the marketplace that honestly, I don’t think today I come across anybody in the scientific literature, sorry, in the medical profession, who is going to express any doubt as to whether stem cells can become cells of various tissues, where we have a challenge, and it’s not even a challenge. It’s just a matter of education right now, the open-mindedness to this is like a light day compared to what it was. But it’s more to say, those stem cells that right now, you go to a place to get an injection, it’s a treatment, it’s to me when I share this with the medical profession, it’s to say, those stem cells they come from your body, to begin with, they’re either in your blood in your bone marrow in your fat tissue. So they’re there, to begin with, then are better because we take them out and put them back in. So what about as a stem cell modality to increase the number of circulation, not through an injection, but by supporting the release of your stem cells, something that is not a one-time intervention, but you can do this every day for long periods? And now we have several ongoing studies and case documentation to show that it can have a significant impact on health. So it’s that concept of releasing your stem cells. That is what I’m most engaged in, like providing education, but the response right now is light and day compared to what it was. Dr. Joel Rosen: Gotcha. Okay, so which is a good transition into longevity? And why is stem cells potentially a problem as we age? What happens with that? And ultimately, what you know, as we go from there, what can we do indigenously or from within to be able to support that? Christian Drapeau: So, I think that in longevity, the biggest discovery in that is, again, total open-mindedness like I don’t, I don’t, nobody is challenging it. However, few people have seen that kind of information. So it’s a novel concept in the marketplace. On the scientific in the scientific world, it’s the understanding that while stem cells are primarily, not true, I will have to walk back that statement, I would say at the core, in its definition, it’s the repair system of the body, you have an injury, it triggers the release of stem cells, and then it calls stem cells to that organ to repair. I was at a conference in Turkey. It was the International Society for Stem Cell Application about two or three weeks ago. In that conference, there was a doctor who said, it is largely known now that stem cells will only migrate in a tissue that has an injury. And it’s interesting because this was three weeks ago, and it is not untrue. If you release stem cells today, the bulk of the stem cells will go where there is an injury. So if you look at them on that day, or within a few days, yes, this statement is true. But in the background in that is to me, one of the biggest discoveries in the world of stem cells is that they are the repair system, but in the background, to a lesser extent, they are the maintenance system. If you look three months later, the stem cells that were released significantly three Months ago, they’re now in your heart, in your liver, in your brain, in your pancreas, and your lungs. They’re everywhere in your body. And my point with this, if I go to the conclusion of all of this is that we have this general idea that you’re born your age, and your organs start to fail because you’ve lost sales and function in your tissues. So when you’re 60 years old, you have a 60-year-old liver that is starting to struggle as a 60-year-old lung or pancreas starting to struggle. And this is not true. When you’re 60 years old, you have a two-three-year-old pancreas. And for a two to three-year-old liver, and a four to six-year-old pancreas, you have half of a new heart every 25 years, you have a new lining of the intestine every five days and your skin every month, everything is constantly in turnover. Constantly. Turnover means you lose cells every day. But to stay healthy, you need to replace the cells that are being lost. That is one of the primordial roles of stem cells is keeping you healthy as you age. The problem. The crux of the whole problem in terms of longevity, is that your stem cells that are produced by red marrow, you are bone with red marrow, but that red marrow converts into yellow marrow fairly early in your in our lives. By age 30, we have lost 90% of our red marrow. And that means somewhere in your 30s, you crossed that line where you no longer have enough stem cells in circulation to fully offset that turnover process that is just natural. And from that day, you start to accumulate a day-to-day deficit that will in 1015 20 years down the road be any one of your age-related diseases that is expressed in your health by an organ that has developed a deficiency because it cannot repair effectively. So I published this view 10 years ago, in a journal called the Journal of Stem Cell Research and Therapies. And with this science emerging, I wrote, there’s a way to test if truly stem cells play that kind of role in Alvin’s longevity, we simply have to go and count the number of stem cells naturally present in the blood of people who have developed any one of those so-called age-related diseases, and compare that with what you find in healthy people of the same age. At this point, many of these studies have been done. If you count the number of stem cells people have developed erectile dysfunction, pretension atherosclerosis, heart disease, diabetes, liver failure, COPD, lung disease, heart cardio, heart failure, cardiac heart disease, and general Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, lupus arthritis. I mean, the list is growing. Anytime they look at it, we find the same thing muscle dystrophy. All these people have on average 50% or less than the number of stem cells that we find and a healthy person of the same age meaning because you have fewer stem cells in circulation, you cannot compensate for several hours every day, you will lose your health faster than somebody who has more stem cells. It therefore becomes the core of your longevity strategy. It’s not the only thing. But it becomes the core of your longevity strategy. Allow your body to maintain the health of your organs as you age. Dr. Joel Rosen: I hope you’re getting tremendous value from our content and learning how to slow your rate of aging. I have a really exciting announcement. I’ve just completed the complete age reversing blueprint User Guide, complete with learning how to not just slow your rate of aging, learn nutritional bioenergetics learn about circadian rhythm entrainment, the six key factors that you need to be aware of learning how to make sure that the environment isn’t accelerating your age-related biomarkers, and of course, mastering your sleep, this course is going to be retailing for $997. But as a gift for me to you for watching our content and subscribing to our channel. I’m going to be giving this away for free just for a limited time only. Leave your name and email and I’ll be sure to send you the complete age-reversing blueprint user’s guide right away. Oh, that’s wonderful. And I wanted to talk to you about that I have written down here stem cell homeostasis, right, and being able to take the monitor and I explained to people simply when I’m working with them when they’re exhausted and burnt out, I look at it as supplying demand, right. And if you have more demand than supply, a lot of bills aren’t getting paid. And if you have more supply than demand, then you can pay back some bills that you haven’t paid in a while. And I think that was echoing the fact that I was curious. I was going to ask you how we measure the stem cells I’ve listened to a lot of your interviews, but I never heard that, and when you determine that these aren’t quite primordial but They do go and after they’ve gone to the tissue injury, they can now go circulate in other places and repair those tissues as well. Was that done through some signature or some kind of following those particular stem cells that had been released? Christian to know where they went afterward? Yeah, I Christian Drapeau: mean, these are, I would say, oddities, it’s data that you find in the scientific literature, I would not generalize that information to say, that stem cells can go into tissue, leave, and go somewhere else, that this is like a common process. I won’t say that. What I’m saying is just that this understanding that once, a stem cell has started to commit in a certain lineage, it can never revert and go into another lineage data exists to show that when you marked stem cells in the liver, or you isolate a stem cell from the liver, and then you put in the pancreas, it starts to become a pancreatic cell producing insulin, that was shown us to be a possibility. So that’s, that’s really what I meant when I shared that kind of information. Right. So to come back to your your previous question, we quantify stem cells, generally speaking, using Flow cytometry. So it’s a machine, which is essentially a tube, very, very fine tube. So you, when you inject sales in that tube, they line up one behind the other, they flow in that fine tube. And there’s a place where you get several lasers in a photo photosensitive receptors sensor, and then it would sense all kinds of things colors, luminosity, radiance, size because when you have a laser, there’s a shadow if there’s a sales like measure the size of the shadow, so you get all kinds of data about the cell. And you can use markers. So you can use a marker for stem cells with a red dye, a marker for primitive stem cells, or in advance, progenitor cells. So at the end with all these markers, using a flow cytometer that has several of these lasers, you can start to document how many sales you are, that are stem cells, young stem cells, advanced stem cells, stem cells committed not committed, all that kind of stuff, small. So now you have your V cells. So that’s how you scientifically count stem cells. Now, the tool to do this, the famous flow cytometer is not a common piece of equipment. So you won’t find that in your normal blood lab, you know, where you go to do a blood test. So counting stem cells is not a common thing to do. So you could not go today and just have your stem cells counted unless, you know a lab would have this machine. And they will agree to do those tests for you. If they do and it happens, I have seen it, it may cost you $2,000 to get your cell count. This being said, with what we know of stem cells, there are fluctuations during the day, there are fluctuations day to day, and one measurement is probably not going to give you your measurement. So we might have to do this two, or three times to get some sort of an average of what would be your baseline number of stem cells. So given the cost of these tests, the cost of the equipment, and the rarity of these equipment, it’s not easy to do. I’m working on developing right now a piece of equipment, it’s just a matter of having the time to finalize all of this. So I’m getting into this, hopefully, we can reach that in 2023. But on a piece of equipment that may cost $5,000, to put into into a clinic or lab to be able to count the number of stem cells in a way that may not be as precise as what you would do with a flow cytometer. But it’s enough to be able to tell you, you are in that range of stem cells. So you should know that right now, you are at risk for developing a problem in you know, in 10 to 20 years. What I want to do now as I’m working on doing a meta-analysis of the entire scientific literature, throughout all the studies, I believe that we can derive several stem cells that we can consider a threshold, if you go below that number of stem cells, you will be considered somebody that has fewer stem cells than what would be average or a healthy population. So you are at risk for developing these age-related problems. So now we can understand stem cell fat stem cell number as a risk factor, and we can quantify it. And now we have PLANT BASE compounds that we can help and take every day to put more stem cells in circulation. So that’s kind of the landscape of where I’m going with all of this really Dr. Joel Rosen: interesting. And I think that there is a need for that. And we talked about this beforehand. One thing I like about what you’re doing is the dietary supplement Health and Education Act where you don’t want to just have charlatan-like claims about this going to turn your age back and it works for me but you want to have a structure-function thing before we get into what it does and what are the compounds that it’s doing that are being used. The question would be, until then until there’s that machine that’s out there. What other biomarkers? Or are you aligning yourself with? Have you looked into DNA methylation? Or if you looked into other types of biomarkers that could be correlated quite strongly and be a proxy for that level of stem cell? Or would it be more subjective? I’m older, I don’t feel as well, looking at some inflammatory markers. What would be a good? I guess? What would it be called? A good? Just standing until then? Christian Drapeau: Yeah. Okay. Very interesting question. I hope my answer will be interesting. I don’t think so. Right now, until we have a marker, I would say, the best way to see how many stem cells you have in your blood would be the next time you have an injury or cut something or you go to the gym, you work out super hard. And you know, you’ll be sore today, How long are you sore? What is your real recovery or healing time? And that is going to be your main marker for how many stem cells you have in circulation. If you have a cut, within a week, that cut should be closed. And within three weeks, it should be pretty much done. If it’s longer than this, you don’t have or if you form a keloid scar like a scar that is visible. That means the lack of stem cells in circulation forces your local fibroblasts and your skin to seal that scar that cut, or you go to the gym and then your recovery time is longer, it means you don’t have enough stem cells to repair the micro lesions that are the source of the inflammation. So these are things that you can observe in your life. And they’ll give you a clue that you don’t have a lot of stem cells. I have not so far aside from the technique that I’m telling you about, I’m working on two counts of stem cells, and I have not looked at markers. And I’m not saying that there might not be one that we could use my first reaction with markers because understand these markers have shown up on the marketplace after I started this journey on stem cells. And as these markers are evolving, and you come and you say gee, I was able to remove that to shave, let’s say, three years on my biological age, you know, and it’s great. I’m using some of the plants that we have documented at a stem cell mobilizer, and I can reverse severe Parkinson’s in an individual, I can take somebody on a heart transplant list, and within a few months is normal, he has normal heart function. We have people with spinal cord injuries that are regaining mobility, does it matter whether they are three years younger in their biological age? So I’m looking at what we get with stem cell mobilizers. And I’m looking at the landscape. And I’m almost thinking, if you give me the choice between gaining greater functionality, greater quality of life, like much greater functionality in life, repairing my heart, or getting three years younger on the market doesn’t tell you you’re younger, it’s telling you that marker that has been with a mix of marketing and science tied to something that we call your biological age, which is just a marker and a concept. Which one do you choose? And for me, it was like, it’s so obvious that I’m going to boost my ability to repair. So I’ve looked at this, probably making a mistake, looking at this without too much focus. So the way the market is developing, I think the places they are to start to look at what kind of markers could be associated with stem cell function, aside from counting the number of stem cells, which to me in my world right now is going to be one of the most important marker for longevity, how many stem cells you have in your blood today? Because it will tell me how healthy you’ll be in 10 years. Dr. Joel Rosen: Yeah, if we can come up with the continual stem cell in you know, good, you know, my monitor would be fantastic. I’m thinking though, so I know as far as some of these Hallmark, longevity markers like vo to max handgrip strength for 6.3 volume, that they can look at a person’s DNA methylation profile, and kind of get an understanding of those that are in the top 99th percentile of those particular markers. What that what that DNA methylation profile look like and use that as a signature to benchmark other things the reason I bring it up is I agree with you I agree that we want to feel better. I mean, the proof is in the pudding and my feeling younger I’m I’m more active. I enjoy my life. I agree. But these are people at least that I’ve seen that are been told that nothing’s wrong, that their lab tests are normal, that everything’s okay and they feel like crap, and they want to have some kind of validation of what they’re doing is working. Right, so I asked him from that point not so much in terms of oh, look, prove it to me that it’s working or not. So I don’t know if you wanted to add on that, or just give me any comments on that. I’m Christian Drapeau: with you. I think that they’re valuable things to look at. But I’m saying exactly what you said if your markers are all good. Blood markers are all good, but you feel like crap. The point is like, what is it going to be? What is going to change? You’re feeling like crap. And to me, that is really what matters. And it could pass through some markers. Yeah, I mean, I had a discussion not long ago with somebody who was deep into these markers. And what she was sharing is that she said, Here I am, my biological age has increased by two years, but I’m feeling great. And I have this friend of mine, who is your biological age, she shaved three years, but she said she’s feeling like crap. So she was putting in just, in context, the fact that its biological age is a concept. I’m not saying it has no value, but it’s a concept. And calling it biological age makes us in our mind, cross that gap and just say I might biologically I’m younger because we use it as a concept. And all I’m saying is that it’s just a concept. We have some markers that have changed me, quality of life, and our ability to enjoy our life is by far the greatest marker that we can tie with stem cells, Dr. Joel Rosen: right? That’s where stem cells come in. Right. So as far as that goes, I’m always interested in, your methodology and your open-mindedness as far as being a brain neurophysiologist and asking the outside question, okay, why, and I got to investigate this. And if this is working for someone, that means that there’s something within this that’s giving me insight to explore deeper. And I liked the idea that you would ask a couple of people, okay, tell me what the one if you’re stuck on an island, what would be the one supplement that would you would use or nutrient that you would use to give you the overarching biggest benefit? Just curious, how did your brain work in terms of Well, that’s gotta be reparative. That’s got to be protective. That’s got to be stem cell-based. I’m curious as to how, how that kind of came in, like, at what point, you benchmark the question with the stem cell? Christian Drapeau: I mean, honestly, I don’t know if I have a good answer to that question. I’m, I’m assigned to I’m born that way. You know, every time I look at something, I want to understand it, I poke it, I study it. I’m just like, I would probably be a pathetic clinician, I’m just not good with like, evaluating people, and following them in the treatment. I’m a researcher. So with that sort of mindset, when I look at something, yeah, I just tried to dissect it down and understand, you know, understand how it works. And so facing those cases with that plant, this blue-green algae, not having an understanding for it, in terms of a mechanism of action, coming across this article about the brain, then those ideas came up now they had to be tested. So we tested them. And after we tested them, and we found that indeed, it was correct that Clint was acting as a stem cell mobilizer, my mind just immediately went into this place to say, what are the other plants we evolved in symbiosis with the environment, there has to be other plants. Just like the immune system, there’s not only one plant affecting the immune system, there have to be others. How do you find them? We asked the same question what plant has been associated with many benefits throughout history? And that’s how we start to just investigate different plants. So it was it’s just like I would say, just a scientific that following the process of scientific investigation. Right, Dr. Joel Rosen: excellent. So now we do have the stem region, and give us an idea on I guess how you formulated it with the ingredients that you did, or what the ingredients that are unique to that specific compound and give us some insight on what we have now. Christian Drapeau: So it was just like everything else like observations, scientific investigation, so we found the first plant the blue-green algae, it’s not the strongest, but it was the first and it’s the one with which we have the greatest amount of documentation just because it was the first. Then we came across, across seabuckthorn berry extract from the Tibetan Plateau. Probably one of the most interesting plants and I think you were referring to that because I shared that in some of the podcasts or some other stories or articles. I’m in China. I have access to several biochemists who have worked with plants that are part of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and I asked them okay, you’re lost on an island and you can only bring one plant from Chinese Pharmacopoeia, which one would it be? And I was expecting something exotic, something probably that I had never heard of. And they all said seabuckthorn, Berry. And I mean, it’s not by itself like exotic. Anyway, I went into the scientific literature, I started to dig and I found a plethora of information, basically revealing that it’s been used for more than 2000 years in Chinese medicine, Tibetan Medicine, and Mongolian medicine, but a disease of the song of the heart, cardiovascular system, diabetes, to help the body repair from a burn, bone fracture, digestive system issues. So you look at the spread. And that was telling me stem cells, and we found that indeed, an extract from seabuckthorn berry from the Tibetan Plateau, acts as a stem cell mobilizer with pharmacodynamics, completely different from what we had with Blue Green Algae. So it’s a different mechanism of action. So the synergy of developing stem regions was to blend ingredients that show different mechanisms of action. That way, one builds on the other, because oftentimes with the same mechanism of action, you add stuff, but it doesn’t make it into a stronger product. The next big ingredient was Aloe microflora from Madagascar. And this is coming. Met a pharmacist whom she had traveled to in many countries in the world like Papua New Guinea, and the Congo saw America looking for plants for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. And when I asked her, is there a plan that the healers told you, this plant is good for everything? Of course, she says nothing is good for everything. So I gave her a copy of my book. And then when she came back, she said, I understand now, it’s not a plan that does everything. It does one thing release stem cells, but people will experience it in various, you know, many kinds of ways. So she said interesting, because I do have a plant from Madagascar, on her last trip on the way to the airport, our guide and translator stopped at a market scooped a whole bag of these black beads, and said, study that. But what do you do as a scientist when somebody says a study that, you know if you study it for what, so it wasn’t a freezer for five years? So she sent me those little beads and we did like we always do, we consumed those beads ourselves and we took our blood before and after. And we saw the biggest response that we had seen so far. So if I accelerate the whole story, aloe microflora endemic to Madagascar used for centuries to make a product called the homeowner only in Madagascar, they use it for all kinds of oil problems. It’s so far to plan that as the strongest effect on stem cell release. So the first version of STEM region adds those three ingredients. And I must add that along the way. As we studied things like goji berry, medicinal mushrooms, and colostrum, which are also associated with many benefits, we found something different. These plants or products with colostrum, trigger the migration of stem cells out of the blood into tissues. This is a part that is very poorly documented in the scientific literature. But to me, it makes so much sense if stem cells need to migrate to go and repair. And we can release them from the bone marrow. If I stumble across something that will facilitate their migration into tissue then let’s blend the two. So I released them and then I stimulated and drove them into tissues. So the first version was those three plants, and then two main plants that are acting as stem cell migrators if you want, but as I’m sharing this with doctors, I had friends doctors in Malaysia and Turkey, in the Middle East, and I was testing the formula. One of the doctors told me you know when I blend stem region with Jensen, I get better results for my patients, I started to dive into Jensen and I find I found several studies documented how not to Jensen, so the original Chinese Jensen, that takes like if at least seven years to grow, and then your land will be three to five years in fertile. So you need to furlough that land for five, five years to be able to have another crop. So it’s your most expensive Jensen because it takes a long time to grow into it Jensen adds specific notoginseng asides that have been documented to act as stem cell mobilizers. So we then added that to the stem region. So the formula slowly grew to what it is today, with the five top plants documented to release themselves. The two main ingredients that we have documented drive the migration of stem cells out of the blood into the tissue, that’s what the STEM region is. That’s Dr. Joel Rosen: awesome. So how long has it been on the market now for this last version? Christian Drapeau: Yeah, this last version here in the US is about two years, two years. Dr. Joel Rosen: Okay. Yeah, and I know that what you’re getting so I mean, again, structure-function, but it’s hard to discount when you’re seeing some testimonials, of people that have had burns and I think the I guess Is the question and it’s a deviation. What are the things that can ultimately increase the acceleration of depletion of the release of stem cells? The reason I’m asking this is more in chronic health, chronic stress, right, we have heard you talk about chronic stress, and how somehow that is, those stem cells are less effective, right than acute stress that know where to go, how to get signaled how to get utilized and migrate and differentiate. But as far as the chronic stress, maybe that’s why the ginseng is so helpful in that regard. But I guess maybe we just switch it up a little bit as to what the things that accelerate the loss of stem cells are, I Christian Drapeau: am not aware of anything that has been studied to show what accelerates the depletion of stem cells. And we need to be clear depletion is a word that is used for two different phenomena. And we need to understand the difference, there is your red marrow that shrinks into yellow marrow as we age. And so we’re born with red marrow everywhere, as an adult, the red marrow remains in the skull, the sternum, the ribcage, the pelvis, and the head of the long bones. But as we age, even that shrinks, and the main source of stem cells will be your pelvic bone. So, so that continues to shrink. I’m not aware of anything that has been documented to accelerate that shrinking or prevent it, you can stimulate the proliferation of stem cells in the red marrow with human growth hormones, and hyperbaric chamber treatments. These are the two things that I’m aware of the one thing that you can do to that is known to be sorry, so this is in the bone marrow. So far, nothing is known. I think it’s it belongs to future research to determine if is there something that we can do to slow down that conversion, if we can find something like this, it probably would be the optimal longevity thing to do to slow down that conversion, because you age because of that, that depletion of stem cells in the bone marrow. Now that red marrow that you have today, or in five years, or in 10 years, that red marrow produces stem cells at the same rate. So if you stimulate the release of stem cells from that red marrow, you don’t deplete that red, that red marrow, it’s like a well, if you take more water from the well, the level of your well won’t change, it keeps producing. Now, those stem cells are released from the bone marrow. So we call that because sometimes the word depletion or exhaustion is used. Exhaustion is not that phenomenon that is conversion. And it’s it happens whether you like it or not, these stem cells will reach tissues, and they will replenish the stem cell layer of your organs and tissues in your body. These organs and tissues are subjected to stress, degeneration, and several losses, and as you age that loss accelerates. And there’s a point that stem cell layer gets depleted in its ability to maintain that tissue. That is when that tissue organ starts to experience, a significant thickening, a significant phase of decline. The stem cell layer is depleted or exhausted. The only thing that you can do to support that tissue now is to put more stem cells in circulation so that they can go and replenish that stem cell depletion in the tissues. So when we look at the hallmark of aging, which is stem cell exhaustion, that’s in your tissues, and you can only change this by releasing stem cells from the bone marrow. Does that make sense? Dr. Joel Rosen: Yes, yes. Intelligent stem cell mobilization. Christian Drapeau: Correct? Correct. Dr. Joel Rosen: Okay. No, that’s it’s fascinating. I guess, the follow-up question I have is, I know that you heard we’re conducting research in France, with IBS, like patients that have such tremendous turnover. Has that been concluded at all? Christian Drapeau: No, that study has not started yet. We’re still we’re still waiting. And a lot of these studies, we’re waiting on receiving all of our first round of investment now it’s completed, so that we’re starting all these studies. So we have a study on congestive heart failure that is ongoing. We started to have preliminary data. So I’m, I’m working on the first publication. We are starting a study on Parkinson’s, actually, this month, in December, and we have one of our ideas that is ready to start. So it’s just a matter of initiating that study wants to one in Parkinson, as started. And we’re targeting those based on what we find in the scientific literature, but also what we have seen over the past, you know, 1520 years that I’ve been doing this. So we have had several cases of people who had very significant improvements in cardiac function, and that is why we now started This study on congestive heart failure. So we are now a little over a year into that study, and we have a limited number of patients about 10 patients per group. But what we can show is that indeed, releasing your stem cells can have a significant impact on cardiac function. All the patients so far in the study after six months are normalized. So that study is done to compare a blend of these plant extracts that release themselves with stem cell injections. So when that is completed, we’ll publish all that data, we’re starting a study on Parkinson’s because we have seen those kinds of cases in the past, and IBS or digestive issues are the same because you have a new lining of the intestine every five days, it is an area of your body, that depends entirely on your supply of stem cells, the day that you have, not the day, but when you have a disease, like ulcerative colitis, or any kind of have issues in the gut, your attempt to repair the problem exhausts locally, that layer of stem cells, when you have reached them selling exhaustion in that area, that’s when you as a patient now experience an acute phase. Now you have to bleed your blood in your stool, now you have credit, now you have like what it is you the tissue can no longer repair, the only way to make it repair is to put more stem cells in the circulation that will replenish the stem cell layer, give a break to that area. And then that area will be able to start to function. Normally, if you have not resolved the issue, you need to keep digging and finding what’s the cause of it. But at least you have given functionality to that tissue and relief. So we have seen many of these cases over the years, there’s a lot of studies showing that stem cell injection can affect digestive conditions like this. So that is why we have that kind of condition as one of our next studies. Right? Dr. Joel Rosen: No fascinating. So add that to the list of if you take longer to recover from the gym, if you take longer to heal from a cut. And if you have any GI issues that are out of hand like that, then you know, you’ve depleted, your stem cells, and you need to support endogenous stem cell mobilization. So as far as a parting question, and thanks for all your time, Cristian. I always like you know the age. This is the age-reversing blueprint podcast. And I guess it’s kind of an easy question for you. But what do you wish you would have known then that you know, now that could have maybe slowed your rate of aging, more helpful, knowing the information that you do know now? Well, Christian Drapeau: on the stem cells, I mean, I’ve been doing this for, like 2722 years. So I started to consume these products every day, you know, for the past 20-some years. So that one I’ve been I’ve been with it for quite some time. But of the things that I know today that I wish I would have known before, it’s probably all the things that are around what in my world stem cell function is the core of human health. I mean, I’m saying this to say you have a cold, what are you going to do if you have a cold, you’ll support your immune system. I mean, this is the first thing that comes to mind. What are you going to do if you have an injury, we have a process a degenerative process in your body. Well, you will tap into your regenerative system, which is your repair system, it’s your stem cells. So it’s almost like to me, it’s the core, but then there are other things around it. So when a stem cell gets into a tissue, it starts to multiply, it starts to age, the end of its life is going to be a senescence cell. So along the way, we can use senolytics to make it so that when you have a senescence cell, it doesn’t stay around and starts to be just an old sale, not doing a job. You know, sometimes I tell people, it’s a little bit like a soccer team. If you’ve got a 60 or 70-year-old guy on your soccer team, do you want to give him another five years? Or do you want to just make him retire and bring another 15-year-old? So that’s what stem cells do. So let’s have those senescence cells killed kick the bucket by using senolytics Take your aging cells rejuvenate by using a toughie G and release themselves to rejuvenate your tissues with new cells. That kind of knowledge. I knew this 15 years ago, I would start right away by combining all of those stem cells with senolytics with a toughie G. And then probably strategies that are going to help the body accumulate as we age, many garbage much garbage, if you want in the body chelation as to be part of your strategy when you cross 50. Does Chelation do things fast and fast? I mean, I’ve done that for many years. But these are the things that we need to do to just cleanse the body and allow this native ability, innate ability to repair to do its job naturally. And the last one, the last one if I could add this one is to understand I mean, this is more of my I’m a scientist but I’ve been meditating for years. If I were to say that there’s one thing that plays an enormous role in overall health is the peaceful you are in your head, you know so many problems in your life come from overthinking everything. So peace of mind is to me, like core aspects of human health. So add that to your old Arsenal if you want to have longevity. And don’t do it for longevity doing for the peace of mind and what it brings to you. But it will become one of your main tools here in longevity. No, Dr. Joel Rosen: it’s awesome. I agree with everything that you said. And I like to keep that analogy running in terms of if you’re if you treat your body like a business and your expenses exceed your income, you’re not going to be in business for very long. So I like to think of it that way. So the company is no joke. Christian Drapeau: I’m sorry, I like this analogy. Because you I’ve used this analogy a lot. So I think it’s a good place to summarize everything we’ve talked about, to me stem cells are like your bank account, how many stem cells you have in your blood is your bank account, how many you release your income, how many cells you lose in your tissues, your expenses, your body is like your bank account, when you’re young, you’ve got plenty of red marrow. So you can lose as many cells as you want, you never even notice it. So you don’t think about your health in your 20s. Like, you hear somebody talking about health and you don’t even know what it refers to. Because you’re Superman in your 20s or you’re in your teens. And then at some point, the day that your income no longer meets your expenses. And now you start to have a deficit in your bank account, you’re still not bankrupt, you just start to realize, oh me my body is not like it used to be the bankruptcy which is the disease that will come down the road as you slowly add this deficit every day. That’s exactly it’s a min amazing image of what stem cells are. And a lack of funds. It can be for you not being able to pay your mortgage, somebody else not being able to pay their study somebody else’s car payment, or somebody’s health payment. So it’s it’s it could be held houses, it can be many different things. But in the end, it’s all if a lack of money in your body is the same thing. For one person is diabetes. Somebody else it’s our potential, somebody else’s heart disease, somebody else’s digestive issues, the liver degeneration, but for all of them, the core cause is not enough stem cells to go and repair what is their Winkley weak link in their body? I think it’s an amazing analogy. Yeah. Dr. Joel Rosen: And you know, bringing you with the mind and not overthinking accelerates your overhead accelerates your expenses depletes your income even further. Right? So why not have that work for you? Awesome information. Christian. I’m excited to see the progress that you make. And we’d love to continue to support your mission. And I’ll have links to how they can get the product in the show notes and the description of this video. And we’d love to keep an open invitation for a part two somewhere down the road. Christian Drapeau: Absolutely. Thank you so much. There was a there was a great discussion. Hi, Dr. Joel Rosen: thank you so much for watching our age-reversing blueprint podcast. If you’ve made it this far, we sincerely thank you for your attention and interest in reversing your age. If you’re looking to get more information on today’s topic or other podcasts that we’ve had, be sure to check out the show notes and be sure to check out Dr. Joel rosen.com. Have an awesome day. [Free Access]: 🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png]🔥 [https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f525.png] The Age Reversing Blueprint User’s Guide Course [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide] Get Started Today before this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity expires, and learn how to customize your age-reversing routine for Metabolic Optimization [https://www.agereversingblueprint.com/usersguide]. The post [EP.13] Why Extra Stem Cells Really Accomplishes A Slower Rate Of Aging [https://drjoelrosen.com/ep-13-why-extra-stem-cells-really-accomplishes-a-slower-rate-of-aging/] appeared first on Joel Rosen D.C. [https://drjoelrosen.com].

20. des. 2023 - 1 h 8 min
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Enkelt å finne frem nye favoritter og lett å navigere seg gjennom innholdet i appen
Liker at det er både Podcaster (godt utvalg) og lydbøker i samme app, pluss at man kan holde Podcaster og lydbøker atskilt i biblioteket.
Bra app. Oversiktlig og ryddig. MYE bra innhold⭐️⭐️⭐️

Velg abonnementet ditt

Mest populær

Tidsbegrenset tilbud

Premium

20 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

2 Måneder for 19 kr
Deretter 99 kr / Måned

Kom i gang

Premium Plus

100 timer lydbøker

  • Eksklusive podkaster

  • Ingen annonser i Podimo shows

  • Avslutt når som helst

Prøv gratis i 14 dager
Deretter 169 kr / måned

Prøv gratis

Bare på Podimo

Populære lydbøker

Ofte stilte spørsmål

Flere spørsmål og svar
Kom i gang

2 Måneder for 19 kr. Deretter 99 kr / Måned. Avslutt når som helst.